Coronavirus

[Dachsie]

This two hour show halfway through started reporting on COVID and the Vaccine. The subject matter lends itself to comedic commentary and there is plenty of that in tonight's Godcast show. Lots of laughs here.

https://www.trunews.com/stream/in-li...n-swing-states

In Like Flynn: Will U.S. Troops Oversee 2nd Election in Swing States?
Content Contributed By — TruNews Team

Take the broadcast with you!

[Dachsie]

Dec 08, 2020
The Great Lies - COVID19 & The Great Reset

First published at 21:59 UTC on December 8th, 2020.

channel image

Jim Fetzer

Jim Fetzer

2040 subscribers

Muckraking investigator & Need to Know regular Giuseppe Vafanculo produced a documentary


____________

In Hour number 1 of Giuseppe's Friday Dec. 18 The Perfect Triangle Revolution Radio show at about 11:20 on the audio track Giuseppe again stated his "theory" that THEY have designed and released a very weak attenuated bioweapon that THEY variously refer to as Coronavirus, COVID - 19, and SARS Cov 2. This is basically a lingering chest cold that causes serious health problem for those with an average of three other serious medical conditions ( comorbidities ).

There was a real serious bioweapon released in a planned and scammed way but it has nothing to do with what THEY tell the public Coronavirs, COVID-19 and SARSCov2 are. Every bit of "information" conveyed to the public about "the virus" has been lie upon lie upon lie to destroy our country and its people and bring in a One World Death and Slavery System for All.

Giuseppe described the propaganda fear / panic disinformation fed to the public as "satanic cabalistic magicians" to accomplish the great reset.

https://www.revolutionradioarchives....ct%20Triangle/

Free downloadable audio archives of all Revolution Radio shows available here

https://www.revolutionradioarchives.com/


Guiseppe speculated as to the way in which the bioweapon was released and suggested it is through the flu shot. I noticed the medical establishement is really really pushing the flu shot this year. I have never taken the flu shot but one thing I can say with certainty is that if you take it you will get the flu and probably a pretty bad case of it.

P.S.

Guiseppe did make his radio show available on his YouTube channel as a video

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGP...-676P5f5-l3oeQ

but YT is censoring him big time.

I do not know if Dr. Fetzer will repost The Perfect Triangle show in video form on his BitChute channel,

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGP...-676P5f5-l3oeQ

but it does not look like it.

Maybe Guiseppe and Scorpio can start a BitChute channel.

[Dachsie]

Dr. James Fetzer is the guest on the Dec. 18 Republic Broadcasting "Uncernsored" show of host Rick Adams.



(Dachsie is appreciative of Rick Adams' introductory comments of this show highlighting the FACT of Mary's genealogy in the Gospel of Luke. Joseph was of the House of David through Solomon (genealogy given in gospel of Mathew) but Mary was descended of the House of David through Nathan, Solomon's brother. I think it is important to give the truth that Mary is PHYSICALLY descended of the House of David (Joseph is the foster father of Jesus and is not physically related to Jesus). With the exception of Dr Robert Sungenis, I cannot find any novus ordo or sedevacantist or traditional Catholic theologian to tell us the FACTS about this. It looks like biblical exegesis has been co-opted by the tribe too. I am most disappointed that truth about this fact is universally lacking where it should be highlighted right now.)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jSzWRAkHZQLh/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jSzWRAkHZQLh/

1:17:00 video runtime

First published at 21:15 UTC on December 19th, 2020.

channel image

Jim Fetzer

Jim Fetzer

2141 subscribers

On the Great COVID-19 Hoax and Theft of the 2020 Election Lively discussion of the faking of the pandemic to justify the use of mail-in ballots to steal the 2020 Election and promote the end of America as we know it through The Great Reset. Several callers and lots of information about how even the Chief Justice of the United State has been compromised as a guest of Jeffrey Epstein on Orgy Island and declared (to Justice Breyer) that he would never allow Trump to be re-elected, prompting L. Lin Woods to call for him to step down from the case and resign from the Supreme Court.
LESS

[Dachsie]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberth...h=5c86757a3740




Editors' Pick|Oct 20, 2020,01:43pm EDT|1,257,499 views

Researchers Warn Some Covid-19 Vaccines Could Increase Risk Of HIV Infection

Robert Hart
Robert HartForbes Staff
Business
I cover breaking news.

Topline

Some of the Covid-19 vaccines currently in development could increase the risk of acquiring HIV, warned a group of researchers in the The Lancet medical journal Monday, potentially leading to an increase in infections as vaccines are rolled out to vulnerable populations around the world.
Coronavirus COVID-19 medical test vaccine research and development

Some Covid-19 vaccines could increase risk of HIV infection, warn researchers who have seen ... [+] getty
Key Facts

The researchers warn of a “cautionary tale” from efforts to create an HIV vaccine over a decade ago, where a promising vaccine candidate actually increased the risk of some men catching the virus.

The vaccine made use of a modified virus — called adenovirus 5 (Ad5) — as a vector to transport some of HIV’s genetic material into the body.

Exactly how the vaccine increased the risks of HIV transmission is unknown, but a conference convened by the National Institutes of Health recommended against further use of Ad5 as a vector in HIV vaccines (Dr. Anthony Fauci was lead author of the paper outlining this position.)

Ad5 is used as a vector in some Covid-19 vaccines — Science identifies four such candidates that are currently undergoing clinical trials in various countries around the world, including the U.S., with two in large scale phase 3 trials ongoing in Russia and Pakistan.

The researchers stressed the need to understand the role Ad5 might play in increasing the risks of HIV in vulnerable populations before developing and deploying vaccines using the vector, adding that informed consent documents should reflect the “considerable literature” on the risk of HIV acquisition with Ad5 vectors.
Key Background

Lots of vaccines make use of modified viruses to transport material into the human body. Many make use of a modified adenovirus to do this, a virus which is usually harmless except the ability to cause the common cold. Some of the leading candidates for a Covid-19 vaccine, including those from Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, use adenoviruses as vectors. There is no evidence that those vectors increase the risk of HIV infection.
Crucial Quote

The authors said they went public because Ad5 vaccines for Covid-19 might soon be tested in populations with high HIV prevalence. Lawrence Corey, one of the authors who now co-leads the Covid-19 prevention network in the U.S. that is testing vaccines on behalf of the NIH, told Science that if he were in a sub-Saharan African country, where there’s a high prevalence of HIV, “I don’t see why I would pick an Ad5 vector (vaccine) when there are many other alternative choices.”
Further Reading

Could certain COVID-19 vaccines leave people more vulnerable to the AIDS virus? (Science)

Use of adenovirus type-5 vectored vaccines: a cautionary tale (The Lancet)

Full coverage and live updates on the Coronavirus
Follow me on Twitter. Send me a secure tip.
Robert Hart
Robert Hart

I am a London-based reporter for Forbes covering breaking news. Previously, I have worked as a reporter for a specialist legal publication covering big data and as a…

Print
Reprints & Permissions

[Dachsie]

Rand Paul's 12 minute rant in congress today regarding the new stimulus bill, a bill that did pass.

I do not agree with Rand Paul's economic philosophy or his solutions.

He does point out the ridiculousness of the goverment's "COVID" regulations and that is valuable.

There will be no solution to the problems that were born of the "COVID pandemic"

until Rand Paul and every other subversive oligarchs care about USA national sovereignty first and realize that COVID was never real.

It was a PLAN and a SCAM from the beginning and the goal is a one world death and slavery system for all.



...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-nyvBfhT90...

Rand Paul ERUPTS on Senate Floor Over COVID Stimulus That Will Hand Out $600 Checks
48,744 views
•Dec 21, 2020
5.9K
178
Share
Save
BlazeTV
1.33M subscribers
Senator Rand Paul just went off on the Senate floor over the COVID-19 stimulus bill about to be passed through congress. WATCH McConnell drop NUKE on Dems after finally agreeing on COVID-19 relief: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wL3in...

[Dachsie]

THIS ONE IS IMPORTANT !






...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZDr3CsfolA...

3:41 video runtime

Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi from Germany got it to the point @Laura Ingraham (Fox News) on 2. 12. 2020
61,349 views
•Premiered Dec 3, 2020
1.6K
28
Share
Save
Blue 1986
257 subscribers
I uploaded this video on behalf of investigative journalist Oliver Janich whose channel was recently deleted by Youtube: https://www.oliverjanich.de/about-me

Further information: https://rairfoundation.com/warning-re...

Telegram Channel Oliver Janich:
https://t.me/oliverjanich

[Dachsie]

source article

https://www.who.int/news/item/14-12-...-for-ivd-users


WHO Information Notice for IVD Users
Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2
14 December 2020 Medical product alert
Geneva
Reading time: 2 min (554 words)
العربية
中文
Français
Русский
Español
Português



Product type: Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

Date: 7 December 2020

WHO-identifier: 2020/5, version 1

Purpose of this notice: To ensure users of certain nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies are aware of certain aspects of the instructions for use (IFU) for all products.

Description of the problem: WHO has received user feedback on an elevated risk for false SARS-CoV-2 results when testing specimens using RT-PCR reagents on open systems.

As with any diagnostic procedure, the positive and negative predictive values for the product in a given testing population are important to note. As the positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 decreases, the positive predictive value also decreases. This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as positivity rate decreases, irrespective of the assay specificity. Therefore, healthcare providers are encouraged to take into consideration testing results along with clinical signs and symptoms, confirmed status of any contacts, etc." SNIP

________________________

Here is the same information given in more layman's terms.

https://principia-scientific.com/who...has-a-problem/

WHO Finally Admits COVID19 PCR Test Has a ‘Problem’

Published on December 17, 2020

Written by John O'Sullivan

In a statement released on December 14, 2020 the World Health Organization finally owned up to what 100,000’s of doctors and medical professionals have been saying for months: the PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 is a hit and miss process with way too many false positives.

This WHO-admitted “Problem” comes in the wake of international lawsuits exposing the incompetence and malfeasance of public health officials and policymakers for reliance on a diagnostic test not fit for purpose.

This World Health Organization admission is that the crux of the “problem” is a wholly arbitrary cycling process which “means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.” [emphasis added]

The UN body is now clearly looking to distance itself from the fatally flawed test as a growing number of lawsuits are processing through the courts exposing the insanity of relying on a test that even the inventor, Professor Kary B. Mullis said was never designed to diagnose diseases. [1]

Professor Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993. ‘Coincidentally’, Mullis died just before the pandemic started.

We reported on November 22, 2020 that a landmark court case in Portugal had ruled that the polymerase chain reaction test (PCR) used worldwide to diagnose COVID-19 was not fit for purpose. Most importantly, the judges ruled that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.

As Off-Guardian.org reported at the time:

“In their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés referred to several scientific studies. Most notably this study by Jaafar et al., which found that – when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more – the accuracy dropped to 3%, meaning up to 97% of positive results could be false positives.

The ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable. Governments and private labs have been very tight-lipped about the exact number of cycles they run when PCR testing, but it is known to sometimes be as high as 45. Even fearmonger-in-chief Anthony Fauci has publicly stated anything over 35 is totally unusable.”

You can read the complete ruling in the original Portuguese here, and translated into English here.

Among thousands of angry doctors arguing PCR tests should not be used is Dr. Pascal Sacré. He wrote that:

“This misuse of RT-PCR technique is used as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments, supported by scientific safety councils and by the dominant media, to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, the destruction of the economy with the bankruptcy of entire active sectors of society, the degradation of living conditions for a large number of ordinary citizens, under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients.”

Clear and conclusive scientific evidence proves that these tests are not accurate and create a statistically significant percentage of false positives. Positive results more likely indicate “ordinary respiratory diseases like the common cold.” [2]

However, none of this is new information to science. These facts were known at least before 2007 after a New York Times report entitled, “Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t,” (image, above) clearly showed how scientifically inaccurate PCR tests are, featuring many shocking statements from medical experts on the use of these tests, clearly laying out how they result in false positives and lead to dangerous exaggerations and false alarms. [3]

In their 2007 story the New York Times cited a prescient quote from Dr. Elizabeth Talbot, deputy state epidemiologist for the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, who said:

“One of the most troubling aspects of the pseudo-epidemic is that all the decisions seemed so sensible at the time.”

Those who run our public institutions have allowed history to repeat itself. At the head of the line of incompetence and malfeasance is the UN itself. At the media briefing on COVID-19 on March 16, 2020, the WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (photo, below) said:

“We have a simple message for all countries: test, test, test.”

This insanity of testing anyone and everyone, even without symptoms has been an unmitigated global public health scandal and must be stopped. All officials in high places complicit in this crime must be prosecuted.

About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.

[1] Kary Mullis : « Le test PCR ne permet pas de savoir si vous êtes malade », vidéo accessible sur YouTube, 9 octobre 2020.

[2] David DeGraw, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, https://www.globalresearch.ca/nation...itives/5720271

[3] New York Times,’Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t,’ Gina Kolota, Published: January 22, 2007
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.

[Dachsie]

Children, Women of child bearing age, and frail elderly people should not be given this truly evil vaccine only useful to kill and reduce population.


SIZE=4]


https://mailchi.mp/cplaction/xupg8jp...8?e=38a1706540



COVID-19 Vaccine: High Risk Briefing Paper
View this email in your browser

December 22, 2020

Briefing Paper on COVID-19 Vaccines for Children and Women of Childbearing Age
The Child Protection League educates citizens on issues that protect or threaten the safety of children. The following Briefing Paper is not medical advice. We are not physicians. However, our research is taken from professional doctors and medical researchers. CPL offers the Briefing because we believe it can contribute to people making informed decisions about their children, their future families, and public policy.
Recent Headline: Doctor on CNN: Don’t be “alarmed” if elderly die after receiving COVID vaccine[i]

"A doctor told CNN that nobody should be “surprised” to see reports of “multiple people dying” at long-term care facilities a day or two after having received the COVID vaccine."

The article explains that the vaccine has not been tested on frail elderly persons so we have no idea what will happen. Take note of what this doctor is saying, “Multiple people dying” and the “Vaccines have not been tested on the frail elderly.”

On what other populations has this vaccine not been tested? Children under age 16 and pregnant women or women who may become pregnant. Why would we give this experimental vaccine to populations where no testing has been conducted? Nevertheless, strong voices in our country are calling for administering COVID-19 vaccinations to all children.
The following provides information concerning the high risks associated with administering COVID-19 vaccines to these two populations: children and childbearing age women.

1) Children under the age of 20

America’s Frontline Doctors[ii] detail the following known facts in their Position Paper on COVID-19 Experimental Vaccines.[iii]

More than 46,000 children were hospitalized for flu in the 2018-19 period, with the hospitalization rate among children 5 to 17 of 39.2 children per 100,000 children. For COVID-19, that hospitalization rate is 6 per 100,000 children ages 5 to 17, according to the CDC. In a report detailing the differences between COVID-19 and the flu, the CDC states, "the risk of complications for healthy children is [much] higher for the flu compared to COVID-19." (p. 9)
No testing has been conducted on the vaccine’s safety for children. Considering the survival rate for children who contract the virus is 99.997% [Ibid p. 15], and when the risk of complications for children is higher for the flu than it is for COVID-19 (see above), we can anticipate that the likely complication rate for children who are vaccinated for COVID-19 will be greater than the complication rate for children who contract the virus.

On December 17, 2020, Mayo Clinic had an advisory posted online stating that the COVID-19 vaccine should not be given to children “because researchers don't know enough about how COVID-19 vaccination can affect children, pregnant women or their babies. There is also no data on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines for breastfeeding women.”[iv]

This underscores the principle stated by Scientific American that administering vaccines should be avoided without adequate advance testing.[v]

2) Women of Childbearing Age

The CDC states that no studies have been conducted on the side effects of the vaccines on pregnant women or breastfeeding women or on breast-fed infants.[vi] NPR states that women who were pregnant, breastfeeding or who might become pregnant in the near future were excluded from these studies.vii] In this way, the pharmaceutical companies made certain it would have no information about the potential of the vaccine to cause miscarriages.

The truth of the matter, as stated in the America’s Frontline Doctors Position Paper, is:

"In layman’s terms: getting COVID-19 has been associated with a high risk of mid-pregnancy miscarriage because the placenta fails – but the vaccine may do the exact same thing – but not for just the few weeks of being sick – but forever. Meaning repeated pregnancies would keep failing ~ mid-pregnancy." (p. 21) [Emphasis added.]

The labels on the bottles of the vaccines acknowledge the risk of ill effects on fertility. They say: “it is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA VaccineBNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.” (Ibid p. 14)

When the manufacturer says the vaccine’s impact on fertility is unknown, we need to proceed with great caution. This is especially true when the survival rate for women under 50 who contract COVID-19 is 99.98% and much lower for those without high-risk comorbidities. (Ibid p. 15)

No coronavirus vaccine has ever been approved before because animal trials have consistently revealed unacceptable side-effects. This may be why the animal studies are being bypassed. (Ibid p. 12) The history of vaccines for other coronaviruses show that none of them pass this test.[viii]

Conclusion
Child Protection League strongly urges policy makers, parents, and the public to carefully consider the available information about the potential high risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine for children and women of childbearing age.

[A printable pdf version of this Briefing Paper is here, https://cplaction.com/wp-content/upl...v-vaccine.pdf]
[i] https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/do...-covid-vaccine
[ii] https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/ America’s Frontline Doctors is a growing community of member physicians from across the country representing a range of medical disciplines and practical experience on the front lines of medicine.

[iii] America’s Frontline Doctors Position Paper On COVID-19 Experimental Vaccines
https://cplaction.com/wp-content/upl...neDrspaper.pdf
[iv] COVID-19 vaccines: Get the facts https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-...e/art-20484859 This exact quote was conveniently removed from that advisory on December 17, 2020, while we were in the process of writing this information

[v] The Risks of Rushing a COVID-19 Vaccine https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...id-19-vaccine/ #15 and #17

[vi] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/me...-03-Mbaeyi.pdf

[vii] https://www.npr.org/2020/12/11/94519...et-the-vaccine

[viii] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335060/
[/SIZE]

[ziero0]

https://needtoknow.news/2020/12/colo...ds-in-2-cases/

Gunshot deaths caused by virus

[Dachsie]

Dr. Rashi Buttar is outspoken in his skepticism of the nurse in Chattanooga Tennessee recently who "fainted" 17 minutes after getting the vaccine. They are trying hard to present this as a minor unimportant matter and that the vaccine is safe and effective. Dr. Buttar explains otherwise.

There is extreme medical cover-up of this story and it reminds me of an even more extreme coverup. I wonder if the cover-up of the vaccine injuries will be as extreme as the medical establishment's lies regarding the purported 14 to 16 amputees from the April 15, 2013, Boston Marathon "bombing" hoax / drill.

See

https://www.trunews.com/stream/trune...cember-22-2020

start watching for about 2 minutes beginning at 01:07 .