Page 17 of 121 FirstFirst ... 715161718192767117 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 1201

Thread: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

  1. #161
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,457
    Thanks
    503
    Thanked 1,654 Times in 1,157 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    It's time to collect.
    For them, for all those Americans who were cheated and whose lives were truncated.
    Sounds good but if anyone was cheated then it is incumbent upon them to find their own relief. I suspect nobody has been cheated simply because they chose limited liability as their course rather than full responsibility.

    Is an action ever founded on the basis that that the one you are taking action for was stupid? Who appointed you as guardian in such a case?

  2. #162
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    Sounds good but if anyone was cheated then it is incumbent upon them to find their own relief. I suspect nobody has been cheated simply because they chose limited liability as their course rather than full responsibility.

    Is an action ever founded on the basis that that the one you are taking action for was stupid? Who appointed you as guardian in such a case?
    I would say those who set up the rules to begin The United States of America.

  3. #163
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,457
    Thanks
    503
    Thanked 1,654 Times in 1,157 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    I would say those who set up the rules to begin The United States of America.
    When it comes to the practice of shearing sheep I am as inclined to blame the sheep for growing wool as the guy who takes it upon himself to clip it. Without the concept of 'TRUTH' there can be concept of 'FALSE'. Without 'GOOD' there can be no 'EVIL'.

  4. #164
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    Sounds good but if anyone was cheated then it is incumbent upon them to find their own relief. I suspect nobody has been cheated simply because they chose limited liability as their course rather than full responsibility.

    Is an action ever founded on the basis that that the one you are taking action for was stupid? Who appointed you as guardian in such a case?
    I rather doubt the sheep knew there was a choice.

  5. #165
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,457
    Thanks
    503
    Thanked 1,654 Times in 1,157 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    I rather doubt the sheep knew there was a choice.
    Yes. That is why they are sheep and not wolves.

    Now if they had the ability to imagine themselves as wolves the story might be different.

  6. #166
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    17 hrs ·


    No Hate or Fear Mongering Here
    I don't hate monger or fear monger. I don't feel either one of those emotions and it is certainly not my intention to engender them.

    My point is to wake people up.

    They have fallen asleep on a railroad track, so the fear in the situation isn't caused by me grabbing them by the shoulder and saying. "Hey, Buddy, you gotta move!"

    The fear is caused by the approaching train and the whistle blowing in the background.


    Many people--millions of people worldwide-- are hearing what I am saying, but they are suffering cognitive dissonance.


    I am telling them that they have to reclaim their Good Name and estate and have to declare their political status on the public record to protect themselves and their assets--- and they say, "What? I am Jane Marie Parker, an American from Point Hope, Indiana. Isn't that self-evident"

    It should be, but it is not. Others have made sure to muddy the water, so that they can take advantage of you and steal from you, Jane Marie.
    They say you are a different Jane Marie Parker, one born in the British Territorial "State of Indiana".

    According to their Master File, you make your living peddling drugs. If that's not you, you have to get evidence of who you really are on the Public Record.


    And yes, you do need to wake up and do the paperwork and educate yourself and get off the railroad track. Or these criminals and liars and thieves will happily prosecute you as a criminal.


    Then stand there when they are caught and say, "Oops! I made a mistake!"


    See how they are working it? The pot always calls the kettle black. They are criminals so they accuse you of being a criminal. And they concoct evidence against you the better to grease their scam.


    I tell people, hey, you have to get busy and self-govern. You have to organize your own Jural Assemblies and operate your own separate land jurisdiction court system.


    They look at me and say, "I am already paying through the nose for those government services! Why should I have to volunteer and organize Jural Assemblies and volunteer to serve and provide another whole court system on top of what we've already got? We have too many lawyers and statutes already!"


    Understandably, they are incredulous and not happy, but-- hear that train whistle? It is getting closer.


    All those courts you are paying for aren't your courts. They are the King's courts.


    And that "United States" they are talking about? That's not your "United States" either.


    What? What! What

    It's all hidden in plain view. I have explained it until I am blue. The Brits acted in Breach of Trust, commandeered the so-called federal government under conditions of fraud and deceit 150 years ago, and have been bilking and abusing Americans ever since.

    And now they say that you abandoned your estate and that it is fair game for their creditors to come collect against you and your assets.

    After all, you just voluntarily donated all your assets, even your name to QE II, didn't you?
    Well, if not, it's time to speak up.

    Entire Counties in this country are tagged for sale as "real estate". You know what "real estate" is? It's "royal estate"--property belonging to the British King.


    And you? You are all deemed to be sharecroppers, mere feudal tenants living on the King's land, ready to be evicted under Color of Law when his creditors show up on your doorsteps.


    There's a train coming and you are still standing there in the middle of the tracks, disoriented, wondering what to do.


    Our legal team is running full out, doing all that they can do to protect everyone. But you do have to wake up. Because you are still standing on the railroad tracks.


    You have to get your own paperwork on the record as evidence countering their false claims and presumptions.


    You have to organize your own lawful land jurisdiction courts so that you have the means to arrest and try these criminals.


    Some of our guys jumped the train and pulled the brake switch. Hear all that screeching? That's the sound of the guilty banks howling.

    The Big Sting isn't going as planned.

    But there are still millions of people in harm's way. And these venal foreign courts are still operating on our shores.


    And you are still on the tracks being "mistaken" for a British Territorial Citizen, an "inhabitant", a "dependent", a "resident", a "person", a "volunteer"--- anything and everything but a living breathing American, one of the free, sovereign and independent people owed every square centimeter of this country.


    That's the one thing you are not being labeled as: an American.

    So you have to label yourself, Jane Marie. Like this:
    Say it loud and strong: "Exempt. Unincorporated. American."
    Not real estate. Land. My land and soil. Not the Queen's. Not the Pope's. Not anything subject to the Territorial United States or the District of Columbia or any corporation anywhere.

    I am a private "person" and this is "private property" and I will ream anyone who says anything otherwise. And no, it is not mortgaged. I am very much alive.


    Did you all hear that loud and clear? Alive. Not decedent. Not incompetent. Here in the flesh.


    This is an American State not a British "Commonwealth".

    If I wanted to be a Communist, I'd move to China, thank you.

    And I am not a resident. Not an inhabitant. I am Native to this country and my State of the Union. I am not a Territorial or Municipal Citizen.


    I am not registered to vote. I am a Sovereign body politic elector.


    I am not a volunteer in the British Merchant Marine Service, not a voluntary "Taxpayer", not a Withholding Agent, either.

    I enrolled in Social Security by mistake, based on false information given to me by undeclared foreign agents.

    I am retired from any and all federal service whatsoever. I waive all benefits.


    I simply require the return of everything that was purloined from me under conditions of fraud and deceit.


    My Indemnity Bond is posted and my Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act Notice is recorded.


    I own my own name and all variations of it.


    And if any Prosecutor wants to address me, he'd better address my Proper Name and he had better have evidence of authority to address me and he had better have his bonds in place because I am going to take him to task.

    And whip his butt bloody from here to Texas.

    Yours truly,

    Jane Marie Parker, born July 11, 1975, Point Hope, Indiana, United States of America (Unincorporated)


  7. #167
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    16 hrs ·

    Get It Together, People
    I can't believe some of the nonsense I am hearing. Cart in front of the horse doesn't begin to describe it.

    For beginners, people living as British Territorial "inhabitants" have no standing, right, or power to organize anything pretending to represent this country.


    We are here, present, acting for ourselves now.


    No "representatives" needed, thanks.


    This is the reason why you all have to make your declarations of political status and move your Good Name back onto the land jurisdiction of this country officially BEFORE you can set up and operate a lawful Jural Assembly.


    British Territorial "inhabitants" function as "persons" and when they set up a court they act as a "Jural Society". Okay? Two different groups, two different political statuses, two different jurisdictions.


    They occupy a part of the sea jurisdiction and the rest of us, the "people" as opposed to the "persons" occupy the land.


    Without land, you don't have a country.


    Without a country, you have nothing to stand upon, therefore, you have "no standing".


    Without land, you are just a "legal fiction entity"--- a "person", a business, a THING -- with no port to call home, no Public Law, and no way to operate effectively in your own best interest.


    There is no such thing as "Nation States" as in "Nation States Assembly" or "Congress" or anything of the sort. Never mentioned in any historical documents, no history, no standing to act for any State of the Union. Just something someone heard and misunderstood and then bulled ahead without thinking and tried to apply.


    I cannot stress enough that there is a logic to everything.
    There is a history to everything. And until you have it straight, you can't build a solid foundation to act upon.


    International law is thousands of years old. It has its own conventions. It has definitions. A "nation" is not a "state, through several "nations" can occupy a "state" and we sometimes talk for convenience sake about nation-states, there is no such thing as a Nation State in international law and it is completely silly to think that you are going to found some new "Republic" on verbiage you pulled out of a hat and made up that has no history, no provenance, and no authority as a result.


    In international law, it's first in time, first in line. The government of this country in international jurisdiction has been established for over 200 years and has never changed, never been affected by all the frou-frou-rah and changes and disasters of the so-called "Federal Government" which is a subservient government under contract to provide nineteen services as a subcontractor.


    The "Federal Government" as is well-known operates under "Delegated Powers" --- well, folks, who or what do you think "delegated" those powers? And obviously, if there are "delegated powers", that implies that there are "non-delegated powers", too?


    The entity that delegated those powers was The United States of America [Unincorporated] and when the subcontractors go tits up, as they just did, and we step forward to receive back our Delegated Powers as we just did--- guess what? By Operation of Law, the Delegated Powers return to us, not some new version of federal contractor that wants to get a new contract by assumption.


    There is no way that some Johnny-come-lately cobbled together effort made by British Territorial Citizens dba "Republic" can "stand for" this country any longer. That part of our history and that kind of usurpation is over.


    The actual living people who are not "persons" and not "citizens" of the watery realm have shown up and taken back their "delegated powers" and are here to conduct their own business.


    We are not confused and we are not deceived. We don't mistake any foreign wannabe subcontractors for our own land jurisdiction government and we won't accept any more British or French cuckoo bird operations usurping against our actual government and pretending to "represent" us.


    We woke up. All the way up. And now, Federales, you need to negotiate a new contract --- not try to bluff your way into usurping against our lawful government again.


    The United States of America is the sovereign government of this country in international jurisdiction and it always has been and God-willing, it always will be. We operate as States populated by people, not as "States of States" inhabited by persons.


    Furthermore, we are the ones who hold and are owed the credit side of the ledger --- the National Credit our country is owed. The "Federal" entities only have access to the debt side of the ledger and responsibility for paying the National debt.


    So if you want to get through this and have jobs and be free of the debt, wake up!


    We are your employers.


    We have the money and credit to pay for your services and discharge your debts. All you can do is go ever more deeply into debt and keep on bankrupting yourselves in the vain hope of bankrupting your way to prosperity.


    So thanks, but no thanks, Nathan. We figured out the schtick. Another version of the same old crap won't do.



  8. #168
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions


  9. #169
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    Yes. That is why they are sheep and not wolves.

    Now if they had the ability to imagine themselves as wolves the story might be different.
    Since you admit that the sheep were never given a choice, how can you claim they chose wrong?

    I would say this is more illustrative of the malfeasance of the lieyers who knew the choices, but failed in their duty to educate and offer a choice.

  10. #170
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    5 hrs ·

    The Paperwork Debate
    Incredibly, despite the actual experience of literally millions of Americans, there are still millions more who need to get the message.

    These quasi-governments operating on our shores to provide "government services" are not Common Law entities so trying to do anything in Common Law has no effect. None. Writs bounce off. Rights are ignored.


    You have all been kidnapped and shanghaied into a foreign jurisdiction with the result that none of these idealistic ideas about "Common Law" and individual rights or Constitutional guarantees apply.


    Imagine being kidnapped and finding yourself aboard a Chinese fishing trawler where everyone speaks nothing but Chinese?


    That's where we all start out-- in a completely foreign place operating under foreign commercial law and being forced to deal with foreign language.


    The situation is only made worse because the foreign language is superficially similar to English and until we learn "Legalese" we are constantly at a disadvantage, because certain words no longer mean what we think they mean.


    Who knew, for example, that the word "person" means "corporation"? So your "personal bank account" means "corporate bank account"?


    Or that a "not guilty" plea means "guilty" by default? You need to enter a plea of "Innocent" if that's what you mean, but nobody on the opposing team of privateers is going to tell you that.


    People who cannot or will not deal with the reality of this situation just get slaughtered by it. They are defenseless and unable to respond and have no evidence on the public record to back up their claims to be treated any differently or under any other law but commercial law.


    This is all dictated by the registration of your name and the issuance of a Birth Certificate.


    Unless you take steps as outlined to reclaim your own name and establish your permanent domicile on the land and soil of your birth state, you are at the mercy of these fiends and have no recourse.


    And no right to participate in the land jurisdiction government, either.


    After all, what right does a Chinese fisherman have to serve on an American Jury?


    People have got to wake up, face facts, and deal with them. All this airy-fairy 'what I was taught in grade school' and the 'Bible is my defense' stuff does not work against these animals in suits.


    They will be quick to prosecute anyone mis-identified as "one of theirs"--- look at what happened to Schaefer Cox and the Colorado Nine?


    Even after you do the paperwork, you have to learn how to use it and bring it into evidence and shove it down their throats. These people make their livings off of preying upon defenseless Americans and they don't go down easily. The only thing they are really afraid of is exposure.


    They are afraid of having a lot of people know what they are doing and how they are doing it and that is about the only thing they are afraid of.


    Which means that all Americans need to wise up. All Americans need to record their actual political status and domicile. All Americans need to push back and getting their own paperwork in order is Job One to be able to do that.


    So enough of the "debate" over whether or not you "have to" correct the public record and declare your political status as an American. If you have been issued a British Territorial Birth Certificate there is absolutely no doubt that yes, you do need to record your actual political status on the public record.


    Besides, unless you are a Brit trying to infiltrate and otherwise mess up the American Jural Assembly process, why would you have any objection to declaring your political status and nationality as an American?


    Why, in God's name, would any American prefer to have the same political status as a Puerto Rican? Especially now that Puerto Rico is bankrupt and at the mercy of Secondary Creditors of the Queen?


    Wake up and listen to what I am telling you all--- and get moving. Get your paperwork on the public record so that you have evidence of your claim and stop milling like cattle in a feed lot.


    You already know for sure what happens to cattle in a feed lot and I should not have to say one more word.


    The paperwork is necessary and the paperwork is only "First Base". Once that is done you have a lot more work to do to educate yourselves and get in position to blow these British Privateers out of the water.


    It may well be a daunting task, but it is still a task that has to be done. So buck up and do it. Those of you who have talent for pushing paper, help the others. There is safety in numbers, so the more people you can get on the public record as Americans, the more on your side of the fence.


    And the fewer "British inhabitants" there are. Kill them off the same way they have offered to kill you ---- on paper


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •