Judge Anna J. Brown had a private meeting with Ammon Bundy's jury panel after the acquittal. It appears she was "fishing" for advice, suggestions additional charges for the prosecution that may result in convictions. That ought to be sufficient to cause an impeachment hearing.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1717...4598350419706/
Bill Goode uploaded a file.
2 hrs
This document, Document 1804, Filed 02/01/2017, is a motion for Anna Brown to recuse herself from the 2nd trial coming up on 14 February in Portland. I just received this document tonight from Jon Ritzheimer. The meeting described is absolutely unconscionable.
From page 3 - 4 of this document:
"This motion is based upon a private meeting the Court held with the September 7, 2016 jurors after the verdict was received. The Court not only answered questions the jurors had, but also discussed the merits of the case with specific reference to potential misdemeanor offenses that could have been used by the government, including trespass and the perceived inadequacy of a sentence to the government for misdemeanor criminal trespass in reference to the acquitted defendants’ conduct.
"Further, during this private meeting which lasted over an hour, the Court invited “advice for the prosecution” knowing that there still remained seven (7) defendants whose trial was scheduled to begin just a few months thereafter and a trial over which the Court was scheduled to preside."
This judge, Anna Brown, knows zero about judicial ethics. Her prejudice in this entire case is absolutely beyond question.
https://www.facebook.com/rsrc.php/v3...IJdJuO43aG.png
MNWR Doc 1804, 1 Feb 2017 .pdf
Portable Document FormatDownloadPreview

![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)

Reply With Quote