Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?

[Neuro]

Agreed, Newtonian physics and General Relatively have a hard time explaining gravity outside of our own planet. Once you ratchet up the scale you start having to compensate for variations which are not explained by either.

I'm a hard data guy, I look at data day in and day out. Data NEVER lies, however data can be misinterpreted. Which is why it is helpful to have as many eyes on the data as possible to see if the same conclusion is reached. If not then help run through the data to show a different outcome.

I think gravity works hundred percent on a planetary scale. I have a problem seeing how it could keep a nuclear bomb star from instantaneously disintegrating. It is obvious it isn't sufficient in keeping galaxies together, behaving like they do. I think electrical universe theories fills a void here.

The gravity in the center of a galaxy is essentially zero (barred absence of a supermassive black hole, eating the galaxies newborn stars), thus an electrical vortex created by a magnetic field makes a perfect explanation for the rapidly rotating plasma staroids in the center. The magnetic field sucks in electrons and protons from surrounding space, and that is the building material of the first generation stars.

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...CsRa6HZAPexYgZ
We are not sucked into it, we are spun out of it!

[Ares]

I think gravity works hundred percent on a planetary scale. I have a problem seeing how it could keep a nuclear bomb star from instantaneously disintegrating. It is obvious it isn't sufficient in keeping galaxies together, behaving like they do. I think electrical universe theories fills a void here.

The gravity in the center of a galaxy is essentially zero (barred absence of a supermassive black hole, eating the galaxies newborn stars), thus an electrical vortex created by a magnetic field makes a perfect explanation for the rapidly rotating plasma staroids in the center. The magnetic field sucks in electrons and protons from surrounding space, and that is the building material of the first generation stars.

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...CsRa6HZAPexYgZ
We are not sucked into it, we are spun out of it!

I'm not so sure Electric Universe does answer those questions. I'm leaning more towards an unknown magnetic physics we are not aware of yet. We do not fully understand gravity or magnetics. Or even Molecular structures yet, just this past year there is a breakthrough in Hyrdogen where a company in New Jersey created a new form of Hydrogen called "Hydrino" that has immense power. They are in the process of creating an energy source called "SunCell" with it with plans to start leasing prototypes sometime this year.

[Neuro]

I'm not so sure Electric Universe does answer those questions. I'm leaning more towards an unknown magnetic physics we are not aware of yet. We do not fully understand gravity or magnetics. Or even Molecular structures yet, just this past year there is a breakthrough in Hyrdogen where a company in New Jersey created a new form of Hydrogen called "Hydrino" that has immense power. They are in the process of creating an energy source called "SunCell" with it with plans to start leasing prototypes sometime this year.

I would recommend you to have a look at these video's posted by vacuum in 7ths magnetic thread. If you haven't done so already...

This guy's videos has some striking similarities to The Primer Fields videos.

I saw them here a few years ago, courtesy of Horn, and I must say it changed the way I viewed the universe a lot. I wonder what happened to the guy, he kind of stopped mid-sentence with these videos.

[Ares]

I would recommend you to have a look at these video's posted by vacuum in 7ths magnetic thread. If you haven't done so already...

I saw them here a few years ago, courtesy of Horn, and I must say it changed the way I viewed the universe a lot. I wonder what happened to the guy, he kind of stopped mid-sentence with these videos.

Good question, he also disabled comments on the videos. Never a good sign when wanting to spark debate on new science but yet block the discussions... I'll give them a view when I get some time.

[Horn]

In the videos I have posted Thornhill EU explains Neutrinos. Facts are many explainations of the Universe become apparent with EU theory. It (the universe) also returns to a classical view of the universe. Gravity remains though replaced with by electroplasma drivers.

Many unknowns fall into place in EU.

"Dark Matter" is bologna and tries to retain relativity Big G.

Big G fusion gas driven stars are not observable, our own Sun refutes it flatly. More power is needed than Big G to drive the universe. It only makes sense that it comes from electrically driven Birkeland currents.

[Ares]

In the videos I have posted Thornhill EU explains Neutrinos. Facts are many explainations of the Universe become apparent with EU theory. It (the universe) also returns to a classical view of the universe. Gravity remains though replaced with by electroplasma drivers.

Many unknowns fall into place in EU.

"Dark Matter" is bologna and tries to retain relativity Big G.

Big G fusion gas driven stars are not observable, our own Sun refutes it flatly. More power is needed than Big G to drive the universe. It only makes sense that it comes from electrically driven Birkeland currents.

Where is the DATA

I don't care what someone says. I want to see the data. His claims need to be VERIFIED and that cannot happen without data.

[Horn]

The data is provided by neutrino detection.

The only difference is how it is generated, standard theory claims it has all the answers but nothing adds up. EU theory does not claim to have all the answers though most all observed data Does line up. The data is the basis of the theory, All of it plainly observable.

[Ares]

The data is provided by neutrino detection.

The only difference is how it is generated, standard theory claims it has all the answers but nothing adds up. EU theory does not claim to have all the answers though most all observed data Does line up. The data is the basis of the theory, All of it plainly observable.

Except for Neutrino's which for the past 70 or so years indicates that Neutrinos are a by-product of a nuclear reaction. Unless you're saying that the sun is still nuclear but draws its sustained energy source from the Electric Universe?

[Horn]

Electric universe deals on the scale and interconnectivity of the universe. What reactions occur at the corona of the Sun are a result of universal scale reactions. Mankind certainly is not capable of reproducing those on Earth. Well maybe if any thought were directed towards it.

[BarnkleBob]

Ever heard of Sonoluminescence?

"Sonoluminescence is the emission of short bursts of light from imploding bubbles in a liquid when excited by sound."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminescence

The creation myth of the Biblical Genesis describes "sonoluminescence". First it begins with "And God said, let there be light" (Genesis 1:3) which is first sound (said) followed by "light", then the "waters" are divided. Genesis 1:2 says that the waters existed before God said.

"Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters." --Genesis 1:2

Where exactly does sound go to die? Or is sound transmuted into light? Science tells us that the universe and all of the planets emit continuous sound. Nature uses everything it produces. Why is it producing comstant sound & what is it utilizing that sound for?

Genesis 1 describes everything springing forth from the "waters" after the sound (frequency) began.

Sounds like sonoluminescense creates the electric universe