150 Militia Take Over Makhuer National Wildlife Preserve Headquarters

[monty]

From J Grady youtube. God Bless these men and women for standing up for what is right



https://youtu.be/P-n00ZGwV_4

[monty]

KOIN TV full interview with LaVoy Finicum's widow



https://youtu.be/OjGjDMyCzPQ

[monty]

John Lamb, Kelli Stewart John Day Meeting Jan. 28, 2017



https://youtu.be/[QUOTE]kyvF1gIXcBo








https://youtu.be/gTBt-j5saQM



https://youtu.be/IWIs3Yu3XC4

[monty]

Sheriff Glenn Palmer message to people of John Day, Oregon about the 'Meeting That Never Happened'


https://s19.postimg.org/l8wke3tb7/IMG_1489.png

[monty]

Jeanette Finicum's John Day Oregon meeting is being live streamed:

https://www.facebook.com/cowboystand...type=2&theater

The meeting that never happened part 1 on youtube great speakers!



https://youtu.be/36p1UIfIBLg

[monty]

Speech by Kate Dalley at John Day, Oregon - freedom of the press and fake news. Everyone needs to listen to this woman tell about the manipulation of the mainstream news.




https://youtu.be/bJ081oDbg3E

[Tumbleweed]

Speech by Kate Dalley at John Day, Oregon - freedom of the press and fake news. Everyone needs to listen to this woman tell about the manipulation of the mainstream news.




https://youtu.be/bJ081oDbg3E

That was really good over all but there's one thing she brought up she shouldn't have because she's guilty of doing what she accuses others in the press of doing.

When she bashed NS Germany she was spewing the lies of the Jew controlled government and press. She should study M. S . Kings three books "Planet Rothschild and the Bad War". That would be a good start for her in searching for and speaking the truth as she promotes.

[monty]

That was really good over all but there's one thing she brought up she shouldn't have because she's guilty of doing what she accuses others in the press of doing. When she bashed NS Germany she was spewing the lies of the Jew controlled government and press. She should study M. S . Kings three books "Planet Rothschild and the Bad War". That would be a good start for her in searching for and speaking the truth as she promotes.

I didn't realize she had done that. I am going to listen to her again. Here is the Part 2 of the meeting KrisAnne, Hall, Jeanette Finicum's attorney M. Philpot.

The audio is poor. I wasn't able to hear much of what anyone said except Kris Anne Hall

https://youtu.be/VYkGiMmy5yo

[monty]

Gary Hunt has been vilified by a man posting on facebook as John Wayne whose real name is Mark West. Gary Hunt responds:

http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/west.htm

Statement re: Mark West, aka "John Wayne"

http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/im...ark%20West.jpg

A little background. In early January, as a person who has a Facebook page, "Dolly Singer", suggested that he was in communication with the Trump Team and that John Lamb and I would soon be meeting with them. This is explained in my "Statement re: Dolly Singer".

On January 13, around the time the "Singer" started his misplaced claims, I received some text messages from Mark West, who is on Facebook under a fictitious name, "John Wayne". Perhaps an allusion to his immature, egotistical, impression of who he thinks he is.

At first, he was just consuming my time, interrupting my writing. However, from the way I was raised and my experience with my own business, years ago, I tend to be curious, so long as the other person is, as well. I return phone calls, and I reply to Private Messages.

After "Singer" was disposed of, West became sort of irritating. He started demanding answers, and prying into what I was investigating. He felt that I had an obligation to answer any and all questions posed by him. If I answered, he was not satisfied, or disputed my honest answer to his query.

Because of what I do, investigating events or people, and reporting on them, my research is not public knowledge, unless and until I write and publish an article. Otherwise, I would be participating in the rumor mill of accusations (pissing contests) that is so prevalent today, especially on Facebook.

Even though I was taking the time to answer West's questions, on January 23, we had a PM discussion that began casually and then was been blown into extreme proportions. During that discussion, he said, "I wish I could trust you... I really want to". Now, that is an interesting statement. If he wished he could trust me, and by now, he does not trust me, then, what is the point?

My response was, "If you have doubts, you can't trust me." I think that is fair, as I would not want anyone to go against their feelings to provide me information. If they cannot find emotional/mental comfort in telling what they know, I can expect that there might be incomplete, biased, or even false, information. I do not want to rely on such. So, I continued, "Besides, I doubt that what you have is anything I could use." That should have shut the door. However, it began to escalate.

Now, I don't pretend to be a psychologist, but when someone praises your work and then damns you, next, you have to wonder just what motivates that person.

After that episode, he started posting all over Facebook rumors and false allegations that have been made against me since 1993. In numerous phone conversations, he says he believes me, yet he encourages others to join in the condemnation of me.

One thing that stands out is that he has, twice, told me that Jeanette Finicum does not want to talk with me. However, this emanated from a radio show that she and I were both guests on. I had asked, on air, if I could call her. She said that I could. West then says that she did not want to speak with me, acting both authoritative and assertive. So, perhaps Jeanette really didn't want to speak with me, and I was willing to leave it at that. However, in talking with one of my sources, I was asked if I had spoken to Jeanette. I said that I had not, and explained why. While we were talking, she texted Jeanette. Jeanette said that she was willing to talk with me, but that she would be busy through the event in Burns to recognizing "The Meeting That Never Happened". Though not a condition, I respect that she is busy and decided to call her after the event. That event, by the way, is going on as I write this. On at least three occasions, one given by West the other two given by other sources, Jeanette Finicum has stated that Mark West does not speak for her.

Though I have not gone into all of the details of the numerous conversations, the promises West made, and then failed to comply with, you can either trust that it was extensive, or, heck, say that I'm lying. But, this brings me to a question that always arises when I do an article. What is behind this?

Absent an answer, or at least an obvious conclusion, I can't do the story. However, in this instance, I will make an exception. What are the possible motivations behind West's attacks, tied with his condescending articulations? Let's list them:

1. Is he protecting Jeanette Finicum, as he has suggested?
Answer: No, since the Finicums had turned their back on him, long ago -- also by his own admission.

2. Does he feel that he has a moral responsibility to protect Jeanette Finicum?
Answer: If so, his self-righteousness goes beyond reason, assuming that he has requested responsibility to protect some from what, themselves. I doubt that Jeanette Finicum has such need, and the evidence suggests that she needs protection from West, not by West.

This, then, leads us to the question of motivation from an outside source. Thursday evening (Jan. 27), I spoke with West and asked what his game was. He told me that I was doing good work and should keep doing so. I explained to him that my courtesy in spending time PMing and on the phone with him, which to this point, exceeded ten hours, was keeping me from my writing. He agreed to take down all of the critical posts, and by morning, all but one had been removed. I accepted friend requests from him and thought that he was a man of his word. During the course of that conversation, I also expressed that if he were a man, I would expect a public apology by Sunday evening. That would be the least that he could do to mitigate the damage that his tirades has accomplished. He did not commit to that, so life went on.

Well, he has jumped back on his bandwagon of endeavoring to smear my name and reputation on the rumor mill, so it appears that neither of the above possibilities had any role in his decisions. More than likely, there is someone, somewhere, bending his ear, and attempting to undermine what he and I had agreed to, by the next time we communicated. It has been a ping-pong sort of situation.

Now, I have a number of members on my team. Their names are not public, but they assist me in many ways, including research, proofreading, consultation, and advising. They are indispensable in allowing me to achieve what I have, whether exposing informants, or allowing me to bounce ideas off of them to help my thought process for my other articles.

It seems as if they think that the government might be behind it, based upon their efforts to silence the press, with regard to my exposing informants from the Burns occupation. The government has dropped their legal pursuit of forcing me to remove all the articles on the subject. So, now we can look at additional possibilities.

3. The government has set someone out to both attack me and intrude upon my time, to minimize any effectiveness I might have with additional articles.

Answer: I doubt that the government would risk the possibility of exposure for doing something as covert, unprofessional, and probably illegal. The risk of being caught would be far more damaging than my articles.

4. An informant is concerned that I might expose him for his participation in infiltrating the patriot community. Now, this is the most probable of all of the possibilities. So, let's look a bit deeper.
Answer: First, a bit of a disclaimer. I don't expose someone, unless I have proof. However, in this situation, I am going to go with my gut.

The suspicion begins about two years ago when Kevin "KC" Massey was set up and charged with felon in possession, for which he is currently serving time in Texas. Massey was running a border operation, encouraging illegals to return to the south side of the Rio Grande River, which had been quite successful. I was the only exercise in Texas that had been continuously operating.

Massey and I talk weekly, if not more often. We have done so since before his trial, and have continued to this day. We have looked at the players that were in a position to do so, and where their activities suggest the possibility of being informants.

Two of those players were also in Burns, though only one was inside of the Refuge. The one inside was Allen Varner (Wolf).

The other, who will be named shortly, did not go into the Refuge, but was present outside. There is a CHS (Confidential Human Source - informant) report that may be this person, though it is not strong enough to make the case, as I have required on all of the other exposures. This person is a "friend" on West's Facebook page.

Back in October, I posted a video, hoping that it might lead to some information that would lead to someone providing some tangible evidence to support of that suspicion. Therefore, I am breaking my own rules, though this is of necessity, and is being done because of the circumstances outlined above. If I am correct, that person is CHS #3, who only filed one report. By so doing, he may have qualified for expenses for his trip to Burns. If I am in error, that would be the first informant that I have failed to identify properly.

I can conclude with, I would not have done so. However, enough is enough. And, West had been advised, in a phone conversation, that his persistence would lead to this being written. When I did, he did seem to spend an excessive amount of time trying to convince me that it was not true.

Gary Hunt
Outpost of Freedom
January 29, 2017

Note: Subsequent research shows that Mark Rulon West violated Six Protective Orders in 2015. Seehttp://utah.arrests.org/Arrests/Mark_West_26398916/

http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/images/mail60c4.gif
Outpost of Freedom


Go to Outpost of Freedom home page

[monty]

Maxine Bernstein's "unbiased" report on Jeanette Finicum's JohnDay, Oregon meeting

https://www.itmattershowyoustand.com...lavoy-finicum/

Crowd of 500, including some Oregon standoff defendants, salute Robert ‘LaVoy’ Finicum

Posted on January 28, 2017 by Doug Knowles

• https://i2.wp.com/www.itmattershowyo...60%2C639&ssl=1
• https://i2.wp.com/www.itmattershowyo...0%2C1411&ssl=1
• https://i2.wp.com/www.itmattershowyo...60%2C630&ssl=1
• https://i0.wp.com/www.itmattershowyo...60%2C622&ssl=1
• https://i0.wp.com/www.itmattershowyo...0%2C1360&ssl=1
• https://i0.wp.com/www.itmattershowyo...60%2C654&ssl=1
• https://i0.wp.com/www.itmattershowyo...60%2C627&ssl=1
• https://i1.wp.com/www.itmattershowyo...60%2C641&ssl=1
• https://i2.wp.com/www.itmattershowyo...60%2C637&ssl=1
• https://i1.wp.com/www.itmattershowyo...60%2C615&ssl=1

By Maxine Bernstein | The Oregonian/OregonLive

JOHN DAY -- Caravans of trucks with American flags and "Don't Tread on Me'' banners rolled into town over several days to gather Saturday night for a conclave that was part memorial, part reunion and part religious revival.

A crowd of more than 500 people grew still as Jeanette Finicum took the microphone.

"They silenced one man's voice,'' she said, speaking of husband Robert "LaVoy" Finicum, an Arizona rancher shot and killed by police as he and others occupying the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge were traveling north to this eastern Oregon town of about 1,700.

"But in doing so," she said, "they created 13 more very loud voices'' - Jeanette Finicum herself and the couple's 12 children.

A year ago on Jan. 26, LaVoy Finicum and other protest leaders had planned to speak at a community meeting here, but never made it when their trip ended with his death and the arrest of the armed takeover's key figures. On this night, the meeting finally happened.

Jeanette Finicum said the year has been difficult, but the love and support she's received, plus her faith in God, have helped her family endure. They're submitting a notice of a claim with the FBI before filing a federal wrongful death lawsuitagainst Oregon State Police and the FBI, she said.

"It is a long road, but it is a road that we, our family, is willing to make,'' she said.

Thirty minutes before the start of the gathering, a line of people stretched outside the Grant County Fairground's Trowbridge Pavilion waiting to get in, coming from Utah, Nevada, Idaho, Washington and California. Finicum's daughters greeted them at the door and inked black stamps of LaVoy Finicum's cattle brand "LVF" on their hands.

They paid $15 to hear a slate of speakers and balanced plates full of spaghetti on their laps as they listened to critiques of federal government regulations that restrict farmers and ranchers.

The speeches mocked mainstream media, the prosecutors who tried occupation leader Ammon Bundy and his followers and the judge who presided over their trial.

"The not guilty verdict was the most amazing verdict of the century!" Kate Dalley, host of a radio talk show on a Fox News affiliate, cried out from the stage. She drew rousing applause from the crowd, filling more than 25 rows of folding chairs that stretched from one end of the pavilion to the other.

Four of the seven defendants who were acquitted last fall -- Jeff Banta, Shawna Cox, Kenneth Medenbach and Neil Wampler - were together again. They slapped each other on the back and hugged each other.




Robert "LaVoy" Finicum's last interview with The Oregonian on the day before his death



Cox, who came from her home in Utah, stood by a table, selling and signing copies of her book, "Last Rancher Standing: The Cliven Bundy Story a Close-Up View.''

"This is the first time I ever got to John Day,'' said Cox, a back-seat passenger in Finicum's truck when he sped off from a traffic stop on U.S. 395 and then crashed into a snowbank at a police roadblock. State police shot him after he emerged from his truck and reached at least two times into his jacket to grab what police suspected was his gun. He had a loaded 9mm gun on him at the time, the FBI later said.

On her way to John Day, Cox said she drove by the spot where Finicum was killed. "I didn't think it was going to be that tough,'' she said.

In the three months since she was acquitted in the federal conspiracy case, Cox said she's been "so busy trying to help the other people" -- the seven other defendants set to face trial next month, as well as Ammon Bundy, his brother, Ryan Bundy, and their father Cliven Bundy, who await trial in Nevada in the 2014 standoff with federal agents near the elder Bundy's ranch.

Jeff Banta, who also was acquitted last fall, said he drove 14 hours from Nevada to attend the meeting. "It's great to be here,'' he said. "It's great to be a free man.''

Since the October verdict, Neil Wampler, who served as a cook at the refuge during last winter's occupation, said he's been happy staying out of the limelight, back at his home in Los Osos, California.

"I hardly even go anywhere,'' he said. "But I couldn't miss this meeting.''

Strangers kept coming up to Wampler, introducing themselves and shaking his hand. "It's kind of overwhelming because I have so many friends here and a certain degree of fame now, not that I ever wanted it,'' he said.

One local woman on Twitter expressed concern about a social media post that Medenbach placed on Facebook this week, contending the Grant County Public Forest Commission, nullified by a Circuit Court judge, "HAS POWER TO BUY, SELL AND TRADE PUBLIC LANDS IN GRANT COUNTY, OREGON.''

He also posted a photo of a white van plastered with a sticker that read, "Grant County Resource Center,'' a takeoff on the "Harney County Resource Center'' stickers that refuge occupiers plastered on U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service trucks at the bird sanctuary.

Medenbach, wearing "Not Guilty'' and "Justice for LaVoy'' buttons on his shirt, smiled and said his probation officer contacted him and told him to "tone it down.'' Medenbach is on probation for unlawfully occupying and camping on federal public land in Josephine County in May 2015.

Supporters could choose from an array of memorabilia to buy: black "LVF" caps that said "It Matters How You Stand," bumper stickers declaring "Liberty Rising" and "In God We Trust," shirts with the words "Defend the Constitution" and "Original Intent'' printed around a picture of an eagle and LaVoy Finicum's book, "Only By Blood and Suffering."

Lawrence Arata of Colfax, Washington, said he drove 300 miles to John Day. He was angry about the treatment of Harney County ranchers Dwight Hammond Jr. and Steven Hammond, sent back to prison to finish serving five-year sentences for setting fire to public land.

Liz Pettibone of Heppner said she supports the Bundys and believes it's unfair that federal prosecutors are pursuing trespass charges against the remaining refuge defendants. "How could they say trespass if it's public land?" she asked.

The defendants are accused of entering and occupying the refuge without authorization.

Toward the back of the crowd, Bob Salinger of the Audubon Society of Portland stood quietly. "Public lands are under assault," Salinger said.
He said he came to the meeting "out of curiosity and to understand the threat.''

The wives of Ammon Bundy and his older brother, Ryan Bundy, were there to support the Finicum family. Finicum's parents, David and Nelda Finicum of Arizona, said they were comforted by the large turnout.

Robert Finicum, LaVoy Finicum's son, said he drove to the site where his father died on his way from Utah to John Day. It was the first time he had seen it.
He wishes his father would have come home during the refuge takeover, but said: "He was passionate about his cause.''

Bryce Poulsen of Utah said he was impressed by the crowd. "I just hope it will keep growing bigger and bigger, and people see that we're not violent.''

mbernstein@oregonian.com

503-221-8212
@maxoregonian

source

Share this: