Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports Zion.gov's Official Sandy Hook Story

[PatColo]

It seems Delphi doesn't want her shows reposted at venues allowing (most of the time...) free & uncensored discussion re her (s.hoax re-bunking) shows any more.

Check link for 8+ comments,
http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/04/...-20150418.html

Recall, comments at her sites are very much censored. From now on, hers are the only sites where her shows & dedicated comment threads will be posted. Telling...

Spingola Speaks 2015.04.18

Victor Fletcher of the Toronto Street News

NB: This is the last Spingola weekend show that I post as per her request. This also applies to all the weekday shows that WHOOLI has been posting.

Pretty good show above btw; another zio-persecuted Canuck. A music snafu around the middle drives Delphi nuts.

[PatColo]

Uh bowee...

plus, a retread of Delphi's 12/14/14 Sandy Hoax Re-Bunker Shill-A-Thon.

don't miss the mami's 16 (and growing) comments; I've posted there as 'zeetip'.

Spingola and Friends 4/20/2015

http://antinwo.com/files/Deanna%20Spingola%202.jpg

Note from Deanna: I have reconsidered my stance about the posting of my programs at Mami's site. I have never run from a fight and recognize that my previous request to Mami's might appear as a surrender on my part. I believe in free speech including the speech of those who disagree with me. I recognize that Mami's posts shows that cover various subjects that may not appeal to everyone. It is like a cafeteria where one may select according to their interests or beliefs.

C. W. Wade of Sandy Hook Facts and journalist, Keith Johnson joined Deanna on December 14, 2014. Today's program is a replay of that very informative RBN program. Read Deanna’s critique of Sofia Smallstorm’s video and notes on Wolfgang Halbig. People can easily ascertain that the Sandy Hook Hoax ~ Walking In Circles Around Sandy Hook Firehouse is a looped video. View the repetitive motion of the silver vehicle in the upper left-hand corner of the video from 1:13-1:32, 2:40-2:50, 4:13-4:23, 4:52-5:02, 5:07-5:18, and 5:27-6:14 minutes. This program was originally aired at RBN and then edited to exclude the commercial breaks resulting in a program that lasted 2 hours and 5 minutes. To listen to the last five minutes which has some very good information about censorship click this link (MP3). Sandy Hook Analysis, Newtown Post-Examiner, Sandy Hook Lighthouse People have asked Deanna if she would have allowed her daughter to lay in a pool of blood for sixteen hours. She answered that question in this show.

Show-page

Download





Posted by WHOOLI at 3:59 PM 16 comments:

[Glass]

one may select according to their interests or beliefs

Not truth then.

[Jerrylynnb]

Another 10 comment thread about Deanna - will it ever end. This time ZAPOPER (a Mami's moderator) is praising Deanna for her "research" and chiding all the "hoaxers" as being twerps who sit in front of a PC but won't go do any real "research". He offers thanks to Deanna for her valiant and valuable "work".

I can't bring myself to listen to her anymore - has anyone (PatColo?) bothered to listen to that show? I am guessing that her "research" is reading government reports, not in going there and actually interviewing and recording any impartial witnesses. Of course, she dismisses the "boy who died twice" as a mere ploy by the press to goad hoaxers so as to divert attention away from the dangers of prescribing drugs to children.

If anyone here has plodded through it all, what does her "research" consist of, besides "government" reports and documents? If she has any "research" about the "boy who died twice", now that would be something I'd want to look at.

[PatColo]

Jerrylynnb: yeah I heard her last 2 SHoax shows... the replay of the 12/14/14 show, I heard when it was fresh, but have no desire to hear that tag-team SHoax rebunking show again!

Her "research" definitely relies most heavily on the zion.gov "report", but other anomalies, like the SH property records, and the internet traffic to SHES ceasing completely in 2008, she just cites a hodge podge of implausible "explanations."

[PatColo]

here's one I won't be listening to; as KJohnstein is prolly the most odious of the S.Hoax rebunkers... just documenting here for posterity.

Spingola and Friends 4/30/2015

Keith Johnson of the Newtown Post-Examiner talks about the Sandy Hook hoaxers in general and about his recently-released videos, Wolfgang Halbig's FOIA "Security System" Blunder! and Sandy Hook: Wolfgang Halbig's Far Away Eyes, both part of his WOLFgang Watch series. One might even refer to Wolfgang Halbig as the High Priest of the Hoaxer movement. He is certainly taking the focus off of the real victims.

Show-pagewww.spingola.comAdolf Hitler Mega-postThe Holocaust Mega-postThe New Babylon - PDFWho Controls America?Download Posted by WHOOLI at 8:46 PM No comments:

[Jerrylynnb]

I have gotten a gristle stuck in my craw over "the boy who died twice", and I did a quick google about it, but came up very disappointed. There were some hits back in January, and some real hard hitting, outspoken, criticism that this anomaly seems to have been swept under the rug. But it seems little follow up, and, like the posters I found, I am irate about that also.

Some suggested that the photo was of a boy named Kevin, taken six years earlier, and only used like a model from a pool of photogenic children whenever it would be needed by the press (in other words, the photo is NOT of one "Noah Pozner" at all, but a child model from six years earlier). The second showing of that photo, in Pakistan (as one of the victims in that "shooting"), was such a blunder that it SHOULD be cause for concern for all Sandy Hook skeptics, but it seems it hasn't gotten much traction. The BBC, and the international branch of the New York Times, which reproduced the photo also, only state that it appears to have been used "elsewhere", with no further explanation.

DUH!

I would have expected the REAL parents of whoever that child is in the photo, to have filed a massive lawsuit, at least against the BBC and the newspaper, for slander. Something is really amiss in the land when something so blatant as this just slides right on by and little is said, or done, about it. Deanna is satisfied with her theory that the BBC and that newspaper did it on purpose to fan the flames of Sandy Hook hoaxers so as to draw attention away from the dangers involved with prescribing strong medicines to children (the alleged shooter, Adam Lanza, allegedly took strong prescriptions and went berserk because of it). So Deanna sees no reason to investigate this any further, since this unlikely theory she embraces compliments her pet theory about the government's Sandy Hook reports being spot-on, believable, and the end-all, be-all, god's truth.

If anyone has any updated information about the boy in that photo, and any well-researched (not mere speculation) evidence as to who he really is (or was), and the details, please advise - this could break the Sandy Hook hoax wide open if someone could positively identify the boy in that photo as being someone other than Noah Pozner, and having been a child model or in some such business. This shouldn't be that hard to confirm, or deny, and it leaves me miffed that this clear case, on which Sandy Hook pivots, gets little or no attention.

[Dachsie]

"If anyone has any updated information about the boy in that photo, and any well-researched (not mere speculation) evidence as to who he really is (or was), and the details, please advise - this could break the Sandy Hook hoax wide open if someone could positively identify the boy in that photo as being someone other than Noah Pozner, and having been a child model or in some such business. This shouldn't be that hard to confirm, or deny, and it leaves me miffed that this clear case, on which Sandy Hook pivots, gets little or no attention. "

Jerrylynnb, I appreciate and agree with most of your great comment.

I have studied Sandy Hook but only moderately compared to the amount of study I gave to 9-11 and one aspect of Boston Marathon Bombing.

MemoryHoleBlog of Professor James Tracy has a search facility so I would search for good up-to-date information about by doing a search there. Also the folks who did the famous video "We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook" have a website where you might also find more good info about "Noah Pozner."

One important fact about Noah is that he appears as an older live version of Noah when he was singing at that national sports event (Super Bowl?) where the Sandy Hook School singing group traveled to the event. There are several videos on YT that show photos of these children who sang at the sports event and several of these children appear to be older versions of several of the children that were said to have been killed at the Sandy Hook event.

"this could break the Sandy Hook hoax wide open if someone could positively identify the boy"

The problem is that we can't "positively identify" a whole host of players in almost all of these false events that happened on U.S. soil in the last 25 years, not only the people said to have been killed but the parents and relatives said to be related to the people killed.

Another thing is that there are many problems with videographic and photographic records of these events, the ones we the people are allowed to see as well as the records we thing ought to be available somewhere but are closed off to us.

It is even possible that some of the photos we see are composits with parts of someone's face with other parts from someone else's face. Just sayin' Not sure of anything.

"This shouldn't be that hard to confirm, or deny, and it leaves me miffed that this clear case, on which Sandy Hook pivots, gets little or no attention. "

It IS that hard to confirm. As stated earlier we do not have any way of prositively confirming if someone is a real person and whether that real person is living or dead. We have things like the Social Security Deceased Index but that is a private data base and it is only as good as the data it gets from the government.

This matter is not something I would call the " clear case, on which Sandy Hook pivots". The case of Noah Pozner is of that CATEGORY of issues that is indeed crucial to breaking open the Sandy Hook hoax.

Every time I or others try to search around of the web and find out anything about where a parent is now or anything about one of the "victims" everything just ends up in a meaningless rabbit trail. NOTHING pans out. Nothing makes sense in all the info we discover.

[Jerrylynnb]

Thanks, Daschie, I hadn't considered the idea of that photo being a photoshopped composite - not a real boy at all. I am not an expert at photoshop, but I have dabbled enough to know that you can actually create a edited version of one or more photos and there are tools to smooth out even single pixel sized telltale signs of editing, so that it would be undetectable as being an edited composite - provided you "flatten" all the "layers" before publishing your final jpg (which the photoeditors of Obama's fake birth certificate 'forgot' to do - remember that?). This option just blows away any hope of getting to the bottom of it, as far as that photo is concerned, and I don't know how anyone (besides the photoeditor and his employer) would ever know.

The reason I focused in on that one photo ("Noah Pozner", allegedly) is because that same photo was used two years later in an alleged Pakistani "shooting". So, unlike the other photos, we have here a case where we know for a fact that somebody, somewhere, in at least one of those two cases (Sandy Hook vs. Pakitan) hoaxed it (or committed a sloppy bumbling "mistake").

Knowing for sure that one or the other, OR BOTH, used a phony photo, and then not seeing the error exposed for all to see, makes me doubt both episodes. I would expect that the one which is true (if either one is), would insist on having the other one prosecuted in a very loudly publicized manner.

That ain't happening, so I got doubts about both episodes.

That is what I was thinking when I described that photo as being "pivotal" - it is the only one that is factually known to have been a phony at least once, so one can reasonably suspect this photo was up for grabs whenever the press needed a photo of a six year old boy for publication for whatever reason.

[PatColo]

here's one I won't be listening to; as KJohnstein is prolly the most odious of the S.Hoax rebunkers... just documenting here for posterity.

Spingola and Friends 4/30/2015

after sitting at Mamis for about 24 hours with no comments, this has begun to percolate, with Delphi participating, debasing her cred further, and getting slammed. check it out: 12 comments: