Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher

[monty]

The three fundamental issues at stake in the Bundy trials

https://www.facebook.com/groups/2373...8090076982984/

https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...3a&oe=5A2F929C
Ronald Perry McKinley
There are three fundamental issues at stake in the Bundy and Hammond cases:

#1) Whether of not the people have the rights to own private property;

#2) Whether of not the people have the right to stand up in self defence against a tyrannical government whether it be a State or Federal government.

#3) Last but not least and perhaps the most important issue is whether our Constitution remains relevant, Is the Constitution still the fundamental primary laws of these United States of America? IS the federal Government still bound to the basic principals and fundamental premises of that Constitution?

Without that Constitution there can no longer be such a thing as The United States of America.
Like · 14 mins

[monty]

Persecutor tells jury militia is illegal in some States, Montana is one. Andrea Olson-Parker August 3 ~ J Grady



https://youtu.be/SSaVRTyPoz8

[monty]

John Lamb More information, Jail Visits and Court Updates Aug. 3 ~ Lo K



https://youtu.be/uEes6NR3b7c

[monty]

Brand Thornton shares his thoughts on yesterday's court proceedings 8/3 ~ Lo K



https://youtu.be/c39ag6qbBpE

[monty]

The nigger deputy who lied on the witness stand

https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...eb&oe=59FD3D00


Deb Jordan with Eric Ej Parker.

52 mins ·

IF A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS; The Las Vegas Metro Officer standing with his back to Eric Parker testified he was so afraid for his life that he cried --
He along with other Metro Police testified that the "ANGRY MILITANT MOB" were throwing things at them and calling them names --
Officer Jenkin's, who can also be spotted in this photo, testified all he saw "was a bunch of angry white guys pointing weapons at him all day" when he arrived on the scene.

Was Eric Parker trying to point out to Metro Police that snipers were positioned on the Mesa? --

Take a good look at this photo and see if you see the same thing the BLM, Metro Police, and Nevada State Highway Patrol testified to under oath --

https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...70&oe=5A2D2493


35 Likes25 Comments150 Shares

[Tumbleweed]

The nigger deputy who lied on the witness stand

Never trust a nigger and stay away from them like my grandmother used to tell me. Those cowboys and patriots need to learn that too.

[monty]

Judge Gloria Navarro is afraid of Harry Reid's wrath if she allows the truth

Is Judge Navarro Afraid of the Defendants?


THE DEFENDANTS ARE KEPT SHACKLED IN THE COURTROOM.

August 4, 2017 BLM, Constitution, Opinion

https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...Banner-JPG.jpg

https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...ic-678x381.jpg

Is Judge Navarro Afraid of the Defendants?

By Shari Dovale

Judge Gloria Navarro is presiding over the Bunkerville retrial in Las Vegas, Nevada. She has continued to show her bias against the defense in her rulings and her reactions in the courtroom.

She has insisted that they not look around, at all, while in the courtroom, even during breaks and sidebars. Navarro was so concerned, one day this week, that she had Eric Parker removed from the courtroom for an entire segment of the trial because he turned to look at the overheard viewscreen.

He did not talk to anyone. He did not look at another person, though Scott Drexlar was seated behind him. All he did was look at the overhead viewscreen that hangs behind the defense tables.

Navarro was so anxious that, though this time was not serious, it could become a serious issue if she did not react to this immediately. She now has someone watch Mr. Parker, and the other defendants, during sidebars to see if they violate her rules.

Additionally, she has insisted that the defendants be kept shackled in the courtroom. Yes, they are restrained while sitting in their chairs, in front of the jury.

Let’s not forget her clearly prejudicial rulings. She allows the prosecution to paint these men as terrorists, yet does not allow the documented bad behavior of the BLM to be presented to the jury. She almost encourages the FBI agents to cry on the witness stand, but refuses to let the defense talk about the assault on Margaret Houston, or the tazing of Ammon Bundy, or to use it as a reason for the defendants to travel to Nevada.

She denies the defendants their right to choose their defense, in essence, she is forcing them to testify, though it should be their right not to do so. Their attorney’s should be allowed to present the evidence of their innocence, yet Judge Navarro is too afraid of the truth.

And, she forbids the US Constitution from being used in this trial.

This behavior could show one of two things, in my opinion.

First, it could show a paranoid personality, to the point of a disorder. She seems, personally, very afraid of these men, though they are surrounded by US Marshals and other law enforcement. There are multiple security protocols in place, which are designed for minimal security breeches.

The second, more likely, reasoning is that she is going out of her way to portray these men as dangerous to the jury. This goes beyond bias. This actually elevates her reactions to being invested to a higher degree than that of the judiciary.

All persons accused of a crime are entitled to a fair and impartial trial. This is a basic premise of our judicial system. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco has ruled that defendants have a right to be free of shackles and handcuffs in the presence of jurors, in part to maintain the presumption of innocence and prevent bias.

Judge Gloria Navarro does not believe this should be applied to these defendants. She believes they are far too dangerous to be allowed even a small amount of movement in a room where they are surrounded by multiple law enforcement.

What is she reacting to? Why is she so invested in the verdicts of this particular case? It is not a respect for the law, as is evidenced by her disregard for the higher courts rulings. Fear of acquittal consumes her.

More truth being revealed is inevitable. Gloria Navarro will be held accountable. The only question will be “when?”

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• 102
  Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  102
• Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

[monty]

"Militia, Martyrs and McVeigh, Oh My" Shari Dovale. The persecution's newest lows.

Prosecution Links Defendants to Timothy McVeigh


EVERYTHING TODAY ADDS UP TO A MISTRIAL, BUT DON'T COUNT ON IT BEING GRANTED.

August 2, 2017 BLM, Featured, Nevada, Oath Keepers, Opinion 6

https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...Banner-JPG.jpg

https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u.../08/parker.jpg

Prosecution Links Bunkerville Defendants to Timothy McVeigh

By Shari Dovale

The Bunkerville Retrial in Las Vegas continued today with Judge Navarro’s bias being highlighted for the world to see.
The day was filled mostly with time outside of the jury presence, going over Facebook posts that were offered for evidence. Both sides had their say on why they did/did not want the evidence admitted.

Facebook evidence is highly controversial. There are too many variables within Facebook to guarantee that a post was made by a particular person. The prosecution wants to show that this attitude of “conspiracy’ continued long after the Standoff was over. They want the jury to believe that the dissidents were recruiting based on their belief that they had won against the government.

The prosecution, and Judge Navarro have taken it too far. Not only are the admitting posts made during the Standoff, but they are gathering posts made up to 2 years after. They are including information on protests in Oregon and Montana that took place months and years after the Bunkerville Standoff. These are unrelated to this case and should not have been allowed.

The defense presented very good reasoning, but the judge overruled the defense and the memes, posts and pictures were allowed. This included multiple repeated pictures, most notably of Eric Parker lying prone on the Northbound bridge on April 12, 2014.

Not only was every angle shown, but the same photos were allowed if they came from different sources. The photographer, someone’s Facebook page, someone else’s Facebook page, a news media outlet, etc. If they were able to download the same picture from a half-dozen sites, they wanted to show it a half-dozen times. This was allowed over the “cumulative” objections by the defense.

The prosecution also attempted to include all of the defendants booking photos. Each defendant had multiple photos, to include each tattoo, if any, and of course in their orange jail scrubs. The defense was successful in arguing these photos down to two photos. Eric Parker and Scott Drexlar each have tattoos depicting the Idaho III% group. The photos were cropped to show just these tattoos.

FBI Special Agent Sarah Draper was on the stand to authenticate and admit the evidence. A particular post from Eric Parker’s Facebook page was to be read by Draper. This was a fairly long post in which the prosecution redacted a couple of words. There had been a reference to the “Miller’s”, in which Parker praised the vetting process at the Sugar Pine Mine for not allowing anyone into the scene that were like the Miller’s. This was redacted.

https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...gh-221x300.jpg

What was not redacted was a reference to “McVeigh”. The defense team made every attempt to get that post from being admitted but Judge Gloria Navarro wanted it to be read to the jury.

However, when it came time for Draper to read the post, the prosecution did not stop there. Draper was asked to stop after reading the word ‘McVeigh’. She was asked who that was, and then asked to clarify who it was. It was done over more objections by the defense. Draper told the jury that Parker was referencing ‘Timothy McVeigh’ and that he was the ‘Oklahoma City Bomber’ and he blew up an office building inn Oklahoma City.

This was enough to connect the four defendants to McVeigh, when there was no mention of these details in the post. It was all conjecture on the part of the FBI agent and the prosecution.

After the jury was allowed to leave for the day, Todd Leventhal, attorney for Scott Drexlar, stood up to argue how prejudicial this testimony was. It was thought that Draper was to read the post, but not elaborate on it, nor put her own inference on it. Leventhal asked for a mistrial, or, if that was denied, a limiting instruction pertaining to the post.

Navarro denied the motions but said the defense could make them again after their cross examination of the witness tomorrow.
Navarro was forced to admit that the testimony was overly prejudicial, but she is allowing everyone the evening to get their arguments together for another look at it.

It almost sounds like she has been forced into a corner and is hoping the prosecution can provide her with a good enough legal argument that will keep her from having to react further to the defense’s motions.

https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...mp-150x150.jpg

Navarro will have even more misconduct to deal with in the morning. The FBI agents that have been watching the trial got out of hand during a sidebar this afternoon. They were so pleased with the prosecution that two of them did “fist pumps” towards each other in front of the jury.

This is wrong on so many levels. it will be interesting to see how small of a slap on the wrist Judge Navarro will give them.
Everything today adds up to a mistrial, but we are talking about Judge Gloria Navarro. Don’t plan for it.

Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• 926
  Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  926
• Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

[Dachsie]

Just because Navarro may be paranoid does not mean we the people are not out to get her.

[monty]

Just because Navarro may be paranoid does not mean we the people are not out to get her.

If Nevada's Congress critters were loyal to we the people they would have had impeachment proceedings months ago, but . . . . Crickets.