Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

[Neuro]

Yes, all of the courts are kangaroo courts which many have known for some time. Numerous people have gone to jail because of these courts. As you can see you can spend years researching and fighting but in the end they win because they own the judges and prosecutors. Its wrong, it sucks but short of a revolution there will be no remedy.

People make the mistake the justice system is about justice... It is about the system!

[Bigjon]

http://www.internallydisplacedpeople.org/joomla30/

* Are you one of the 300,000,000+ IDP's in America or the millions around the world? What are internally displaced people?




http://www.internallydisplacedpeople...9.24.26-AM.png

Note: This entire site is under construction. Refresh your browser often. Until this notice disappears documents are a continual work in progress. Please forgive errors while we work on the site.

Three hundred million plus Americans alive today, and generations of Americans preceding have unknowingly lived from cradle to grave under a Babylonian debt slavery system. Americans were betrayed and robbed of their private American national - private state national - non Incorporated birthright status and natural law form. The Corporate de facto UNITED STATES Couped mostly foreign agents banned from Government because of TONA (explained below) operate in office KNOWING that each American has been illegally made a debt SLAVE soon after birth through a deceit that involves the crimes of indentured servitude, personage and barratry. A Talmudic Babylonian debt slavery scheme where an individuals future labor over a lifetime is pledged to the foreign UNITED STATES Corporation which is a creation of the UNITED STATES shadow government of Rothschild Zionists, Talmudists and other Black Nobility Satanist crime cartels that couped the fifty Nation states and the Great Union in the 1860's. The coup was orchestrated at the misnamed civil war - a war in which NO WAR was ever declared - yet EMERGENCY WAR POWERS were declared illegally as explained herein. European so called High Contracting Powers couped the Great Republic and the fifty Natinoal states between 1812 and the 1970's with an all out push to take down America on 9/11 which is still on going and accelerating and now includes Weather Warfare technologies directed at the American people who have no idea that such TESLA Weapons exist.

America has been operated as a private little thief-dom to an expanding Family dynasty crime cartel ever since the 1860's as recent events in DC reveal as we watch untouchable families from the Dynasty prove that they are above the so called law. While the crime cartel uses Americans wealth, labor, ingenuity to wage war on the world, Americans - Not the ZIONIST - JESUITICAL criminals behind the illegal wars are legislatively placed on the hook to pay their WAR and GENOCIDE tab and pick up the blame for these crimes orchestrated in America's and Americans name!

While America builds up negative karma for these global atrocities, dumbed down Americans are recruited to staff the JESUIT FOREIGN private military called UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, UNITED STATES ARMY (CROWN CORPORATIONS registered in England as shown below) and they are the ones being illegally SENT OFF to genocide OTHER sovereign nations unlawfully set upon and mallgned by ZIONIST lies and propoganda told to young Americans that fall for the lies and disinformation re-inforced by Hollywood lies and disinformation. Propaganda manufactured by ZIONIST corporations which are part of the enter-trainment, edu-trainmen divisions of the JESUIT - ZIONIST controlled US Corps. Military Industrial Complex. Other investigators have identified this crime cartel and captioned them under one appropriate title, the Khazarian mafia.

This coup of the American Nation was enabled by a private foreign corporation called UNITED STATES that has been masquerading as the lawful we the people National government since 1868. It has been operating for foreign criminal interests EVER SINCE. Foreign trans-national parasitic family crime cartels have been waging war on humanity since before the time of the Roman cult. Since the overthrow of the great American Union by this crime cartel in the 1860's, Billions have been robbed of their life, liberty, property, estates, unalienable rights by a deeply evil parasite class that move among us - pretending to be our friends. The criminal parasites behind this coup self identified themselves and confessed to their plan in the Secret Treaty of Verona - yet none were arrested and their Institutions remain fully operational to this day and operating as a front for these criminals that plan the next phase of their global coup for their ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT.

The coup of the United States of America Organic National Government was enabled by foreign agents BANNED FROM TAKING OFFICE IN AMERICA at the time they enabled the overthrow of our legitimate government. This law remains in force today and is called the Titles of Nobility Act XIII and its existence proves UNITED STATES is NOT an American we the people government. BOUGHT and PAID FOR de facto congress in the 1860's - no different to what we find in DC today over-through The United States of America Union of Great Republics and in later years the Organic physical states.

Agents of the Crown, Holy See and the ROTHSCHILDS ZIONIST JESUIT foreign banking Interests aka the High Contracting powers (CROWN - VATICAN HOLY SEE) that self confessed to their plot to Overthrow America in the Secret Treaty of Verona of 1822 were exposed in the House by Senator Curtis in 1916 who validated the coup some fifty years after the fact. Despite this proof the Un-Holy Roman Cult and the associated Jesuitical Secret Societies couped our lawful governments and knowingly converted every American in to an Internally-Displaced-People, they continue to operate among us in the light of day - stealing for us - caging our people - stealing our children - even though their crimes have never been answered for!

The couped Corporate congress in the 1860's moved to UNLAWFULLY define Americans as UNITED STATES CITIZEN’s deliberately to enable their enslavement using legal sophistry. They deceptively changed the meaning of words to enslave Americans. Today this parasite criminal class operate ABOVE THE LAW of the land and enjoy every benefit of society as if they were Royalty even while they continue to perform acts of depravity that includes molesting children, sacrificing children, stealing children, caging people for no lawful crimes, peonage, bondage, indentured servitude, canibalism and every crime known to humanity including waging war on sovereign nations. They now have North Korea, Syria, Yemen, iran, Venezuela in their cross hairs each who at this time is without a Rothschild Bank and that like Libya, Iraq, Iran defied the Rothschilds and announced they will no longer sell Gold denominated in US Dollars.

The parasites among us manufactured the couped congress that sanctioned the developed of a Zionist Talmudic banking slavery system operating in America in violation of Organic constitution, the Titles of Nobility Act enacted in 1810 and that became law in 1819. Those violating the laws of this nation included Lincoln who HAD NO AUTHORITY to become President due to his TONA violation. Lincoln was illegally in office when he caused the Southern states to walk out of congress voiding the national government that no longer had a quorum to govern! The Union government operated without delegated authority and it later created the UNITED STATES Corporation to then RULE AMERICA through FIAT. All acts by this imposter national government SINCE are for these reasons in fact legally invalid because the people that enacted a litany of illegal laws were in office illegally due to TONA - i.e. NO DELEGATED WE THE PEOPLE AUTHORITY. This fact corresponds to EVERY ACT since to this present day. This UNITED STATES relies on the people believing its acts are laws when an investigation of this history immediately confronts one with the fact it is a Corporation of NO AUTHORITY!

Agents of this foreign imposter UNITED STATES Corp. e.1871 have been asset stripping America and the people since the 1860’s. Imposters running this CROWN Corporation deceitfully called UNITED STATES may have as well called the corporation Pinky and Perky Corporation for it would of had the same legitimacy to do what it has done since the 1860's - which is NONE. These same criminal cartel in 1933 STOLE all the Gold from the original Organic Government and the American people using color of office, color of law.

UNITED STATES used an unlawfully created National Emergency in 1933 that it created through FRAUD and made the American people debt slaves to the UNITED STATES DC Corporation ILLEGALLY created and illegally acting as a National Government, created in (e.1868-1871) and that did deliberately bankrupt itself in 1933 to enslave Americans in a pre-planned plot against the American people that it has since perpetuated across the planet, placing all nationals of a nation as property of a Corporation named after each company. This made shareholders of a nation as chattel of a nation! Sovereigns as as owners to debts slaves! The fact of the matter is that the American people or the physicals states were never a party to the Bankruptcy, yet they were UNLAWFULLY made legally liable for the so called National debt to this day since March 9th 1933. The American people are in fact the Priority creditors to this fraud as explained by annavonreitz.com.

Foreign CROWN - Un-Holy Roman cult agents - Jesuits have used America for its criminal activities and ran up debts for the foreign controlled DC UNITED STATES Corporation successors that have been funding the creation of a parallel ONE WORLD ORDER GOVERNMENT - SLAVE PLANET that is intended to be ran by satanic freaks. Those now OPENLY engaged in actively genociding the global population through Quiet War - silent Weapon techniques.

As of the time of this writing, it is well known that those behind this global coup are confirmed Satanists and have been running the DC UNITED STATES Corporation RICO (Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organization) unlawfully over the American people since 1933 and using every EVIL means to keep this FRAUD a secret from the American people. The controllers have relied Psychological warfare machine to operate as if it were a FREE PRESS.

There is considerable evidence that those foisting this fraud over America have relied on blackmail of so called officials, who appear to have been ensnared using evidence of officials caught participating in pedophile rings, child sacrifices and even canibalism. Those at the core of this fraud are the Black Nobility behind the un-Holy Roman Cult and its church have been engaging in these crimes for millennia. The Vatican proclamations called BULLS were written on the sacrificed Skin or children and heretics.
Those at the core of this cult believe that for them to bring forward their savior they must do the opposite of the commandments and practice ever ill known to man which is why they take the most innocent among us and sacrifice them, drink their blood and eat of them as was exposed in the Pizzagate expose that was quietly buried by the criminal powers that are in DC.

One third of the DC Cesspool behind this un-holy Roman cult has since been reported to be Satanists, pedophiles and MUCH WORSE as exposed in the Piza-gate investigation further exposed below. These parasites have funded global death and slavery through thieving life, liberty, property and children from Americans since the 1860's lives. They have deceived Americans in to giving their lives to fight endless unlawful ZJONIST Bankster wars for ZIONIST interests now known to be enabling the Greater Israel Project!
It is time for America to unlearn, to leave ZION and go back to the physical states and re-institute lawful we the people governance. UNITED STATES and all similar Rothschilds Country corporations created across the world are as you will see governments of no lawful authority! Turn off the TV - everything you are being fed is a lie! Unlearn, re-educate - go to the memu on the left and read through the documents there that validate this introduction.

http://www.internallydisplacedpeople...6.03.31-PM.png
and what is the true meaning of
"in this state", "in the state" ?

For the sake of you and yours, America, the world, all life on earth - turn off the TV, un-learn - re-educate and pass forward. Your life may depend on it!

Everything you have been told your entire life by government, media IS A LIE! We do mean everything!

~more at link~

[monty]

New post on supremecourtcase

http://s0.wp.com/i/emails/blavatar.png

http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2fcf362...=identicon&r=G Motion denied; summons enforced; audit conducted; motion for immunity; no response, then lies; busted by supremecourtcase Please note: For the sake of consistency, in this website, John Parks Trowbridge, Jr. is always the “Petitioner” (capital “P”), a practice first adopted when this webpage was opened after Petitioner’s filing of a petition in the Supreme Court in 2014. In the current IRS summons case, however, John Parks Trowbridge, Jr. is the “respondent” (lower-case “r”) and IRS is the “petitioner” (lower-case “p”). --- After the judge on September 13, 2017, enters his Order Order Compelling Compliance with Summons, Petitioner on September 25, 2017, files a Rule 60(b)(4) motion for relief from said Order as void for the issuer’s (the judge’s) lack of constitutional authority to discharge or perform the duties of a judge anywhere in the Union, in places like Harris County, Texas, for failure to take an oath or affirmation that conforms to the provisions of Article VI, Section 3 of the Constitution. Despite no lawful authority to continue the charade, the judge the next day, September 26, 2017, declares the usual false generalities in his denial of the Rule 60(b)(4) motion and subsequent Order compelling Petitioner’s appearance at the October 2, 2017, examination (the “Examination”). Petitioner appears as appointed at the Examination accompanied by a Certified Shorthand Reporter (C.S.R.) (who produces a transcript of the Examination) and submits to questioning. At the Examination, the United States Department of Justice attorney representing the IRS notifies Petitioner that if Petitioner does not cooperate and answer questions and produce documents that he will file a motion with the Court to have Petitioner held in contempt. Petitioner answers certain of the IRS’s questions, but declines to answer others or produce any documents. Knowing that the USDOJ attorney representing the (private-sector) IRS was not pleased with Petitioner’s aforementioned abstentions, Petitioner the following day, October 3, 2017, files in the Court Respondent’s Notice of Readiness to Comply with the Orders of the Court (Documents 11 and 13) and Request for Grant of Immunity against Potential Self-Incrimination (the “Notice and Request”). Local Rule 7.4 gives the USDOJ attorney 21 days to file a response in opposition to the Notice and Request, but he neither files a response in opposition nor a motion to have Petitioner held in contempt; instead: Silence What this means is that the USDOJ attorney did not know what to do. Why would the USDOJ attorney not know what to do? It is a simple motion to oppose the Notice and Request or for an order holding Petitioner in contempt. The reason Petitioner’s October 3, 2017, Notice and Request stultifies the USDOJ attorney is that the USDOJ attorney ultimately is not interested in answers to questions and production of documents which would allow the IRS to calculate Petitioner’s alleged tax liability (as falsely propounded by the USDOJ attorney at the Examination). The USDOJ attorney wants to set the stage so Petitioner can be charged with “willful failure to file” and tried, convicted, and imprisoned—and a response in opposition or a motion to have Petitioner held in contempt would throw a wrinkle in that process (the USDOJ attorney wants Petitioner to volunteer testimony and records without a grant of immunity). So, upon receipt of the October 3, 2017, Notice and Request the USDOJ attorney goes deer-in-the-headlights, freezes in his tracks, and misses the opportunity for a timely filing of a response in opposition. Evidently, the next move comes from above (as does the intent to bring criminal charges against Petitioner), because the USDOJ attorney evidently is not crafty enough to figure out how to orchestrate the witch hunt within 21 days of the filing of the Notice and Request. On the tenth day after lapse of the deadline, the USDOJ attorney files in the Court a motion to file, out of time, a response to Petitioner's Notice and Request. The reason, says the USDOJ attorney, as to why he failed to file a response within the 21 days, is that he was “confused” by the title of Petitioner’s Notice and Request: He thought it was only a “notice” and not a motion—even though a request and a motion are the same thing (a legal fact which is taught the first day of law school) and the clerk labeled the filing on the docket as a motion—and wants, therefore, to be granted relief, based on “excusable neglect,” to file, out-of-time (late), a response. A sworn declaration as to the veracity of such factual contentions is an essential element of such filing, but the USDOJ attorney omits to include such evidence (declaration) or even an explanation as to an alleged sequence of events that would support his factual contentions and, apparently, just wants the Court to take his (unsworn) word for it and rubber-stamp his motion. The language of the USDOJ attorney’s motion to file a response out-of-time is all “sweetness and light,” i.e., exudes utter innocence as to any wrongdoing and seemingly is written by a babe-in-the-woods attorney. Accompanying the USDOJ attorney’s out-of-time motion is the object thereof, his proposed response to Petitioner's Notice and Request, which is couched in terms, however, that are anything but innocent and evidently written by a seasoned government attorney, experienced in bringing down his prey. To the USDOJ attorney’s two aforementioned filings, Petitioner responds with an exposé of the USDOJ attorney’s guile: A Response to IRS's motion to be allowed to file, out of time, a response to the Notice and Request; and A Reply to IRS's proposed response to the Notice and Request. supremecourtcase | November 27, 2017 at 21:16 | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: https://wp.me/p6epB3-vq Comment See all comments

[monty]

Federal Court Constitutional Tyranny Exposed ~ Tom Lacovara Stewart RTR Truth Media

https://youtu.be/PBgWTrL2iHs

[monty]

Federal Court Constitutional Tyranny Exposed ~ Tom Lacovara Stewart RTR Truth Media

https://youtu.be/PBgWTrL2iHs

The Lighthouse Liberty Law Club video and comment regarding the Constitutional oath

https://youtu.be/FoZpPorxbwc

Gary Crawford
The information in this video is simply incomplete. There are, in fact, two different oaths taken by Federal judges. The creator of this video seems to be unaware of this fact and he completely omits any mention of the actual Constitutional Oath that federal judges take.

The first oath that federal judges take is known as the Constitutional Oath. Article VI of the constitution requires that all federal officials must take an oath in support of the Constitution. This is the text from Article VI of the constitution:

“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

Not that this article from the constitution does not specify the wording of the required oath. It leaves that for the Congress to determine. Until 1861 this oath was,

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States.” During the 1860s, however, the oath was altered several times until Congress eventually settled on the text we use today. It is set out at 5 U. S. C. § 3331 as follows:

“I, _______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

This oath is now taken by all federal employees (including federal judges), other than the President. This is the oath required by the constitution and a you can plainly see it requires the taker to swear to support and defend the constitution. This oath is NOT the oath changed by the act of Congress mentioned in the video and it has remained unchanged since the 1860s.

The second oath taken by federal judges is known as the Judicial Oath. It is NOT required by the constitution. Its origin is an act of Congress, the Judiciary Act of 1789, which requires the justices of the Supreme Court and the district judges, before they proceed to execute the duties of their respective offices, to take a second oath or affirmation. This is the oath to which this video refers. As the video correctly states, until 1990, the original text used for this oath was this:

“I, _______, do solemnly swear or affirm that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _______, according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
As correctly stated by the video, in the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990, Congress replaced the phrase “according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the Constitution" with the phrase "under the Constitution.”

With that change, the revised Judicial Oath (which you can find at 28 U. S. C. § 453), now reads as follows:

“I, _______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _______ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”

Somehow the creator of this video seems to think that this change to the second oath somehow “severs the connection between the federal judiciary and the constitution”. That is just plainly wrong. The second oath (the Judicial Oath), which is the one that was changed in 1990, is NOT required by the constitution. In fact, it isn’t even mentioned in the constitution. It was created entirely by an act of Congress (the Judiciary Act of 1789) and amended by another act of Congress (the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990). The Constitution Oath, which is the oath actually required by the constitution has remained unchanged since the 1860s, is still taken by all federal judges, and still requires that the oath taker

“will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” and “will bear true faith and allegiance to the same”.

This seems to completely undermine the basic premise of this video. Federal judges still take the same oath to support the constitution as they have been taking since the 1860s, and the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990 does not change that.

[COLOR=rgba(17, 17, 17, 0.6)]5 months ago4

[/COLOR]

[Bigjon]

The Lighthouse Liberty Law Club video and comment regarding the Constitutional oath

https://youtu.be/FoZpPorxbwc

Gary Crawford
The information in this video is simply incomplete. There are, in fact, two different oaths taken by Federal judges. The creator of this video seems to be unaware of this fact and he completely omits any mention of the actual Constitutional Oath that federal judges take.

The first oath that federal judges take is known as the Constitutional Oath. Article VI of the constitution requires that all federal officials must take an oath in support of the Constitution. This is the text from Article VI of the constitution:

“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

Not that this article from the constitution does not specify the wording of the required oath. It leaves that for the Congress to determine. Until 1861 this oath was,

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States.” During the 1860s, however, the oath was altered several times until Congress eventually settled on the text we use today. It is set out at 5 U. S. C. § 3331 as follows:

“I, _______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

This oath is now taken by all federal employees (including federal judges), other than the President. This is the oath required by the constitution and a you can plainly see it requires the taker to swear to support and defend the constitution. This oath is NOT the oath changed by the act of Congress mentioned in the video and it has remained unchanged since the 1860s.

The second oath taken by federal judges is known as the Judicial Oath. It is NOT required by the constitution. Its origin is an act of Congress, the Judiciary Act of 1789, which requires the justices of the Supreme Court and the district judges, before they proceed to execute the duties of their respective offices, to take a second oath or affirmation. This is the oath to which this video refers. As the video correctly states, until 1990, the original text used for this oath was this:

“I, _______, do solemnly swear or affirm that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _______, according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
As correctly stated by the video, in the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990, Congress replaced the phrase “according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the Constitution" with the phrase "under the Constitution.”

With that change, the revised Judicial Oath (which you can find at 28 U. S. C. § 453), now reads as follows:

“I, _______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _______ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”

Somehow the creator of this video seems to think that this change to the second oath somehow “severs the connection between the federal judiciary and the constitution”. That is just plainly wrong. The second oath (the Judicial Oath), which is the one that was changed in 1990, is NOT required by the constitution. In fact, it isn’t even mentioned in the constitution. It was created entirely by an act of Congress (the Judiciary Act of 1789) and amended by another act of Congress (the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990). The Constitution Oath, which is the oath actually required by the constitution has remained unchanged since the 1860s, is still taken by all federal judges, and still requires that the oath taker

“will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” and “will bear true faith and allegiance to the same”.

This seems to completely undermine the basic premise of this video. Federal judges still take the same oath to support the constitution as they have been taking since the 1860s, and the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990 does not change that.

[COLOR=rgba(17, 17, 17, 0.6)]5 months ago4

[/COLOR]

Question, what is a Constitution?
It is curious that The Constitution always refers to itself as "this" Constitution.

There can be many Constitutions. Which one is "the" Constitution?

When any officer swears an oath to the Constitution is a copy of that constitution included with the oath?

[monty]

Question, what is a Constitution?
It is curious that The Constitution always refers to itself as "this" Constitution.

There can be many Constitutions. Which one is "the" Constitution?

When any officer swears an oath to the Constitution is a copy of that constitution included with the oath?

Still, if the judges do take an oath to support and defend the Constitution, the Constitution does not grant them authority to take jurisdiction in a Union state.

[Bigjon]

Still, if the judges do take an oath to support and defend the Constitution, the Constitution does not grant them authority to take jurisdiction in a Union state.

My point is if the oath is not attached to a specific constitution, we can't know which constitution the oath pertains to.

The specific words in the Constitution of 1787 call for an oath to support this Constitution. Why do they not use those specific words? Why do they change the word "this" for the word "the"? It makes me suspect more of their usual chicanery.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

[Cebu_4_2]

My point is if the oath is not attached to a specific constitution, we can't know which constitution the oath pertains to.

The specific words in the Constitution of 1787 call for an oath to support this Constitution. Why do they not use those specific words? Why do they change the word "this" for the word "the"? It makes me suspect more of their usual chicanery.

In legalese I think you are dead on a non discussed subject. Very interesting observation BJ.

[monty]

New update from Dr. John Parks Trowbridge Jr.

New post on supremecourtcase

http://s0.wp.com/i/emails/blavatar.png

http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2fcf362...=identicon&r=G Judge okays lies, denies motion; Petitioner shows that IRS’s evil practice deprives it of the right to relief in a court of equity by supremecourtcase As expected, the judge on November 22, 2017, entered his Memorandum & Orderdenying Petitioner’s October 3, 2017, motion for a grant of immunity for testimony. Notwithstanding that the USDOJ attorney is the point man in this proceeding, as in virtually every other so-called “federal” (municipal) case, the judge is running the show and in this one intends to see that Petitioner ends up behind bars; the USDOJ attorney is just along for the ride to provide what the judge needs to accomplish his objective. When the USDOJ attorney failed to respond to Petitioner’s motion for a grant of immunity and give the judge the tool he needed to rule against and deny Petitioner’s motion for immunity, he threw a monkey wrench in the judge’s plans and—having demonstrated insufficient intellect to pull it off on his own—had to be bypassed and an alternative plan devised to reopen the matter, so the judge would have the justification he needed to deny Petitioner’s motion for immunity. The process was effectuated by the judge who, by way of proxy, caused the USDOJ attorney to sign and file certain documents which opened the door for the judge to get involved again—based on a point so lame it would not support the weight of a dust mote: that the USDOJ attorney was unaware that a request is a motion, even though the clerk knew it and docketed it as the same (Document 24) and evidently knows more about the law than the USDOJ attorney, and “motion” is defined as a request and taught as such on the first day of law school. The USDOJ attorney’s failure to respond to Petitioner’s motion for immunity is a major black mark on his record as a government lackey and he did exactly as he was told and filed the documents that were given to him; the judge thereafter, in his Memorandum & Order, denied Petitioner’s motion for immunity. Following the judge’s November 22, 2017, denial of Petitioner’s motion for grant of immunity, Petitioner on November 29, 2017, filed Petitioner’s amended motion demanding disclosure of the taxing statute that makes Petitioner liable to tax, or dismissal with prejudice of the case. Twenty-one days later, on December 20, 2017, the very last day in which to file a response to said motion, the USDOJ attorney filed his feeble Response in Opposition to the new demand (motion) for taxing statute (the USDOJ attorney is not doing so well since his flub). A week later, on December 28, 2017, Petitioner filed his Reply to Response in Opposition to Motion, easily crushing the two points raised by the USDOJ attorney in his Response in Opposition. More importantly, however, said Reply shows that no matter what statutes may authorize Internal Revenue Service to sue Petitioner, based on its own evil practice and wrongdoing in this case, it is disqualified from using the Court any further; specifically: It is deprived of any right to relief in a court of equity to which it previously may have been entitled—meaning the case is essentially done. Petitioner is unaware of any previous case where the Internal Revenue Service was barred from using the court as a consequence of its evil practice toward its target. This development does not fit into the judge’s plans. We shall see what he decides to do about it. supremecourtcase | January 7, 2018 at 13:41 | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: https://wp.me/p6epB3-vH Comment See all comments