Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher

[monty]

Court Watchers for Constitution Originalists. https://www.facebook.com/groups/8500...ef=group_cover

Loren Pearce

20 hrs

SHOCKING DISPLAY OF INJUSTICE

You had to be there to believe it. This was my first time in Las Vegas court to observe what is happening. John Lamb, who has racked up a lot of court watching time in Oregon and Nevada, told me that this day was the worst that he had seen so far. In addition to what he says below, I will add my comments:

1. If there was any question that Navarro was biased or not, it became crystal clear that she was biased in favor of the feds. She opened court by lecturing us on not showing any emotion through our body language, no rolling eyes, no shaking head, etc Shortly after that, the judge shook her head in disapproval of a defense comment.

2. One of the witnesses for the prosecution, an FBI agent, sat at the prosecutor's table in clear violation of the court rule banning witnesses from being present. Margaret Houston, the woman body slammed by the BLM, was called by the defense to be a witness and had to remain outside of the courtroom. A double standard.

3. The prosecution objected to the defense witnesses as being irrelevant and the judge agreed. In fact, I don't recall the judge ever disagreeing with her prosecutor counterparts. Margaret Houston was denied by Navarro as a witness as well as several other defense witnesses.leaving the defense with very little to offer the jury in the way of witnesses.

4. The defense had motioned for a dismissal, and the judge, obviously had her mind made up prior to hearing arguments as she read all the reasons why she would deny the motion.

5. Probably the most disturbing part of the trial was for the prosecution to claim they have an ongoing investigation going on and that witnesses who were present at the Bunkerville protest, could be indicted/prosecuted if they gave testimony that incriminated them thereby intimidating the witnesses not to testify. Those who would testify were given court appointed counsel in case they wanted to plead the 5th.

6. Another highly disturbing development, was the denial by Navarro of the defense request to have Dan Love brought in as a witness. Dan Love was the key BLM player at the Nevada protest, who as superviosr, had organized the BLM activities and military response, yet Navarro said his testimony was not relevant.


https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...36&oe=5951DDC4

LikeCommentShare

​Loren Pearce There is a clear conflict of interest as she was nominated by Harry Reid, the arch enemy of the Bundys. She owes her position as not only federal judge, but chief justice because of him. This young woman was catapulted to a high position over other judges with decades more experience and tenure and she had ZERO experience. She owes him big time.

Like · 3 · 12 hrs



https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...a0&oe=595549C5


Loren Pearce

12 hrs

https://www.facebook.com/groups/8500...2009784571286/
Patricia Badish SPOT ON!
There is a clear conflict of interest as she was nominated by Harry Reid, the arch enemy of the Bundys. She owes her position as not only federal judge, but chief justice because of him. This young woman was catapulted to a high position over other judges with decades more experience and tenure and she had ZERO experience. She owes him big time.

https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...91&oe=59558079

LikeCommentShare

[monty]

Bundy Trial Eric Parker will take the stand against tyranny (article)



https://youtu.be/my5peAJBvPM

Bundy Trial - Eric Parker - Will take Stand against Tyranny (article)


Valley Forge Network 51 views

https://yt3.ggpht.com/-lo1d6vjbM_Q/A...ffff/photo.jpg
SUBSCRIBE

1,673
9
0
Published on Apr 4, 2017 Judge Openly LAUGHS At Defendants Rightshttp://redoubtnews.com/2017/04/03/jud...~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Nevada Bundy Trial Update #2 - No Witnesses Allowed for Defense - Monday - 04/03/17 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcSRA...

HELP! Nevada Update - Bundy Women Make Plea to Americans to Help get Justice !!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEyLp...~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is the redoubt news article, I simply went over it as a means to get some news out about Eric.

This man is being railroaded to further the conspiracy charge against the Bundy's. He was simply protecting protestors (women and children) from armed government agents. (Who were openly taunting the protestors with rifles drawn) One of the other DEFENDANTS was outed as a government INFORMANT and now THEY WILL NOT LET ERIC CALL ANY WITNESSES!

He is now faced with possibly having to testify himself. Please pray for Eric and his wife and family, she has worked very hard to report for her husband.Please pray the truth will shine and the jurors will hear it...

• Category
  
  • Education
  
  
• License
  
  • Standard YouTube License

[monty]

KrisAnne Hall sends greetings to Judge Gloria Navarro

https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...3c&oe=59536886



KrisAnne Hall4 hrs

These charges against Judge Gloria Navarro are sickening. It is stunning that we could have a person whose position is of justice, yet is so ignorant of Liberty, so ignorant of the Constitution, so deep in the depths of servitude and slavery.

https://www.facebook.com/notes/kel-stewart/list-of-violations-in-judge-navarros-federal-court-room-las-vegas-nevada-cliven-/253956671674795

"Constitution only allowed to be in courtroom if turned around backwards in the observers pockets."

"Refusing to allow defense to call federal witnesses that prove bias in the federal government."

Navarro even violates her own precious god of precedent by denying the settled law of Plummer v State and John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529.

This woman deserves no respect in the law, or in person. She is offensive to the Spirit of Liberty and offensive to all things that make our Constitutional Republic what it is. She has sold her soul to the hand that feeds her. The saddest thing of it all, her children and grandchildren will be the miserable sufferers of her ignorance.

After you read these charges, if you would like to discuss this with Judge Navarro and see what her defense is of these charges, you can contact her at:
Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro (702) 464-5490


Courtroom Administrator: Aaron Blazevich (702) 464-5421

My message to Ms. Navarro?

"Since you love wealth and Harry Reid better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your services. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” ~ KrisAnne Hall

Bundy Ranch #LibertyFirst #LibertyMatters

[monty]

Navarro pushes defense to rest its case

Judge Navarro Pushes Defense To Rest Case in Bunkerville Trial


NOT YET ABLE TO CALL A SINGLE WITNESS, JUDGE NAVARRO ASKED THE DEFENSE IF THEY WERE READY TO REST THEIR CASE TOMORROW.

April 4, 2017 BLM, FBI, Featured, Nevada 1

http://www.avantlink.com/gbi/11653/2...9211/image.jpg

https://i2.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=641%2C425

Judge Navarro Pushes Defense To Rest Case in Bunkerville Trial

by Shari Dovale

It has been two days that the defense has been attempting to present their case to the jury in theBunkerville trial being held in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Out of these two days, the jury has been in the courtroom about 15 minutes, or so. The remaining time has been filled with frustrations from the defendants and laughter from the Judge and prosecutors.

Yes, Judge Gloria Navarro continued to laugh at the distress of the defendants every time she slapped more evidence out of their hands.

https://i1.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=150%2C150
Eric Parker
Eric Parker said yesterday that he would testify, as he felt he had no other options. Navarro and the prosecutors subjected him to another round of intimidation today in their attempts to make him change his mind. Navarro has already threatened him with “enhanced” perjury charges if she feels he has not told the truth.

And the truth is very subjective in her courtroom. She spent most of the morning going over jury instructions. She intends to instruct the jury that just carrying a holstered weapon can be a criminal act. She also does not intend to allow the jury to hear that there is a “Right To Carry” law in Nevada.

The defense asked for an instruction to be included about the missing witness, Dan Love. They have been attempting to introduce video evidence. This video includes Dan Love and Pete Santilli, yet neither one of them are allowed to testify, therefore, there is no one available to introduce this evidence. Navarro dismissed that motion and will not allow the instruction.

https://i2.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=150%2C150
Todd Engel
The only bright spot today is that Navarro has finally agreed to allow Todd Engel to present his closing arguments. Engel is still not allowed to do anything else, including speak, in her courtroom, but he can represent himself in the closing.

I am happy that the defense was able to discuss the Facebook evidence. It has been stressed throughout the country and the government that Facebook posts and articles are not to be considered trusted sources. Yet, the prosecution has brought in over 500 posts, memes and more to show just how evil these defendants are. The prosecution has even gone so far as to suggest that using the phrase “Whatever it takes” is an implied threat.

https://i2.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=225%2C225

They have suggested very warped definitions of ‘threats to the government’. Navarro has made it clear from the very first day that she makes law in that courtroom, therefore, if she wants to distort the truth to the jury, then we must accept that.

The prosecution continues to stress their “ongoing criminal investigation” into UN-indicted Co-conspirators. They have suggested that they can prosecute people just for showing up to watch the protesters. They have even implied that if someone “Likes” a post on Facebook, that is evidence for conspiracy. Based on their definitions, just by reading this article you can be considered a conspirator. I guess I will continue to be on their list, as I will continue to write these articles and expose their corruption.

Navarro was not concerned with the defense arguments, yet it did get on the record. That made it worthwhile at least.

The defense also argued for “limited immunity” for select witnesses so they may testify to the events. The prosecution refused and the Judge agreed. They do not want the defense to have any witnesses, though the defense will likely present one or two witnesses.

After the prosecution had extended time, over five weeks, and the defense has yet to be allowed to call any witnesses, the Judge asked the defense if they were ready to rest their case tomorrow.

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• 148
  Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  148
• Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
• Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Judge Openly LAUGHS At Defendants Rights April 3, 2017In "BLM"

Shutting Down The Defense - UPDATES on Bunkerville Trial April 3, 2017In "BLM"

Shawna Cox: What America needs to know about the Bunkerville trial March 30, 2017In "BLM"

[monty]

Navarro is getting raked over the coals on social media, but nobody in government has made a move to get her off this case



Navarro: Jury Cannot Use Constitution


JURY NULLIFICATION MUST BE PROHIBITED AND NO JURY INSTRUCTION SHOULD INCLUDE ANY MENTION OF THE 1ST AND 2ND AMENDMENT.

April 5, 2017 BLM, Constitution, DOJ, Nevada

http://www.avantlink.com/gbi/11653/2...9211/image.jpg

https://i0.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=678%2C381

Navarro: Jury Cannot Use Constitution

By Loren Edward Pearce

IMAGINE A BASKETBALL REFEREE ASKING FOR GUIDANCE FROM THE COACH OF HER FAVORITE TEAM DURING A CONTEST

Court watch, Tuesday, April 4

That is what we have with Gloria Navarro in her interaction with the fed prosecutionteam. What we really have is a judge who is solidly in support of her team mates, the federal prosecutors.

At 10:11 am, on April 4 during arguments over jury instructions, Navarro looked at the prosecution team and said, “I am not sure what to do” then she said she would go back to the issue later. Repeatedly, throughout the hearing, the judge would look to the prosecutors for guidance and then would say, “I agree”.

The defense was repeatedly denied their motions and requests until the suggestion was made for a jury instruction to change the wording from “victim” to “alleged victim” so as to not give the jury the impression that the victim was a certain fact. Adding the word alleged created the impression that there was still doubt as to who was the victim.

Like throwing a bone with no meat to a dog, the judge reluctantly agreed to change the language to “alleged victim”. A short time later, the judge took the meatless bone away from the dog, and said, “I am reversing myself, I am not going to modify the language to alleged but will leave it as it is.” This tiny concession to the defense was too much for the judge and prosecution and it was taken back.

The defense repeatedly said that it was for the jury to determine if and when the 1st and 2nd amendment would apply in determining their relationship to the intent and actions of the defendants. The prosecution would have opportunity to show the jury why the defense argument was not correct and then let the jury decide.

Navarro said, and I am a witness, jury nullification must be prohibited and no jury instruction should include any mention of the 1st and 2nd amendment. She went on to say that bringing any mention of the 1st and 2nd amendment to the jury would not be helpful and would confuse them. Should there be any violations of the 1st and 2nd amendment or other constitutional questions, that it could be appealed and it was for the appellate court to decide, not the jury. Of course, that is an outrageous statement, starting with the fact that constitutional questions are for the jury to decide as facts may relate to it and appeals means long prison time for the defendants as they await an appellate decision.

One issue that jumped out at me was Navarro’s denial of a jury instruction that would show that Nevada is an open carry state and as such, many of the defendants thought it was perfectly legal to carry weapons while at the protest. The prosecution objected, and the judge agreed, that federal law trumps state law and as such, the Nevada open carry had no relevancy and the jury didn’t need to be confused by that.

Eric Parker asked to testify on his own behalf. When asked by the judge why he wanted to testify on his own behalf and if he understood the risks he was taking, Eric said, “I feel obligated to testify because the court has taken away our other witnesses, not allowing them to testify, so I am compelled to testify as one of the only remaining witnesses the court will allow”.

PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, TO BRING THESE ATROCITIES TO THEIR ATTENTION. WHILE IT MAY SEEM LIKE SPITTING IN THE OCEAN, IF ENOUGH PEOPLE SPIT ENOUGH TIMES, IT WILL GET THEIR ATTENTION.

[monty]

Longbow Productions may have muddied the waters

I-Team: FBI's undercover tactics raise questions

Copyright 2017 Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed

[monty]

Free Range Report Harry Reids pet judge


Harry Reid’s pet judge violates civil rights of Bundy Ranch defendants

April 5, 2017 editor Leave a comment

Most of the prosecution’s witnesses (federal agents) were allowed to be in the court room before they took the stand, but potential witnesses for the defense have been restricted from hearing the trial before taking the stand. The prosecution witnesses have spoken of their fear, and were even allowed to cry on the stand, but the defense witnesses were told they could not do or say anything that would make the jury feel badly for them.

Commentary by Kel Stewart



A list of violations in Judge Navarro’s Federal Court Room: Las Vegas, Nevada, Cliven Bundy et al vs United States of America



Our Constitutional rights are not only being violated, they are being mocked and disposed of as if they are nothing more than a suggestion from our framers.
A court of order and Justice can only exist if all parties involved follow the Law, the supreme Law of the Land.

Following are just some of the violations that our fellow Americans now standing trial in Judge Gloria Navarro’s Federal Courtroom are suffering:

• First, the US Constitution, the very document our founders fought and died for to protect the people from an overreaching government, has been denied to be visible in the court room. The only way it’s being allowed in the federal courtroom, is if it’s turned around backwards in the observers’ pockets. This should break the hearts of any proud American who looks to our Constitution and flag as a symbol of Justice and Liberty for all.
• Defendant, Todd Engel, has been denied his constitutionally-protected right to represent himself because he dared to ask an FBI agent on the stand if the head BLM agent, Dan Love, was in fact under investigation for misconduct. That question alone, caused the judge to strip him of his right to self represent. And even though the defense has every constitutionally-protected right to call Agent Dan Love to the stand, the judge is denying that right, stating his testimony is not necessary to their defense.
• We have a constitutionally-protected right to face our accusers. however, FBI Agent Adam Nixon, took the stand and testified that he had obtained a warrant to search Greg Burleson’s Facebook page, and he went through the information presented, and NEVER mentioned he was also Burleson’s appointed handler in 2013. Greg was the only ‘defendant’ (informant) who had spoken a message of violence which was NOT in line with our families’ messages and in fact shocked us all when the videos were revealed in court. Had we heard those words from him while we were protecting our property and cattle, he would have been immediately removed from our land.
• It was not revealed that Burleson was an FBI informant until the following week when another agent, Michael Caputo, took the stand and Burleson’s own attorney came out and questioned him about Burleson’s time as an informant. Burleson’s last phone call to Agent Caputo was right after he was interviewed later in 2015 by the FBI’s fake documentary company, Longbow Productions.
• Along with all this, no other defense attorneys were not allowed to cross-examine Agent Caputo in order to get more information about Burleson’s payments from the FBI or time as an informant. To top it off, news Channel 8 came and reported on Burleson’s damming and violent videos, and failed to report to the public that he was in fact an FBI informant. They failed to report on the other two defendants’ peaceable interviews with the fake FBI news crew (Longbow), and only focused on Burleson’s very violent videos, under the pretense that he was one of us. This biased reporting has tained the jury pool for the next 2 trials coming this year for the rest of the defendants.
• We have a constitutionally-protected right to call witnesses to the stand in our defense. Nowhere in the Constitution does it regulate how many or what kind of witnesses can be called. Yet the defense was denied nearly every witness it attempted to call as it attempted to make its case. On the first day set for defense to call its witnesses, not one was allowed to take the stand. In the end, those willing to testify for the defense are being threatened with arrest because prosecutors are calling this an ongoing conspiracy, indicating they can indict more people at any time.
• During the 7 weeks since the prosecution took the stand, the defense was not able to start their day with even one approved witness.
• Family members who were eye witnesses, including the wives of some of the defendants, were prevented from testifying for the defense for being ‘unprofessional or lay or political’ witnesses.
• They are not allowed to discuss the fact that cows were shot by federal agents, which was the main motivation people came to the aid of the Bundy family in the first place.
• They cannot discuss Ammon Bundy being tazed, Dave Bundy being arrested on the road for simply recording the activities, or Margaret Houston being thrown to the ground.
• They cannot discuss how afraid they were of the agents, or anything that would ‘pull on the hearts strings of the jury.’
• They cannot discuss anything political or religious nor can they bring up anything that can risk Jury Nullification (words from the judge).
• At one point, the judge was actually objecting FOR the defense and telling them they could not even state why they were objecting because it was disrupting the court, they could only motion their hand to show agreement they wanted to object. Then she would wait until the prosecution was done before making a ruling. She said the jury was educated enough to know to dismiss the information if she sustained the defenses objections. This is NOT how an objection works! This jury has been completed tainted.
• At this point, even though the defendants have a constitutionally-protected right to not take the stand and testify in their own case, Eric Parker had agree to testify because if he does not, there may not be anyone to speak on behalf of the defense.
• Most of the prosecution’s witnesses (federal agents) were allowed to be in the court room before they took the stand, but potential witnesses for the defense have been restricted from hearing the trial before taking the stand. The prosecution witnesses have spoken of their fear, and were even allowed to cry on the stand, but the defense witnesses were told they could not do or say anything that would make the jury feel badly for them.
• The prosecution had the stand for 6-7 weeks but the defense can not even start on day 1 with out being shut down, and is being told they will rest within 5 days.
• The prosecution presented ‘evidence’ from before 4/12/14 but the defense can not.
• The prosecution presented witnesses that were not even present at Bunkerville but the defense is being told even eye witnesses are not qualified to testify because they are ‘lay witnesses’.
• The judge has prohibited defendants from discussing United States Constitutional Amendments or the Nevada Constitution which are relevant the ‘right to carry,’ because, according to Navarro, it could cause them to consider jury nullification.

America, this should shock your conscience. This is not the America we have come to love and cherish. If God does not intervene, and the people do not speak up, justice will not prevail.

~Concerned but still hopeful American

***********

Kel Stewart is a friend to Angie and Lisa Bundy and was a Bundy family representative for the first Oregon trials in which Ammon and Ryan Bundy were defendants. Kel lives near Portland, Oregon, and made weekly jail visits, and also coordinated peaceful rallies in support of the defendants in the first and second Oregon trials.

http://www.sltrib.com/csp/mediapool/...YPE=image/jpegSalt Lake Tribune photo

Free Range Report

[monty]

The defense was able to call their first witness ths morning. 4/5/17

John Lamb and Andrea Olson-Parker



https://youtu.be/dqjmS9A9gx4

[crimethink]

JURY NULLIFICATION MUST BE PROHIBITED AND NO JURY INSTRUCTION SHOULD INCLUDE ANY MENTION OF THE 1ST AND 2ND AMENDMENT.

Is everyone really this clueless? This has been the norm in Federal star chambers aka "courts" for decades. You don't go to court to get justice; you go to court to do business. And the policies are all stacked mightily against you. Appeals to the Constitution: not allowed. Appeals to reason: not allowed. Calling meaningful or effectively examining witnesses: not allowed. David Lane explained all this years ago.

Like I said in another thread, you have three options when dealing with the regime:

1) avoid it;
2) submit to it;
3) attack it.

1 is not always possible.

3 is a "play for keeps" enterprise. And I'm talking deadly force, not some faggy "redemption" or "free man on the land" shysterism.

Unfortunately, the Bundys, Finnicum, and their allies all made the mistake of thinking there was a fourth option, "use 'the law' to enforce one's 'rights'."

Sadly, "the law" is the barrel of a gun. Either wielded by them...or you. Meaning the illusory option 4 is actually option 3.

[crimethink]

I must also point out: where is Jeff Sessions or even Trump on this?

Sessions just reversed a bunch of Obama "civil rights" actions. Apparently he agrees with this persecution? "He's not aware" is not a tenable position.