Coronavirus

[Dachsie]

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/Rbtrop3rRlZl/

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/Rbtrop3rRlZl/

First published at 01:07 UTC on December 18th, 2020.
51:16 video runtime




channel image

Jim Fetzer

Jim Fetzer

2099 subscribers

Dr. Tom Cowan Interviews medical journalist and author, Jon Rappoport. For those of you who have been following my work concerning COVID-19, you know that the entire foundation of the story of the virus rests on whether the novel “corona virus” has been properly isolated and its entire genome characterized. Many of you have sent papers to me that have been published in prestigious peer-reviewed journals that claim to have isolated and characterized this new virus. They are all incorrect.

In fact, the original Corman-Drosten et al paper on which this edifice of viral causation is based states that they used an “in silico” genome of an “in silico” virus. “In silico” is Latin for “theoretical.” In common English, synonyms for theoretical are “imaginary” or “make-believe.”

The CDC in its July 2020 monograph states “no quantified isolated of the 2019-nCov are available.” Again, in simple English, this means they have no examples of an isolated virus in their possession. In Freedom of Information requests, the Canadian health ministry, the Australian health ministry and the governments of many Commonwealth countries admit that they do not possess any studies that show the isolation of this purported virus.

In this interview, and hopefully for the final time, Jon Rappaport and I describe in common language and precise detail the steps that are needed to properly isolate and characterize a virus. We did this so we could empower our readers and listeners to know for themselves how to read and identify fraudulent science. Among the many challenges we face, one is the rampant scientific illiteracy. In some ages this may not have been relevant, but if we are going to live in an era in which “science” is the new religion and its tenets control our lives, we had better understand what its unquestioned “priests” are saying.

Mirrored from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6-8VRGvNtQ
LESS
Category News & Politics
Sensitivity Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over

[monty]

Toda y I went to the fda website to print a copy. The. CDC has revised the document and removed that statement from the paper

[Amanda]

Toda y I went to the fda website to print a copy. The. CDC has revised the document and removed that statement from the paper

is there anyway to get a screen shot from when it used to say that. So, I guess they realized people were onto the scam?

[monty]

is there anyway to get a screen shot from when it used to say that. So, I guess they realized people were onto the scam?

.

Jon Rappoport upset their canoe.

I have a copy of page 39 of the original before they scrubbed it

I scanned it and saved the file also.

I’ll see if I can upload the .pdf.

[monty]

Page 39 CDC Emergency Instructions for Covid Testing

I marked it up with a highliter and smuged the print. That is why I wanted another copy

[Dachsie]

I found this ,,,

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only Instructions for Use

Page 42


Analytical Performance: Limit of Detection (LoD): LoD studies determine the lowest detectable concentration of 2019-nCoV at which approximately 95% of all (true positive) replicates test positive. The LoD was determined by limiting dilution studies using characterized samples. The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. Samples were extracted using the QIAGEN EZ1 Advanced XL instrument and EZ1 DSP Virus Kit (Cat# 62724) and manually with the QIAGEN DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit (Cat# 61904). Real-Time RT-PCR assays were performed using the Thermo Fisher Scientific TaqPath™ 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix, CG (Cat# A15299) on the Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument according to the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions for use.

A preliminary LoD for each assay was determined testing triplicate samples of RNA purified using each extraction method. The approximate LoD was identified by extracting and testing 10-fold serial dilutions of characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA. A confirmation of the LoD was determined using 3-fold serial dilution RNA samples with 20 extracted replicates. The LoD was determined as the lowest concentrationwhere≥95%(19/20)ofthereplicateswerepositive

[woodman]

I found this ,,,

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only Instructions for Use

Page 42


Analytical Performance: Limit of Detection (LoD): LoD studies determine the lowest detectable concentration of 2019-nCoV at which approximately 95% of all (true positive) replicates test positive. The LoD was determined by limiting dilution studies using characterized samples. The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. Samples were extracted using the QIAGEN EZ1 Advanced XL instrument and EZ1 DSP Virus Kit (Cat# 62724) and manually with the QIAGEN DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit (Cat# 61904). Real-Time RT-PCR assays were performed using the Thermo Fisher Scientific TaqPath™ 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix, CG (Cat# A15299) on the Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument according to the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions for use.

A preliminary LoD for each assay was determined testing triplicate samples of RNA purified using each extraction method. The approximate LoD was identified by extracting and testing 10-fold serial dilutions of characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA. A confirmation of the LoD was determined using 3-fold serial dilution RNA samples with 20 extracted replicates. The LoD was determined as the lowest concentrationwhere≥95%(19/20)ofthereplicateswerepositive

"to mimic clinical specimen." This means it was faked. Plain and simple statement of fact. Good to get some truth from the CDC, even if they remove it later.

It would be nice to get a layman translation of the entire page.

[Dachsie]

Update: Lin Wood Puts Evidence Against Justice Roberts In Protective Custody Of Third Parties
17,200 views
•Dec 18, 2020
6.1K31Share
Save
The Werff Report
28.4K subscribers
Third Party Protection! Lin Wood tweeting that he has placed documentation he has of his claims concerning failed Supreme Court Justice John Roberts into the hands of several quote “third parties” for protection. SUPPORT THE WERFF REPORT: https://fundly.com/the-werff-report-k... SUBSCRIBE ON RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/c/TheWerffReport

first 7:53 minutes interesting corona news. Good report on scoliosis treatment at end.

TruNews Headlines with Kerry Kinsey - December 18, 2020

A nurse in Chattanooga, Tennessee collapses on live television after getting the Coronavirus vaccine, in El Paso, Texas it appears a nurse didn’t depress the plunger on a syringe during a similar hospital vaccine event, pressure from social media forces the hospital to do it over the next day, now that the Moderna vaccine is out medical experts from around the world are saying that not only is there no Coronavirus Pandemic, but that the vaccine is dangerous because it never went through animal trials and there was a race to produce it, on "Corona. Crazy,’ in Bolivia one of the most popular Christmas decorations this year is a figurine of a “Baby Jesus,” wearing a face mask and a hazmat suit, and an interesting look at the screws, rods and hooks that helped Kerry Kinsey’s wife Angela recover from scoliosis surgery thanks to a 60 degree curve in her spine, it’s a fascinating story about the "Daytona Deformity System’
Content Contributed By — TruNews Team

Take the broadcast with you!

[monty]

I found this ,,,

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only Instructions for Use

Page 42


Analytical Performance: Limit of Detection (LoD): LoD studies determine the lowest detectable concentration of 2019-nCoV at which approximately 95% of all (true positive) replicates test positive. The LoD was determined by limiting dilution studies using characterized samples. The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. Samples were extracted using the QIAGEN EZ1 Advanced XL instrument and EZ1 DSP Virus Kit (Cat# 62724) and manually with the QIAGEN DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit (Cat# 61904). Real-Time RT-PCR assays were performed using the Thermo Fisher Scientific TaqPath™ 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix, CG (Cat# A15299) on the Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument according to the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions for use.

A preliminary LoD for each assay was determined testing triplicate samples of RNA purified using each extraction method. The approximate LoD was identified by extracting and testing 10-fold serial dilutions of characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA. A confirmation of the LoD was determined using 3-fold serial dilution RNA samples with 20 extracted replicates. The LoD was determined as the lowest concentrationwhere≥95%(19/20)ofthereplicateswerepositive

Look at the information on this website, mind boggling

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois...-purification/ Thanks to Jon Rappoport

[Dachsie]

I started wondering if even SARS Cov-1, first heard of "SARS' in the "outbreak of 2003-2004. wondering if even that disease had any evidence of isolation.

I am thinking it does not and from what they said on that video, not HIV, not SARS, not MERS. not COVID anything has ever been proven to exist. Existence is proven by real science including electron microscopy of several specimens in a properly constructed study.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ARS_virion.gif



Electron micrograph of SARS coronavirus virion

Pronunciation • /sɑːrz/

Specialty
Infectious disease

Symptoms Fever, persistent dry cough, headache, muscle pains, difficulty breathing
Complications
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with other comorbidities that eventually leads to death
Causes Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1)
Prevention Hand washing, cough etiquette, avoiding close contact with infected persons, avoiding travel to affected areas[2]

Prognosis 9.5% chance of death (all countries)
Frequency 8,098 cases
Deaths 774 known



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severe...atory_syndrome


We have seen almost no electron microscope images. All we get is that computer graphics art / image that is total nonsense.

All we know is that Wiki tells us that image is of

Electron micrograph of "SARS coronavirus virion"


That seems like utter nonsense to me.