I've listened to the whole Fetzer/MacDonald debate now (MP3). Good job with your call-in Dachsie; first caller! I knew what you meant, though admittedly I pre-read your post-mortem above. I didn't know there were that many alleged amputees stemming from the pretend Boston event?! I recall the "former pro dancer" was another one the joozmedia touted... but what about all the pretend others?

All I can say is, WOW, that AJM guy STUNK! As JF noted 1 or 2 times, AJM seemed to be counting on coasting through the debate by maintaining his cool & relaxing tone, while his facts & reasoning were AWOL! Oh, and AJM repeating "Occam's Razor" over & over, hoping no one would know what that was! Distilling his closing statement down further: "It appeared to be bombs & bloody mayhem, Occam's Razor, therefore Fetzer loses & I win." Unbelievable...

I recall early in the 911 TM, circa '04-'08, the boiler room army of JREF shills (pro JOO-911-Story, obviously) stinking up the discussion forums, had a serious fetish for citing Occam's Razor, again hoping to bluff sounding like the smartest guy(s) in the room. But it was like the old lawyer saying, "If the facts are on your side, then bang on the facts! If they're not on your side, then bang on the table (or, bluff sounding smart by banging on "Occam's Razor")." Meanwhile, as David Ray Griffin summarized beautifully in Chapter 9 of his book "The New Pearl Harbor" (< free PDF), Occam's Razor is in reality, quite the foe of those advocating for the Official JOO 911 Story.

Griffin's Chapter 9 above cited all the circumstantial reasons; but especially as it related to the CD's of the towers and esp-esp WTC-7, where it was NIST's bafflingly convoluted "explanations" based upon their seeekrit computer models, vs controlled demolitions; the "Occam's Razor" parroting JOO 911 Story shills would get cut up to shreds by their own "...Razor".