Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?

[singular_me]

ahahaha... you ran out of arguments, that is all I am seeing here. Yes, you cannot deal with metaphysics, you are ALLERGIC to it. You associate it with nonsensical magic or voodoo. That was all I meant and you know it.

You just speak nonsense.

There you go again making contrary positions for me again, for you to discuss against. For along time I actually thought you were intentionally lying about me, when you made up these positions I actually don't hold. But I start to think you are not doing this with the knowledge that they are lies. You probably believe you know me, when you are conversing with the demon inside you.

Ares the correct term would be Schizophrenia.

[singular_me]

I asked to explain the source of neutrinos if the sun is not nuclear.

RE:
well it occurred to me that I may have the beginning of an answer. Walter Russell,(possibly the main father of the EU theory) contends that Light, replicates, photons do not motion. Light does not travel. He has a chapter explaining this.

SECRET OF LIGHT
Chapter XII. Light cannot be seen, it can only be known. Light is still.

Light Does Not Travel

The speed with which light presumably travels is 186,400 miles per second. The distance between stars is so great that the speed of light is computed as light years, for the distance computed by lesser units of time would yield figures so great that they would be meaningless.

Light only seems to travel. It is but one more of the countless illusions caused by wave motion. Waves of the ocean seem to traverse the ocean but they only appear to do so, for waves are pistons in the universal engines, and pistons operate up and down. Wave pistons of light, or of the ocean, operate radially and spirally inward and outward, toward and away from gravity.

Waves of light do not travel. They reproduce each other from wave field to wave field of space. The planes of zero curvature, which bound all wave fields, act as mirrors to reflect light from one field into another. This sets up an appearance of light as traveling, which is pure illusion...
https://lightspeedzero.wordpress.com...alter-russell/


And I believe he is correct. And that could explain why our atheistic academia would hate this to be known. Light has extremely mysterious properties that eventually end academia itself.

Where are the neutrinos? they replicate and vanish simultaneously...


light cannot be seen but be known.EnLightenment

ares, I dont think you are that interested in the EU, if you were your postings would demonstrate that you did watched much of the EU materials available online. Instead you want an evidence presented to you.

The EU may or may not be fully complete at this stage (but all what I heard made sense to me so far) and this is something that should allow you to leave the intellectual door open instead of bashing.

I dont have any particular material in mind right now to answer your question BUT know that anybody following the laws of electricity will always be proven right at some point down the road. Because electricity is the blood of the Universe.

Quantum physics has its detractors too, I think neuro is one of them. But quantum physics depends on computers, while living geometry does not. Something to chew on.

[monty]

I asked to explain the source of neutrinos if the sun is not nuclear.

RE:
well it occurred to me that I may have the beginning of an answer. Walter Russell,(possibly the main father of the EU theory) contends that Light, replicates, photons do not motion. Light does not travel. He has a chapter explaining this.

SECRET OF LIGHT
Chapter XII. Light cannot be seen, it can only be known. Light is still.

Light Does Not Travel

The speed with which light presumably travels is 186,400 miles per second. The distance between stars is so great that the speed of light is computed as light years, for the distance computed by lesser units of time would yield figures so great that they would be meaningless.

Light only seems to travel. It is but one more of the countless illusions caused by wave motion. Waves of the ocean seem to traverse the ocean but they only appear to do so, for waves are pistons in the universal engines, and pistons operate up and down. Wave pistons of light, or of the ocean, operate radially and spirally inward and outward, toward and away from gravity.

Waves of light do not travel. They reproduce each other from wave field to wave field of space. The planes of zero curvature, which bound all wave fields, act as mirrors to reflect light from one field into another. This sets up an appearance of light as traveling, which is pure illusion...
https://lightspeedzero.wordpress.com...alter-russell/


And I believe he is correct. And that could explain why our atheistic academia would hate this to be known. Light has extremely mysterious properties that eventually end academia itself.

Where are the neurinos? they replicate and vanish simultaneously...


light cannot be seen but be known.EnLightenment

here is a man who has some knowlege of neutrinos. I only have a high school education, no physics, 2 years of algebra, basic chemistry, introduction to organic chemistry some biology and botany, not qualified to argue in this debate

http://hitoshi.berkeley.edu/neutrino/PhysicsWorld.pdf



https://s19.postimg.org/r4as9r7oj/IMG_1448.png


https://s19.postimg.org/up6nszc83/IMG_1449.png



https://s19.postimg.org/yzlbokhb7/IMG_1450.png

https://s19.postimg.org/70r5xpfoj/IMG_1451.png

[singular_me]

hey thanks for sharing, and please do not be discouraged from posting

but the higgs boson, God's particle, has an interesting % of detractors too, some say that higgs experiment was a hoax. I personally dont know (I do not have a Phd and was studying biology to become a veterinarian for 3 years, until philosophy, metaphysics and writing became my passions) but also know we cannot trust mainstream academia.

here is a man who has some knowlege of neutrinos. I only have a high school education, no physics, 2 years of algebra, basic chemistry, introduction to organic chemistry some biology and botany, not qualified to argue in this debate

http://hitoshi.berkeley.edu/neutrino/PhysicsWorld.pdf

[singular_me]

from naturalphilosophy.org.. without a resistance nothing progresses. well I just found a new site that I am going to promote in my doc. Thanks a lot to you all

==========================


http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/sit...ng-768x525.jpg


http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/sit...ez-768x524.jpg

http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/sit...er-768x552.jpg

[Horn]

"If I only had a neutrino" is the tinman argument of standard physics.

It ignores all other obligatory requirements of theory, or having themselves a brain...

[Neuro]

"If I only had a neutrino" is the tinman argument of standard physics.

It ignores all other obligatory requirements of theory, or having themselves a brain...

Some physicists say there are no neutrinos. That what is detected in these neutrino detectors in mountains deep is actually ultra-high energy gamma rays...

http://www.autodynamics.org/neutrinos-home/

[singular_me]

from the walter russell link in my earlier post... and you wonder about his success? One doesnt find this type of knowledge in the mainstream. So let alone expecting the EU to be greenlighted by the mainstream

=================
Man likewise cannot see darkness. The nerves of his eyes, which sense motion, slow down to a rate of vibration that he can no longer “feel.” Man is so accustomed to the idea that he actually sees light in various intensities illuminating various substances to greater or lesser degree that it is difficult for him to realize that his own senses are but acting as mirrors to reflect various intensities of wave motion. But that is all that is happening.

Every electrically conditioned thing in Nature reflects the vibrations of every other thing, to fulfill its desire to synchronize its vibrations with every other thing. All matter is the motion of light. All motion is expressed in waves. All light waves are mirrors that reflect each other’s condition unto the farthermost star.

This is an electrically conditioned wave universe. All wave conditions are forever seeking oneness. For this reason all sensation responds to all other sensation.....

Light is all there is in the spiritual universe of knowing, and simulation of that light in opposite extensions is all there is in the electric wave universe of sensing. The simulation of light in matter is not light. There is no light in matter.

Perhaps the confusion which attends this idea would be lessened if we classify everything concerning the spiritual universe, such as life, intelligence, truth, power, knowledge and balance as being the One Light of Knowing, and everything concerning matter and motion as being the two simulated lights of thinking.

Thinking expresses knowing in matter but matter does not think, nor does it know.

Thinking also expresses life, truth, idea, power and balance by recording the ideas of those qualities in the two lights of matter in motion, but matter does not live, nor is it truth, balance or idea, even though it simulates those spiritual qualities.

Man’s confusion concerning this differentiation lies in his, long assumption of the reality of matter. His assumption that his body is his Self, that his knowledge is in his brain, and that he lives and dies because his body integrates and disintegrates, has been so fundamental a part of his thinking that it is difficult for him to reverse his thinking to the fact that matter is but motion and has no reality beyond simulating reality.

The light which we think we see is but motion. We do not see light. We feel the wave vibrations set up by the motion that simulates light, but the motion of electric waves that simulate light is not that which it simulates.

[Ares]

from the walter russell link in my earlier post... and you wonder about his success? One doesnt find this type of knowledge in the mainstream. So let alone expecting the EU to be greenlighted by the mainstream

=================
Man likewise cannot see darkness. The nerves of his eyes, which sense motion, slow down to a rate of vibration that he can no longer “feel.” Man is so accustomed to the idea that he actually sees light in various intensities illuminating various substances to greater or lesser degree that it is difficult for him to realize that his own senses are but acting as mirrors to reflect various intensities of wave motion. But that is all that is happening.

Every electrically conditioned thing in Nature reflects the vibrations of every other thing, to fulfill its desire to synchronize its vibrations with every other thing. All matter is the motion of light. All motion is expressed in waves. All light waves are mirrors that reflect each other’s condition unto the farthermost star.

This is an electrically conditioned wave universe. All wave conditions are forever seeking oneness. For this reason all sensation responds to all other sensation.....

Light is all there is in the spiritual universe of knowing, and simulation of that light in opposite extensions is all there is in the electric wave universe of sensing. The simulation of light in matter is not light. There is no light in matter.

Perhaps the confusion which attends this idea would be lessened if we classify everything concerning the spiritual universe, such as life, intelligence, truth, power, knowledge and balance as being the One Light of Knowing, and everything concerning matter and motion as being the two simulated lights of thinking.

Thinking expresses knowing in matter but matter does not think, nor does it know.

Thinking also expresses life, truth, idea, power and balance by recording the ideas of those qualities in the two lights of matter in motion, but matter does not live, nor is it truth, balance or idea, even though it simulates those spiritual qualities.

Man’s confusion concerning this differentiation lies in his, long assumption of the reality of matter. His assumption that his body is his Self, that his knowledge is in his brain, and that he lives and dies because his body integrates and disintegrates, has been so fundamental a part of his thinking that it is difficult for him to reverse his thinking to the fact that matter is but motion and has no reality beyond simulating reality.

The light which we think we see is but motion. We do not see light. We feel the wave vibrations set up by the motion that simulates light, but the motion of electric waves that simulate light is not that which it simulates.

Asking for EVIDENCE is not mainstream, it's basic human understanding, especially when it comes to something new. Like I have asked previously, SHOW ME THE MATH, as well as the source for the neutrino's. Gamma rays are different as they are ionized radiation while neutrino's are not.

Here is the differences between Gamma Rays and Neutrinos:

Neutrino's:

Types 3 – electron neutrino, muon neutrino and tau neutrino
Mass ≤ 0.120 eV/c2 (95% confidence level, sum of 3 flavors)[1]
Electric charge 0 e
Spin 1/2
Weak isospin LH: +1/2, RH: 0
Weak hypercharge LH: -1, RH: 0
B − L −1
X −3

Gamma Rays:

Gamma rays, X-rays, visible light, and radio waves are all forms of electromagnetic radiation. The only difference is the frequency and hence the energy of those photons. Gamma rays are generally the most energetic of these, although a broad overlap with X-ray energies occurs. An example of gamma ray production follows:

First 60
Co
decays to excited 60
Ni
by beta decay emission of an electron of 0.31 MeV. Then the excited 60
Ni
decays to the ground state (see nuclear shell model) by emitting gamma rays in succession of 1.17 MeV followed by 1.33 MeV. This path is followed 99.88% of the time:

60
27Co
→ 60
28Ni*
+
e−
+
ν
e +
γ
+ 1.17 MeV
60
28Ni*
→ 60
28Ni
+
γ
+ 1.33 MeV

Another example is the alpha decay of 241
Am
to form 237
Np
; which is followed by gamma emission. In some cases, the gamma emission spectrum of the daughter nucleus is quite simple, (e.g. 60
Co
/60
Ni
) while in other cases, such as with (241
Am
/237
Np
and 192
Ir
/192
Pt
), the gamma emission spectrum is complex, revealing that a series of nuclear energy levels exist.

Or for visual representation of Gamma Ray source:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...Scheme.svg.png

I have asked for evidence to support the E.U. theory and get told to watch a video. I've watch about 15-20 minutes of it (my time for watching these types of videos is limited) but have not seen any evidence presented just theory.

[Neuro]

Asking for EVIDENCE is not mainstream, it's basic human understanding, especially when it comes to something new. Like I have asked previously, SHOW ME THE MATH, as well as the source for the neutrino's. Gamma rays are different as they are ionized radiation while neutrino's are not.

Here is the differences between Gamma Rays and Neutrinos:

Neutrino's:

Types 3 – electron neutrino, muon neutrino and tau neutrino
Mass ≤ 0.120 eV/c2 (95% confidence level, sum of 3 flavors)[1]
Electric charge 0 e
Spin 1/2
Weak isospin LH: +1/2, RH: 0
Weak hypercharge LH: -1, RH: 0
B − L −1
X −3

Gamma Rays:

Gamma rays, X-rays, visible light, and radio waves are all forms of electromagnetic radiation. The only difference is the frequency and hence the energy of those photons. Gamma rays are generally the most energetic of these, although a broad overlap with X-ray energies occurs. An example of gamma ray production follows:

First 60
Co
decays to excited 60
Ni
by beta decay emission of an electron of 0.31 MeV. Then the excited 60
Ni
decays to the ground state (see nuclear shell model) by emitting gamma rays in succession of 1.17 MeV followed by 1.33 MeV. This path is followed 99.88% of the time:

60
27Co
→ 60
28Ni*
+
e−
+
ν
e +
γ
+ 1.17 MeV
60
28Ni*
→ 60
28Ni
+
γ
+ 1.33 MeV

Another example is the alpha decay of 241
Am
to form 237
Np
; which is followed by gamma emission. In some cases, the gamma emission spectrum of the daughter nucleus is quite simple, (e.g. 60
Co
/60
Ni
) while in other cases, such as with (241
Am
/237
Np
and 192
Ir
/192
Pt
), the gamma emission spectrum is complex, revealing that a series of nuclear energy levels exist.

Or for visual representation of Gamma Ray source:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...Scheme.svg.png

I have asked for evidence to support the E.U. theory and get told to watch a video. I've watch about 15-20 minutes of it (my time for watching these types of videos is limited) but have not seen any evidence presented just theory.

It is of course clear that there is an emission of these particles coming from the sun (as can be seen in the General path they are traveling). However the question is whether the emissions detected is from ultra high energy gamma rays or from low energy neutrino's. Both have very low likelihood of interaction with matter and penetrate deeply. I don't know whether they would have very different behaviors in a fog chamber when interacting. I would imagine so since we are talking multiples of magnitudes difference in energy levels...