Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher

[monty]

Just In: Obama Accused By Congressman Of Illegal Action At Bundy Ranch He cites a severe violation of U.S. Code -- 43 U.S.C. Section 1733, Subsection C

Harry Reid had to be aware of this because the Atomic Energy Commission and Dept. Of Defense had to allow the Nye County Sheriff's deputys to police the Nevada Test Site. Maybe his young inexperienced director of the BLM was ignorant of this fact because of the break down in our education system. But Obama being a ]CONSTITUTIONAL lawyer [/SARC] surely is fully aware. Attachment 6270

When I was just out of high school I worked for the local Ford dealer. Several times a year the resident Las Vegas FBI agent came to town and often stopped to get his car serviced. He always went to the Sheriff's office to see permission to conduct his business. I know this because he personally told me so.


Edit to add: I have believed from the start of this conflict that any of those armed federal rangers who attached or harrassed a citizen has lef himself open to criminal charges and to personal civll law suits. And for killing and stealing cattle ??. . Hmmm



Sent from my iPad using Forum Runner

[Horn]

Well it all makes sense since the sheriff is electable that he's able to secure others to do the dirty deeds.

There oughta be a law.

[Ares]

BLM Whistleblower: Reid Bunkerville and the Military Industrial Complex at Bundy Ranch



Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNGJXDuLkdI#t=14

BUNDY RANCH: Domestic Terrorists and Mass Graves



Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lio_...ndfUGOb2f7E1Ew

BUNDY RANCH: Sheriff Mack Calls out Glenn Beck!



link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B08j...ndfUGOb2f7E1Ew

[Ares]

Terrorist Responds to Harry Reid.



Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UT1XxiE038M#t=12

[Libertytree]

It's not a laughing matter but his mentioning for Harry to look up John Parker made me LOL. I do so hope that Harry sees this.

[Ares]

Harry Reid Doubles Down: “If They’re Patriots, We’re in Big Trouble”

After Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called Bundy Ranch supporters “domestic terrorists” earlier this week, on Friday he doubled down.

On KSNV’s What’s Your Point?, Reid had this to say:

“If anyone thinks by any figment of their imagination that what happened up there last week was just people rallying to somebody that was oppressed, 600 people came in armed. They had practiced. They had maneuvered.”

“They knew what they were doing. They set up snipers in strategic locations with sniper rifles. They had assault weapons. They had automatic weapons. And they boasted about the fact that they put women and children, in fact one retired sheriff from Arizona posted he put women and children, so that they would get hit first.”

“If there ever was an example of people who were domestic violent terrorist wannabes, these are the guys, and I think that we should call it that way. We have a situation that is really untoward.”

Notice that its not the federal government whose bad for threatening to murder peaceful protestors, it is the protestors fault for possibly getting shot.

A Fox News interview with Constitutional sheriff Richard Mack is what Reid was in part referring to.

Here is the 22 second sound bite:



Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=RZd61_9hofE

Obviously Mack is discussing having women VOLUNTARILY placed at the front lines to act as a deterrent to violence, reasoning that surely the feds wouldn’t shoot them. But if they did, it would illustrate the full injustice and manically nature of the mafia style situation.

The mainstream liberal media has fed the public a steady diet of pro-government propaganda for the last two weeks. Even going as far as to label Cliven Bundy and his supporters dangerous anti-government right wing extremists and domestic terrorists for daring to live by their conscience, and stand up to a thieving government.

The Southern Property Law Center, famous for its far-left radicalism has even tagged Bundy and his supporters as a “threat” in their “Hate Watch blog:



link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=G729gUVYIC0

Its literally amazing how many Americans are reacting to this obvious abuse of power by the federal government and their enforcers. Just visit #BundyRanch on twitter and you will get your fill of unwavering totalitarian support of caging, stealing from, and even physically harming and killing Cliven Bundy and his courageous supporters for daring to make a stand.

Senator Dean Heller (R-NV) objected to Reid’s description of the events in Bunkersville, Nevada, last week at Bundy’s ranch. Heller told What’s Your Point? Hosts Jeff Gillan and Amy Tarkanian, “What Senator Reid may call domestic terrorists, I call patriots. We have a very different view on this.”

Reid responded, “These people think they’re patriots, and they’re not. If they’re patriots, we’re in big trouble.”

“It’s a pretty broad brush when you have boy scouts there. You have veterans at the event. You have grandparents at the event. And these are people who, as long as they’re not promoting violence, in my opinion…” said Heller.

Reid, shocked by Heller’s remarks, said, “Promoting violence? There were sniper rifles. Talk to Sheriff Gillespie – automatic weapons. That’s grandmothers? That’s boy scouts? I hope not, because we got more problems with boy scouts than whether they can have gay leaders, if that’s the case.”

Heller told Gillan and Tarkanian that he took “more issue with BLM coming in with a military army of individuals with snipers. I was talking to individuals at the event, and to have your own government with sniper lenses on you – it made a lot of people very uncomfortable.”

Heller says he plans to call for hearings on Capitol Hill to try and find out why BLM handled the situation so heavy-handedly as well as the situation surrounding the federal ownership of land, while Reid has spoken to Clark County Sheriff Gillespie, Attorney General Eric Holder, Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell, and FBI chief James Comey as to what steps to take next.

Despite Reid’s characterization of Bundy supporters as “domestic terrorists,” the only violence that occurred during the dispute was when BLM agents tasered and assaulted Bundy supporters during an incident on April 9.

Reid’s characterization of American protesters as “domestic terrorists fits the narrative that the federal government has been pushing for years through literature such as the MIAC report, which framed Ron Paul supporters, libertarians, people who display bumper stickers, people who own gold, or even people who fly a U.S. flag, as potential terrorists. In 2012, a Homeland Security study was leaked which characterized Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists.

Spokespeople for Reid refused to comment when asked by Appalachian Area News about the double standard of supporting armed agents attempting to steal personal private property while demonizing armed Americans resisting them.

For slime ball Reid, armed federal snipers and machine gunners good, armed Americans bad. OK got it. Now why would anyone need that pesky second amendment?

Turns out Reid has been using the federal and state governments for years to push hard working Americans off their land in order to secure shady energy deals.

Check out this article by Jerome Corsi for the extensive details. It does not include the Solar farm story many in the alternative media have pointed to as the reason Bundy was being pushed of his land. Even though their were specific references to thew removal of Bundy cattle in project documents, the project was shelved in 2013.

http://appalachianareanews.com/harry...s-big-trouble/

[midnight rambler]

Western state lawmakers now openly talking about taking back 'Federal' land. About fucking time - even with the most perverse and twisted 'interpretation' of the Constitution there cannot be any justification whatsoever for D.C. having any claim for these lands. No, this 'claim' by D.C. is strictly Marxist.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politic...deral.html.csp

[mick silver]

when did killing kids an women mean anything to this goverment

[Hitch]

when did killing kids an women mean anything to this goverment

Apparently killing kids and women is OK by the government when using drones. They do it all the time overseas.

By labeling Bundy and his freedom loving patriots "domestic terrorists", the government can now use drones on them, in our own country.

This could be the start of a civil war. All it takes is Nevada to say NO, no more feds on our land, we are claiming sovereignty from the Federal government. Then Texas jumps on board, Arizona.

The feds are pushing the limit, and shit is happening. What an exciting time to be an American.

[Tumbleweed]

Monty might have posted some links to these two interviews with Wayne Hage in a thread here but if he did I didn't find it so I thought I would. These interviews are long but they are very interesting on this subject of ownership and grazing rights. His fight was over the same issues and with the same people Cliven Bundy is in a fight with. Wayne Hage was good at explaining everything and he was a good and interesting story teller. He acquired wisdom from his experiences over the years and it's very interesting listening to him tell his story.

Wayne Hage and Helen Chenoweth both spoke to a cattlemans group several years ago I belong to on this subject and it was very interesting to me then and I'm glad I attended it. Last fall Cliven Bundy and Richard Mack also both spoke to this same cattlemans group in my area but I was to busy to attend. Wish I could have made it.


Video 1

http://vimeo.com/8520897

This interview was conducted with Wayne Hage at the Pine Creek Ranch in Nevada. One of America's largest ranches, it stretches over 1100 square miles (approx. 760,00 acres). From the time Hage and his family bought the ranch in June 1978 until 2009, they battled the US Government and various environmental agencies over the grazing and water rights, ultimately prevailing at the US Supreme Court level. It became one of America's landmark property rights cases and is studied in law schools today. Part one of two parts is Hage's fascinating account of the events that transpired on his ranch. Hage passed away shortly after these interviews were conducted and we believe that this was the last time he went on camera. I didn't know until I interviewed Wayne that (according to Wayne) much of the water in the United States is owned by United Water, which is in turn owned by the Suez Company located in France but owned by the United Arab Emirates, whose mission is to be the largest water company in the world. This interview is unedited (except for my questions, which were taken out, leaving only Wayne's voice).

Video 2

http://vimeo.com/9776367

This interview is the last one that Wayne gave before he passed away. It is a fascinating look at the challenges of ranching life in America. No editing - just Wayne.