QR code and the mark of the beast

[C.Martel]

https://endtimestruth.com/the-qr-cod...-of-the-beast/

[C.Martel]

It does not matter if you buy with QR codes, bitcoin is the beast system:

What emerges is what social theorists call technofeudalism — a regime where digital systems manufacture consent, curate our desires, and monetize our very existence. Each QR code, tap-to-pay, or blockchain validation is one more data point in a planetary feedback loop that abolishes privacy and replaces autonomy with behavioral steering.

Nearly fifty years ago, Stanford researcher Paul Armer testified before the U.S. Senate about the surveillance potential of electronic funds transfer systems. To control a population invisibly, he warned, you wouldn’t build barbed wire and secret police — you’d build EFTS. In effect, a cashless network is the ultimate surveillance machine: total financial mapping of every life, instantaneous censorship of dissent, and a kill switch for the noncompliant.

https://thesilverindustry.substack.c...w-technofeudal

CBDC were the side show distraction and controlled opposition to crypto Jewish money of bitcoin.

As the fake populists fought CBDCs as the fake mark of the beast, those not fighting crypto bitcoin were building the new jewish money temple of bitcoin.

You have one million or more useless internet messages about CBDCs as the mark of the beast and to fight CBDCs, barely a message about QR codes and bitcoin as the global money mentioned in the Bible.

Have the psy-oped public that believe in bitcoin fight a sock puppet of CBDC as the public is herded into bitcoin and the maga cia reservation.

You have two choices: be a bitcoin millionaire or fight the usual suspects new central bank - bitcoin.

Know 99% of the populists are fake populists shilling for bitcoin. Only 1% resisted trump and bitcoin are for gold and silver as money.

[keehah]

Tokenized economy with computerized control of every financial and online social transaction for a 'more efficient' unnatural persistent predatory hegemonic social control.

'Improvement' on the fallen western public servants existing East German based modern western Stasi Zersetzung political terrorism predation and treason (aka 'Community Orientated Policing Services').

This article warns similarly and explains these predator's need for transitioning their state control and abuse systems:

stuartparker.ca: Zersetzung: the Word We Need to Understand Our Present in the West

When Erich Honecker assumed power in East Germany in 1971, he sought to remake the image of his brutal dictatorship in the minds both of its citizens and of the West, to achieve hitherto-elusive diplomatic recognition among members of the NATO alliance and to emerge as the most successful Soviet vassal state in the Warsaw Pact.

This plan contained two central elements, both innovative within the Soviet bloc. The first was to use a highly effective strategy for economic development that had not previous been attempted in a planned economy:

• Import substitution industrialization, an economic development model most thoroughly explained and propounded by revisionists like Andre Gunder Frank and the other “dependency theorists,” that had been most successful in Cold War Turkey and Brazil; and

• Developing less violently coercive and more “inclusive” means of suppressing dissent and maintaining political and social control over the population so that the unanimous elections and staged applause of the regime would be seen less as a show of power and more as a show of popularity

While the latter could not have been successful in persuading the West of the regime’s exemplary character without the former also succeeding, this piece will concentrate exclusively on the second element: social control.

The Stasi, East Germany’s secret police, were already among the most feared of the secret police forces of the Warsaw Pact and their playbook was largely that developed by the KGB, the USSR’s secret police, during Joseph Stalin’s purges of the 1920s and 30s. Show trials were used not to convince the public of dissidents’ guilt but to demonstrate the power of the state to rig its own judicial system and turn every verdict into a foregone conclusion. Torture, similarly, was widely practiced and efforts at denying it were transparent and perfunctory because the point was to make torture a public secret, an unacknowledged fact that nevertheless shaped everyone’s expectations of what happened if they stepped out of line. Knowledge of torture was as universal as its formulaic denial. The odd street beating was thrown in as well, so that the state’s violence could erupt anywhere, any time, again conditioning everyone’s expectations.

Honecker was faced with the problem of how to reform the Stasi without damaging the hegemonic social control it exercised on behalf of the state. The innovations he made should sound eerily familiar to anyone navigating our present society’s profoundly dystopian turn.

First of all, the Stasi were successful because of the large number of volunteers for every Stasi agent in East German society, there were two civic-minded volunteers who helped the agency do its work by informing on their neighbours, friends, family members and co-workers. Taken together, including both direct employees and volunteers (these include only regular volunteers). Those who simply cooperated or fed information to the Stasi occasionally, or at their convenience, was likely about 2 million people, or 12% of the population. But those who made Stasi activities part of their day-to-day lives were closer to 250,000, around 2% of the population. These numbers peaked in the 1980s, having steadily increased through the 70s.

Stasi operatives, paid and unpaid, were disproportionately concentrated in the caring professions, such as doctors, nurses and teachers. Stasi personnel, both paid and voluntary, were also disproportionately concentrated in institutions wielding what we might call “syndical power.”

By “syndical power,” I mean institutions that exercise direct control over key aspects of society unmediated by conventional legislative bodies like parliaments, cabinets, central committees, legislatures, etc.
[cont'd]

[C.Martel]

Technofeudalism by Design

What emerges is what social theorists call technofeudalism — a regime where digital systems manufacture consent, curate our desires, and monetize our very existence. Each QR code, tap-to-pay, or blockchain validation is one more data point in a planetary feedback loop that abolishes privacy and replaces autonomy with behavioral steering.

Nearly fifty years ago, Stanford researcher Paul Armer testified before the U.S. Senate about the surveillance potential of electronic funds transfer systems. To control a population invisibly, he warned, you wouldn’t build barbed wire and secret police — you’d build EFTS. In effect, a cashless network is the ultimate surveillance machine: total financial mapping of every life, instantaneous censorship of dissent, and a kill switch for the noncompliant.

https://thesilverindustry.substack.c...w-technofeudal

If I owned bitcoin I would not sell, I would use that fortune to defeat the banksters. The banksters last phase before imposing bitcoin as global money is to get libertarian "freemasons" that built the jewish temple of bitcoin to abandon bitcoin to the monied crooks on wall street.

I would use crypto to buy gold and silver to defeat the banksters.

As I said I own a bunch of alt coins, not enough to be wealthy, only enough to survive a dark age planned. I want crypto to crash and gold and silver to get rockets.

From the emails of Epstein, the banksters hated the competition of the alt coins and for that reason, knowing when I began mining altcoins, that this was a way to fight bitcoin from within. Alt coins piss off the banksters. Silver and gold moreso than anything else.