Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?

[Neuro]

Throwing out some numberology. Saturn = 93. Sun is 93 million miles away. Coincidence? Saturn is considered keeper of time by some. Strong December 22 - 25 influences. Sol/Sun is considered keeper of time by others. Time = 144. 12 day hours 12 night hours, 12x14 = 144. 1440 minutes per day. 144,000 saved in Revelations. 144,000 sheep in the book of Jacob. Sum of the 1st 144 decimals of pi = 666. stop. enough.

In Swedish Saturn=Saturnus=133 distance to sun 149 million kilometers. 149-133=16=2^4. Michaels birthday 2nd of April = Hyperdimensional Tigeristic Insanity= 666

[singular_me]

but try to find out WHY the mile has reigned for centuries long in the west first... there lies the secret. the Mile makes patterns completely obvious.

if you want to convert to the masonic teachings in the bible, you'd better know where the 144,000 is coming from Because this explains why there are 12 canonized apostles by the same token.

In Swedish Saturn=Saturnus=133 distance to sun 149 million kilometers. 149-133=16=2^4. Michaels birthday 2nd of April = Hyperdimensional Tigeristic Insanity= 666

[Neuro]

but try to find out while the mile has reigned for centuries long in the west first... there lies the secret. the Mile makes patterns completely obvious.

if you want to convert to the masonic teachings in the bible, you'd better know where the 144,000 is coming from Because this explains why there are 12 canonized apostles by the same token.

It is even easier to find patterns if one can use different measurements and choose the language freely. Not to ignore the fact that spellings and the definition of a mile has changed a lot during these centuries. English was barely considered a serious world language a hundred years ago.

Still you haven't explained how the elites keeps us in their grip from this so called "knowledge"...

[JohnQPublic]

...The forces of Gravity and speed of light are claimed to be inversely proportional. According to Einsteins theories...

Can you expound a bit on this? Which of his theories?

[Ares]

Regarding the time delay, unless the orbiting planet was also acting on the sun (they were comparable size), I don't see how it would be flung out of orbit. If the sun is assumed to be immovable because it is so big, does it really matter whether a planet is orbiting the past, present, or future sun? The sun doesn't care, it won't move any differently because of the planets.

The Sun isn't immovable, during the late 90s its how humanity discovered the first planets outside of our own solar system. Watching the wobble of the star as its planet tugs on the star as its being flung around the stars orbit. Like hammer throwing as the thrower spins around building momentum the hammer starts to exert it's own pull on the thrower the faster it goes. So it does matter, and the sun does move differently when a heavy planet tugs on it around it's orbit.

Also, here is something to consider. The speed at which a body orbits is directly determined by he distance it is orbiting. Hence, as you get farther away (more time delay) you will be orbiting slower. Therefore, the issue doesn't get worse as you orbit farther away. (see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbita...a_central_body)

Agreed

I agree, there is more than just the corona to explain. If the fusion explanation explains everything, then its pretty compelling. I haven't studied this field so I don't know how solid it really is, but those things have to be kept in mind.

Fusion explains the birth and death of a sun, in between there are still some mysteries that we do not yet understand. Such as the Corona being hotter than the surface of the sun. The other issue that fusion has a hard time explaining is the "faint young sun" younger suns are typically less bright than older suns. The current theory of our own sun doesn't hold up against Earth's geological record as the theory goes that the sun should of been only about 75% as bright as it is now about 2.5 to 3 billion years ago. However at that brightness level the sun would not of been able to produce enough energy to keep liquid water on the Earth and geological records show that Earth's water has been liquid for the majority of it's life so far.

[Horn]

I haven't read much into Electric Universe theory. But from what I do understand about it, the electric universe claims that the sun is powered by the universe and accounts for the corona being hotter than the sun itself.

However it doesn't explain how a star will go super nova, or turn into a red giant when it's fuel supply of hydrogen is used up, or how a star will get brighter as it ages. It also doesn't touch upon the stars birth.

You ever seen a blown fuse?

Welding spatter?

[Ares]

This assumes that those things, about traditional solar explanations, are true which wouldn't be the case if the universe were actually electric.

Then the Electric Universe theory has to match observations as we have witnessed super novas, and stars as Red Giants. Neither of which is explained by the Electric Universe theory.

[Ares]

You ever seen a blown fuse?

Welding spatter?

Yep, but I never formed a star when I blew a fuse.

[Horn]

Yep, but I never formed a star when I blew a fuse.

i know u like to think u are the universe, but its just not so.

Have you ever welded on a scale of the horsehead nebula?

[Ares]

i know u like to think u are the universe, but its just not so.

Have you ever welded on a scale of the horsehead nebula?

I know you like to inject your own thoughts and feelings into discussions, but logic often fails you.

It's called critical thinking, if you or the theory you support cannot explain how a star is formed more so than the current theory then it's bullshit.