The 3/4 Spingola so-called "interview" show with Halbig comments @ Mamis have gone pretty much silent now, at 40 comments. So I moved up a couple of my unanswered questions for Spingola, to the latest Halbig interview thread comments.
Using quote boxes italicizes everything, so I'll just use indents to paste these:
_______________
Deanna said...
According to the introduction at the beginning of the program, this interview took place on February 18, a week after Gahary's initial interview with Halbig on February 11.
March 7, 2014 at 11:57 AM
Pat Colo said...
Deanna @ 11:57: I don't know what to make of the date-of-interview question; as this AFP page dated 3/5 gives the impression that's when it took place;
http://americanfreepress.net/?p=1589....OL9AGddh.dpuf
but Gahary's date-related words at the opening are pretty clear. Maybe your employer AFP put up the page inferring the interview took place 3/5 coz Wolf's a hot item atm, and they knew the ad-rich page would catch lots of new eyeballs?
Separately, I'd appreciate if you could respond to a couple of questions I've asked you in previous SHoax discussions @ Mami's, which you didn't respond to in their respective threads (or anywhere AFAIK).
Most recent was re your Mar 4 Halbig "interview" show comments:
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?bl...90206013096376
where @7:42 AM you stated in part,
" I asked him some very direct questions, many of which he avoided answering or else he changed the subject. "
in response I asked you,
"[...] could you please provide some examples of the "many" instances in this show, where in response to a direct question, Wolf "avoided answering or else he changed the subject", ideally with minute-marks? This so I can re-listen to the exchange, and see whether or not I agree? Coz based on the show I heard, it sounds like this claim may be another case of...
http://tinyurl.com/opf5sjo
Second question I asked here @11:07 PM, and never got an answer:
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blo...33661382763428
"[...] those following this saga know Deanna has repeatedly declared to the effect of, 'I never said I support the government's Sandy Hook Story!'. I distinctly recall her writing this in a Mamis comment, though finding WHICH SHOW would require more time than I have atm.
So this seeming "supporting of both sides" beckons the question, on which "S.Hoax anomalies" issues are you in support of S.Hoax skeptics? Which specific aspects of zion.gov's official S.Hoax narrative do you disbelieve (ref: 'I never said I support the government's Sandy Hook Story!')? Where do you and the S.Hoax skeptics share common ground?
March 8, 2014 at 12:16 AM