Coronavirus

[Dachsie]

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/t...m_source=email



The new ivermectin video is a must see

This video is approved by Doctors Pierre Kory and Paul Marik and many others. The video is NOT approved by the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, CNN, or the White House. Producer: Mikki Willis, Length:

embedded video

also on Rumble

https://rumble.com/v1huyrn-ivermectin-the-truth.html

Steve Kirsch September 1, 2022
12 min ago



Ivermectin: The Truth is an amazing film, less than 15 minutes long! I highly recommend this film. Watch it and share it.

Pierre Kory, Paul Marik, Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Chris Martenson, Richard Bartlett, and Mike Yeadon all appear. My name appears briefly at 11:45 in the video. Still trying to get that debate with the mainstream “experts.”

The Ivermectin film is free.

If you’d like to sponsor Plandemic3, you can donate here.
CNN “COVID expert” Leana Wen

Leana Wen appears briefly in this video (at the beginning and near the end) saying “we know it doesn’t work.” She’s total blue pill. If you feel the same way about Lena as I do, you’ll want to watch this excellent Leana Wen takedown video by Kim Iversen. It’s awesome.

The world would be a better place if Kim Iversen was the authority being promoted on CNN instead of Lena Wen.

P.S. Kim should write a book on “How I avoid being censored by YouTube.” She walks as close to the line as you can get. I don’t know how she does it.
Fluvoxamine

Just a footnote here since I was heavily involved in funding the research on fluvoxamine, another highly effective drug for treating COVID. If you take just 50mg of fluvoxamine twice a day for 2 weeks, most everyone avoids long-haul COVID symptoms due to the anti-inflammatory properties of this drug (Prozac also works).

They did the same thing to fluvoxamine as they did with ivermectin. They used the excuse that the US Phase 3 trial was halted for futility as a reason for not recommending the drug, but they never pointed out that the futility was that very few people in the placebo group were being hospitalized because the variants had gotten so mild and people were likely taking ivermectin, so they had no “comparison group” and they did a horrible job at recruiting (we spent gobs of money sending them leads and their enrollment % was horrible).

This doesn’t mean the drug doesn’t work. These are the kinds of games these people play.

Here’s what the reference cited by the NIH said:

The Data Safety Monitoring Board(DSMB) for the study recommended an early stop for futility due to a low case rate and difficulty recruiting patients.

Here’s how the NIH deliberately twisted the facts to make it look like the drug didn’t work:

The subsequent STOP COVID 2, a Phase 3 randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04668950) that enrolled >700 participants in the United States and Canada, was stopped for futility by a data safety monitoring board after lower than expected case rates and treatment effect were observed.

[Dachsie]

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...e-28ad50f9b728

childrenshealthdefense.org

What’s Really Behind CDC’s Plan to Revamp Agency?




By Dr. Joseph Mercola

September 1, 2011

After botching the COVID-19 response in every possible and improbable way, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now wants more money — and more power.

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender's Top News of the Day. It's free.

Story at a glance:

On Aug. 17, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director Dr. Rochelle Walensky publicly admitted the agency’s COVID-19 response “fell short,” and that an internal reorganization has been launched to improve response times and data sharing, and to make health guidance easier to understand. Six days before this announcement, the CDC published updated COVID-19 guidance, now matching what “misinformation spreaders” have called for all along.
The vow to revamp fails to take into account the real reasons why people no longer trust the CDC, namely their dishonesty, their suppression of science that doesn’t fit the Great Reset narrative and their protection of Big Pharma at the expense of American lives, including children and pregnant women.
Despite widespread failures and blatant corruption within the CDC, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) is asking for a bigger budget. Its proposed budget for 2023 is $1.7 TRILLION in mandatory spending and another $127.3 BILLION in discretionary spending.
Of those budgeted trillions, the CDC will in 2023 receive about 1% of the HHS budget, or $10.6 billion — $2.3 billion more than its 2022 appropriation — and this includes “mandatory funding to establish a Vaccines for Adults program.”
The CDC being wrong on everything about the pandemic — and taking two and a half years to admit even a fraction of it — is proof positive that centralizing health care decisions is a bad idea. Ideally, all that HHS money should be divided among the states. We’d be far better off with local community programs handling current HHS services — including pandemic response.

After botching the COVID-19 response in every possible and improbable way, the CDC now wants more money — and more power.

On Aug. 17, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky publicly admitted the agency’s COVID-19 response “fell short,” and that an internal reorganization has been launched to improve response times and data sharing, and to make health guidance easier to understand.

“My goal is a new, public health action-oriented culture at CDC that emphasizes accountability, collaboration, communication, and timeliness,” Walensky said in a statement.

The problem is that reorganization will not fix the foundational problem, which is that the CDC can’t seem to quit protecting Big Pharma at the expense of public health. Americans have lost faith in the CDC for the simple reason that it’s been lying to us day in and day out for two and a half years.

They’ve flouted basic rules and regulations, they’ve redefined well-established medical terms to suit the chosen narrative, they’ve made recommendations without scientific support while telling us to “trust the science.”

They’ve completely ignored massive, unprecedented safety signals for both the COVID-19 jabs and remdesivir, flatly refusing to answer questions about the mounting deaths and injuries from these drugs.

They’ve refused to take into account other public health parameters such as suicides and alcoholism caused by lockdowns, and deaths due to lack of treatment for chronic conditions such as heart disease, diabetes and cancer. They’re also refusing to address what is clearly deteriorating immune function among the COVID-19-jabbed. The list goes on.

In March, Walensky admitted they “never suspected” the effectiveness of the shots might wane, despite clear and abundant evidence — shared on alternative media platforms — that the shots were not working.

What’s more, she admitted her source for the “95% effective” claim was a CNN report (which in turn pulled its information directly from a Pfizer press release). That’s the level of data gathering for decision-making we’re dealing with here.

I guess that’s what happens when the vast majority of CDC employees, including Walensky herself, work from home for years on end. Considering Walensky STILL works from home to this day, one also wonders how effective these supposed reorganization efforts can actually be.

The CDC is a wholly captured agency, beholden to Big Pharma, and as long as a single decision-maker remains, they can reorganize and restructure to their hearts’ content. It won’t change a thing. As noted by The Defender, the CDC needs to be replaced with “a public health model that operates independently from Big Pharma.”

Health and Human Services to get $1.7 trillion

Failures and ineptitudes be damned, the HHS proposed budget for 2023 is now an eye-popping $1.7 TRILLION in mandatory spending (up from 1.5 trillion in 2022), and another $127.3 BILLION in discretionary spending (down from 131.8 billion in 2022).

Operating divisions under the HHS include not only the CDC and the FDA, but also the NIH, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid and several others. In total, the HHS employs some 80,000 people.

Of those budgeted trillions, the CDC will in 2023 receive 1% of the HHS budget or $10.6 billion — $2.3 billion more than its 2022 appropriation — and this includes “mandatory funding to establish a Vaccines for Adults program.”

Yet with all that supposed brain power and money, what exactly do they accomplish? I would argue “precious little,” and the CDC’s COVID-19 response is a perfect example of how our taxpayer funds are being wasted on advice that ranges from bad to worse.

The problem with concentrated power is that it gets corrupted. After 69 years, it seems the HHS is finally entering its death throes, as corruption within many of its operating divisions is now shockingly blatant.

The same goes for the World Health Organization (WHO). Incidentally, its biannual budget for 2022-2023 of $6.7 billion is dwarfed by the HHS budget. Still, the WHO is now seeking to gain control over health decisions globally. I explain why this is such a horrendous and unworkable idea in “The WHO Is a Corrupt, Unhealthy Organization.”

The CDC being wrong on everything about the pandemic, and taking two and a half years to admit even a fraction of it, is proof positive that centralizing health care decisions is a bad idea. Ideally, all that money should be divided among the states.

We’d be far better off with local community programs handling current HHS services — including pandemic response.

CDC’s botched test kits

The errors of the CDC are too numerous to recount in a single article, but let’s take a look at one of the doozies, namely its botched COVID-19 test.

As reported by HealthDay reporters Robert Preidt and Robin Foster, back in December 2021:

“Along with being contaminated, there was also a basic design flaw in COVID-19 testing kits created by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention early in the pandemic, a new agency review shows.

“It was already known that the PCR kits were contaminated, but the CDC’s findings published Wednesday in the journal PLOS ONE are the first to note a design error that caused false positives.

“When the CDC’s test kits were developed and distributed in the early weeks of the pandemic, there were no other authorized tests available. … The agency started shipping the test kits to public health laboratories in early February 2020, but many labs soon told the CDC that the tests were producing inconclusive results.

“The CDC acknowledged later that month that the kits were flawed, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials said in April that poor manufacturing practices had caused contamination of the kits …”

So, the tests had not just one but two problems. First, they were contaminated with synthetic fragments, sequences of genetic material from the virus that are used to ensure the test is working properly. These synthetic sequences are thought to have contaminated the kits during quality testing, as they were being manufactured in the same CDC lab where quality testing took place.

Secondly, the CDC failed to catch a serious design flaw. The test was designed to detect the presence of three specific genetic regions or sequences of the virus.

The test kit included a set of primers that bound to and made copies of those regions (when they were present in the patient, indicating exposure to the virus), as well as probes that fluoresced to signal that copying was taking place.

To work properly, these primers and probes had to bind to the genetic sequences, but not to each other. Here, one of the probes had a tendency to bind to one of the primers, thereby triggering a fluorescent signal, suggesting a positive result. This is how the test ended up producing an unacceptable number of false positives.

Eventually, smaller private companies ended up providing most of the PCR tests — without encountering these contamination and design flaw problems.

The fact that the PCR test cannot identify an active infection and was used to create a false “casedemic” is another story, which we’ve covered multiple times. Here too, the CDC displayed shocking dishonesty, alternatively hiding and manipulating data to make the pandemic out to be something it really wasn’t.

They also recommended mask wearing despite overwhelming scientific evidence showing masks don’t prevent the spread of viruses.

Time and again, CDC leadership made public health decisions on what appears to have been nothing more than assumption, personal opinion or fear — and that’s if you’re kind enough to exclude the possibility of fraud and collusion to benefit Big Pharma and the globalist Great Reset agenda.

Did HHS create the problem?

As mentioned, the HHS runs the NIH and CDC, both of which are implicated in the creation of SARS-CoV-2. So, basically, the same circle of people who may have created the problem are also in charge of solving it and providing a cure.

We’ve already seen how “effective” they’ve been in that regard. They’ve devastated public health with useless lockdowns, mask mandates and social distancing, and killed an as-yet undetermined but extraordinarily high number of people with improper, dangerous and experimental treatments.

As noted in “Why the COVID Jab Should Be Banned for Pregnant Women,” the CDC to this day insists pregnant women get the COVID-19 shot, despite trial data suggesting it may cause miscarriage in 8 out of 10 cases. Will reorganization eventually correct this murderous advice?

In an Aug. 2 Current Affairs interview, professor Jeffrey Sachs, chair of The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission, said he believes the U.S. government is preventing a thorough investigation into the origin of the pandemic, for the simple reason that the virus was the result of U.S. research.

Indeed, there are patents spanning decades to suggest that’s true (see “Patents Prove SARS-CoV-2 Is a Manufactured Virus”).

If our very worst suspicions are true, then the U.S. government funded not only one bioweapon but two — the original SARS-CoV-2 and the gene transfer injections misrepresented as “COVID vaccines.”

And the HHS divisions of the FDA and CDC went along with all of it, not even pausing at the possibility of killing or injuring 6-month-old infants and toddlers.

Waging war on pathogens is a failed strategy

In an Aug. 10 Brownstone Institute article, Aaron Vandiver, a wildlife conservationist, writer and former litigator, reviews why the global war on pathogens is a failed strategy that needs to end:

“Bill Gates has called the global response to COVID-19 a ‘world war.’ His militaristic language has been echoed by Anthony Fauci and other architects of COVID-19 policy for the last two and half years. …

“I believe that an ecological perspective reveals many of the flaws inherent in an aggressive high-tech attack on a pathogen …

“To me, the ‘war’ on COVID-19 has been characterized by a destructive set of attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors that appear to be deeply engrained in our political and economic institutions, and which form a pattern that should be recognizable to conservationists and ecologists.

“1. Aggressive intervention in complex natural processes using new, poorly understood technologies designed to achieve narrowly defined short-term goals, with disregard for the potential long-term ramifications;

“2. Profiteering by private interests that own the technologies, enabled by government entities and ‘experts’ that have been financially captured by those interests;

“3. Followed by a cascade of unintended consequences.”

In the remainder of the article, Vandiver goes into several aggressive and destructive COVID-19 interventions in greater detail — and their consequences. I recommend reading through it.

Importantly, when we go to war against pathogens, we go to war against ourselves, because without pathogens we cannot exist. The key to health is balanced co-existence with bacteria, viruses and other pathogens, which exist by the trillions in and on our bodies.

The twisted logic behind gain-of-function research

Vandiver, like Sachs, also points out that gain-of-function research funded by the NIH appears to be the most logical and most heavily supported theory as to the origin of the pandemic, and that denial of the lab leak theory is underpinned by reckless scientists unwilling to recognize the risks inherent in their work.

Vandiver writes:

“Most fail to realize that Fauci and other proponents of ‘gain of function’ have long shown reckless disregard for the risks of tampering with natural viruses, expressing a paranoid attitude toward nature that is the antithesis of respect for ecology.

“Fauci and others claim that ‘Mother Nature Is the Ultimate Bioterrorist’ to justify their Frankenstein-like efforts to hunt down the most dangerous viruses that exist in wild nature, take them to labs like the one in Wuhan, and tinker around with them to make them more dangerous and deadly.

“Their twisted logic seems to be that if they intentionally create superviruses, they can somehow anticipate and prepare for natural pandemics. Most objective observers, however, say that ‘gain of function’ is a military-industrial boondoggle that has no practical benefit whatsoever and dramatically increases the risk of pandemics. …

“It remains inconclusive whether ‘gain of function’ research actually caused the COVID-19 pandemic, but its potential to have done so is a vivid example of how powerful actors like Fauci use technological tools to interfere with natural processes, with disregard if not outright contempt for the long-term ecological consequences, thereby creating opportunities to exercise more power.”

In conclusion, Vandiver notes:

“If we carefully analyze each aspect of ‘world war’ on COVID-19, we can see how each tactic and high-tech ‘weapon’ has harmed human health, destabilized civil society, and possibly disrupted the ecological balance between the human population and the virus, while enriching private interests and empowering financially captured government regulators.

“The ‘war’ has been characterized the distinct pattern that I described at the beginning of this essay … This destructive pattern appears to be deeply ingrained in our institutions and in the outlook of our leaders. It largely defines our society’s dysfunctional relationship with the natural world.

“An ecological perspective that keeps this pattern in mind, and takes into account all of the consequences of launching high-tech ‘wars’ on pathogens or any other part of our environment may help us avoid similar catastrophes in the future, or at least to recognize them.”

Death by medicine

In “Are Medical Errors Still the Third Leading Cause of Death?” I review the now decades-long history of modern medicine being a leading cause of death, at times spinning up to take first place, and rarely dipping below fourth.

Several studies and investigations over the years have placed medicine and medical errors as the third leading cause of death in the U.S.

The pandemic has revealed just how dangerous it is to listen to dog whistles like “trust the science.” Which science? The one Big Pharma concocts to make money or the one that double checks and investigates claims independently?

The CDC’s COVID-19 policies were all wrong — consistently 180 degrees from helpful — and have only recently been updated to match what all of us “misinformation spreaders” have been saying for well over two years. That update was published Aug. 11, just six days before Walensky announced the CDC’s reorganization plans.

I’m not buying the idea that the CDC suddenly realized it was going in the wrong direction. They knew it from the start, and they did it intentionally. I suspect they’re only now starting to course correct because mainstream media are losing their grip on the public.

Mainstream media were their cover for every obnoxious, unscientific recommendation, and without that brainwashing arm, the CDC has no way to turn but back.

Like Dr. Anthony Fauci, they probably realize that the political tide is turning, people are fed up with the “1984” double-speak, and if Republicans take the House in November, the CDC could well be facing any number of investigations.

Senators promise investigations

On Aug. 23, two U.S. senators promised a “full-throated investigation” of Fauci’s and former NIH chief Francis Collins’ potential roles in the origin of the pandemic, and issued a formal request for the HHS and NIH to preserve documents and communications.

Leadership at the CDC and FDA also need to be investigated and questioned about the ins and outs of their decision-making. Not that I think they’ll ever admit to “working for the devil,” meaning the Deep State cabal that is using COVID-19 as a cover for a global takeover, but there needs to be a reckoning nonetheless.

Those willing to sacrifice the lives, futures and Constitutional rights of Americans on behalf of these transhumanist psychopaths need to be ruthlessly weeded out. And then, we need to implement new public health systems, perhaps new agencies, with powers that are more limited in scope and state-run rather than federal.

Never, ever, should an agency like the CDC be allowed to ban doctors from treating patients, for example, based on their own expertise and experience. What has happened during this pandemic, and is still happening, is a true crime against humanity.

We must never forget how health officials, government officials, media and other influencers tried to foment hatred against the unvaccinated, and how they’ve been willing to discriminate to the point of death.

The CDC has now backtracked on discrimination, agreeing people should not be treated based on their vaccination status. But we remember the calls for “re-education camps” and no-fly lists. Backtracking is not going to erase the attempts to destroy the lives of those who refused to play their Russian roulette.

I, for one, would love to hear the CDC explain why they have ignored the blaring safety signal of nearly 2.3 MILLION reports of COVID-19 jab injuries in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Wouldn’t you?

Originally published by Mercola.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.

[Dachsie]

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...e-28ad50f9b728


COVID Vaccines Didn’t Work, so CDC Changed the Definition of Vaccines

The Epoch Times reported:

In early 2020 when the public first learned that a novel virulent virus was making people sick in China and around the world, it made sense to institute public health measures to protect against it.

But, instead of encouraging doctors and scientists to look for ways to treat the virus and ways to keep sick people from healthy people, as has been done with other pandemics in modern human history, government authorities actually actively prevented doctors from treating patients.

Tech companies quickly censored and de-platformed doctors who discussed potentially-effective treatment options. The scientific debate was silenced.

Instead of any open, honest discussion about the effectiveness of preventative measures and the different treatment options, the world was told that the only way out of the coronavirus crisis was via mass vaccination. If the public understood that there were options for treating COVID-19 and that the infection was likely to be mild in over 99% of the people who got it, they wouldn’t be as motivated to get a vaccine.

[Dachsie]

https://brownstone.org/articles/unco...tm_source=push

Uncovering the Army of Federal Censors

By Aaron Kheriaty September 2, 2022

Excerpt:

"I've recently posted twice on the case of Missouri v. Biden, in which the states of Missouri and Louisiana — along with four private plaintiffs (Jay Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff, the non-profit Health Freedom Louisiana, and yours truly) represented by the New Civil Liberties Alliance — are suing the Biden Administration for alleged free speech violations. Specifically, the executive branch of the federal government has been colluding with social media to censor any content on social media platforms — Twitter, YouTube (owned by Google), and LinkedIn (owned by Microsoft), Facebook and Instagram (both owned by Meta) — any content that questions, challenges, or contradicts the government’s covid policies.

While private companies might arguably choose to censor content on their platforms, the government cannot pressure or coerce private companies to censor disfavored content. Any such action is clearly a violation of the free speech guaranteed by the First Amendment of the US Constitution. As we articulate in our latest legal brief: “Under the First Amendment, the federal Government should have no role in policing private speech or picking winners and losers in the marketplace of ideas. But that is what federal officials are doing, on a massive scale.”

Our joint statement on discovery disputes legal brief, filed with the court and made public today, reveals scores of federal officials across at least eleven federal agencies have secretly communicated with social-media platforms to censor and suppress private speech federal officials disfavor. This unlawful enterprise has been wildly successful. Here are just a few excerpts from this document, which includes attachments of hundreds of pages of emails and other governmental and Big Tech internal communications as supporting evidence. These documents were obtained after we requested the following information on discovery:" SNIP

Author


Aaron Kheriaty

Aaron Kheriaty, Senior Scholar at Brownstone Institute, is a psychiatrist working with the Unity Project. He is a former Professor of Psychiatry at the University of California at Irvine School of Medicine, where he was the director of Medical Ethics.

[Dachsie]

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3




Biden Administration to Shift COVID Vaccine Distribution to Private Sector Despite Plans to Extend Public Health Emergency





More Than 1,000 Reports of Adverse Events After COVID-19 Vaccination in Children 5 and Younger, CDC Data Shows



What Is the Cause of Increased Mortality Rates?





‘America’s Other Drug Problem’ — Overprescribing





Here’s Proof Our Government Does Not Want to Compensate for COVID Vaccine Injury

[Dachsie]

https://usawatchdog.com/fraud-lies-p...dead-more-war/

Fraud, Lies, Psyops, Cheating For Midterms, More Vax Dead, More War

By Greg Hunter On September 2, 2022 In Weekly News Wrap-Ups



By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com

The amount of psyops for the Deep State Dems to win in November is kicking into high gear. They are way behind in the real polls, but that does not stop them from lying to make you think otherwise in the phony polls. (As I have said in the past, the real approval rating for Biden is 11% to 12%.) This is why the Democrat strategy must include fraud, lies, psyops, cheating and rigging for Midterms come November. They sure as heck do not have any policy to make the lives of ordinary Americans better, unless you think killing your unborn baby or paying much more at the gas pump and grocery store will enrich your life. Don’t fall for the psyops. You are not hearing any good ideas from Democrats because they don’t have any.

Another week and more young healthy people die from “unknown causes.” When are we all going to say enough and call this what it is—people are being murdered from the bioweapon injections they passed off as a “vaccine.”

The War in Ukraine could have been stopped in April, but the UK and the West halted any hint of peace to stop the bloodshed. Meanwhile, Germany’s economy is about to totally shut down and destroy the lives of its citizens all in an effort to support Ukraine. Now, natural gas from Russia has been cut to zero as the Russians say the Nord #1 pipeline is down for repairs. When it reopens (and who knows when that will happen), it will be running at 20% of capacity, just like before. Germans are trying to find coal to burn so they don’t have to burn their furniture to stay warm this winter. If the economy shuts down anymore, can the banks also suffer from this? Deutsche Bank (DB) is in Germany, and the IMF has been calling it “the most systemically dangerous bank in the world” for the past few years. Is the German economic shutdown over this stupid war going to help or hurt DB?

There is much more in the 45-minute newscast.

Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he talks about these stories and more in the Weekly News Wrap-Up for 9.2.22.

(To Donate to USAWatchdog.com Click Here)

Embedded video
video also on Rumble
https://rumble.com/v1ibj8p-fraud-lies-psyops-rigging-cheating-for-midterms-more-vax-dead-more-war.html

45:45 video runtime

After the Interview:

Renowned pulmonary doctor and CV19 expert, Pierre Kory MD, founder of FLCCC.net, will be the guest for the Saturday Night Post. The deaths and injuries are increasing from the failed CV19 bioweapon vax, and Dr. Kory will bring us an update to give you the info to fight this menace.

[Dachsie]

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...soylent-green/

COVID-19 is the Murder of Old People

Sep 2 2022
by Jon Rappoport

In the 1973 film, Soylent Green, a NY police detective discovers that the vastly overcrowded, poverty–stricken population of the city—who are being sustained on processed government food, called Soylent—are now unknowingly eating humans who have died. That’s what Soylent Green is made of. That’s the terrible secret. What’s the secret now? It’s all there in the open-source literature…

by Jon Rappoport

September 2, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

Note: I’m republishing this piece to keep the truth on the record. It can easily slip away.

Here we go:

The SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist.

The supposed diagnostic tests are meaningless.

The case numbers are meaningless.

The people who have died have died for multiple reasons, none of which has anything to do with SARS-CoV-2.

I have spent the past year writing over 300 articles, providing compelling evidence for the above assertions.

There are “people who have died who are LABELED COVID deaths.” AKA “official reality.” AKA “official lies.”

Who are these people? By and large, who are they?

Here are two statements.

The Kaiser Family Foundation, July 24, 2020: “Adults 65 and older account for 16% of the US population but 80% of COVID-19 deaths in the US…”

AARP, April 1, 2021: “95 percent of COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. have occurred among people who were 50 or older.”

A member of Biden’s coronavirus task force, Dr. Zeke Emanuel, once stated there is no reason people should want to live beyond the age of 75. Just go gently into that good night.

Well, what is called COVID is old people.

My first clue about the elderly came from a report published by Italy’s National Institute of Health during the early days of the “pandemic.” It stated that the average age of people dying from COVID in the country was 79.5. That clue was the size of an aircraft carrier parked outside your house.

Soon after the Italian report, the Institute of Health went dark. No more research was released. No updates. They’d spoken out of school, and someone slapped them in the head.

Open-source press reports revealed the “excess mortality” of 2020 was largely the result of elderly people dying in nursing homes.

This has nothing to do with a virus.

It has to do with patients who are ALREADY on a long downward health slide. They ALREADY have multiple health conditions. For years, even decades, they’ve been pounded with toxic medical drugs, weakening their bodies and shredding their immune systems—

And THEN they’re hit with the TERROR of an arbitrary and fake COVID-19 diagnosis—

And THEN they’re isolated and shut off from family and friends—in facilities where gross neglect and indifference are all too often the “standard of care.” THEN they’re treated with toxic and destructive drugs like Remdesivir and Midazolam.

Death is the direct result.

Forced premature death.

These patients just fold up and die.

The managers of pandemic information tell the big lie. They spin tales about “the virus” having a greater impact on the elderly.

No, the STORY about a virus has the impact. The terror has the deadly impact. The isolation has the deadly impact. The terror and the isolation deliver the final blow.

To an astounding extent, COVID-19 is a NURSING HOME DISASTER.

Mass murder by cruelty.

Memo to financial investigators: Calculate how much money government and private insurers are saving, because they don’t have to keep paying for the long-term care of all the old people who are dying premature deaths in nursing homes. The money number will be staggering.

Tony Fauci knows the con. He knows COVID-19 is old people. People are dying from the fear he promotes. Fauci has no shred of shame. He’s a mouthpiece turned out by Bill Gates and David Rockefeller.

Evil permeates the COVID operation. The elderly in nursing homes are the primary target. Getting them to die earlier is the tactic, in order to pump up the fake COVID mortality numbers.

Without those phony numbers, the whole “pandemic” would be exposed in an hour.

I’ve said there were two key events in the foisting of the whole vicious COVID fiction—the Chinese regime locking down 50 million citizens overnight for no good medical reason, giving the green light to the World Health Organization and the CDC to “follow the new model”; and the Bill Gates-financed computer projection of deaths, put together by Neil Ferguson, who lied through his teeth when he claimed half a million people could die in the UK and two million in the US by the summer of 2020—thus supplying the final “rationale” for the lockdowns.

The third key event was and is the sustained attack on the elderly.

Kill these people with terror and isolation, and make the death numbers escalate.

As of May 22, 2020, Forbes reported that, “…in the 43 states that currently report such figures, an astounding 42% of all COVID-19 deaths have taken place in nursing homes and assisted living facilities.”

Washington Post, May 18, 2020: “The World Health Organization said half of Europe’s covid-19 deaths occurred in such facilities.”

Headline of same Post article: “Canada’s nursing home crisis: 81 percent of coronavirus deaths [in the country] are in long-term care facilities.”

The Guardian, May 16, 2020: “About 90% of the 3,700 people who have died from coronavirus in Sweden were over 70, and half were living in care homes, according to a study from Sweden’s National Board of Health and Welfare at the end of April.”

“The country [Spain] was shocked at the end of March when the defence minister revealed that soldiers drafted in to disinfect residential homes had found some elderly people abandoned and dead in their beds.”

“…the regional governments of Madrid and Catalonia have been publishing their own figures on people who have died in care homes…”

“In Madrid, the total for Covid, or suspected Covid, deaths since 8 March stood at 5,886 on Thursday. In Catalonia, it was 3,375. Between them, care home deaths in the two regions account for more than a third of all the coronavirus deaths in the country.”

And there was a great deal of early warning on the subject, if anyone from public health agencies wanted to pay attention—The Guardian, 13 April, 2020: “About half of all Covid-19 deaths appear to be happening in care homes in some European countries…Snapshot data from varying official sources shows that in Italy, Spain, France, Ireland and Belgium between 42% and 57% of deaths from the virus have been happening in homes, according to the report by academics based at the London School of Economics (LSE).”

These nursing home figures only give a partial picture. Consider the HUGE NUMBER of elderly, already-ill people who are basically in the same situation AT HOME—terrified by COVID propaganda, locked down, isolated; and then die—and also those who manage to make it to a hospital, where they are put on breathing ventilators, heavily sedated, and killed.

The Hill, undated (late April 2020), reported on “data…gathered at Northwell Health, New York state’s largest hospital system. The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) examines 5,700 patients hospitalized with coronavirus infections in the New York City region, with final outcomes recorded for 2,634 patients. The average patient age was 63 years old… For the next oldest age group, ages 66 years and older, patients receiving mechanical ventilation recorded a 97.2 percent mortality rate.”

And yet the ventilator death-treatment continues. As does treatment with remdesivir, a highly toxic drug.

The New York Times (June 27, 2020) reported that 43 percent of all US COVID deaths were occurring in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities for the elderly. In at least 24 states, more than 50 percent of all COVID deaths were occurring in these facilities. The Times failed to mention deaths of the elderly at hospitals or, at home, cut off from family and friends. The situation is far worse than the Times made it out to be.

COVID is old people. Pushed into death.

It’s mass murder.

Behind politicians’ and public health officials’ oh so caring directives and demands and declarations and pronouncements, it’s mass murder.

Imagine YOU were 80 years old. For years you’ve been suffering from multiple serious health conditions. For years, doctors have been giving you many toxic drugs, carving up your immune system, weakening your body, affecting your judgement. Along comes a false story about a deadly virus. Every time you turn on the television set, there it is, that fearful story. You’re terrified. Maybe the virus will visit you. And then one day, your doctor gives you a test, or simply eyeballs your clinical symptoms, and says yes, you have it. The virus. You’re infected. Your terror escalates. Your worst nightmare has come true. And suddenly, you’re isolated in your home, alone, or you’re locked up in your room in a nursing home, cut off from family and friends. Day after day, week after week. What would you do?

Chances are, you would see no point in living. You would give up and die.

The operation called COVID is old people. Killing old people.

[Dachsie]

Dachsie comment:

Anticipate an article analyzing and summarizing the September 2022 latest court-ordered Pfizer document dump which is dropped at the beginning of each month, I think this September 2022 document dump will be the fifth month of a release, if they began in May 2022. Not sure of that.

The two main places from which to anticipate an article any day now are...


https://childrenshealthdefense.org/a...vradakis-ph-d/
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.'s Posts:

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/dea...announce-a?s=w