Coronavirus

[Dachsie]

New VAERS Data as of July 15, 2022 (posted July 22, 2022)

32,212 Total Deaths and

1,443,402 Total Adverse Events

29,635 Pfizer/Moderna and 2,577 J&J Deaths

1,350,950 Pfizer / Moderna and 92,452 J&J Adverse Event

Source: https://drtenpenny.com/newsletter/#vaers

________________

Dachsie comment.

Using the recommended, and most conservative, factor of 41 to reach the most real deaths and injuries in the USA,

DEATHS - 1,320,692

ADVERSE EVENTS - 59,179,482

[Dachsie]

https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/...m_source=email


Jon Rappoport
22 min ago

48 hours after receiving the second dose of Moderna’s COVID vaccine, Mike’s 16-year-old son, Tommy, collapses on a baseball field and dies.

A few days later, Mike visits his family doctor, who expresses “deep sadness and condolences.”

---Mike, I’ve known you for 20 years. I’m aware you have a temper, and you’re probably going to make a public statement about Tommy dying. You’re going to say the vaccine was the cause.

Because it was the cause.

I’m not going to waste time arguing with you. But there’s something you should know. And I sincerely hope you’ll mention it if you launch a misdirected tirade.

What’s that, Doctor?

We ran a PCR test on Tommy during the last few minutes of his life, while the ambulance was taking him to the hospital. The result was negative. He had no virus in his body. He was completely clean.

SILENCE.

What’s your point, Doctor?

The vaccine was effective, Mike.

SILENCE.

You mean for 48 hours, before he died, he didn’t catch COVID.

That’s right.

And you want me to mention that, when I talk to reporters.

Yes. I think you should. In the interest of fairness.

SILENCE.

Tell you what, Doctor. YOU can tell that to the press. In my statement, I’ll mention your name, and I’ll say you strongly recommended that Tommy get the vaccine that killed him.

If you do that, Mike, I’ll sue your ass off. My lawyers will get a judge to issue a gag order. He’ll command you to keep your big mouth shut.

But I won’t shut up. And when I’m arrested for speaking the truth, that’ll make the news story bigger. And your name will keep leaking out.

The media won’t print my name.

What media? I’m talking about thousands of people who post online.

Wait a minute, Mike. I’m sure we can settle this amicably.

Settle the fact that my son was killed by the vaccine?

It was a very rare adverse effect.

You know that’s bullshit. People are dropping dead all over the world.

I knew you were going to be a problem, Mike.

---Well, look at this. A doctor pointing a gun at a patient in his office.

Who do you think the police are going to believe? I’ll tell them you threatened to kill me and then charged at me.

So that’ll be two CLEAN deaths you were responsible for.

The men stare at each other.

Mike turns and walks out of the office.

There are millions of Mikes in the world who are mourning the vaccine death of a loved one.

Can you guess what happens if they all speak up?

-- Jon Rappoport


_________________________________________

Jon also writes at NoMoreFakeNews.com and OutsideTheRealityMachine.com

Follow Jon on Twitter and Gab: @jonrappoport
Subscribe to Jon Rappoport

Thousands of paid subscribers

The hottest takes on culture

Subscribe now
12 likes
Comments
The Monkeypox Outbreak---Is It Real?
Listen now (102 min) |
Jon Rappoport
May 24
101
41
Part-1: The Whole COVID and AIDS Fraud: My 35 Years of Investigation
Listen now (131 min) | The complete story for the first time
Jon Rappoport
May 3
105
22
Part-1: Viruses That Don’t Exist
Listen now (77 min) |
Jon Rappoport
Jun 21
93
18
See all
Ready for more?

[Dachsie]

picked up the best video sample here...

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...d_science.html

Tucker Carlson: Anyone Who Tells You You're Anti-Science For Asking Questions Doesn't Understand Science
Posted By Tim Hains
On Date July 22, 2022

embedded 16:35 video runtime

go to 9:40

I believe this original broadcast was on July 21, 2022.

______________________

The best commentary comes from

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/-co...m_source=email

If you can, help me get the truth out and spread optimism and hope: https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/-le...-get-involved-

Twitter: @jchilders98
Truth Social: @jchilders98
MeWe: mewe.com/i/coffee_and_covid.
C&C Swag! www.shopcoffeeandcovid.com
Emailed Daily Newsletter: https://www.coffeeandcovid.com

Here it is...

Corporate media broke the embargo on vaccine injuries last week.

"It was Tucker — it HAD to be Tucker — who ran a segment discussing some of the jab studies that WE have already been looking at for months but the entire media apparatus has been industriously ignoring, like teenagers making a PBJ sandwich while casually pretending not to see a puppy accident on the kitchen floor, so they don’t have to clean it up.

In his show Thursday night, Tucker started by riffing on Biden’s oil cancer and his convenient covid diagnosis, and then used all that to segue into a monologue questioning the jabs:

Is it possible that the vaccine actually can hurt you, especially if you keep getting boosted? Can it weaken your immune system? Well, that looks possible. Multiple studies have looked into this. Just last month, the Journal of Food and Chemical Toxicology published the findings of several MRNA researchers and we’re quoting, “In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type one interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.”

Tucker continued discussing the study, saying:

The researchers continue that, in their studies of the COVID vaccine, “We identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances potentially have a causal link to neurodegenerative disease… myocarditis, Bell’s Palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response, etc.”

So, it’s possible. In fact, it’s looking likely that the vaccine might suppress the immune system. This fact, the authors concluded, will “have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to effectively combat future infections.” Now again, we sincerely hope that’s not true, but it’s not just the conclusion of one scientific journal.

He said immune suppression — VAIDS — was “likely!” Tucker then moved to a different Lancet study from February, and said:

The Lancet may be the most famous scientific journal in the world, released similar findings in February. The Lancet’s piece was entitled “Risk of infection, hospitalization and death up to nine months after a second dose of COVID 19 vaccine.” A physician called Kenji Yamamoto made this observation about the data from The Lancet. He wrote this in a letter to the Journal of Virology and we’re quoting “The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals eight months after the administration of two doses of COVID 19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals.”

Tucker dug into the Lancet article’s data and found what we’ve been seeing all year:

Among people around the age of 80 who have been double vaccinated, that would include people like Joe Biden, the per capita rate of medical incidences, including hospitalizations or death, is nearly twice as high as the rate of serious incidence for the unvaccinated. This is 180 days after vaccination. What is that, and why is no one interested? The piece also includes a chart showing negative vaccine efficacy for all ages after eight months for all participants in the study.

If Tucker keeps this up, I may be out of a job soon! Tucker then cited the German data, and suggested that 100,000 Americans could have serious jab injuries:

Germany’s Ministry of Health found that 1 in 5,000 Germans have suffered “serious side effects after a COVID 19 vaccine.”

I think that’s low. But Tucker spent several long minutes discussing potential jab injuries. He summed his monologue up by making the obvious connections and asking the right questions:

This is sad news for a lot of Americans, but it’s also a profound indictment, maybe the greatest indictment in our lifetimes of our leaders, their recklessness, their pig headedness, their dishonesty… People were misled. They were forced. They were forced, medical ethics thrown out the window. People were forced to take medicine they didn’t want and some of them have been hurt by it… Given this, how is the D.C. government, among many others, still requiring schoolchildren, public and private schoolchildren, to get a COVID vaccine? How are members of the U.S. military being dismissed without their pensions because they won’t take this same vaccine, in light of these study results?

Twitter avatar for @P_McCulloughMDPeter McCullough, MD MPH @P_McCulloughMD
Tucker correctly cites Yamamoto observation after 2 of them, the immune system is less responsive than the pure unjected with an intact and natural immune response. More evidence the products are backfiring and why so many regret taking them in the first place. @TuckerCarlson

July 22nd 2022
5,444 Retweets11,202 Likes

So, it’s finally out, and into the mainstream media. Now, we’ll watch and see what happens. Does Tucker get cancelled? Does some group start a pressure campaign against his advertisers? Does the government contact Fox News, concerned about Tucker spreading disinformation? Do they wheel out Fauci and Birx to “debunk” Tucker’s studies and reassure Americans “the vaccines are competely safe and 100% effective — mostly.”?

In other words, Tucker just broke ALL the rules of covid coverage. You aren’t allowed to even ASK the question whether the jabs might hurt people; that’s strictly forbidden. But there was Tucker, reading from several anti-vaccine studies and speculating that as many as 1 in 5,000 Americans could have a serious vaccine injury. Will Tucker be buried in the mammoth pushback?

Nope. Not so far.

So far, it’s crickets. When I searched all my go-to news sources this morning for “Tucker” news, I found his anti-vaccine screed was completely invisible. Not a peep, not anywhere. I even tried to look it up on Snopes and the Washington Post’s “fact checker.” Nothing.

Remember, this story isn’t about potential jab injuries, not really; the “news” is that a corporate media outlet covered it at all, even if only on a rightwing opinion show. Where are the howls of protest from the Narrative’s caretakers? Where’s Karen? Where are the armies of fact checkers? Where’s Ashish Jha complaining ruefully about Tucker spouting misinformation and making everybody vaccine hesitant?

In other words, Tucker’s show, plus the absence of pushback, is a signal. It’s a signal for a bunch of folks that it’s okay now, you can talk about it in public. Either Tucker’s vaccine segment shifted the narrative, or his segment was a symptom of a narrative already shifted by something else.

Either way, this is a HUGE development. Who do you think will be next? "

[Dachsie]

Here are two excerpt transcripts in Tucker Carlson video from last post here, #3507

"So, it's possible. In fact, it's looking likely that the vaccine might suppress the immune system. This fact, the authors concluded, will "have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to effectively combat future infections." Now again, we sincerely hope that's not true, but it's not just the conclusion of one scientific journal.

The Lancet may be the most famous scientific journal in the world, released similar findings in February. The Lancet's piece was entitled "Risk of infection, hospitalization and death up to nine months after a second dose of COVID 19 vaccine." A physician called Kenji Yamamoto made this observation about the data from The Lancet. He wrote this in a letter to the Journal of Virology and we're quoting "The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals eight months after the administration of two doses of COVID 19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals."

Now your first response, if you're a humane person to a line like that, has got to be deep sympathy because people were misled. They were forced. They were forced, medical ethics thrown out the window. People were forced to take medicine they didn't want and some of them have been hurt by it and you don't have to take this man's word for it. Pull up the Lancet study yourself. You won't find anything of the text of the article saying what Kenji Yamamoto said, which is weird. Why would the Lancet want to hide a major finding like that? We can't say, but if you look at table three in the piece, here's what you'll find buried in the data.

Among people around the age of 80 who have been double vaccinated, that would include people like Joe Biden, the per capita rate of medical incidences, including hospitalizations for death, is nearly twice as high as the rate of serious incidence for the unvaccinated. This is 180 days after vaccination. What is that and why is no one interested? The piece also includes a chart showing negative vaccine efficacy for all ages after eight months for all participants in the study. So again, this is sad news for a lot of Americans, but it's also a profound indictment, maybe the greatest indictment in our lifetimes of our leaders, their recklessness, their pig headedness, their dishonesty.

Given this, how is the D.C. government, among many others, still requiring schoolchildren, public and private schoolchildren, to get a COVID vaccine? That's a question that no one asked at today's White House press briefing. How are members of the U.S. military being dismissed without their pensions because they won't take this same vaccine, in light of these study results. Is no one paying attention? How is this allowed? But instead, today at the White House briefing, all the questions are about the proof of life video that Joe Biden's office released today.
"

"Germany's Ministry of Health found that 1 in 5,000 Germans have suffered "serious side effects after a COVID 19 vaccine."

Now, one in 5,000 may seem like a lot or a little, but extrapolate forward to the United States, a country with our population. That would mean that in the U.S., if that number holds constant across countries (and why wouldn't it?) it would mean more than 100,000 Americans may have been seriously injured by the COVID vaccine. "

[Dachsie]

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/exc...n-the-rise-but

Meryl’s COVID Newsletter

Excess deaths are on the rise – but not because of Covid.

Were the causes deliberately obscured?

Meryl Nass

Jul 17 2022

Hat tip to Daniel Horowitz of the Blaze for pointing out the Telegraph article (see below) and supplying the Canadian data. The full text of the Telegraph article is at the bottom of this piece.

While I suspect the vaccinations are the cause of the excess deaths, I cannot prove it without a lot more autopsy data or additional statistics that are not being supplied. It seems that there are less autopsies being performed than usual, however. Even though their purpose is to elucidate unexplained deaths.

The governments of the US and UK know exactly who was vaccinated, and when, and they know the diagnoses on the death certificates for every death. Don't believe the excuses that it takes weeks and months to gather these data. A funeral parlor cannot pick up a body from the hospital until the death certificate has been completed. The state gets the death certificate within hours of a death. What they then do with the data is the question. In the US, the Centers for Deception and Confabulation bury it.

In Canada, Horowitz reports that similar large increases in deaths have been reported from Alberta and New Brunswick, but they started earlier, in mid 2021.

The ICD-10 Codes

Have you ever heard of ICD-10 codes? This is the "International Classification of Disease" set of diagnosis codes created by the USG and WHO, allegedly for medical billing purposes.

Something really peculiar happened in the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10, which occurred in the US between 1999 and 2015. Suddenly the number of diagnoses and procedures ballooned, including bizarre diagnoses (burns sustained on water skis, bitten by pig, sucked into jet engine—not kidding, these are real)--splitting lots of hairs when there was no discernible need to split them. Per the CDC,

There are nearly 19 times as many procedure codes in ICD-10-PCS than in ICD-9-CM volume 3

There are nearly 5 times as many diagnosis codes in ICD-10-CM than in ICD-9-CM

There are now 70,000 different diagnoses, up from 14,000 in the ICD-9.

It seemed apparent that someone had fun making some of these diagnoses up. Were the inventors given a total number of codes that had to be devised? I always wondered why the US and other nations transitioned to this more expensive and unmanageable system. But now I think I know. It was intended to confuse the data on diagnoses and causes of deaths.

Again, according to the CDC,

World Health Organization (WHO) authorized the publication of the International Classification of DiseasesExternal 10th Revision (ICD-10), which was implemented for mortality coding and classification from death certificates in the U.S. in 1999.

1999. Did the proponents of this convoluted system know they were going to need to obfuscate the causes of death in the future? Should we be investigating the roots of the ICD-10 coding system to identify some of the Great Reset perpetrators?

Because the Telegraph is behind a paywall, I subscribe so you can be informed. (If you would like to help me out, please donate to Children's Health Defense for the mounting legal costs to defend my medical license.)

[Dachsie]

Source

[Dachsie]

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-...tm_source=push

The Day Anthony Fauci Wrecked American Freedom

By Jeffrey A. Tucker July 26, 2022


Fears of a virus from China had been rising for two months in the spring of 2020. The White House under Donald Trump had already weathered two impeachment crises and was turning its attention toward reelection in November, which seemed assured. The virus was an enormously complicating factor.

Trump surrounded himself with a small team of people among whom included supposed infectious disease experts such as Anthony Fauci from the National Institutes of Health and Deborah Birx of the Centers for Disease Control. On the recommendation of his vice president and son-in-law, Trump trusted them.

Trump had already closed travel from China but now his scientific advisers were urging him to do more: stop travel from Europe, UK, and Australia. That was March 12. He made the announcement in a prime-time address. In that brief speech, he misread the teleprompter and said that the travel ban would include goods. He meant to say that it would not. The stock market tanked and the White House had to issue a clarification the next day.

Already there was chaos in the air. Over the weekend, Trump spent most of his time in huddles with close advisors. The main influence over that period became Deborah Birx, whose job it was to convince Trump of the need for a two-week lockdown of the entire American economy.

Trump agreed to do the deed. He would appear with Fauci and Birx at a press conference on Monday, and preside over the call for a lockdown. “If everyone makes this change or these critical changes and sacrifices now,” Trump said, “we will rally together as one nation and we will defeat the virus and we’re going to have a big celebration together.”

Later Birx admitted that she knew that two weeks “was a start, but I knew it would be just that. I didn’t have the numbers in front of me yet to make the case for extending it longer, but I had two weeks to get them.”

Meanwhile, the CDC prepared an unusual flyer to hand out to reporters that day and send around the country. It was only two pages. It is posted below. It is the flyer that began the disaster as month moved to month and then one year became two. It groomed the American public for an unprecedented explosion in the power and reach of government at all levels.

What began as two weeks turned to a presidential election decided by mail-in ballots (safer that way, they said), closed schools, Grandma locked in a retirement community alone, no weddings or funerals, ruined small businesses, destroyed educations, the rise of massive substance abuse, some $10 trillion in government spending and $6 trillion in money creation that generated historic inflation, vaccine mandates that cost millions of jobs and still didn’t end the pandemic, and legal chaos in which judges and legislators themselves seemed powerless as the administrative bureaucracy of the country ruled every town.

There is something deeply suspicious about the order that began it all. It had a loud part and a quiet part. The loud part talked about washing hands and staying home from work. The quiet part was in very small print on the bottom of page two. Here was the shocking material that wrecked American freedom.

“Governors should close schools in communities that are near areas of community transmission,” said the small print, “even if those areas are in neighboring states.” That effectively means the entire country. The federal government was right here calling for all schools to be closed. What would happen to the kids? No one knew but of course that meant working moms and dads would need to stay home too, while children in poorer communities just got lost.

“States and localities that close schools need to address childcare needs of critical responders,” said the fine print, “as well as the nutritional needs of children.” Did that happen? No.

In addition, the document called for all elderly people in “nursing homes and retirement and long-term care facilities” to be forbidden from seeing family members. That situation persisted for one to two years.

Finally, the fine print had these astonishing words: “bars, restaurants, food courts, gyms, and other indoor and outdoor venues where groups of people congregate should be closed.”

This was one of the most egregious attacks on free enterprise and property rights in the history of humanity.

Trump at the press conference denied that he was issuing a closure order. He was merely making a recommendation that people refrain from eating out. He was twice pressed on the point and twice denied that he was issuing an order for full lockdown. Clearly, he had not read the fine print.

It was at this point in the press conference that Fauci stepped up to the microphone. “The small print here,” he said, pointing to the flier. “It’s really small print.” Then he read word for word from the third point in the tiny print in the document.




Once the document got to state health officials, the small print became large print and the entire country seized up. The Bill of Rights was overnight reduced to refuse. Only one state resisted the order, and that was South Dakota. Governor Kristi Noem was pilloried in the press for that and still is today.

Today, Fauci frequently denies that he ever issued a lockdown recommendation. But clearly he did.

____________________________

embedded video

https://twitter.com/i/status/1551944711060987907

Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
Townhall.com
@townhallcom
FAUCI YESTERDAY: "I didn't recommend locking anything down."

FAUCI IN OCTOBER 2020: "I recommended to the president that we shut the country down."

Townhall.com
@townhallcom
FAUCI YESTERDAY: "I didn't recommend locking anything down."

FAUCI IN OCTOBER 2020: "I recommended to the president that we shut the country down."

embedded video
9:57 AM · Jul 26, 2022·Twitter Web App
___________________________

More than that, Fauci demonstrated at that press conference special knowledge of a fine print that not even the president of the United States had seen. He was itching to read it. Did he have a hand in its creation? Most certainly. And what about the typesetting? Are we really supposed to believe that it was an accident that the text with the devastating material was so small as to be barely visible whereas the large text featured mostly common hygiene tips?

Clearly this was a plot, a sadistic caper to pull the wool over the eyes of the president, right there in public for the whole world to see. It worked. It worked so well that Trump himself later came to embrace it and even brag, repeatedly, about how he had shut down the economy and then started it back up again. It is very likely the case that even now, he is unaware of just how badly he was sandbagged in a way that ultimately doomed his presidency.

Fauci today denies that he had anything to do with it. But we have the receipts.

______________

Jeffrey A. Tucker is Founder and President of the Brownstone Institute and the author of many thousands of articles in the scholarly and popular press and ten books in 5 languages, most recently Liberty or Lockdown. He is also the editor of The Best of Mises. He writes a daily column on economics at The Epoch Times, and speaks widely on topics of economics, technology, social philosophy, and culture.