new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

[Dachsie]

As the debate progressed the guy named "Wade" was made by Wolfgang to show his fangs. At first Wade was playing the role of a person who actually read the 9-book report and was just an average person of good common sense who could make perfect sense of what played out at Sandy Hook and who could easily fit all the pieces of the puzzle together. But WH was aggressive and would not let up and this strategy forced "Wade" to show his fangs. WH capitalized on his real-life experience of being at the scene of several school shootings and this made Wade look quite inane in drawing all his conclusions from a government report.

It was unclear exactly what "report" when they kept referring to "the report." In fact "the report" being referred to was several data dump "reports" in various formats, not just text.

For the record, there are two sites and two reports, with the second being a compilation of data dump government garbage "reports".

1.
http://www.ct.gov/csao/lib/csao/Sand...nal_Report.pdf

Report of the State’s Attorney for the
Judicial District of Danbury on the
Shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School and
36 Yogananda Street,
Newtown, Connecticut
on
December 14, 2012
OFFICE OF THE STATE’S ATTORNEY
JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY
Stephen J. Sedensky III, State’s Attorney
November 25,
2013


2.
http://cspsandyhookreport.ct.gov/
Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection

Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting Reports

(This is the 9-book report that the debate revolved around for Wade.)

Only someone with experience like Wolfgang Halbig could possibly identify the flaws and omissions of these reports.

I was a bit disappointed that Wolfgang did not expand on the FBI reports that were totally missing from these two official "reports" and is the main point of contention Wolfgang has with the grossly deficient official "report" of the event.

Our evil darkside government has learned well how to blur anything that could be regarded as "the clear official story" of any event. This is the government's THESIS, the official story, how they declare that the event happened. We are, as they well know, left in a difficult position when we do not have a clear thesis to respond to.

Lastly, the REAL LOSER in this debate was the image and reputation of American Free Press, the moderator Dave Gahary's employer. AFP looked weak and trashy to dig up this Wade shill/insult for the debate.

Wade is playing the same role of Deanna Spingola and Michael Collins Piper and the whole dustifying edifice of AFP. Gahary did not manage the "debate" very well and there were many times he should have restored order. Also the comment Gahary made at the end about both of these men truly being sincere in their position (something like that) was a bit nauseating. Wade was a poor actor/shill peddling the government Big Lie and is not much better than the perps.

Just when AFP's coverage of the Zionists, the Jews, and Israel was beginning to be accepted by more and more of the public in light of Israel's recent glaring and indisputable intrusions in global geopolitical machinations, AFP totally "blows it" on Sandy Hook. Piper and Spingola appear to mysteriously deliberately self destruct with Piper leaving AFP and Spingola being cut in her RBN show hours from 10 hours per week to one two-hour show per week. Something very weird is going on behind the scenes at AFP and it seemed to be start when Piper came out like a discombobulated maniac in support of the Sandy Hook official story.

I bought a book from AFP and received a "FREE 1-YEAR ELECTRONIC EDITION SUBSCRIPTION WITH EVERY ORDER!" and they were sending me an email notice each time a new edition was available to me, but those email notices abruptly stopped right around when this Sandy Hook issue ensued. They must have seen one of my negative posts on John Friend's blog and deleted me. I suppose I still have access but I am no longer interested in reading AFP because I have come to believe that it is just another twisted subversive Zionist operation.

In other words, AFP and it's stable of writers is not about seeking objective truth wherever it may lead but are a totally controlled operation. No matter how "persecuted" some entity appears to be for telling/printing the "truth", that does not make them truly telling/printing the truth. (Alex Jones and so many other flim-flam alternative media personalities have been playing that persecuted "suffering martyr - servant of the people and the truth and the republic" role for many years. )

I read the following article that postulates that Mark Lane really runs the AFP operation.

http://ajmacdonaldjr.wordpress.com/2...collins-piper/

“This would mean that the so-called right-wing patriotic and anti-Semitic publications of the Liberty Lobby, such as the Spotlight and American Free Press, are actually controlled-opposition outfits controlled by the Zionist Jew, Mark Lane.”

I have observed that Zionists machinations can indeed be this twisted. You have this front publication appearing to be oh so "anti-semitic" and oh so persecuted for telling the truth and may be in reality an operation of the persecuted semites.