The post that PatColo did that I commented on but comment was not posted had something to do with Anthony Lawson and also about this recent thing with John Kaminski.

I posted a link to an article by Dr. James Fetzer from a long time ago wherein he explains how Lawson did not communicate or write about Dr. Fetzer's ideas objectively. Lawson did some great videos and I guess I should not talk negatively about the dead but Lawson, like so many other ostensibly good sounding 9-11 "truthers" spoke about the Israel/Zionist/ connections to 9-11, always supported, vigorously, the existence of real large airline planes crashing into the WTC Twin Towers. That is something that just breaks the laws of physics and the laws of aerodynamics and just did not happen.

Anyway, here is a May 2015 article Gahary linked for me showing how AFP is now apparently supporting Sandy Hook truth.

http://americanfreepress.net/?p=24266

Sandy Hook: Still Looking for Answers
May 03, 2015 AFP 26 Comments
19_20_SANDY_HOOK

By Victor Thorn —

When serious investigative journalists co
- See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=2426....p3uj5R1K.dpuf "

One commenter said about this article...

Chris Hassell says:
May 4, 2015 at 17:48

This article does, however, raise important questions about AFP’s “evolving” coverage of Sandy Hook. As I recall, it started out neutral on the question of conspiracy but quickly moved to an almost rabid defense of the official narrative or at least one Allan would approve of. Grotesque attacks were made by Michael Collins Piper and others against respected researchers attempting to maintain a dialogue on the valid questions surrounding this incident. And now AFP seems to have swung almost the other direction.

I would like to demand, as a subscriber, that AFP clarify its position on this subject as it has changed over time and to explain why such changes occurred.
- See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=2426....p3uj5R1K.dpuf