I've listened to this now. DS is solo the first hour; actually it's 45 mins in the MP3 above where the comm/news breaks are removed; and she talks Sunstein, Delphi, infiltration, & WH.
Not much to remark about the first 29.5 mins, as it's more of the same old same old with DS schooling listeners on Sunstein, infiltration, Delphi, etc. Following MCP's lead I guess.
Gets interesting at 29:30 where she introduces the WH topic again. DS notes how WH's Child Safety Institute website has gone down. She rehashes Suite-Number-Gate, Zzzzzzz. She claims that the "referrals" WH cited at his (former) CSI website, were all deceased people. This claim is apparently according to the "research" of an anonymous "Poseidon" internet persona who DS evidently extends her full faith & credit to... so much so that she posted "Poseidon's research" denigrating WH's (former) business, publicly on her "Links for Deanna's Interview of Wolfgang Halbig March 4, 2014" webpage. Hey, at least she "cites her source", lol
Don't miss Amanda's info on DS's "uber-trusted anonymous internet source", the "Poseidon" character, in her Reply 66 above.
At 32:25, DS says of WH:
"... He demands all these answers from other people. And yet when I questioned some of the information that had come out; he really didn't want me, you know, asking any questions, about people who'd done research on Sandy Hook. He called into my program, a program that I did on February 11, and umm, and really didn't want me to be asking questions. "
DS imagines all of the above, again, based on WH's ~7 minute call-in to her Feb 11 show (MP3 clip), where WH even says to DS at 5:35 in the clip, "Seek the truth; Deanna, only seek the truth".
DS appears to me to be posturing as the VICTIM™ again above; as her seemingly 'paranoid' characterization of WH's very polite call-in, is in tune with her portrayal of herself as the VICTIM™ of how people, "...often using mob censure (see first paragraph), have attempted to denigrate and silence me", as she stated in her opening paragraph here. More on DS's make-believe persecution & VICTIMHOOD™ in my Reply 71 above. http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.png
At 33:20 in this Mar 9 show, DS resumes her ad-hom attacks against WH, related to his just-dissolved CSI business. She wonders aloud to her audience,
"... His parter quit, because of Halbig's questioning of Sandy Hook. Well I'd like to know, okay, who was his partner; and if Halbig has been investigating Sandy Hook for about a year, didn't that partner know about that investigation before now? I think it's very interesting that his partner quit, and that Halbig took down his website just 3 short days after I questioned the validity of his business on my radio program on March 4th. Now, if he fabricated a business, did he also fabricate the story about the local homicide detectives and sheriff's deputies coming to his house to threaten him? Maybe he just saw them at the local supermarket and said hi. ..."
DS knows well that WH's investigation into S.Hoax 'blew up', went global, viral, beginning only Feb 11th; as surely as she writes in her own timeline entry following:
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014, Dave Gahary uploaded a podcast, School Safety Expert Threatened for Questioning Sandy Hook, which went viral throughout the Internet. See more here
WH's business partner obviously didn't ask for, nor want, the uninvited attention of being the business partner of the overnight US/global alt-media sensation which WH had become post Feb 11. WH was presumably going about his S.Hoax work quietly prior to Feb 11, not making for any issues in their partnership arrangement. DS can figure all this out, and/or she can call WH and ask him for details. But her choice to post her entirely 'speculative' & defamatory nonsense publicly instead, speaks to her disingenuousness & her S.Hoax AGENDA.
DS's "... if he fabricated a business, did he also fabricate the story about the local homicide detectives and sheriff's deputies coming to his house to threaten him? Maybe he just saw them at the local supermarket and said hi. ..." noise is even more disgraceful. Amazing how Delphi-Deanna magically, rhetorically morphed last week's events wrt her Mar 4 WH show & WH's CSI business closing, into publicly 'suggesting' that WH's business was somehow a 'fabrication'; and then how she magically further morphs that completely unsubstantiated 'rumor' she just made up, into suggesting that therefore WH is lying about the police visits to his FL home.
During their Feb 18 radio interview, WH told Dave Gahary the names of 2 of the police officers who'd come to his home, based upon the business cards they'd left with him. Did 'Honest S.Hoax Truth Seeker, Delphi-Deanna' follow up on this, calling WH's local PD and verifying their visit(s)? Or, did she publicly shoot the S.Hoax Truth messenger first, and ask questions later, if at all? 
Notice above, DS gave *ZERO* attention to WH's S.Hoax questions in her Mar 9 show; she only launched her own fabricated rumors & ad-hom smears against the S.Hoax-Truth Messenger. Even the "police visits" matter is separate from WH's S.Hoax questions. Though the police visits certainly do speak to the "guilty demeanor" which zion.media.gov have exhibited for the past ~15 months since their orchestration of the S.Hoax charade.
One nice thing is, with just one small tweak, we can re-invert DS's Flip the Script & Project spiel below, such that she spells out her pro-zion.gov-S.Hoax-story, anti-S.Hoax-skepticism tribe'shttp://gold-silver.us/forum/attachme...1&d=1361024018 game, in plain & simple language:
" The one thing that I note, whether it was during the "debates" or on a radio program, those who believe the Joosh-controlled media and Joosh-controlled "government reports" narrative of Sandy Hook, never change their views about any of the issues, even when presented with contradictory evidence or when someone answers their questions. Perhaps these people are not really looking for answers. They just wish to impose their views on the population. People who research regularly change their minds as they discover additional data. Change agents do not do that. "