Jews, the children of Satan

[Bigjon]

Download the entire book in .pdf format here: The Controversy of Zion

Your only source for this amazing "fact" is Reed's book? It was well known that degenerates and faggots and genetic retards were also locked up. We should be doing that today!

His stories were printed in The Times of London.

It's well known (now) that the press was owned by the Jews.

That's how Jews talk about their fellow German's. And anybody else they disagree with.

Douglas Reed


Douglas Launcelot Reed (11 March 1895 - 26 August 1976) was a British journalist, playwright, novelist and author of a number of books on politics. His book Insanity Fair (1938) was influential in analyzing the state of Europe and the rise of Adolf Hitler before the Second World War. By the time of his death, Reed had fallen victim to an organized campaign of character assassination reserved for those critical of Jewish supremacism; his best known work on the Jewish Question is The Controversy of Zion.
At the age of 13, Reed began working as an office boy, and at 19 a bank clerk. At the outbreak of the First World War he enlisted in the British Army. He transferred to the Royal Flying Corps, gaining a single kill in aerial combat and severely burning his face in a flying accident. (Insanity Fair, 1938) Around 1921 he began working as a telephonist and clerk for The Times. At the age of 30, he became a sub-editor. In 1927 he became assistant correspondent in Berlin, later transferring to Vienna as chief central European correspondent. He went on to report from a variety of major European cities including Warsaw, Moscow, Prague, Athens, Sofia, Bucharest and Budapest.
According to Reed, he resigned from his job by expostulant letter in protest at the appeasement of Hitler after the Munich Agreement of 1938 and the following outbreak of the Second World War, Reed retired to Durban, South Africa. In his Insanity Fair, Reed recounted that he was informed that he had to leave Germany quickly, and there was concern as to his whereabouts in diplomatic circles.
Richard Thurlow confirms that Reed was one of the first scholarly writers to state that Hitler did not persecute the Jews as per post-war propaganda.
In the 1960's Reed was outspoken in his opposition to the decolonization of Africa, considering the Black Africans to be unable to govern themselves and needing prolonged colonial tutelage. In his The Battle for Rhodesia (1966) Reed explicitly compared decolonization to the above-mentioned appeasement of Hitler and outspokenly supported Ian Smith's unilateral declaration of independence, arguing that Smith's Rhodesia had to be defended as "the last bulwark against the Third World War", like Czechoslovakia had to be defended in 1938.

Books By:

• Insanity Fair (1938)
• Disgrace Abounding (1939)
• Fire and Bomb: A Comparison between the Burning of the Reichstag and the Bomb Explosion at Munich (1940)
• Nemesis: The Otto Strasser Story and the Black Front (1940)
• A Prophet at Home (1941)
• All Our Tomorrows (1942)
• Lest We Regret (1943)
• From Smoke to Smother: A Sequel to Insanity Fair (1948)
• Somewhere South of Suez: A Further Survey of the Grand Design of the Twentieth Century(1949)
• Rule of Three (1950)
• Far and Wide (1951)
• The Prisoner of Ottawa: Otto Strasser (1953)
• The Controversy of Zion (Written 1956)
• The Battle for Rhodesia (1966)
• The Siege of Southern Africa (1974)
• Behind the Scene (1975)
• The Grand Design of the 20^th Century (1977)

[Bigjon]

Chap 36


When I resigned in 1938 I had a second reason, not present in 1933, for perplexity about the way the press is conducted.

In that matter, too, I could only assume that some infatuation worked to distort the truthful picture of events. The outcome of the ensuing war, however, showed that a powerful motive had lain behind this particular misrepresentation.

In the case of "the Jewish persecution" in Germany I found that impartial presentation of the facts gradually gave way to so partisan a depictment that the truth was lost. This transformation was effected in three subtle stages.

First the persecution of "political opponents and Jews" was reported; then this was imperceptibly amended to "Jews and political opponents"; and at the end the press in general spoke only of "the persecution of Jews".

By this means a false image was projected on to the public mind and the plight of the overwhelming majority of the victims, by this fixing of the spotlight on one group, was lost to sight. The result showed in 1945, when, on the one hand, the persecution of Jews was made the subject of a formal indictment at Nuremberg, and on the other hand half of Europe and all the people in it were abandoned to the selfsame persecution, in which the Jews had shared in their small proportion to populations everywhere.

At that period I, typical of Englishmen of my generation, had never thought of Jews as different from myself, nor could I have said what might make a Jew, in his opinion, different from me.

[Bigjon]

EPILOGUE

If this book has any sombre look, that is the native hue of the story it tells, not the reflection of my own cast of mind. I have written with feeling: the feeling of a contemporary, participant, eye-witness and of a journalist thwarted in his calling, which in my belief should serve truth without fear or favour, not special interests. I have seen more of the events of our century and of the secret perversions of national purposes than most, and have discovered through this experience that it was not all chance, but design. Therefore I have written a protest, but it is a protest against the suppression of truth, not against life.

It is a contemporary's tale of history in the making. After my time will come the historians, who from the fragments they disinter will assemble the story in all its elements. As well might one judge the impulses of a man from his skeleton. However, they may perceive things now hidden from me, and, above all, they will find that it was all necessary to the state of affairs in which they find themselves (and that, in the case of historians, is usually a comfortable one). Between the two depictments, somewhere, lies the whole truth; my part of it is the living protest of the living participant.

~more~

[Tumbleweed]

Well I listened as far as Hitler was a great man, because he stood up against the Jews.

That was Hitler's role in the Jewish 3 act play. Hitler came, made war, and killed millions of white Christians and subjugated Germany for all time up to now.

Have you read Benton L. Bradberrys "Myth of German Villainy" Bigjohn? Looks pretty well researched and documented to me and Hitler was the good guy. There are other books as well that shine a light on what the allies did during and after the war that identify them as the bad guys.

You can read "The Myth of German Villainy" online for free.


http://911tv.org/Library/LB-0003%20B...20villainy.pdf

[Jewboo]

What world famous men have said about the Jews...

A reminder that Tumbleweed started this great thread.

[Bigjon]

Have you read Benton L. Bradberrys "Myth of German Villainy" Bigjohn? Looks pretty well researched and documented to me and Hitler was the good guy. There are other books as well that shine a light on what the allies did during and after the war that sure identify them as the bad guys.

You can read "The Myth of German Villainy" online for free.


http://911tv.org/Library/LB-0003%20B...20villainy.pdf

I don't have many issues with the German people.

The fact as reported by Reed shows Hitler locked up his fellow German's. How long would it take American's to sig heil if Bernie started locking up all conservatives?

The German people were brought to heel by Hitler's SS Secret Police.
I would venture that German's of that day were in the same spot we find ourselves in today. The Jews own everything.
Voting is rigged by the Jews.

Hitler was a soldier in Munich at the time when the communist's controlled Munich. All those soldier's wore a red armband and were communists.
Reed interviewed camp prisoners and they said that the SS turned over control to avowed communist's who were mostly Jews. These Jewish prisoners ran the camps.

The National Socialist's are the same as the communists they are both about an elite oligarchy running a collective society.

The political map runs from anarchy to communism with socialism in the next to last place.

[woodman]

Have you read Benton L. Bradberrys "Myth of German Villainy" Bigjohn? Looks pretty well researched and documented to me and Hitler was the good guy. There are other books as well that shine a light on what the allies did during and after the war that sure identify them as the bad guys.

You can read "The Myth of German Villainy" online for free.


http://911tv.org/Library/LB-0003%20B...20villainy.pdf

The 'Allies' were definitely the bad guys. Reed's book points this out. He clearly shows the Zionist hand that ruled the war machine. The German people and all humanity were the losers of that conflict.

[Jewboo]

The 'Allies' were definitely the bad guys. Reed's book points this out. He clearly shows the Zionist hand that ruled the war machine. The German people and all humanity were the losers of that conflict.

Oh. Hitler isn't to blame after all. We finally agree.

[hoarder]

In the days before the internet, books and articles about Khazar transgressions were of paramount value, especially to those who were just beginning to learn about Jews. But we have to remember this about books and articles:

If Book or Monty or Woodman or hoarder or anyone else writes a book or an article about the chosen little darlings, it has no more and no less credibility than it would if the same person spoke those words verbally or posted them in a thread. The value in books and articles like the ones posted in this thread is when the authors convey what they themselves actually experienced or heard spoken by key individuals at the time, and even then the author is and should be subject to scrutiny for bias or ulterior motives. But remember much of what is written is heresay and we know Jews do most of the saying for both sides of any conflict.

Let us not assume that authors are gods, as we are all subject to deceit when researching the tribe of liars. "Well the author was an expert and he studied the topic".....but what makes him an expert? A degree from a university that doesn't disclose banking systems? What did he study? Lies? Jewsmedia articles?
Learning about this topic is not a simple matter of determining what the facts are, as they have too often been provided by individuals or organizations who are/were not who they pretended to be. Learning is about getting a general idea of what is probable.

This matter of probability needs to be tempered with a good understanding of strategy, modus operadi and modus agendi. We have to keep weighing the "cui bono" of every event, and do so from every angle.

[Tumbleweed]

A look inside the Notre Dame Cathedral in 2016 of the work of the the true descendants of the Israelites, the real chosen ones of god, a look at the beautiful work of white, Adamic christians of the past.