![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)
Reply to Tumbleweed
"Just incase anybodys wonderin my ancestors were mostly Irish and I'm catholic"
Just remarking that the Catholic interpretation of Genesis 3:15 allows for several different interpretations but they all are the same basic idea and none of them even mention or give credence to the "Serpent Seed theology." Serpent Seed idea came about in the 800s A.D. It is Rabinical Kabalistic and Protestant Christian Identity movement.
In other words, I too was raised as a traditional Catholic on the cusp time of the Novus Ordo anti-Christ fake church and I do not agree with comedian Skip Wilson's theology...
"It wasn't the apple in the tree. I was the tomato on the ground."
______________
"https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/the-woman-the-seed-the-serpent
The Woman, the Seed, the Serpent
Jimmy Akin
April 20, 2016
Genesis 3:15 is one of the most famous passages in Scripture, since it offers the first, veiled prophecy of the coming of the Messiah. In broad outlines, Genesis 3:15 speaks of future conflict between a Woman, her Seed, and the Serpent that deceived man in the Garden. "
_________________
Serpent seed ShareThis
http://www.artandpopularculture.com/Serpent_seed
The Doctrine
The doctrine of the Serpent's Seed is followed by several minor Christian groups, the followers of Branhamism, Two-Seed-in-the-Spirit Predestinarian Baptists, and some of the Christian Identity Movement among others. There are variations and differences between these groups but the basic belief is that the Original Sin was an act of sexual intercourse between Adam and Eve and, prior to that act, Eve was sexually seduced by the serpent and committed sexual intercourse with the serpent; further, that Cain was conceived by the act with the serpent and Abel by the act with Adam.
"Serpent seed, dual seed or two-seedline is a controversial doctrine according to which the serpent in the Garden of Eden mated with Eve, and the offspring of their union was Cain. This belief is still held by some adherents of the Christian Identity theology, who claim that the Jews, as descendants of Cain, are also descended from the serpent. The idea has also existed in several other non-racial contexts, and major proponents include Daniel Parker (1781–1844), William M. Branham (1909–1965) and Arnold Murray (1929-).
The doctrine that Eve mated with the serpent, or with Satan, to produce Cain also appears in early Gnostic writings such as the Gospel of Philip (c. 350); however, this teaching was explicitly rejected as heresy by Irenaeus (c. 180) and later mainstream Christian theologians. A similar doctrine appeared in Jewish midrashic texts in the 9th century and in the Kabalah. It is considered a false doctrine by mainstream Protestant denominations. Catholic theologians point to the fact that the Bible states that the original sin is that of Adam and Eve eating a forbidden fruit. "
__________________
Here is the Catholic Encyclopedia meaning of Original Sin
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11312a.htm
Original sin may be taken to mean: (1) the sin that Adam committed; (2) a consequence of this first sin, the hereditary stain with which we are born on account of our origin or descent from Adam.
From the earliest times the latter sense of the word was more common, as may be seen by St. Augustine's statement: "the deliberate sin of the first man is the cause of original sin" (De nupt. et concup., II, xxvi, 43). It is the hereditary stain that is dealt with here. As to the sin of Adam we have not to examine the circumstances in which it was committed nor make the exegesis of the third chapter of Genesis.
Reply With Quote
.gif "wavy mouth")
This is another case of that, IMHO:
Originally Posted by PatColo
) angle into that already-too-wordy P*gate definition above; as many HOT victims either won't be minors, or won't suffer the SRA/rape/etc treatment above before they're murdered for their organs... and yet, many undoubtedly have/will suffer the full trifecta: the above P*Gate treatment, PLUS murder/cannibalism, PLUS their organs then being trafficked/sold for (((SOMEONE ELSE's))) economic gain. 
Those 'overlap' cases aside, prolly best to classify HOT differently; as it's principally economic-driven in motive, without (necessarily) having those core P*Gate motives of "elite levers of power/control (blackmail) and/or satisfaction of elites' satanic/luciferian 'spiritual' beliefs."
