Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
9 hrs ·

Translation Key for Everyone

The United States is the Proper Name of our Union of republican states.
Capital T on The.

But "the" United States is the Municipal United States, an independent international city state, a franchise of the Holy Roman Empire on our shores. This entity is a plenary oligarchy run by the crooked members of Congress.

The United States of America is the Proper Name of our Federation of States. It is an unincorporated business organization of which our States are members.
Notice again--Capital T on The.

But "the" United States of America is the name of a British Territorial Government that is responsible for the mutual defense of our States.

Remember these distinctions so that when you are reading news and other documents you can recognize which entity is actually being referenced---and be less confused.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
9 hrs ·

Impersonation - The Cause of World War I

Obviously, someone with a Given Name like "Anna Maria Wilhelmina Hanna Sophia Riezinger - von Reitzenstein von Lettow-Vorbeck" is not (and is not claiming to be) Jane Smith.

My ancestry is what it is, and for the most part, I am proud of it. The story of our family weaves back and forth across the Atlantic for centuries. I can easily prove ancestors in America prior to the Revolution.
Also, obviously, I grew up in America and love this country and consider myself an American.

So did George Washington, who was a cousin of King George.

Just because we have familial relationships that span oceans and continents does not mean that we are disloyal to the land that bears us, nor does having "royal" or "noble" blood suggest that we are part of the problem.

Not all of the Royals failed humanity. Not all of them sold their souls for the Rothschild's profits.

Not all of them were deceived by the fornication of the Church. Notably, the Prussians and the Russians, stood firm.

It may have escaped everyone's notice, but Kaiser Wilhelm II was a Protestant King and Czar Nicholas was Russian Orthodox.

They opposed the British return to Babylon and Queen Victoria's "adultery of Mankind" -- the enfranchisement (meaning incorporation) of living men so as to render them mere "things" and also opposed the "securitization" of living flesh-- on religious grounds.

There are many scriptural references in primarily the Old Testament, but also in the New Testament, warning us against the use of "persons", telling us that God does not "respect" them, condemning "personhood" and in James 2:9 flatly telling us that we cannot be part of these practices without sin:

"But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors."

Please note that to this day, when pirates come ashore they are said to be "trespassing" upon us, but when the opposite happens, and landsmen invade the ships dry docked in port or at sea, it is called "transgression".

As a result of this scriptural indictment and those numerous examples in the Old Testament, truly Christian Kings could not support any British scheme to profit from impersonating living people and were and are still obligated to protect against it.

For all those who felt (as I did) that the assassination of one Archduke was a petty provocation to start World War I, or that even jealousy over the Kaiser's navy was insufficient to explain what happened --- look again.

Queen Victoria succumbed to the lure of the profit to be made from impersonating living men in the 1860's--- and profit she did. She used the credit gained from enslaving the English population by "enfranchising" them to enslave the Indian Subcontinent.

Encouraged by this, Queen Victoria and her Ministers and her Successors rapidly expanded this practice of impersonating living men as corporate franchises and "securitizing" their assets as chattel backing the Royal Credit throughout the Commonwealth and imposed --- totally illegally and immorally --- the same scheme in America.

Her chief opponents in this rampant criminality serving to enslave and profit from her own subjects in a devious and diabolical way, were the German Kaiser and the Russian Czar, both of whom raised religious and moral objections.

That is what led to World War I: the stubborn refusal of the Germans and the Russians to take part in the identity theft-impersonation and credit fraud scam promoted by the British and the Holy Roman Empire, on moral and scriptural grounds.

Put bluntly, the Roman Catholic Church did "fornicate" with the bankers and the renegade royals by getting involved in the whole business of defining and managing and promoting corporations -- that is, "persons" and then allowing these practices to be grossly abused to seize the assets of living men and women for use as chattel property, thereby enslaving the population of the entire Earth.

The Roman Catholic Church, or to be more specific, its "Secular Office" running the Holy Roman Empire side of things, is revealed to be The Great Whore, and cannot be anything else: they have promoted and facilitated and failed to object to this entire abuse --- and the Biblical injunctions and the Treaties and the high-sounding United Nations Declarations have been standing against them the whole time.

It is as wrong now and as forbidden in scripture now as it was in the 1840's when all of this began to gain traction.

And all of the Sons of Abraham of all three major western religions -- Judaism, Islam, and Christianity -- are obligated to stand against it.

My relatives, the Archdukes of Mecklenburg-von Strelitz and the House of Romanov, did stand against it.

Not all the Royals failed, but just like the startling news that you are not all "United States Citizens" nor "Citizens of the United States" --- comes the equally startling news that America backed the wrong horse in 1917. We should have come in and finished the job that the Kaiser and Czar Nicholas started.

Had the Czar lived, we could have been living in a much different and better world. Instead, we all had to suffer through World War II and the Communist Era and now this.

We could have saved ourselves and everyone else the trouble of World War II and the entire Mess that the world is in right now, simply by cleaning out the Church and exposing the villains and the "Holy Roman Empire" for what it is.

So here we have a phony Queen, who in proven fact abdicated her Throne within three days of taking her Coronation Vow, and a British Parliament without the guts to enforce the actual law they are always enshrining and prattling about.

And who are they all appealing to for protection? Donald J. Trump.

And who is Donald J. Trump? He is President of the United States.

And what is the United States with a small "t" on the "the"?

The Municipal United States Government--- the independent international City State of Washington DC's government, the franchise of the Holy Roman Empire, the one that is supposed to limit its activities to the ten miles square of the District of Columbia, just like the Vatican Government is supposed to limit its activities to the one square mile of Vatican City. LOL.

And who are they blaming for this debacle? The Lord Mayor of London.

Bar Members worldwide, did you hear that? You and the bankers are being fingered for all this rot.

Claiming that you were just "following orders" per the Nuremburg Defense is not likely to work, so you had all better take counsel and correct your operations to bring them into accord with the actual Public Law.

It's time for the rest of us, the Silent Majority, to take our Silent Notice of the situation. That, and alert Donald Trump and the Joint Chiefs of Staff and NATO, so that they are all fully informed and aware that their actions are being scrutinized to within a gnat's eye-lash.

The Roman Curia is on the Hot Seat before God and all Mankind, to repent and take corrective action.
The British Parliament, which is secondarily responsible for this Mess, is also called to account.

Both are desperately seeking some way out, because they know that they are condemned under the Law of God and the Law of Man; both are resisting the only Law that will allow them to live --- The Law of the Kingdom of Heaven, which has come at last.

"So oftentimes it happens, that we live our lives in chains, and never even know we have the key....." --- The Eagles, "Already Gone".

Special Call Out to my German Readers: my German language skills are pretty rudimentary. Would some of you undertake the challenge to translate the German Declaration of War in World War I into English for us?

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
9 hrs ·

Scriptural Defense Against Impersonation

Yesterday, I unleashed quite a discussion about the causes of World War I and also discussion about the scriptural reasons why no truly Christian Monarch can go along with the British-Holy Roman Empire practice of enfranchising people and securitizing their living flesh and other assets as chattel property backing the debts of the British Crown and/or the Municipal Government run by Rome.

Begin with Ezra 7:23-26. Here you find the actual definition of "minister" and the prohibition of mixed marriage of flesh with incorporated things.

This has happened before in the history of Mankind and resulted in the "adultery" of our identity as men and women, a condition known as the Great Abomination in scripture, and as the "Collective Entity Doctrine" in the current species of law being practiced in our courts.

The Collective Entity Doctrine makes bold to claim that there is no difference between the identity of a living man and the identity of a corporate thing and that we are responsible for the debts of corporations merely made up out of thin air and named after us ---- all without our knowledge or consent.

Deuteronomy 1:17,10:17 stands against such impersonation.....
2nd Samuel 14:14 stands against such impersonation.....
Matthew 22:16 stands against such impersonation....
Acts 10:34 stands against such impersonation....
Romans 2:11 stands against such impersonation.....
James 2:9 stands against it and leaves no doubt that impersonation is a sin.

Impersonation is also a crime under the national law of every country we have researched. Nobody allows it, not even as a private contract.
Peonage, whether voluntary or involuntary, has been internationally outlawed since 1926.

So, how is it that any Christian Monarch, any Jewish Rabbi, any Muslim Mullah is tolerating this gross lawlessness?

And what possible excuse does Elizabeth II or Pope Francis, either one, have for this situation?

It is possible that in the endless quest to profit themselves, these institutions and offices have been utterly overcome with greed and corruption. It is possible that these evils have crept in upon us so gradually and behind so many closed doors that even those practicing these evils --- the governments and purveyors of the "law"---- are truthfully unaware of them.

Yet we, the living people of each country thus affected, suffer the consequences of being enslaved and held responsible for phantoms, legal fictions and their odious debts, that we did not knowingly create or allow to function in this manner at all.

By no means on Heaven or Earth is the "securitization" of living flesh allowed, yet we have Cede and Company and the American Corporations Company spawning the DTTC on our shores and the DTTC issuing bonds against us and our "value" as if we were widgets on the factory shelf, and in Canada, we have self-interested cretins sponsoring legislation like the Canadian Ownership Control and Determination Act.

And it is all against the Biblical Law, the Public Law, the Treaties governing interactions between governments, and all the tripe offered by the United Nations. It is literally a matter not of what they say, but what they do.

While spouting all the platitudes about justice and freedom, they are running a de facto slave market in the back room, selling child labor contracts under The Miller Act, and running a lively business in the trading of souls based on Baptismal Certificates, which like Birth Certificates, are records of ownership interest.

Go to your incorporated Church and ask for your Baptismal Certificate. They will tell you that they don't have it and don't keep such records, which so far as it goes, is true. They ship them off for profit, and plump their bank accounts, based on the false claim that you agreed to entrust them with your soul---donated it as chattel backing their organization.

This pretense of "gifting" these organizations with our substance, even our souls, is repeated throughout this disgusting scam. When held to account, the perpetrators tell you that the STRAWMEN attached to you like parasites are "gifts". When you look up the IRS Codes, you find that all your "voluntary" donations to the IRS are listed as "gift estate taxes". They claim that you "gifted" your Earthly estate to them, or that your Mother gifted it to them.

Where is all this bushwah coming from?

The Secular Administration of the Roman Catholic Church, aka, the Holy Roman Empire, aka the Municipal Government of the United States, run by utterly corrupt and corrupting members of Congress--- mostly Democrats --- and ultimately, by the Pope and the Roman Curia.

When you press the perpetrators of this to the wall, they will point to the Inaugural Address of Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1933, and they will try to convince you that his remarks created a valid contract with the American People, and that he merely took our voluntarily offered gifts for his "holy cause" and that the occupation of our country by Municipal Government Corporations was fully disclosed and allowed

--- but it wasn't.

Not at all. We, the American States and People, weren't even under any obligation to reply to FDR's "offer". Here's why:

(1) FDR was consistently speaking of "a Nation" and "this Nation" throughout his Inaugural Speech, but each State is a nation, and at that time, the Territorial Government had "States of States" so the only entity operating that could speak of itself as "a Nation" was the Vatican's Municipal Government: FDR's Nation---the independent, international City-State of Washington, DC, and its Municipal Citizenry was being addressed throughout his Inaugural Address---- not us, not ours.

(2) He makes reference to "pledging" which is a feudal act, again, totally foreign to us or anything to do with the American States or People.

(3) He refers to a "trust reposed" in him--- but by whom? Let's step back a moment and look at what he was doing in the Inaugural Address: he was accepting the Office of President of the United States, that is, President of the Municipal Government being run as a commercial corporation, so it only makes logical sense that he was talking to the Citizens of the United States. Again, more proof that he was not addressing the general public, not talking to the American States or the American People.

(4) We could not possibly be part of FDR's "consecrated Nation" and "Enemy Aliens" at the same time.

(5) We, Americans, our States of the Union, were provably, demonstrably, definitely, not operating in Commerce at that time; our commercial "Vessels" were all moth-balled and had been moth-balled since 1868. Therefore, any supposition that we, Americans, were even possibly under the Law Merchant--- which is the only venue of the law that allows implied unilateral contracts--- can't be supported.

Neither, for that matter, can we be held to account under any interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Clause since 1868.

The King and the Pope came in here as our "Trustees" in 1868 and moth-balled our Federal States of States "for" us pending "reconstruction" and then just forgot to tell us all the details, just like they forgot to tell us how we could obtain the Mutual Offset Credit Exchanges and Exemptions we are owed under their 1933 scheme.

Having removed our commercial "vehicles" from service, they willfully substituted their own, and they are 100% responsible for all of them and for all the misery and rot they have caused from 1868 onward.

And as for FDR, as we have seen, the only "citizenry" addressed in his 1933 Inaugural Address, were the Citizens of the United States. We had no reason to reply to his offer and no obligation to do so, either.

What has gone on here is naked extortion, racketeering under color of law, and utter lawlessness in contravention of the scripture and the Public Law.

No Christian Monarch, no Jewish leader, no Muslim leader, can suffer this with a straight face, and as for the Pope(s) and the Queen --- they need to be: (1) providing modern access to our National Credit and all our Exemptions; and (2) returning our land jurisdiction assets to our lawful administration without further obstruction or excuse.

The United States of America --- the actual Federation of States --- is alive and well and operating and we do not appreciate the continued false pretenses being offered against our lawful claim to the land and soil of our own country. We have renewed and in the public addressed our claim to all right, title, and interest associated with our States and People since September 9, 1776 and those claims, liens, and notices are cured upon the public international record since 2011.

See the final re-conveyance of authority from the Receiver, The United States, to the Agent, The United States of America, and all the associated liens and notices issued upon the Recording District 311, 2019-008503-0 and UCC Central Unit 500.

Those who have entertained the Great Abomination need to be held to account by the world community and suitable correction is required, returning to the American States and People the National Credit, the exemptions, and the Mutual Offset Credit Exchanges that are owed to them, and also returning all right, title, and interest in our land assets, including our Good Names, unharmed, unencumbered, and free of debt.

All pretense of "war" including mercenary war needs to be dropped and the property seized upon by the Office of the Custodian of Alien Property (now the US Attorney General) needs to be returned to the States and to the People of this country without further adieu.

The IRS has also been allowed to run rampant under the false pretenses described above regarding FDR's Administration and any commercial quid pro quos resulting from it.

Millions of innocent Americans who never owed a dime of "Federal Income Tax" and who were not in receipt of any Federal Income have been the victims of organized theft and racketeering at the hands of both the IRS and the Internal Revenue Service. They have been harassed under false pretenses and entrapped via undisclosed contracts and denied relief including exemptions and Mutual Offset Credit Exchanges they are owed.

This ruthless abuse and mistreatment of Allies and Friends deserves nothing but universal condemnation and disgust. It is owed nothing but prompt correction and return of our stolen property. .

This entire System is in fact and in truth a part of the Great Abomination, forbidden by scripture, and leading inexorably toward the extinction of any principal of religion, any ethical consideration, any concept of justice or order.

That it should even be necessary in modern times to come forward and do battle with this ancient adversary, is some measure of the ignorance and depravity that consumes our society and infects world leaders.

Men are not corporations; corporations are not men. The Collective Entity Doctrine is bunk. The courts need to be reformed. The premises upon which they operate need to be promptly, permanently, and with prejudice---corrected.

Fictio cedit veritati;fictio juris non est, ubi veritas.
Translated --- Fiction yields to truth; where truth is, fiction of law does not exist.
And we are now speaking the truth.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
11 hrs ·

A Spiritual War

It has been said many times, many ways, and it is clearly stated in the Bible. We do not struggle against flesh, but against the Spirit of Evil; all that the Spirit of Evil makes incarnate is like itself: deceptive, illusory, unreal, and yet having a form.

Consider that the Holy Spirit brings forth its children and its fruits in the same way, except that what it makes incarnate is like itself: honest, true, imbued with endless power derived from our Creator.

The Spirit of Evil thrives on secrecy, deceit, and distortion.

The Holy Spirit thrives on transparency, truth, and clarity.

It is really as simple as that, and the only thing holding Mankind back, is fear.

It takes courage to embrace the Holy Spirit and more courage to live our lives without fear, but it can be done.

Fear and lies are the greatest weapons of our opponents--- fear which keeps us from acting upon our convictions and lies that keep us from knowing the truth and acting appropriately, so that our efforts are wasted.

Those who would keep us enslaved seek to keep us confused and misinformed, wish us to cling to our own chains and believe in secrets and in money. If you are ready to move on, then come along.
Admit that time does not exist. There is only now.
Admit that money does not exist. It is only a symbol of value.
Admit that secrets don't exist. Everything is known.
Admit and know that the Holy Spirit within you is unimaginably powerful, that love is the true currency of the Universe, and that your strength lies far beyond your physical body in the realm of the spirit and the mind.

If you will overcome the Spirit of Evil, you must overcome both delusion and fear.

You have heard it said that in these days we will contest with Evil in High Places, and you have known that the Evil One would be released for a short time before the end of this world as we have known it. Do not despair and do not be troubled; all these things that are happening must happen; rather, put on the full armor of God and His Peace which passes all understanding.

Redouble your efforts to dissolve the Great Seals and gently release the pent up energies of the Earth. Feel them beginning to flow as they should. Release all your bad memories and traumas and grudges and losses and heartaches. Let them go.

Over the past six months I have been dredging up a lot of "gunk" --- hurts, disappointments, losses --- examining them like objects, like bad teeth that have been extracted, no longer able to cause any pain--- objects that I am looking at before throwing them away.

They were part of my life once, but they are baggage now --- baggage that I am not taking with me into tomorrow or next week or next year. These painful things, these injuries, are like they happened to someone else.

I step back from them. I see them for what they are, and I let them go. Old knee injury? Gone. Supremely embarrassing moments? Gone. Lost loves? Gone. Vain regrets? Gone. Consuming anger? Gone. Might-have-beens? Gone.

And with each thing you toss away, your soul becomes lighter and stronger.

We are like fractured crystals --- all this pain, all these injuries --- have served their purpose: to break us, so that we can capture and disperse more light, but having served their purpose, they can go now.

This week let the pain go. Release it into the void somewhere beyond yesterday. Go with me to my Happy Place, if you don't have a Happy Place of your own.

My Happy Place is a meadow with a cool, clean, fast-flowing shallow stream flowing through it. There is soft grass and small prairie flowers in the meadow itself, birds in the trees along the banks, and the sand and small gravel of the stream bed is soft and clean underfoot..... I just wade out in the middle of the stream and let the water carry away all my sadness, all my weariness, all my pain. I watch the tiny fish darting here and there. I see the dragonflies hovering above the yellow pond lilies growing in a small pool just downstream. It's early afternoon in Midsummer and the hot sun is nicely balanced by a cool wind and the cool water.

It's just a little old farm place in the Midwest. Nothing grand, no palaces, no buildings at all, but I am perfectly at peace there, and eternally renewed.

Take some time to go to your Happy Place this week. Seek the lightening of your load and the renewal of your spirit. Remember what matters and let all the rest of it go.

In this way, and by making this your practice, you will be constantly restored and renewed, set free of past suffering, ready and able to accept new blessings and new opportunities without being burdened or afraid.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
10 hrs ·

Dog Report and La-La-Land Again

In all my life I can only remember one rainy birthday. The first week of June is usually like the weather of charmed Camelot, with wild roses in bloom, strawberries ripening in the sun, and blue skies. It was certainly that way on my birthday this year and again, today.

One of my college chums sent me a gorgeous bouquet of roses and Gerbera Daisies and stocks. I charmed the guests with my pound cake and fresh strawberries and fresh raspberries (your choice) and whipped cream in lieu of a traditional birthday cake.

I have my own world and time, when everything is perfect and the music is gentle and the wine is smooth and everyone smiles because the purity of the day is so undeniable and sweet.

It's a great time of year to have a birthday--- after school is out, before the weather gets too hot.

The only sad note to a June 6 birthday is remembering D-Day; because of that long shadow, it is a memorial day of its own. There's a quiet to it, an echo of cemeteries instead of brass bands. A time of remembrance, I used to say,

and not just of a year gone by, or the passing of my time. I stood in the doorway as the wind was rising and listened to Pavarotti.

Evening came and storm clouds gathered in the East, soon there was lightening and thunder and pouring rain, and I went to sleep, snug and warm in my bed, listening to the rain on the roof, smelling the fresh cool wind, feeling blessed.

My dog, who has survived so much, is recovering nicely from surgery and our primary concern remains keeping him quiet long enough to actually heal. His nature as a Labrador Retriever is so exuberant --- his tail wags SO hard --- it's difficult to keep him calm enough, even with the sedatives the vet provides. If he makes it through the next two weeks, we can start to breathe easier ourselves and count the operation a success. By all means, keep the prayers and good thoughts coming.

With love and blessings and lots of rest the next two weeks, he can hope for a few years more of bumping along at my side, and snoozing with his nose on my foot as I sit at my desk --- his proven method of knowing whenever I go anywhere or do anything, the signal for him to get up and follow me wherever I might go. This morning, only two days out of surgery, he was ready to hop in my old Suburban, otherwise known as The Dog Car, and go snoop around at the world.
Tonight, I pour a little oil of lavender and oil of marjoram into my palms and rub it on the fur of his golden ruff, and sense how the smell relaxes him and bids him to rest and to sleep, rest and sleep. That is about all he can do or should do for the next two weeks.
Also tonight, I was amused to read a long and rambling expose by Sun-Tzu, who still imagines himself to be Jesus and who just discovered the infamous Act of 1871.

How many generations of American Patriots will it take to realize that the Act of 1871 was repealed in 1874? How often must we learn how it was passed piecemeal and how the rats finally achieved their aims in 1878? And then, too, how long before the worthwhile message of his meanderings comes through?

Yes, they incorporated everything, including the Church. They reduced life to business franchises, dead things without souls, without mercy: eating machines locked into a single inflexible purpose: profit, profit, profit, profit at any cost, profit by any means, including war.

So now they have their profit, but not their souls, their corruption but not their names.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
10 hrs ·

The Act of 1871 -- A Correct Analysis by Team Law

With all the hub-bub about The Act of 1871 circulating in the patriot community, I felt it was time to re-publish (for about the tenth time) the actual breakdown of what happened to The Act of 1871 after its initial repeal in 1874 ----- and to publish again the correct analysis of it all by Team Law, which was finished some years ago:

1871 - Act of 1871 ---“An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 62, 16 Stat. 419, February 21, 1871 ---which was repealed in 1874 and then passed piecemeal via these actions---- “An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)).

When looking at the intent of all this, given that the actual District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, the aim of the Act of 1871 is, it appears, merely to set up “U.S. Corp”---

“That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the “District of Columbia”, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation.” – Act of 1871 verbiage---

So the Act of 1871 was to create a private corporation owned by the actual government of the District of Columbia--- the infamous District of Columbia Municipal Corporation:

“Further, the only government created in that Act was the same form of private government any private corporation has within the operation of its own corporate construct....... U.S. Corp is not merely an incorporated municipality (District of Columbia); rather, it is a private corporation (District of Columbia Municipal Corporation) that was lawfully created by our original jurisdiction government.” ----
Team Law analysis.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·

States vs. States of States

Why, you might ask yourselves, was it necessary for the fledgling government of this country to create multiple organizations of states?

We have the Union, The United States, formed of republican states occupying the national soil jurisdiction of this country.

We have the Federation, The United States of America, formed of Sovereign States occupying the international jurisdiction of the land and sea.

We have a Confederation of States of States, the States of America, formed of commercial corporations, occupying the global jurisdiction of the air.

If you look at this list you will see the answer. Each of these different organizations--- The United States, The United States of America, and the States of America---- all serve in different capacities and occupy different jurisdictions.

Their member "states" are different in nature, too. The national-level republican states and the international States of the Union are defined by physical borders, but the global States of States represented by the States of America Confederation are commercial corporations.

So as you can see, each one of these organizations operate in profoundly different capacities and in different jurisdictions. A state is not the same as a State, and a State is not a State of State [Confederate State].

We rarely have a reason to differentiate between our states and our States, because soil and land jurisdictions work so closely together that the evidence of one is evidence of the other. General Session Laws of the State are supposed to reflect the will of the republican state and people, whereas State of State Statutes are supposed to "codify" and regulate the operations of the Territorial Government and their corporate personnel on our shores.

An important distinction needs to be made here and underlined in Day-Glo Orange Highlighter.
A State is corporate in that it is partially fictional by virtue of having a name --- say, Wisconsin---- but it is a free-standing entity that is physically defined, much as a man named Thomas Tinker is a free-standing entity that is physically defined. Neither Wisconsin nor Thomas Tinker is incorporated as part of some greater entity.

In keeping with the Law of Kinds, a State like Wisconsin, is operated by People, like Thomas Tinker.

A State of State, like the State of Wisconsin, may be incorporated (chartered) by the greater, free-standing entity --- the State, which is what our original plan was when the Confederation of States was formed.

Or, a State of State could also be chartered by a foreign government --- and merely set in place as a "service provider" which is in fact what has gone on here since the Civil War, when the British Government secretively came in here and arbitrarily put a Scottish corporation in charge of our State of State administration "for" us.

States are sovereign entities; States of States, by definition, are not.

Under the constitutional agreements, our States agreed not to operate directly as States of States, which is also part of the reason that we can be absolutely sure that none of our actual States were involved in the Civil War, which was a commercial mercenary fight among commercial corporations--- States of States, which are also called "Confederate States" even though they are not actually States at all.

Since World War II we have further compounded the confusion between States and States of States by allowing the deployment of Municipal STATES OF STATES on our shores. These incorporated franchises are totally foreign and are chartered by foreign governments in the business of providing essential government services.

That is, the STATE OF WASHINGTON is not chartered by nor operating under the auspices of Washington, the State. It is a franchise of the foreign Municipal United States Government and its infamous District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, dba, the UNITED STATES.

So, we have our native States which are corporate, but not incorporated, which are sovereign free-standing entities with physically-defined borders, and then, we have a plethora of foreign "service organizations" operating as Territorial States of States and Municipal STATES OF STATES, none of which are actually chartered by our States.

This is not the way our government is supposed to be organized or operated.

What should happen in a sane world is that the State, such as Georgia, charters a State of State and incorporates it to conduct business for Georgia.

The original States of State were put out of commission by the Civil War and never "reconstructed" which has led to this situation wherein foreign Territorial and Municipal franchise organizations have been here on our soil conducting business "for" us and recklessly spending our money and credit as if we ever authorized them to do this.

To solve this conundrum requires us to organize our actual States of the Union and to act in our capacity as the People of this country, and to finish the so-called "Reconstruction" that has been pending since the end of the Civil War.

Put simply, the People of Georgia need to re-charter The State of Georgia to conduct business for them.

We have been hampered from doing this necessary work by the foreign-chartered government services organizations on our shores arbitrarily conferring citizenship obligations upon us. The British Territorial States of States claim that we are United States Citizens.
The Municipal STATES OF STATES claim that we are Citizens of the United States.

It is up to us to thumb our noses at these patently false presumptions and tell our subcontractors and their employees that no, in fact, we are State Citizens and nothing else: Virginians, Californians, Minnesotans and so on, for each of the fifty States of the Union.

It is also up to us to act in our own best interests and explicitly return to the land and soil jurisdiction of our States which is our natural home --- and deny them any excuse for their insupportable presumptions.

[ziero0]

It is also up to us to act in our own best interests and explicitly return to the land and soil jurisdiction of our States which is our natural home --- and deny them any excuse for their insupportable presumptions.

The nature of all governments is: Charitable Trust. Only Charitable Trusts exist for more than 99 years.

Governments exist in TRUST SPACE. They act as all trusts do. They hold and manage property of the estates of their beneficiaries. They hold these properties as either USES or USUFRUCTS. If you don't know what these words mean then you would do well to do some research into the concepts and specifically how long government has made use of them.

I'll give you an example. Written in the Spanish Civil Laws (las sietes partidas) still in effect in Louisiana (which it seems extends even north of the Canadian border):

How long a usufruct endures which is granted to a city or town, without mention of any specific time. When the usufrcut of a building, or an estate, or other thing belonging to another person, is granted to a city, or town, the usufruct will endure a hundred years, and no more, if not specific time had been stipulated in the grant; after which it will revert to the owner of the estate, or his heirs. And the reason is, that a usufruct granted expressly to the commons of any place is extinguished by the death of all its inhabitants; for the ancient sages have conceived that after the lapse of a hundred years, all those would be dead who were born at the time the usufruct were granted. And we also say that the usufruct would expire, if the town or place in favor of which it was granted, should be destroyed so that the ground be cultivated on which it stood or the place become a desert. Yet if all, or a part of the inhabitants of such place, afterwards establish themselves in another place they will preserve the usufruct nothwithstanding they had abandoned the soild of the town where they dwelt at the time they acquired the usufruct.

Kindly read that code carefully. If you happen to be an heir to anything that was donated 100 years ago you have a right to demand its' return without waste (in the same condition it was granted). Take your parents or grandparents birth certificates. Was this a usufruct granted to government? Has 100 years expired? How much and what property was transferred to the municipality that issued the certificate? What was that wealth used to create? Was waste involved in the usufruct? Has this estate been squandered by government or has it been held honestly in TRUST?

You might want to review the actions that necessitated the dropping of the Articles of Confederation to T(t)he United States Constitution with these concepts in mind. The NW Territorial Ordinance was created first under the Articles and then soon after under T(t)he Constitution. There is a problem with territories. These must be attached to a municipality and there was no municipality created under the Articles. T(t)he Constitution cured this defect by creating Washington City in the district. This is the entity that attaches all estates to fund their ongoing bankruptcy.

The Matrix is a TRUST.

[Bigjon]

I don't think the Article's were dropped, as The Constitution called for a president of the United States and a president of the United States of America.

I think they were combined.

[ziero0]

I don't think the Article's were dropped...I think they were combined.

I don't discard used toilet paper. Instead I combine it with other used toilet paper.

The U.S. constitution was combined in a similar manner to the 14th amendment. History suggests that when you are insufficiently able to decipher a legal document you place it at the bottom of the heap and make the heap higher.