Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports Zion.gov's Official Sandy Hook Story

[Jerrylynnb]

I tried to get Deanna to explain why she claimed that all identifications by next-of-kin of recently deceased was "always by photo", and, she finally, after I had to repeat the question, allowed as she had used "a poor choice of words", and that she really meant "usually", instead of "always". She then claimed that she had already proven that elsewhere with references, which she didn't bother to cite in her answer.

I also asked her to hone in on ONE particular alleged victim, that boy whose photo was published as one of the victims killed at Sandy Hook, and then again as one of the children killed a couple of years later in Pakistan. I suggested that this ONE case could prove, or disprove the whole Sandy Hook episode, since we know for sure somebody is faking it in this case. She replied that she had already mentioned the "death certificate" and that she had references to it, but, again, she didn't bother to cite her reference in her reply, as if a mere "death certificate" proves anything about the photo of a little boy we all saw in both cases.

I am no longer interested in anything Deanna has to say. She has dug herself into a deep pit of deception by her own gullibility, and she isn't adult enough to get out as that would require a much larger admission than a "poor choice of words". She has made herself not credible. I suspect she got "had" by someone, concerning Sandy Hook, and it would be just too much to her self esteem to have to admit it. Somewhere along the way she jumped from being a true skeptic and truth-seeker to a "true believer" - and you can't have a rational discussion with a "true believer".