Yes, we would all appreciate a little context and for the poster to say briefly why they thought it was worth posting and some brief comments.
I am the analytical type so I really need that. But this is needed even for people who just do not have time to go on wild goose chases to find articles or videos - then to be let down and find it was indeed, for some reason, a waste of time. These days we are being bombarded with data, information overload, and many do not even have time to read a short article or even watch a video.
PatColo,
That looked like a really interesting article you just posted...
JoozWeek story from 2/1, which Q linked to above... I hadn't seen!!
How ‘the Storm’ Became the Biggest Fake News Story of 2018
By Michael Edison Hayden On 2/1/18 at 12:40 PM
Analysis Info Wars QAnon TheStorm Conspiracy Fake News
________
but after I started reading it, I saw it was very long and knew I could not devote full time to reading and analyzing it.
If, PatColo, you had shared a little more about...
how you knew the article came from a Jooz site and Jooz author - would have appreciated that.
also
what is your opinion about the article, in brief general terms.
Is it you just put a big X on it because you consider the source? If so, please say that.
I was sucked in at first into reading the article because it seemed objective and it seemed to be Infowars bashing and I always like that, but then I saw that Jooz line at first by PatColo and realized PatColo was not posting this as something reasonable to be read and considered.
I will post my brief comments on the article pending PatColo's notes on that posting.
I always try to figure out what the same old tried and true Cass Sunstein misinfo, disinfo strategies are employed.

![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)



Reply With Quote