Post-Genderism: Beyond the Gender Binary (Trans-Humanism stuff)

[PatColo]

Transgender Activist Wants All Children Born Genderless
2014 07 12
From: personalliberty.com
http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_im...drej-Pejic.jpg

Above model Andrej Pejić, first male to model bra; is an Australian androgynous model of Bosnian Croat and Bosnian Serb ethnicity. Pejić has described "herself" as living "in between genders" and has stated a preference for female pronouns. More here.

The left-leaning publication Slate published an article Thursday that offers unsettling insight to the primary goal of some militant LGBT activists: Defining every child as genderless from birth.

In “Don’t Let The Doctor Do This to Your Newborn”, Canadian transgender activist Christin Milloy describes “infant gender assignment”— which means defining a baby as a boy or a girl based on basic biology— as some insidious practice that “might just be Russian roulette with your baby’s life.”
Milloy writes:

We tell our children, “You can be anything you want to be.” We say, “A girl can be a doctor, a boy can be a nurse,” but why in the first place must this person be a boy and that person be a girl? Your infant is an infant. Your baby knows nothing of dresses and ties, of makeup and aftershave, of the contemporary social implications of pink and blue. As a newborn, your child’s potential is limitless. The world is full of possibilities that every person deserves to be able to explore freely, receiving equal respect and human dignity while maximizing happiness through individual expression.

With infant gender assignment, in a single moment your baby’s life is instantly and brutally reduced from such infinite potentials down to one concrete set of expectations and stereotypes, and any behavioral deviation from that will be severely punished—both intentionally through bigotry, and unintentionally through ignorance. That doctor (and the power structure behind him) plays a pivotal role in imposing those limits on helpless infants, without their consent, and without your informed consent as a parent. This issue deserves serious consideration by every parent, because no matter what gender identity your child ultimately adopts, infant gender assignment has effects that will last through their whole life.

Instead, the author contends that parents should wait for their children to inform them of whether they are boy, girl or neither.

While, as one commenter to the original Slate piece pointed out, the essay reads like a shining example of Poe’s Law, the author is actually being serious.

Source: personalliberty.blogspot.com

http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_img/3094400077681.jpg

Push-Up Bra Uses Male Model


"Gender" is a HOAX

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=WeDzP7rtaQk


From: unknownmisandry.blogspot.com

http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_im...-is-a-hoax.jpg

FACT: If your body produces sperm you are of the male sex. If your body produces ovaries you are of the female sex. If your body produces both, a rare condition, you are “intersex” (both male and female.).

The abstract concept that “gender” exists in living beings (as opposed to existing as a category applying to words) holds that “gender” is a socially construction. This is nonsense. If a member of the male sex chooses to dress a a member of the female sex, that does not in itself change his sex. Only a physical alteration (hormonal, surgical, etc.) can change his sex. Thus, if a man "feels" he is a woman it is perhaps reasonable to refer to him as a person of the male sex who is also of the female "gender" (using the marxist idea that "gender" is a social construction).

http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_im...fter-color.jpg

The natural, morphological and biological idea of sex identity and “gender” are not interchangeable. One’s sexual identity is not a social construction; it is a physical/biological state.

When we allow ourselves to accept the use of the incorrect term “gender” to describe our sex we are acquiescing to manipulation -- into accepting a falsehood that has been foisted upon us by social engineers for the purpose of furthering their political and human management agenda.

We must reject such manipulation and control by “authority figures.” Do not be bullied or tricked into using the term "gender" by authoritarians, whether they be conscious of this malicious strategy or unconscious of it.

Read the rest of this article from unknownmisandry.blogspot.com

More: The Death of David Reimer

The True Story of John / Joan

Red Ice Radio

Frank Salter - War on Human Nature, Replacement Level Migration in the West & Crime of Diversity

Thomas Sheridan - Hour 1 - Cultural Marxism & The Psyop in Europe

[PatColo]

http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_im...-is-a-hoax.jpg

[...]

More: The Death of David Reimer

wow, sad!


The Death of David Reimer

A tale of sex, science, and abuse

Jesse Walker | May 24, 2004

On May 4, 2004, David Reimer committed suicide in Winnipeg. Thirty-eight years old, he had been a slaughterhouse worker and an odd-job man. He had also been both a boy and a girl, thanks to one of the darker episodes in the history of pseudoscientific hubris.

Born Bruce Reimer in 1965, David suffered a botched circumcision when he was eight months old. Most of his penis was burned off, and reconstructive surgery was too primitive at the time to restore it. Dr. John Money, a sexologist at Johns Hopkins University, persuaded Reimer's parents to have their son completely castrated and raised as a girl.


This was not simply a matter of trying to make the best of a bad situation. Money had been a leading exponent of the theory that children were born psychosexually neutral and could be assigned to either gender in the first years of their life. He had retreated somewhat from the most radical statement of this thesis, but stood by the central contention that when it came to sexual identity, nurture trumped nature. Bruce—now named Brenda—was an ideal test case. Along with everything else, she was an identical twin; so as an object of study, she came bundled with a built-in control.


Money trumpeted the results in his 1972 book Man & Woman, Boy & Girl, written with the psychiatrist Anke A. Ehrhardt; a more popularized account appeared in Sexual Signatures (1976), written with the reporter Patricia Tucker. By Money's account, Bruce/Brenda moved easily into her new identity. She soon "was observed to have a clear preference for dresses over slacks and to take pride in her long hair," he wrote in Man & Woman. She "was much neater than her brother, and in contrast with him, disliked to be dirty." Though it "needed perhaps more training than usual," she usually urinated sitting down, and when she did attempt to stand she was simply "copying her brother." She took to housework and to helping her mother in the kitchen, while her brother "could not care less about it." Her taste in toys ran to dolls, and despite some "tomboyish traits" she clearly was adapting to life as a girl.


Scientists with a less enthusiastic view of infant sex reassignment, Money added, had been "instrumental in wrecking the lives of unknown numbers of hermaphroditic youngsters."


For two decades this remained the accepted view of what happened. It helped influence many parents—approximately one or two for every 1,000 births, according to a 2000 paper in the American Journal of Human Biology—to opt for "corrective" sexual reassignment of their babies: not just hermaphrodites and victims of accidents like Reimer's, but boys born with abnormally small genitals. But then Dr. Milton Diamond, a longtime critic of Money's theories, reconstructed what had actually happened, co-authoring a paper on the case that was published in the March 1997 Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. Several follow-up stories appeared in the press, notably John Colapinto's excellent account in Rolling Stone; after Reimer agreed to make his identity public, Colapinto expanded the article into an engrossing book, As Nature Made Him (2000). Now that the patient was able to speak for himself, a very different story was on display:


• Brenda Reimer resisted being classified as a girl from the beginning. The first time she wore a dress, she tried to rip it off. She preferred her brother's toys to her own. (A toy sewing machine was untouched, Colapinto writes, "until the day when Brenda, who loved to take things apart to see how they worked, sneaked a screwdriver from her dad's tool kit and dismantled the toy.") She got into fights, insisted on peeing standing up, and ran into terrible problems at school, where the other kids quickly recognized her as someone who didn't fit the ordinary sexual categories. By the time she was 10, she was declaring that she wanted to grow up to marry a woman, not a man.


• Money's meetings with Brenda were a darkly comic study in how a scientist could refuse to see the evidence he didn't want to see, and how a subject can gradually learn to respond to his cues. Worse, his efforts to make her conform to his expectations were coercive and abusive. Her refusal to receive vaginal surgeries—her penis was gone, but her doctors had not yet put a vagina in its place—was met not with an effort to understand her stance but with a series of attempts to manipulate her into agreeing to the procedures. (She succeeded in avoiding the surgery but was compelled to take estrogen pills, though she flushed them when she could.) Also disturbing was Money's belief that Brenda, in Colapinto's words, "must understand at a very early age the differences between male and female sex organs." Not an objectionable idea in itself, except that Money accomplished it by showing Brenda and her brother pictures of adults having sex and by forcing them to disrobe and examine each other's genitals. Worst of all, he allegedly insisted, starting when the twins were six, that they "play at thrusting movements and copulation"—more bluntly, that they pretend to have sex in various positions while he watched. (This last detail has been disputed.)


• Finally, when Brenda Reimer learned the truth about herself, at age 14, she decided to start living her life as a boy. She had her estrogen-created breasts removed, took testosterone injections, changed her name to David, and eventually had surgery to create a penis. In 1990 David married. The allegedly successful transformation of a boy baby into a girl was in fact a complete failure.


For much of his career, Money's admirers saw him as a bold pioneer fighting puritanical reactionaries. This was his self-image as well. He touted himself as a defender of sexual liberation: for the rights of gays and other sexual minorities, for legalized pornography, for breaking down social taboos. But this seemingly libertarian attitude obscured an authoritarian core. When the truth about the Reimer case was exposed, the sexologist suddenly seemed much more repressive than the conservatives he hated.


Not that he acknowledged this. He told Colapinto that the press's embrace of Diamond's exposé was a product of right-wing media bias and "the antifeminist movement," insisting that "they say masculinity and femininity are built into the genes so women should get back to the mattress and the kitchen." By this time, though, his critics were emerging not just from the right but from the community of open intersexuals—people born with mixed or indeterminate gender. It turned out they don't like to be coerced by social engineers any more than they like to be coerced by the party of rigid sex roles.


It's the Intersex Society of North America that's leading the charge against the procedures Money championed, calling for "a model of care that is patient-centered, rather than concealment-centered." What this means in practice is summed up by a series of humane principles listed on the front page of the society's website, among them "Intersexuality is basically a problem of stigma and trauma, not gender," "Parents' distress must not be treated by surgery on the child," and "Honest, complete disclosure is good medicine." It's significant that groups like the Intersex Society focus their attention not on the scientific debate over the roots of gender identification, but on the proper way to treat those people who have landed in their position. It's interesting to compare and contrast the battles they're fighting with the battles being fought by transsexuals. One group is often cited by those who favor the nature side of the nature/nurture debate, while the other is embraced by the nurturists; one group wants to stop involuntary surgeries, and the other wants fewer barriers to voluntary surgeries. But both are essentially asking that they be allowed to decide how to live their lives; both want final say on what is done to their own bodies. That basic respect for the individual is what's missing from people like Money, who preach liberation but practice something much less attractive.


And David Reimer? I of course don't know what went through his mind when he decided to end his life. He had just lost his job, a big investment had failed, his marriage had split up, and his twin brother had died not long before, depressing events all. But surely the "therapeutic" abuse he had suffered was a factor in his death. It figured heavily, after all, in almost everything else that happened in his life.




http://reason.com/archives/2004/05/2...f-david-reimer

Dr. John Money:
http://www.zam.it/images/7200/1.jpg

what is it with the name-changing tribe's affection for choosing names like "Diamond", "Gold/smith/berg/stein", "Silver/stein/berg", "Money"

[Hypertiger]

It will never work.

They are dreamers...The mind has no constraints like the Universe does...that is why what you imagine does not work out like you imagine when put into practice.

As for enslavement...You already are entangled in threads like flies on the world wide web of lies ruled by the horror of babble on now.

You all are living in a electronic digital computerized game world right now.

"The worshippers (rich servants) of the compounding interest equation (master/false GOD) will bear its burdens without complaint and perhaps without even suspecting that the equation is inimical to their interests while those who follow the worshippers (Poor saves) will complain about the effects but will be ignorant of the cause."--Hypertiger

There are digital computers.

and

Analog computers.

English is called a natural language.

But it is a high level programing language.

Legislation is program to follow to the logical conclusion.

The US Constitution is ultimately a program to follow.

Grades 1 to 12 is programming...The primary function of a typical social engineering institution is to produce new autonomous absolute capitalist drones to be exploited by the previously produced absolute capitalist drones.

Elite control freaks created the so called education system to produce easy to control output from hard to control input.

If you all were taught how the absolute capitalist system actually worked...You would refuse to supply the demand for yield by it.

So you are not taught how the absolute capitalist system actually works.

[Hypertiger]

They just realized recently that there are female animal cells and male animal cells and that using all male test animals was wrong and that both female and male test animals should be used for testing because some treatments that work on male cells don't work on female cells.

there is no such thing as Human being cells...all the cells in a mouse and a cat a donkey and a person.

are animal cells...they are absolute capitalistic or take more power than they give.

Basically people act like animals but claim to be human beings and that their animal actions are just Human nature.

A human being is an ideal to strive to attain.

People are not realized ideals at the moment of conception or at birth and what you see when you look into a mirror is not a human being.

People do not have a right to anything except what they need...not what they want.

Believing that someone owes you something because it is a human right is antisocialism.

The animal cells that compose your body want power...They do not need power.

Sure if you do not give the cells that compose your body what they demand (want) they will die.

But you can only obtain what your cells want when what they want and need are the same.

If you demand another person to supply your demands and will not take no for an answer...That is animal nature not human nature.

one you convince a person they are a human being...that is the master lie believed to be Truth that all the rest of the lies that require that lie to be believed as Truth depend upon for empowerment.

Then it's a simple operation to make any want a universal human right and transform it into a need.

Your body is way more powerful than you know...It is keeping you existing more than you are keeping it existing ultimately.

[PatColo]

Sofia begins by talking about the paper in the OP. I've just started listening.

2 hrs, go to the link where there's both a player console and a download button:

Postgenderism and the Future of Humanity 8-4-14

http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/...gender-era.jpg

Sinead speaks with Sofia Smallstorm about a number of important issues: postgenderism, healthy sex roles, reproductive health, electromagnetic toxicity, and much more.

http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/...manity-8-4-14/

[PatColo]

2 recent podcasts from radio3fourteen hostessed by a hot chick named Lana.

Warren Farrell - The Myth of Male Power
July 23, 2014

Dr. Warren Farrell is the author of 7 books on men’s and women’s issues, probably best known for The Myth of Male Power plus Why Men Are The Way They Are. His books create links between self-help and legislative solutions to male-female and family problems such as the disenfranchisement of dads after divorce. He has served on the boards of four national men's and fathers' organizations and he is the only man in the US to ever have been elected three times to the Board of Directors of the National Organization for Women. Warren has taught at the university level in five disciplines. He’s been featured on numerous mainstream TV shows and publications. Dr. Farrell is currently the Chair of the Commission to Create a White House Council on Boys to Men.

We’ll discuss the myth of male power and question the image of male as oppressor. Just who is the worst treated demographic today? Warren responds to the feminist claim, “we need to level the playing field and have our chance because men have had their day.” We’ll have an interesting conversation about anti-male gender studies courses, how political correctness affects men and discuss the portrayal of men in entertainment, media and education. Also, we question the agenda to feminize males. Later, Warren talks about the harm of boys growing up without their father. He’ll also share his thoughts on male circumcision. At the end, Farrell explains his view of a healthy relationship dynamic between a man and a woman.

Website: warrenfarrell.com Music: Hans Zimmer - The Thin Red Line OST – Journey to the Line

Download MP3

Jack Donovan - The Way of Men
August 6, 2014

Jack Donovan is the author of The Way of Men, and an advocate for the resurgence of tribalism and masculine virtue. He’s also known for his criticisms of feminism and gay culture. Jack is a contributor to AlternativeRight.com, Counter Currents, Radix Journal, and The Spearhead.

We’re going to discuss what is controversial these days, Violence, Masculinity and Tribalism. For thousands of years mankind has settled territories, disputes and enforced laws through acts of violence. Order demands violence. Today we resort to proxy violence. Is this better or worse?

We’ll talk about masculinity, the male crisis and the missing brotherhood. There was a time when Strength, Courage, Mastery, and Honor were an important part of being a man. When speaking on matters of the state, can we ultimately fight corruption through non-violent means?

We’ll also discuss how big government has killed risk, competition and the primal drive to survive and how it has negatively affected men in western society. Are religion, new age ideologies and egalitarianism a revolt against nature?

Later on we’ll talk about the gender neutral fad, the feminization of men and gay culture.

Also, we talk about the imbalanced relationship between the sexes and how modern society refuses to acknowledge biological differences between men and women.

Website: jack-donovan.com
Music: Wardruna - Helvegen

Download MP3

[PatColo]

JFriend:



Thursday, October 16, 2014

Transsexual TV show "good for the Jews"

In yet another display of the utter debasement and perversion of mainstream American culture, spearheaded by radical Jewish intellectuals and activists, a new television show promoting transsexualism is currently being broadcast by Amazon's online television network. Jewniverse, a rather interesting online Jewish daily, published an article yesterday proudly proclaiming this disgusting, subversive propaganda masquerading as "entertainment" is actually "good for the Jews."

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-G09Lda7x2D...icture%2B1.png

Amazon’s first foray into television, Transparent, looks like it will be good for the Jews, especially if it succeeds. In the first season, three self-involved, adult Jewish siblings in Los Angeles will discover that the person they know as their father Mort (Jeffrey Tambor) identifies, and wants to live publicly, as a woman, Maura. Tambor has plenty of experience playing patriarchs: as the head of the zany Bluth clan, he helped raise the profile of the FOX’s Arrested Development. Can he play a Jewish mother without descending into farce? Will mainstream America tune in to see?

Signs point to yes. Time calls Transparent “Fall’s best new TV show.” And show runner Jill Soloway has both experience and credibility: as an MOT (with Reboot, she founded East Side Jews), as a prize-winning writer/producer/director (Six Feet Under, The United States of Tara), and as the daughter of a transgender parent who only recently came out. Though the show isn’t autobiographical, it seems to be as informed by Soloway’s experiences as the Netflix series Orange is the New Black is by Piper Kerman‘s.

B’hatzlahah, Jill!

How much further can the organized Jewish community debase and distort traditional American culture? And how much longer can or will people put up with this cultural terrorism and warfare being waged against them?

Posted by John Friend at 11:30 AM 2 comments:

[crimethink]

Transsexualism is proto-Transhumanism. Both are a slap in the face of God. And will not go unresponded to. Transsexualism is part of the continued effort of Marxism (which is Judaism) to "overcome nature" (that is, overcome God's design).

It is no surprise that Jews lead the freak show of sexual and gender deviancy, as well as Transhumanism; the latter's probably-most-well-known propaganda boy being Ray Kurzweil. As the Jews are Satan's officer corps, as an entity they have always opposed beauty, aiming to replace it with degenerate ugliness (witness their "art" movements, in particular), and Natural Law, aiming to replace it with delusions produced by psychotic minds.

The German National Socialists (including existential philosopher Martin Heidegger) were aware of not only "Cultural Bolshevism" but the apparent natural instinct of Jewry to pervert things from what they ought to be to what defective minds & souls want them to be - even though such things should not be.

[EE_]

http://tentofabraham.files.wordpress...-ransdell4.jpg

[Cebu_4_2]

http://tentofabraham.files.wordpress...-ransdell4.jpg

Lets sell these!