monty (1st February 2022),Tumbleweed (1st February 2022)
That is precious.Originally Posted by Dachsie
Jon Rappoport’s email:
This photo was posted on brilliant reporter Celia Farber's substack page (link).
I have no words for it, except to say I hope you see in it what I see.
Jon
The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fd1Z9DKLA8LK/
Dr. Mike Yeadon - Ex-Pfizer Chief Scientific Officer Exposes Deadly Vax Lots for Nuremberg 2.0
First published at 17:03 UTC on February 1st, 2022.
iNCREDIBLY GOOD recent interview with former Pfizer V.P turned whistleblower, Dr. Mike Yeadon. He lays it all on the line here!
“They are lying to you. And if only symptomatic people are the source of infection, why would you ask everyone to wear masks? It’s obviously a fear-tactic. Even if they worked, which they don’t, why would you make people without symptoms wear them? And then lockdowns don’t work either — it’s not human contact that spreads the disease, it’s infectious human contact. It’s only when you contact someone who’s a good source of infection and you’re susceptible — THAT’s the only chance of transmission — ALL other contacts are irrelevant.
“We used to call symptomatic people “ill.” And when you’re ill you stay at home — you don’t need to be told to self-isolate because you feel like crap. So most of the time, the real sources of infection are at home on the sofa or in bed or in the hospital. SO if you then close down the non-infectious community, which is what “lockdown” is, it doesn’t do a damn thing.
“So they’ve wrecked your economy, they’ve frightened you to death by lying in your face, and they’re still doing it today. PCR tests don’t mean anything, lateral-flow tests haven’t been properly calibrated, and most people survive infection by this particular virus — if it even exists, who knows? — but certainly if you get ill with these respiratory viral pneumonias, if you get early treatment, even if you’re very vulnerable, most people survive.
“So, there’s never been a NEW emergency — there’s never been a new hazard in your environment and there isn’t now, with the exception of 2 things: (1) your government’s behavior and (2) the vaccines. Those are the serious hazards. And if you think it’s the virus, there’s a serious risk that we will lose our liberty, possibly permanently, and possibly our lives. So the reason that I keep speaking out even though it’s uncomfortable is that, as a scientist with 40 years’ experience, it’s blindingly obvious that what I’m telling you is true and they used what is called “Psy-ops,” psychological operations, to condition you and reinforce that this is a really fearful thing and you’d better do what you’re told and do what your peers are doing.
“My job is to tell you, “Stand Up, Take your mask off, Go Outside, say you’re not doing all this stupid stuff the government is telling you anymore.” Take your lives back while they still exist because it won’t be much longer. After 2 years of the destruction of the world’s economy, we could be right on the brink, so I’ve said it for a year and I mean it — take your lives back while you can.”
“It’s a [global] coup d’etat. It’s a takeover of all the liberal governments of the West. It’s been planned for years. They’ve gone for it and we’ve just rolled over. They’ve used standard propaganda techniques that have been in use since the early 20th Century and written up by Edward Bernays — they’ve used all those “nudge” techniques and they used them on us, all in one go and we fell for it.”
From: https://rumble.com/vtom4k-dr.-mike-y...vax-lots-.html (1:18:30)
In the interview above, Mike Yeadon refers to this presentation by Paul Schreyer:
This German researcher, Paul Schreyer, put together a presentation on the simulations/preparations for a global pandemic that had been in the planning stages for decades.
Pandemic Simulation Games | Preparing People for a New Era? | Paul Schreyer (English)
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/oOSxm4qLg8NiCZ3 - Kristall - 09 Jun 2021.
monty (1st February 2022)
Dachsie comment:
Important to see that older individuals with comorbidities greatly benefit from taking Ivermectin prophylacticly, that is, as a preventative to take at home.
________________________________________
https://flccc.substack.com/p/large-p...-study?r=hzrr3
Large, peer-reviewed research study proves ivermectin works
Regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and mortality rates.
FLCCC Alliance
Jan 20
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch..._2000x1428.png
The results are in from the world’s largest study of ivermectin for COVID-19.
Researchers in Brazil found that regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and mortality rates.
The study was conducted in Itajaí, a port city in the state of Santa Catarina, between July and December 2020. Study authors include FLCCC physicians Dr. Flavio Cadegiani and Dr. Pierre Kory. Lead author Dr. Lucy Kerr was approached by the mayor of Itajaí, after the city began to experience a severe outbreak of COVID.
The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.
Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.
Reduced infection and hospitalization rates
The study found a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate in favor of the group that took ivermectin (3.5% versus 8.2%).
In cases where a participating citizen of Itajaí became ill with COVID-19, they were recommended not to use ivermectin or any other medication in early outpatient treatment. Of those who did become infected, two equal-sized, highly matched groups (one that used ivermectin as a prophylaxis and one that did not) were compared. The regular use of preventative ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (0.8% versus 2.6%), and a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate (1.6% versus 3.3%).
The regular use of preventative ivermectin led to a reduction in COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and mortality.
Study methods
Since vaccines were not available at the time, and few prophylactic alternatives existed in the absence of vaccines, Itajaí initiated a population-wide government program for COVID-19 prophylaxis. This was a prospective observational study that allowed subjects to self-select between treatment vs. non-treatment. The use of ivermectin was optional and based on patients’ preferences, given its benefits as a preventative agent was unproven.
To ensure the safety of the population, a computer program was developed to compile and maintain all relevant demographic and clinical data. All subjects were weighed to be able to accurately calculate the correct dose of ivermectin. In addition, a brief medical evaluation was conducted to record past medical history, comorbidities, use of medications and contraindications to drugs.
The following variables were analyzed and adjusted as confounding factors or used for balancing and matching groups for propensity score matching:
Age
Sex
Previous diseases (myocardial infarction and stroke)
Pre-existing comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular diseases, cancer [any type], and other pulmonary diseases)
Smoking
Patients who presented signs or the diagnosis of COVID-19 before July 7, 2020, were excluded from the sample. Other exclusion criteria included contraindications to ivermectin and age (subjects below 18 years of age were excluded).
During the study, subjects who were diagnosed with COVID-19 underwent a specific medical visit to assess clinical manifestations and disease severity. All subjects with symptoms were recommended not to use ivermectin, nitazoxanide, hydroxychloroquine, spironolactone, or any other drug claimed to be effective against COVID-19. The city did not provide or support any specific pharmacological outpatient treatment for subjects infected with COVID-19.
Intriguing findings
Interestingly, the group who self-selected to take ivermectin was older and had more comorbidities than the group who opted for no treatment. These results show that prophylactic ivermectin may be a mitigating factor in groups with higher risk of morbidity.
The results show prophylactic ivermectin may be a mitigating factor for high-risk groups.
The belief that preventative and early treatment therapies would cause people to relax their caution of remaining socially distanced, leading to more COVID-19-related infections, is not supported here.
The data demonstrate that using preventative ivermectin significantly lowers the infection rate, and that benefits outweigh the speculated increased risk of changes in social behaviors.
Subscribe to The FLCCC Alliance Community
By FLCCC Alliance · Launched 7 months ago
The FLCCC is dedicated to developing highly effective treatment protocols to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 and to improve the outcomes for patients with the disease.
Pfizer is pushing hard to poison the babies
February 1, 2022
by Kyle Becker
Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer is pushing the Food and Drug Administration to approve its mRNA shots for children under 5 years old.
“Pfizer and its partner BioNTech are expected as soon as Tuesday to ask the Food and Drug Administration to authorize a coronavirus vaccine for children under 5 years old as a two-dose regimen while they continue to research how well three doses work,” the New York Times reported.
“Federal regulators are eager to review the data in hopes of authorizing shots for young children on an emergency basis as early as the end of February, according to multiple people familiar with the discussions, who were not authorized to speak publicly,” the report continued. “If Pfizer waited for data on a three-dose regimen, the data would not be submitted until late March and the vaccine might not be authorized for that age group until late spring.”
There have been 280 Covid-related deaths from ages 0-4 years old since the beginning of the pandemic. There were 23.2 million children this age, as of 2020. 95% of Covid-related deaths have underlying health conditions. Children thus have a 99.999% chance of survival and healthy children have over a 99.9999% chance of survival. This is effectively 100%. Children are not at significant statistical risk from Covid-19.
Children are at increased risk of heart inflammation due to the mRNA shots, however, which do not have reliable long-term side effects data. As reported in Science in June, the shots have been tied to spikes of myocarditis and pericarditis cases in young people.
This isn’t stopping Pfizer from putting ‘profits over people,’ however. In an interview with CNBC in November, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla was “optimistic” that the mRNA shots would be approved for children under 5 years old:
Embebded Video
Pfizer’s revenue in 2022 is projected to be $29 billion, according to the report.
AdvertisementsIn early January, the FDA authorized a booster shot of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 12 to 15. The FDA also authorized a Pfizer booster for immunocompromised children ages 5 to 11. This would include those who have had an organ transplant or an underlying health condition.
The FDA also shortened the waiting period between a second dose of Pfizer and a booster shot from six months to five months. While this change applies only to Pfizer’s vaccine, the FDA said in a news release, the agency will continue to review data on COVID-19 vaccines and “provide additional updates as appropriate.”
The FDA held a media call in January with Janet Woodcock, the FDA Acting Commissioner, Dr. Peter Marks, its Director at the Center for Biologics. Dr. Peter Marks said that the risk of myocarditis to 12 to 15 year age range for a third shot was “quite acceptable” compared to potential benefits, even though an Israeli study showed that this age group was two to three times risk of myocarditis after the second shot.
Science’s report on heart inflammation should give health practitioners pause if pushed to reflexively administer the mRNA shots for this age cohort.
“The COVID-19 vaccine made by Pfizer and BioNTech appears to put young men at elevated risk of developing a heart muscle inflammation called myocarditis, researchers in Israel say,” Science reported. “In a report submitted today to the Israeli Ministry of Health, they conclude that between one in 3000 and one in 6000 men ages 16 to 24 who received the vaccine developed the rare condition. But most cases were mild and resolved within a few weeks, which is typical for myocarditis. “I can’t imagine it’s going to be anything that would cause medical people to say we shouldn’t vaccinate kids,” says Douglas Diekema, a pediatrician and bioethicist at Seattle Children’s Hospital.”
“Israeli health officials first flagged the issue in April, when they reported more than 60 cases, mostly in young men who had received their second dose of vaccine a few days earlier,” the report continued. “Around the same time, the U.S. Department of Defense began to track 14 such cases. In mid-May, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said it, too, was reviewing myocarditis cases. Officials at the European Medicines Agency said on 28 May they had received 107 reports of myocarditis following the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, or about one in 175,000 doses administered. But relatively few people under age 30 have been vaccinated in Europe.”
Cardiologists have reported a huge spike in heart inflammation cases to the American Heart Association (AHA). A cardiac surgeon in November circulated a warning to the AHA that heart inflammation markers are drastically increasing in patients in conjunction with mRNA vaccination rates.
The warning to the AHA is clear: “Patients had a 1 in 4 risk for severe problems after the vaccines, compared to 1 in 9 before.”
The FDA has been ordered to turn over Pfizer’s clinical trial data associated with its Emergency Use Authorizations. However, after a judge rejected its proposed timeline of 75 years to turn over the data, Pfizer has intervened in the case and is seeking a delay.
The FDA “has now asked the Court to make the public wait until May for it to start producing 55,000 pages per month and, even then, claims it may not be able to meet this rate,” attorney Aaron Siri writes.
AdvertisementsIn addition to its complete lack of transparency, a whistleblower has accused the company of falsifying clinical trials data. Pfizer has had to settle claims in the past worth billions of dollars for “deceitful” pharmaceutical advertising.
NOW READ:
Whistleblower Exposes Pfizer for ‘Falsifying Data’ in Covid Vaccine Trials Used to Justify Mandates
“The whistleblower was fired the same day as she raised the clinical trial issues with Pfizer and the FDA”…
OPINION: This article contains commentary which reflects the author's opinion.
The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org
Dachsie (2nd February 2022)
My "State Department of Health Services" here in the sate capital keep calling me and leaving a message that they want me to participate in some kind of survey they are doing. It was not a recorded message that was left. If was a female voice. I have written to that state agency (SDHS) to express how wrong it is to be promoting that parents get the alleged vaccines to very young children.
I have a feeling that it is not completely random that I am asked to participate in the survey.
Of course I will have nothing to do with that dishonest operation.
The bottom line is that all of these state health agencies and their employees in all states
do not mind at all pushing the jab and injuring children.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...make-chronica/
Archbishop Vigano: “Time Will… Make the Masks Fall from Those Who… Disguised Themselves as Saviors of Humanity (While… They Sought to Subjugate… and Exterminate Citizens or Make Them Chronically Ill).
By Joe Hoft
Published February 2, 2022 at 11:51am
337 Comments
Archbishop Vigano: “Time Will… Make the Masks Fall from Those Who… Disguised Themselves as Saviors of Humanity (While… They Sought to Subjugate… and Exterminate Citizens or Make Them Chronically Ill).
By Joe Hoft
Published February 2, 2022 at 11:51am
337 Comments
Share
Tweet
Gab Share
TelegramTelegram
Clouthub Share
Archbishop Carlos Maria Vigano from Italy shared with us his letter to the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) and the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith (CDF). He also shared a letter from Dr. Massimo Citro, M.D. to Dr. Gwyneth Spaeder.
He also shared his message that was published at the Church Militant. Here are some of the thoughts that he shared: SNIP
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/...p-church-cabal full letter
Viganò Rips Big Pharma, Deep Church Cabal
News: Commentary
by Abp. Carlo Maria Viganò • ChurchMilitant.com • February 1, 2022 14 Comments
Dr. Massimo Citro rebuts Dr. Gwyneth Spaeder's 'vaccine' proselytization
You are not signed in as a Premium user; we rely on Premium users to support our news reporting. Sign in or Sign up today!
As was foreseeable, my open Letter to the President of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and to the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith about the moral liceity, effectiveness and dangerous nature of the experimental gene serums (which are supposedly vaccines against COVID) received no response. This shows that the question I have raised is not considered relevant by either the American episcopate or the former Holy Office — or perhaps that, precisely because of its importance, it has been decided to ignore it following the official narrative embraced by the Vatican.
Image
Dr. Massimo Citro
The multiple Vatican endorsements of the criminal mass-vaccine campaign confirm the full adherence of the hierarchy to the globalist vulgate, without taking even the slightest account of the serious critiques of the so-called vaccines (in terms of their production as well as their demonstrated ineffectiveness, the weakness of the immune system that they induce and, finally, the serious side effects they entail).
Prelates who betray their mandate, who are almost always just as corrupt in doctrine as they are in morals, have occupied the Church of Christ in order to transform Her into a State church, a zealous servant of the New World Order and apostate in its faith.
What was an infiltration up until a few decades ago has been transformed into a true and proper invasion — in all of the Roman dicasteries and in the peripheral organs of the Holy See.
The Pontifical Academy for Life is no exception. It has become an organ of neo-Malthusianism, even to the point of declaring that subjecting oneself to inoculation with the experimental drug is an act of love and a moral duty, incontrovertibly denying not only the evidence of the facts but also the existence of a global plan that has deliberately caused this psycho-pandemic in order to bring about a ruthless reduction of the world population (especially the elderly) and impose forms of control and restriction of the natural rights of citizens.
Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, after having displayed a collectivist mentality worthy of the worst communist dictatorships, denies that there is a "conspiracy" — just as the United Nations' "Agenda 2030" (that is, the "Great Reset" of the World Economic Forum) is explicitly mentioned by the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. Access to the Vatican and the offices of the Roman Curia is now forbidden to employees and anyone who does not have the "super green pass." Cardinals and prelates who are healthy or who have recovered from COVID are not permitted to carry out their duties in the Roman dicasteries and unvaccinated employees are left at home without any salary. As a practical example of inclusivity and mercy, the Bergoglian "pontificate" repudiates itself.
The Pontifical Academy for Life has become an organ of neo-Malthusianism.
Gab
Tweet
If it is surprising neither that the deep Church is totally subservient to the deep state, nor that Bergoglio wants to put himself forward as a candidate for the presidency of the "religion of humanity" that the New World Order intends to establish, on the other hand we see that the pandemic represents only one aspect of the complex network of complicity between the globalist oligarchy, the financial power of the pharmaceutical companies, international institutions and national governments all over the world.
We find confirmation of this in the Argentine's confidential meetings with the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla, denounced by Edward Pentin at the National Catholic Register and by Jules Gomes at Church Militant (in which there also emerges the substantial funding, to the tune of $1.6 billion per year since 2014, that the communist dictatorship of Beijing is said to have paid to the disastrous Vatican coffers as payment for the Holy See's silence about the persecution of Catholics of the clandestine Church in China — whose martyrs have been betrayed and ruthlessly ignored by the very people who should instead be defending them and denouncing the violations of their human rights).
These joint interests are much broader and also involve other characters. Time will do justice to the complicity of the Bergoglian church with the protagonists of the global coup that is currently underway and, along with the masks that have been imposed on the population, time will also make the masks fall from those who have disguised themselves as saviors of humanity (while, in fact, they sought to subjugate the peoples of the world and exterminate citizens or make them chronically ill).
Your browser does not support the video tag.
The Vortex: Vatican Vax
Anyone who is not blinded by prejudice or discredited by macroscopic conflicts of interest has now understood that the moral evaluation of the experimental gene serum cannot, and should not, be limited to an analysis of its individual elements but must also extend to the overall picture, which alone can show the relation between the emergency pandemic, the vaccine campaign, the boycott of available treatments, the imposition of the "green pass" and the destruction of the social and economic fabric of many nations.
Looking at the gene serum as if it were a real vaccine that prevents a serious illness is useless because its effectiveness in preventing contagion is zero, and COVID is not a fatal disease if treated promptly. The news of the falsification of official data regarding deaths as a result of COVID by health institutions is accompanied by the inefficiency of the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) in reporting adverse cases, to which is added the passive supervision of the European health system — in violation of the regulations in force for experimental drugs.
Someone maintained that my intervention on this topic was a sort of "invasion of the field [of medicine]" by a bishop, especially because of the scientific topics that I addressed. And in order to teach me not to meddle in specialized issues, a paper was published by Dr. Gwyneth A. Spaeder that was intended to refute my arguments. The affair was so badly orchestrated, with such bias, that it ended up bringing to light Dr. Spaeder's conflicts of interest. Dr. Massimo Citro Della Riva wanted to intervene in my defense, responding point-by-point, backing up his answers with hundreds of authoritative sources and unequivocal proofs. Dr. Spaeder's second paper, in reply to Dr. Citro, did not present any valid element to even minimally rebut Dr. Citro's statements. Dr. Citro now sets forth a conclusion to the dispute with a new irreproachable letter (below).
As a practical example of inclusivity and mercy, the Bergoglian 'pontificate' repudiates itself.
Gab
Tweet
With the courtesy and refinement that always distinguish him, Dr. Citro has demonstrated the groundlessness of what Dr. Spaeder has affirmed (in particular by highlighting the conflict of interest that involves doctors, pharmaceutical companies, scientific publications, drug agencies, university bodies and public institutions). But, according to some, pointing out the evidence of a malicious intention in the management of the pandemic is an indication of psychiatric disturbance or diabolical possession — which says a lot about the professionalism of certain journalism outlets and the decline of certain news agencies.
Having taken note of the scandalous apostasy of the hierarchy, on the one hand, and the criminal plan of the globalist oligarchy on the other, one then understands why Bergoglio and his court are necessary supporters of the coup in progress. The corruption of the pharmaceutical industry, although it is well known, is deliberately ignored because Big Pharma is one of the principal allies of the elite in the pursuit of the Great Reset. The Bergoglian church is also a supporter of the New World Order, and the crimes committed under the pretext of the pandemic are culpably silenced by Bergoglio because he hopes to gain political advantage. This coup will be thwarted and, along with it, the sect of heretics and corrupt men that now occupies the Vatican will inexorably collapse.
But, in order for the truth to triumph and the guilty to be condemned, it is necessary to open our eyes, recognizing the crisis of authority both at the political and religious levels. Both of these, having denied their origin in God the Creator, Lord and Redeemer, have lost their legitimacy and, as a result, they have also lost the obligation on the part of citizens and the faithful to obey them. Let us pray, therefore, that both civil and ecclesiastical rulers may understand that only by returning to God and His law will they be able to merit the respect that today it is a duty to deny them. And may the Lord protect and give courage to those who oppose the kingdom of Satan on earth.
+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop
Jan. 27, 2022
S. Joannis Chrysostomi Episcopi et Confessoris et Ecclesiae Doctoris
Dr. Massimo Citro's Second Reply to Dr. Gwyneth A. Spaeder
Dear Dr. Spaeder,
Thank you for your reply. I have the highest esteem for you and for the world-famous institution from which you graduated, so I am sure that you will not be able to deny that coronaviruses cause a brief (and poor) antibody response (they may not even respond, sometimes) which does not allow the creation of effective vaccines against single-chain RNA viruses — for which failed attempts have been made in which the grave and frequent risks (Antibody-Dependent Enhancement, first of all) are superior to the benefits, that with these types of viruses you can never achieve the so-called herd immunity and that you should not vaccinate during the period of an epidemic, especially with these families of viruses, in order not to favor the mutations which flee from the vaccine as well as ADE and vaccine-resistance.
Image
Dr. Gwyneth A. Spaeder
Our common scientific preparation must make us recognize that these are gene-based vaccines and, as such, are subject to the regulations of GMO drugs. This must be made clear to the public, just as it must be made clear that, although they have obtained conditional authorization, they do not de facto lose the characteristic of experimentation (since there is not yet sufficient data to establish their efficacy and safety). These molecules are already used in various oncological and lung diseases (such as cystic fibrosis and so on) but it is the first time ever that they are being used as vaccines. Personally, I think that all compulsory vaccines, including vaccines used on children, in the military and those imposed for work reasons, constitute a violation of the ethical codes of individual freedom.
We come to what you call the crux of our disagreement the way we assign value to medical research and publications. As an independent researcher, I usually study mainly serious publications in serious journals, selecting studies not polluted by partisan sponsorships or conflicts of interest. There is a need to be very cautious and attentive because self-referential or partisan studies (which today, as you well know, unfortunately constitute the majority) lack credibility. I remind you of the "Lancet-Gate" scandal: On May 22, 2020, in two of the most prestigious scientific journals, The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine, two studies claimed to have analyzed more than 96,000 records of COVID-19 patients from more than 600 hospitals in the world to prove that hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin are not only useless but even dangerous.
The studies were withdrawn two weeks later because they were phony, completely invented (the obvious purpose was to withdraw hydroxychloroquine from consideration as an excellent drug during the first phase of infection), as even the directors of the two journals admitted. Richard Horton himself (editor of The Lancet) had acknowledged in 2015 that "half of the scientific literature could be false" while the well-known epidemiologist John Ioannidis already argued in 2005, "most of the published studies are false, and many experiments are not replicable." So we must be very careful not to fall into the trap of "it is valid since it is published in an authoritative magazine." I am also in favor of rigorous and intellectually serious scientific investigation, and that is why I only consider works that bear the words "no financing, no conflicts of interest."
I only consider works that bear the words 'no financing, no conflicts of interest.'
Gab
Tweet
For example, with regard to spike prefusion (which I also talk about in my book Apocalisse [Apocalypse] — in the process of publication), you cite the article by the esteemed cardiologist Glen Pyle[1], which criticizes numerous studies from which, through pseudoviruses, it is clear that the spike alone is able to seriously damage the endothelium, causing the deadly damage that we know.
Pyle argues that the vaccinal spike does not go into the circulation and therefore cannot damage the endothelium since "the vaccine remains largely contained near the injection site," and he states this based on the Ols study[2], which, however, does not refer to SARS-CoV-2 but to HIV-1 — and he limits himself to arguing that "the intradermal administration of an mRNA vaccine (there is no mention of the vaccine for SARS-CoV-2) led to a more efficient activation of antigen-presenting cells at the injection site than intramuscular vaccination and was accompanied by transiently higher levels of vaccine-specific T cell responses and antibody concentrations."
This does not mean that the spike does not go into the circulation. In addition, the Ols study is funded by the NIH (historical partner of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) and by IAVI (in turn funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation): conflicts of interest. Pyle reiterates that no significant amount of vaccine enters the circulation since the EMA has established this.
But what scientific credibility can an entity that is 84% funded by the pharmaceutical industry have? Pyle claims that this would happen thanks to the conformational change due to prefusion, and he does so by citing the article by Cross[3], which reports the claims of the two inventors of prefusion, but note that Barney S. Graham and Jason McLellan work with NIH, NIAID and Moderna and are entirely biased. There is no credible scientific validity in these claims. According to Pyle, the spike thus engineered would not be able to make the shape change necessary to bind effectively to cells and cites Corbett's study[4], in which several different authors, including Graham himself, are inventors who have made patent applications for spike prefusion and for a vaccine for SARS-CoV-2: conflicts of interest.
But what scientific credibility can an entity that is 84% funded by the pharmaceutical industry have?
Gab
Tweet
In the end, Pyle quotes verbatim that "in addition to designing the spike protein so that it cannot be fully activated, the protein is labeled with an extra piece still called transmembrane" and is based on Polack's well-known study[5] regarding the efficacy and safety of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, a study funded by Pfizer and BioNTech — zero credibility!
You will know that Derek Lowe has also tried to argue that the vaccine is drained from lymph and not from blood, but, unfortunately, Lowe has conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry, having worked for Bayer, Vertex, Schering-Plough and Novartis and is a columnist for the Royal Society of Chemistry, whose "editorial policies meet the guidelines established by major funders" — including Wellcome, Research England, NIH, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, HHMI, UKRI and the European Commission. There is no evidence that spike vaccines do not go into circulation and produce damage, so how can it be said with certainty that the spike produced is harmless and that the contrary thesis is unfounded?
In contrast, Charles Hoffe states that only 25% of the vaccine remains at the injection site, while the other 75% reaches the circulation via the lymphatic system, damages the endothelium and increases coagulation (increase in the D-dimer) in more than 60% of patients. Hoffe has been harshly attacked, including by a study done by Imperial College London (repeatedly funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation), which has continually produced erroneous models of the epidemic. There is no evidence that the spike does not go into circulation; indeed, on the contrary, it has been seen that the spike vaccine circulates and is even conveyed by exosomes.[6]
In addition, C-terminal truncated and soluble spike variants spill into the lymphatic and blood circulation and tend to escape HLA (immune evasion syndrome) causing "serious side effects when they bind to endothelial cells that express ACE-2 in blood vessels, vaccine-induced COVID-19 mimicry syndrome."[7]
The danger of these vaccines is beyond question.
Gab
Tweet
Similar incompletely translated proteins enter the lymphatic and blood circulation and are picked up by different receptors (which, over time, are increasing) also in the brain tissue (neuropilin-1 above all) being able to damage the vessels and the nervous system.[8] Truncated spikes can arrive in vivo to 26% of all those produced.[9] Spike vaccines circulate in our body, so much so that "mRNA vaccines cause inflammation of the endothelium (endotheliitis) and infiltration of T lymphocytes into the cardiac muscle."[10]
Thus, spike vaccines are responsible for serious vaccine damage and adverse reactions, including the death of many of those who have been vaccinated. The danger of these vaccines is beyond question.
Sorry to contradict you, but it is not at all true that these vaccines prevent hospitalization and death. There is no evidence that they have saved lives, on the other hand, they have killed many. Since this infection is treatable, it does not require vaccines as long as it is treated immediately and well. It is not so extraordinary that I have avoided hospitalization for my patients. I am only a doctor, not a specialist. I treat them in the way I have learned from literature and experience and hundreds of doctors in Italy, and other European nations have done the same as me and with even better results than me.
COVID-19 does not evolve into the severe form if it is treated, immediately and well, within the first 48 hours. It is medicine based on evidence. People heal, this is a piece of factual data. The tens of thousands of deaths or serious injuries among those who have undergone these serums are also evidence, above all among young people. The ineffectiveness of the vaccine is demonstrated by the epidemic itself, which is more ferocious than last year when the vaccines were not present.
The ineffectiveness of the vaccine is demonstrated by the epidemic itself, which is more ferocious than last year when the vaccines were not present.
Gab
Tweet
The regime's propaganda has made the president of France say that the unvaccinated minority of about 7 million people in a nation where more than 90% of the people are vaccinated is the cause of the large number of infected people, about 300,000 per day. But, if mathematics is not an opinion, if it were only the unvaccinated who infect, then the infection would have run out in less than a month. Instead, it is the vaccinated themselves who become infected and infect others.
Quasispecies can also be induced by traditional vaccines (attenuated viruses), but in those used against SARS-CoV-2, engineered starting from a unique sequence for the spike, these variants are even more frequent, making vaccine effectiveness critical and favoring reinfections.[11]
Dear doctor, we are doctors; ours is a sacred role, and it has been so since ancient times, from Asclepius onwards. We must treat, reassure and protect our patients, and we must do so both in science and in conscience, without following the protocols written by the industry. If we are on the side of the patients, we cannot stand with the industry since the pharmaceutical industry does not want the good of others and certainly is not a sacred profession as that of the doctor must be.
Probably, each of us will remain in our positions. I am not interested in convincing anyone or in undermining the powerful financial oligarchic system that now rules everywhere. You will see that even this answer of mine will be accompanied by articles by some journalist who, not being able to argue about the contents, will invent nonsense concerning my person, confirming that they do not know how to make information but only propaganda.
Dear Dr. Spaeder, it has been a pleasure to discuss this issue with you, and I wish you all the best.
With esteem,
Massimo Citro, M.D.
Turin, 21 January 2022
[1] "COVID-19 Vaccines and Spike Proteins – COVID-19 Resources Canada"
covid19resources.ca
[2] Route of Vaccine Administration Alters Antigen Trafficking but Not Innate or Adaptive Immunity, (Cell Rep. 30(12): 3964-71. 2020)
[3] "The tiny tweak behind COVID-19 vaccines" (Chem Eng News. 98(38)
[4] SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine design enabled by prototype pathogen preparedness. Nature. 586(7830): 567-571. 2020
[5] Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine
[6] Bansal S et al, Cutting Edge: Circulating Exosomes with COVID Spike Protein Are Induced by BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) Vaccination prior to Development of Antibodies: A Novel Mechanism for Immune Activation by mRNA Vaccines J Immunol. 2021; 207(10):2405-10
[7] Kowarz, E. et al., Vaccine-Induced Covid-19 Mimicry" Syndrome: Splice reactions within the SARS-CoV-2 Spike open reading frame result in Spike protein variants that may cause thromboembolic events in patients immunized with vector-based vaccines
[8] Bolgan, L., COVID-19 - the vaccine, in www.studiesalute.it
[9] D'Alessandro A, High rate of SARS-CoV-2 nonsense spike genomes coding for prematurely truncated proteins. arXiv:2105.10074[q-bio. GN
[10] Gundry S, Observational Findings of PULS Cardiac Test Findings for Inflammatory Markers in Patients Receiving mRNA Vaccines. Circulation, 2021; 144: A10712
[11] Bolgan L., COVID-19 - the vaccine, in www.studiesalute.it
Read the first refutation by Dr. Citro Della Riva.
Boycott |All-American" company Hershey Chocolate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cOcc1kqqvE
17:28 video runtime
go to 9:56 for Hershey story
also see
https://www.theepochtimes.com/hershe...eRoganCensored
EXCLUSIVE: Hershey Fires Unvaccinated Employees
Offers payment to sign exiting agreement
By Beth Brelje
January 31, 2022 Updated: February 1, 2022
biggersmaller Print
The Hershey Co. has begun firing office workers who have declined to be vaccinated against COVID-19.SNIP
full article is on for-pay access only
https://trib247.com/articles/big-med...ign=Newsletter
Big Med ‘experts’: Mentally damaged are more likely to question government health regime
by: WorldTribune.com 02/02/2022 Source: WorldTribune.com
Analysis by Joe Schaeffer, 247 Real News
How Orwellian is this? From The Guardian, a UK newspaper that is heavily funded by Bill Gates, on a new research study in Wales:
Refusal or reluctance to have a Covid-19 vaccine may be linked to traumatic events in childhood, such as parents separating, neglect, or physical, verbal and sexual abuse, new research suggests.
Those who suffer in childhood are also least likely to trust official [National Health Service] coronavirus information, follow the rules of restrictions or wear masks during the pandemic, public health experts found.
A government-funded project involving major university personnel with globalist health ties speaks volumes about what the Big Medical Establishment really thinks about the common people. Remember: This is a government-funded study:
Health experts and policymakers are urgently trying to figure out why. Now the findings of a new study funded by Public Health Wales and published in the journal BMJ Open suggests that Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy may be linked to childhood trauma.
Six Bangor University researchers are listed as authors of the study. Three of them are also affiliated with the government Public Health Wales "World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Investment for Health and Well-being." Mark Bellis is the first author listed. He is the "Executive Director of Policy and International Health/Director" for the globalist health center. His Public Health Wales bio states:
Internationally, Mark is a member of the World Health Organization (WHO) global expert advisory panel on violence prevention, the UK Focal Point to the WHO for Injury and Violence Prevention and has worked as an advisor to a range of other UN agencies including United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund.
Now would be a good time to point out that WHO operates as a wing of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The global health titan is so deeply in the pockets of Gates that U.S. News & World Report noted in 2020 that:
The Gates Foundation has been a key donor to the WHO over the past decade, accounting for as much as 13% of the group's budget for the 2016-17 period. In February, the foundation pledged $100 million to fight the coronavirus pandemic, and it upped that to $250 million in April after an order from [President] Trump brought U.S. government funding to a halt.
The Gates Foundation has financed WHO to the tune of over $150 million in the past four months alone. One could have a field day picking through this abjectly Bolshevik document. Those who refuse to obey the Jab Social Regime are other-ized in the cruelest of ways. They are literally declared mentally damaged beings. We're not interested in highlighting the flimsy methodology of this tripe. For it is clearly not being done in good faith. The only worthwhile takeaway is what this paper says about those responsible for producing it. Here's how much the World Health Organization, the professional university class and the government of Wales hates its own citizens.
The researchers begin by stressing the urgent need to identify those who won't go along with medical establishment social curb regimens:
In many countries, the control of COVID-19 has relied on public acceptance of, and compliance with, restrictions on travel, work, socialising and public behaviour....
[D]espite some discussion on mandatory vaccination, the success of this emergent COVID-19 control measure also relies on individuals having confidence in and complying with health messaging. Consequently, it is critical for COVID-19 control to understand what factors differentiate individuals who may or may not trust health information, adhere to behavioural advice or accept offers of vaccination. Such understanding can inform the development and targeting of future measures to maximise behavioural compliance and vaccine uptake in different population groups.
The door has thus been opened for the other-ing process:
Here, we examine relationships between a history of childhood adversity and current levels of trust in health systems information, support for and compliance with COVID-19 control restrictions, and intention to be COVID-19 vaccinated. We hypothesise that, independent of sociodemographics, exposure to more [Adverse Childhood Experiences] will be associated with less trust in health systems, lower support for governmental restrictions intended to control COVID-19 transmission and higher vaccination rejection rates (termed here vaccine hesitancy).
Amazingly, the study confirms the hypothesis. How about that?
Nine ACE types before the age of 18 years (physical, verbal and sexual abuse; parental separation; exposure to domestic violence; and living with a household member with mental illness, alcohol abuse, drug abuse or who was incarcerated) were measured....
Individuals with higher ACE counts were more likely to have low trust in NHS COVID-19 information along with individuals from more deprived quintiles of residence.
The desired results are now official: If you question government medical health officials, you are not normal. You are a mentally impaired individual:
Just under 1 in 10 people reported feeling unfairly restricted [by coronavirus government social curbs]. This rose with ACE count, with the proportion among those with four or more ACEs being more than twice as high as in those with none.
You don't want to demand that every human being who crosses your path remain six feet away from you at all times? It is now scientifically proven: You are a trauma-scarred lunatic:
Supporting the removal of social distancing increased more than threefold from those with no ACEs to those with four or more.
It goes for masks too:
Support for ending mandatory face coverings increased fourfold between those with no ACEs and those with four or more ACEs.
And then, of course, comes the Jab itself:
Around 1 in 13 individuals surveyed reported vaccine hesitancy. However, this increased around fourfold between those with no ACEs and those with four or more.
From there, the official "Conclusions" are easy to foretell. These damaged "others" pose a dire public health threat:
Coping with trauma resulting from at least one current or previous ACE is common in the populations of many countries with proportions having experienced multiple ACEs frequently reaching ten percent or more of the population. Such individuals are already known to have greater health risks across the life-course. Results here suggest such individuals may have more difficulty with compliance with public health control measures and consequently require additional support.
Menace identified: Those branded with the starkly labeled "Adverse Childhood Experiences" are "at higher risks of infection and posing a potential transmission risk to others."
Our Elites are coming out and saying it: There are no issues up for debate here. If you will not obey them, you are not to be regarded as one who holds a differing view. Rather, you will be marked as a mentally disturbed individual who endangers the healthy body of the community at large.
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...nd-sequencing/
My bottom line on the existence of the virus, its isolation and sequencing
Feb 3
by Jon Rappoport
What proof would I accept? What sort of proof would convince me that SARS-CoV-2 exists?
Suppose, for example, a study described how researchers actually DID separate a virus from all the material surrounding it in their cell-soup in the lab?
Would that be enough?
And the answer is no.
Why?
Because I don’t trust studies based on research conducted in elite labs where no independent outsiders are allowed. And that’s the situation, when it comes to purported virus isolation.
These labs are like the famous bunkers where key government officials are taken, in the event of a massive attack against the country.
Try getting in off the street.
And who are these researchers in the super-secret labs? To put it another way, what sort of establishment do they represent?
Is it a clean establishment with a track record of honesty? Or is it a cartel with a criminal history?
If it’s a cartel, why should I accept the “scientific methods” of these researchers or their honesty?
As my long-time readers know, I’ve spent decades exposing lies and crimes of the medical cartel. Chapter and verse. (For example this: Medical weapons of mass destruction)
When it comes to vital issues that mean the difference between life and death—drug/vaccine-fueled destruction of human life; mistreatment and errors in hospitals; faked disease case and death numbers; inaccurate, meaningless, and deceptive diagnostic tests; the fabricated existence of a whole range of phony diseases and disorders and syndromes; the true numbers of medically caused deaths—medical authorities have been lying and sliming their way out of accountability for MANY decades.
And all this doesn’t touch on the history of public health declarations of epidemics that have turned out to be duds.
Nor does it include the overall history of Rockefeller medicine, which is based on the fatuous notion that there are thousands of separate and distinct diseases, each one of which is caused by a germ that must be treated by a profit-making drug.
Nor does it include the history of vicious suppression of innovative treatments developed by individuals who’ve worked outside the mainstream.
Therefore, suspicion is warranted. Is absolutely necessary. And “suspicion” is a vast understatement.
I refuse to trust the researchers who simply claim they’re isolating viruses.
When it comes to the so-called basic building blocks of MANY so-called diseases—which ARE “the viruses”—all the discovery-research HAS BEEN conducted by insiders in their off-limit labs. Without independent witnesses. Without educated witnesses who can watch and question each and every step of “the accepted method” for isolation of new viruses.
Frankly, you would have to be crazy to accept anything coming out of these insider-club labs.
So NO. I don’t accept such findings.
Before I describe how outsiders SHOULD be allowed to witness and participate in secret lab work, let me give you two quotes to consider.
They come from decidedly mainstream and elite editors of elite medical journals. These editors have read and explored and probed and lifted the fake cover from published medical material for decades. Material they themselves have published. Therefore, these are CONFESSIONS.
ONE: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” (Dr. Marcia Angell, NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption)
TWO: “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness…”
“The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of ‘significance’ pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale…Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent…” (Dr. Richard Horton, editor-in-chief, The Lancet, in The Lancet, 11 April, 2015, Vol 385, “Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma?”)
Suspicion is warranted. It’s absolutely necessary. And again, “suspicion” is a vast understatement.
More than a year ago, I mentioned how virus-isolation research—if the word “research” applies at all—should be done.
And I issue this now, as a challenge, to the entire insider-club of virologists, all of whom claim their established method of finding and sequencing new viruses is scientific and rigorous:
Let’s have a film crew on site. As you work. In your lab. Looking over your shoulders and recording every move you make.
And with the film crew, let’s have several knowledgeable, outside, independent researchers. People whom you would ordinarily refuse to give the time of day. People who are insightful. Possibly, people like Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan.
As the film crew works, and as you conduct and describe your step-by-step “isolation” of a new virus, these outsiders can stop you at any moment and question you. In depth.
“Why did you just do that?” “Why didn’t you record that step?” “Explain that answer you just gave me. It makes no sense.” “Exactly what did you just withdraw from the solution in the dish, and how do you know what it was?”
This is not a public relations exercise or an educational documentary for medical students. This is REAL. This is research about your research. No holds barred.
You give a slippery answer to a question; you evade with a vague generality; you try to pull rank; you get nailed to the wall. On film.
THIS is the procedure I want.
All the way from start to finish. Including the so-called sequencing of the “new virus.”
And then we would know a great deal more about what you’re actually doing and not doing in your labs. In the absence of what I’m proposing and demanding, THERE IS NO REASON TO ASSUME THE PROCESS OF VIRUS-ISOLATION IS LEGITIMATE.
Virologists, your work affects every human on Earth. Profoundly. To see this, all a person has to do is look around him these days, at what is called “COVID.” It proceeds from your so-called discovery of SARS-CoV-2.
I view you virologists as I would view the court magicians and soothsayers and high priests who surrounded and advised the leaders of tribes and nations in ancient times.
Those “experts” huddled with the leaders in their very private rooms and spun stories and predictions, and recommended strategies to deal with supposed ongoing and looming crises.
And then the leaders took actions that affected the lives of all the people.
So it is now. With you virologists.
So my demands are entirely within bounds. If you have a shred of honesty, and if you stop and think about it, what I’m demanding is prosaically simple:
You account for every step you take. In real time. Where you work. Right there, you submit yourselves to the detailed scrutiny of independent outsiders.
That’s my bottom line.
And I challenge any scientist, analyst, investigator, doctor, researcher, reporter, alt. reporter who says what I’m demanding is not necessary. You’re wrong. You’re dead wrong.
You either haven’t thought things through, or you’re lying.
Someone is going to tell me what I’m demanding, as proof, is impossible. It would never happen. “They” would never let it happen. They would never let independent outsiders into their holy labs.
You think I don’t know that?
If outsiders can’t get into their labs, what does that tell you?
And someone will say, “We just have to rely on the best evidence we have.”
No we don’t. Because the best available evidence is no evidence.
In a vast sea of death-dealing medical lies, a sea that has existed for more than a hundred years (actually much longer), if experts tell you they’re discovering viruses in labs you can’t enter, and they say you must believe them, and you buy that…
I have condos for sale on the far side of the moon. Full cash only, no payments.
Here it is: Virologists are saying and writing they’ve found a purple man with pink hair and green lips and four arms living a thousand miles under the surface of a planet in the next solar system over. And he causes disease.
Then they’re saying, “Prove us wrong.”
On top of that, they’re saying, “You can’t watch us work while we discover such creatures.”
Conclusion: the purple man doesn’t exist.
Virologists, text me when you’ll let my people into your lab.
Until then, get lost.
Dear reader, the elephant in the room is trust, not data.
When it comes to the “discovery of viruses,” there are no reliable data. We, on the outside, are told that what happens behind locked doors is irrefutable. Period.
We’re told we just can’t understand what the pros are doing. The problem is our lack of knowledge, our lack of training.
We’re the peasants toiling in the valley. Our better, the baron, is up in his castle on top of the mountain. He’s planning our lives, he’s taking care of us.
Sure. Of course. Uh-huh.
Sounds familiar. It’s pretty much the history of the world.
Or it was, until people who came before us finally staked out a territory called freedom, which involved opening locked doors and finding out what lay behind them.
Consider a parochial example: the mafia. They, too, plan behind closed doors. They concoct methods of carrying out crimes. They record their profits. Then, finally, a prosecutor announces, “We were able to get into their books. We saw the details. We made arrests.”
I want my independent accountants to get into the virologists’ books. But not after the fact. I want my people to BE there while the virologists are creating the books, entry by entry, in the lab.
“Why did you just make that entry? Where did your conclusion come from? Who are you trying to kid? You’re just fabricating this stuff? You know, that’s called RICO. That’s a RICO case. Continuing criminal enterprise. They’ll send you away for a long time…”
And all of a sudden, the high and mighty virologist, who’s been able to con the world with his hustle, who knows how to come off sounding superior in every way, feels a dent in his armor. A big dent. He smells his own blood.
And he starts talking.
He wants to make a deal. He’ll roll over on his colleagues. He’ll expose the whole sham.
“…You don’t understand. It’s the money. It’s all about the money. Where it comes from. We have to do this kind of work. Otherwise, we starve. They cut us off. I know the people on the funding committees. I’ll give you their names. They take orders, too. The whole thing is a system. I can draw you a map. I can’t go to jail. I have a family. I’m paying eighty grand a year just to send my kids to college. There’s the mortgage, and the cottage on the Cape…”
The whole bluff POPS and deflates, and we begin to hear words we understand, at last. The words of confession. The down-to-earth sordid truth.
There was never a towering mystery in the castle on the hill.
There was just the passing of the buck. The soiled buck. From hand to hand.
The “science” was the front.
“…You see, it works this way. The pharmaceutical companies have to have new viruses. For every fake virus, they develop a real drug and a real vaccine. It’s marketing. That’s what they’re doing. That’s what they’ve always been doing. This is much bigger than anyone realizes. I’m just a little fish. The big boys run the whole show. They pay the Congress and the FDA. They pay everybody…”
He keeps talking. He can’t stop. He’s way past “isolation, purification and sequencing.” They’re in his rear-view mirror. Now he’s fighting for his freedom from prison. Now he’s telling the truth.
And the ever-present storm clouds over the valley where we peasants toil are blowing away. The air is fresher.
We’re breathing easier.
The big-cheese baron is really a shrunken little man—when he takes his perp walk in chains.
Posting Permissions
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)
Reply With Quote
