Page 6 of 121 FirstFirst ... 456781656106 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 1201

Thread: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

  1. #51
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    How many lures do you have in your tackle box and do you use worms, minnows or stink-bait? Do you fish for the sport or to survive?

    Stink-bait of course.
    This is a sporting event.
    Originally Posted by Bigjon
    Norwegian's like Jews, want to know just who we are dealing with. What strange foods does this guy eat? Ever eaten lutefisk?
    Well we know your not a scandinavian, because no scandinavian could pass up a lure like that. You live in Czech land, eat beef and are not retired.
    Farming is a part time job and with GMO there is no need to walk the beans anymore, so that's my best guess.

  2. #52
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,332
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,142 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    that's my best guess.
    Could you define the space within a cube in a spherical coordinate system?

  3. #53
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    Could you define the space within a cube in a spherical coordinate system?
    Short answer is no.

    I do have the book, somewhere. I believe I studied that in vector analysis about forty years ago.

    Is there a good reason why I would want to?

    Or is this a hint as to what it is that you do for a living?

    Do you teach it or use it?

  4. #54
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,332
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,142 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    Short answer is no.

    I do have the book, somewhere. I believe I studied that in vector analysis about forty years ago.
    Consider for a moment the space in a spherical coordinate system to be analogous to EQUITY.

    Consider also that the space in a cartesian coordinate system to be analogous to LAW.

    Now both systems can define the same space but it would be difficult to convert a shape such as a cube in the cartesian system into spherical coordinates. The same statement is true of a sphere easily defined in spherical space but not so easily defined in cartesian coordinates.

    You waltz into EQUITY court acting like a cube don't be surprised when they define you as a number of balls each with a radius of r fitted into the cube as r approaches zero. You might want to be treated like a cube but EQUITY is going to treat you as a ball because they have difficulty dealing with cubes.

  5. #55
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    Consider for a moment the space in a spherical coordinate system to be analogous to EQUITY.

    Consider also that the space in a cartesian coordinate system to be analogous to LAW.

    Now both systems can define the same space but it would be difficult to convert a shape such as a cube in the cartesian system into spherical coordinates. The same statement is true of a sphere easily defined in spherical space but not so easily defined in cartesian coordinates.

    You waltz into EQUITY court acting like a cube don't be surprised when they define you as a number of balls each with a radius of r fitted into the cube as r approaches zero. You might want to be treated like a cube but EQUITY is going to treat you as a ball because they have difficulty dealing with cubes.
    There you go, taking the sport out of it.

    And I thought this would be a fun topic:
    http://www.eas.uccs.edu/~mwickert/ec...es/N3110_3.pdf


    The logical answer is they are not our courts, as I'm not a corporation. Therefor stay out of them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l0BTV06s9A


  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Bigjon For This Useful Post:

    ziero0 (10th August 2018)

  7. #56
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz

    22 mins ·

    By Operation of Law

    I highly recommend that those who are just encountering this information read our book, "You Know Something Is Wrong When.....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause" as a starting place. It gives the overall basics in an easy-to-read illustrated format and provides very handy information in the Appendix. This book gives references and citations as it goes through its narrative. It is available on Amazon.com as are all the other books.


    If you are a more hard-charging "Just the Facts Ma'am" executive type, the same basic information is covered in a sound-bite format in our book "America: Some Assembly Required". If you need to get up to speed fast and can take in information in 30-second or less increments and build the picture as you go, this book will summarize the situation and the history for you in about an hour and a half. This book doesn't give a references and citations that have been provided elsewhere so includes only one or two new citations covering additional topics.


    Behind, before, and underlying these two books is the first book, "Disclosure 101", which is the history of how I got involved, how I addressed the problem, and ultimately where it all led. This book includes publication of basic documents I or others issued in pursuit of remedy and gives eleven pages of underlying citations and references.


    President Trump has, since the publication of these books, sicced teams of lawyers on the information and combed the National Archives. As a result, it has all been newly confirmed. At the highest levels of international government there has never been any disagreement about the facts, there has only been a divide between those who knew and those who didn't know. President Trump now knows and has the proof of the facts we have brought forward.


    Despite what is apparent in the external world, many people think that our country functions under one government. It doesn't and except for five years early on, it never has.


    Examine what happened between 1776 to 1781. During those years The United States of America
    [Unincorporated] was the sole face of our country to the external world. It was and is an unincorporated Federation of States, which are also unincorporated entities. The members of The United States of America Federation are known simply as: Wisconsin, Illinois, Massachusetts, Virginia, and so on.


    Five years after the States and the original Federation were formed, a
    Confederation of States of States was formed under The Articles of Confederation.


    The members of the Confederation were all doing-business-as entities belonging to the Federation States. These "States of States" did business as "The State of Florida", "The State of Wisconsin" and so on. They were all members of the "States of America" and were called "Confederate States" long before the Civil War.


    It was these original States of States that were party to The Constitution for the united States of America and they, together, were intended to exercise the nineteen Powers delegated to them by the sovereign States and The United States of America.


    And then came the Civil War. The Confederation of States of America was torn apart. After the mercenary conflict (never a true war) ended, the original States of States needed to be "Reconstructed" --- hence the "Reconstruction Era".


    Britain saw its chance to usurp --- again --- against our lawful government, and via fraudulent means substituted Territorial "States of States" to replace the actual Federal States of States, and used that as a means to commandeer our Federal Government and exercise our Delegated Powers for its own benefit. The Territorial "States of States" have operated under names styled like this: "the State of Vermont", "the State of Florida" and so on ever since.


    Millions of innocent Americans assumed that the "State of Florida" was the same as "The State of Florida" but in fact a terrible change had taken place.


    The actual Federal States of States were moth-balled and converted into State Land Trusts doing business as, for example, the Florida State, the Ohio States, and the Michigan State.


    And every year the renegade Territorial United States Congress votes to "set aside" the actual Constitution owed to our General Government and pretends that our Federal Government --- which never exercised anything but Delegated Powers in the first place --- is "in abeyance" and that their Territorial Government therefore takes its place.


    Nothing could be further from the truth.

    In fact, by Operation of Law, when an agent exercising delegated authority becomes incompetent to exercise that authority, it does not evaporate or bump down the railroad tracks to the next lower level of government. It reverts to the government that delegated the power in the first place ---- The United States of America and its member States.

    The problem is that we were never notified of all these changes purportedly being made "for" us and were in fact purposefully deceived by international Trustees acting in Gross Breach of Trust against us and against our interests.


    As a result, the "Reconstruction" of our Federal States of States has remained incomplete since 1868. We were purposefully misled into thinking that the Reconstruction was over and done, but in fact, nothing but a fraudulent substitution had taken place.


    In the last two years both the Territorial United States and the Municipal United States have been bankrupted and also become incompetent to function under their own power, albeit for different reasons.


    So all three levels of the Federal Government created to exercise the Delegated Powers and manage the Territorial Possessions and provide a government for Washington, DC, have been rendered incompetent.


    By Operation of Law, the Delegated Powers have reverted to The United States of America, it's member States, and their People. To us, in other words. We have stepped forward in a timely fashion and acknowledged and accepted the return of our Delegated Powers. We have arranged for President Trump to enter the legitimate though long-vacant Office of the President of The United States of America and extended a month-by-month service contract in support of the American military and basic services as outlined by our original Constitution.


    Everything else that you are seeing go on -- all the fire and nonsense of the political parties, all the investigations into this and that, all the fear-mongering and posturing and arguments ongoing in Washington, DC --- are the stuff that dreams and illusions are made of --- the corporate politics of legal fiction entities.


    And all of it is completely foreign to us. It has nothing whatsoever to do with our actual government. It's the Kitchen Staff amusing itself and beginning to sober up after a long debauch and improper occupation of the actual Landlord's estate.


    Our Government is not and has never been a "democracy". Our people don't "vote" --- they elect. We don't convene Congresses of "States of States". We convene Congresses of States. Likewise, our Congressional Delegates are "Deputies" of our State Legislatures --- that is, Fiduciary Officers owing their allegiance to us and our States, not "Representatives" owing allegiance to political parties and corporate bottom lines.


    It is this last point that deserves special Notice and mention. A Fiduciary Deputy
    working for our actual State of the Union is accountable for the way they spend your money and can be "recalled" by the State Legislature if they fail to meet the Prudent Man Standard.


    A mere "Representative" claiming to "represent" your State of the Union in an agency capacity has no such accountability or office, and as a result these Territorial Congressional Delegations have been spending like drunken sailors and racking up Odious Debt against you and your State --- and getting away with it for 150 years --- simply because you didn't wake up and object. Instead, you were misled and duped into participating in their fraud and thereby seeming to support their insubordination.


    And now we come to a New Day, not a New Deal.

    The Delegated Powers have returned to us and to our States by Operation of Law.

    You have been informed of the situation and are called upon to correct your political status records which have been conveniently falsified "for" you, and to return to reclaim your birthright and operate your actual State.


    The means to convey your Trade Name back to the land and soil of your birth state and to seize control of your affairs and to assert your "reversionary trust interest" has been provided for you. Go to Article 928 on my website: www.annavonreitz.com and record your claim to your Good Name and Estate.


    Recording your claim to your own Name and re-conveying it back to the land and soil jurisdiction of your state is Step One. Seizing control of all the Derivative NAMES and expatriating them back to the land and soil jurisdiction is Step Two.

    Denying all Powers of Attorney and assigning your Trade Name as the only Attorney in Fact is Step Three.

    Rebooting your lawful County Jural Assembly is Step Four. And Reconstituting your State Jural Assembly is Step Five.


    This is a lot to take in and a lot of work to do.


    But Americans have done more with less.


    All of you who have ancestors who were living in this country prior to the Civil War are automatically "grandfathered in" to the guarantees of the original Constitutions and the National Trust --- you merely have to accept and claim your birthright and heritage and record a "Claim for the Life - Lineage Treaty".


    We took the pre-caution of locating a cadre of men qualified to claim each and every State over two years ago, so that under the Last Man Standing Rule, we have effectively claimed back the entire country from the verge of loss to foreign bank creditors. That does not relieve anyone of their responsibility as Americans to assemble and operate their lawful government.


    That this situation even exists should be eloquent enough warning to all of you to

    (1) take action to preserve your own protections and exemptions and property rights and

    (2) pay attention and get involved in assembling your local county and state units of government.


    Those things operating "as" counties and "as" States of States aren't your government. You are your government.

    That is what "self-governance" means.
    So get your records straight and get busy, or a bunch of
    European sharpies will be more than willing to claim everything you think of as yours as payment for debts you don't owe.


    And now one final plug. The research that led to these conclusions and actions and which have served to protect you and your family and bring forward the actions that have been taken to preserve your country and your property rights and your State of the Union --- has all been done by people like me, working away for free for years at a time, not all those people on your payroll.


    We get nothing ---- no pay from the renegade "government" and in fact, many of us have suffered and died and been attacked by these criminals and prosecuted under deliberately constructed false legal presumptions.

    Many of us have spent time in jail --- not for our "political beliefs" --- but because we had the temerity to assert our birthright and claim our property and our exemptions.


    In doing this, we protected all of you and even protected those persecuting us, because without this, all our land, all our rights, all our freedoms would have been lost.


    The international bankers actually thought they were going to pull it off, and claim that our entire continent was "abandoned" assets, up for grabs.


    If you have any sense of just how close this entire country and the rest of the world has come to disaster --- get going. Reclaim your Good Name and your rightful political status and then, boot up your local assemblies.


    And if you can, send a donation our way. Because our accounts were commandeered along with everything else and bungled up and commingled as part of these infernal bankruptcies --- we still have no money to operate on.


    Everything is being boot-strapped. Everything is being done by volunteers. Our researchers and our lawyers are making huge sacrifices. The least we can do as a nation is to pay their out of pocket costs --- materials, court fees, postage, travel, electricity.


    Our PayPal is the same as my email address: avannavon@gmail.com. Snail mail for donations is: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652.



  8. #57
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,332
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,142 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    There you go, taking the sport out of
    The point of my example is you want to operate in LAW but EQUITY can only treat you as a sphere or as a cube approximated by a number of spheres. I am presuming here that a sphere in sphere space operates in a set of legal rules not entirely compatible with those a cube operates on in cube space. EQUITY will know you desire to be treated like a sphere because only spheres ever show up in their space.

    Now you take the remedy ole Jonah is suggesting in the BC. He seems to want to suggest that your best position is to admit (and surrender) to EQUITY by proclaiming yourself the executor of your estate because, well, you have been presumed dead over seas for all these years you have been sending payments into the government. You aren't proclaiming yourself a cube where EQUITY laws have no application. You proclaim yourself an OFFICER of EQUITY in a position of being a trustee of an estate. You are abandoning your cubeness in favor of a round solution.

    Just some thoughts. Used to be EQUITY was the position you wanted to be in when LAW was too harsh. Now you select EQUITY because they become too hard on you when you choose LAW.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to ziero0 For This Useful Post:

    Bigjon (10th August 2018)

  10. #58
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    I don't understand why you say 'be a trustee of the estate'?

    I was told trustee's always pay.
    And never be the trustee,always be the beneficiary or the administrator.
    Make the court be the trustee. Is that not right?

  11. #59
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,332
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,142 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    I don't understand why you say 'be a trustee of the estate'?

    I was told trustee's always pay.
    And never be the trustee,always be the beneficiary or the administrator.
    Make the court be the trustee. Is that not right?
    I once sent in paperwork to appoint the court trustee and the judicial actor made it clear I didn't have the authority.

    In regards to the estate established by the BC I would hold the administrator and trustee to be equivalent terms. But you could be right. Perhaps if the definitions of each were established?

  12. #60
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    I have no idea.
    I would have to read law books. Just no fun, I'd rather bs on the internet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •