Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Virus Isolation (No Evidence via FOI requests)

  1. #1
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,822
    Thanks
    2,225
    Thanked 4,501 Times in 2,050 Posts

    Virus Isolation (No Evidence via FOI requests)

    Okay, so I found this woman through one of Rappoport's articles and I signed up on her email list.

    Anyway, the latest is:

    FOI responses from 64 institutions (including Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, US CDC) in 18 countries/jurisdictions show that health/science institutions have no record of "SARS-COV-2" isolation/purification from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois...-purification/

    FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever

    Would a sane person mix a patient sample (containing various sources of genetic material and never proven to contain any particular virus) with transfected monkey kidney cells, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs, then claim that the resulting concoction is “SARS-COV-2 isolate” and ship it off internationally for use in critical research (including vaccine and test development)?
    Because that’s the sort of fraudulent monkey business that’s being passed off as “virus isolation” by research teams around the world.
    Just 1 of many examples is shown below – this is from a study cited by the Australian Department of Health as a paper “which led to the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in culture“. (Can you spot the oxymoron in that quote?)
    If you are new to the topic of “virus isolation/purification”, I strongly recommend reading the Statement On Virus Isolation by Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Thomas Cowan and Sally Fallon Morell, MA.
    https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/
    A colleague in New Zealand (Michael S.) and I (CM) have been submitting Freedom of Information requests to institutions in various countries seeking records that describe the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus from any unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient.
    Our requests have not been limited to records of isolation performed by the respective institution, or limited to records authored by the respective institution, rather they were open to any records describing “COVID-19 virus” (aka “SARS-COV-2”) isolation/purification performed by anyone, ever, anywhere on the planet.
    Thus far (May 22, 2021) 24 Canadian institutions have provided their responses: Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, the National Research Council of Canada, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre (VIDO-InterVac), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Ontario Ministry of Health, Institut National de Sante Publique du Quebec, British Columbia’s Ministry of Health (re “the UK variant”), British Columbia’s Centre for Disease Control, British Columbia’s Provincial Health Services Authority (2 responses, 1 re “SARS-COV-2, 1 re “the UK variant”), Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (re “the UK variant”), Newfoundland Labrador Department of Health & Community Services, McGill University, the City of Toronto, Toronto Police, the Region of Peel (Ontario), KFL&A Public Health (Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington, Ontario, re “any variant”), Grey Bruce Health Services, Peterborough Public Health (Ontario), the University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University and Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto) (note that researchers from the last 4 institutions had publicly claimed to have “isolated the virus”, as had VIDO-Intervac).
    Every institution has failed to provide even 1 record describing the isolation aka purification of any “COVID-19 virus” directly from a patient sample that was not first adulterated with other sources of genetic material. (Those other sources are typically monkey kidney aka “Vero” cells and fetal bovine serum).
    The response from 1 additional Canadian institution is long overdue:
    Public Health Ontario (request submitted July 16, 2020)
    Click on the above links to access the responses from Canadian institutions. Scroll further down this page for responses from institutions outside of Canada.
    Here are 3 compilation pdfs containing ~70 responses from 53 institutions in 11+ countries/jurisdictions re the isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2” last updated April 9, 2021 (note: some of these responses were obtained by FOI-submitters other than Michael S. and myself, as indicated further down this page):
    Part 1: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...ono-part-1.pdf
    Part 2: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...ono-part-2.pdf
    Part 3: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-3-April-3.pdf
    Check back here (the page you are currently on) for regular updates. As of May 25, 2021: 64 institutions and offices in 18 countries/jurisdictions have responded thus far, and none have provided or cited any record describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation. Note that some institutions failed to fully co-operate. Tsk tsk University of Auckland, Public Health Wales, Imperial College London.

    (And yes, we are aware of the many publications wherein authors claim to have “isolated the virus”. We’ve looked at numerous such studies and have yet to see one where they actually did so. Claiming to have done something and actually doing it are sometimes 2 different things, even in peer-reviewed science. And yes we are aware of the many published alleged “SARS-COV-2 genomes” – these were in fact manufactured, not discovered. And yes we are aware that EM photos have been published, allegedly of “the virus”, however a photo of something does not tell you what the thing is, where it came from or what it does. One has to scrutinize the Methods used to “isolate the virus” / obtain said photos / obtain alleged genomes, and that is when absolutely everything falls apart with “COVID-19”.)
    FOI responses from institutions in the U.S., India, New Zealand, Australia, U.K., England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Denmark, Spain, European CDC, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Columbia, etc

    A big Thank You to all the individuals who have now kindly shared additional FOI responses that they obtained re isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2”. Some prefer to remain anonymous, others are named below.

    Also note that we have included below responses from the U.S. CDC and a couple of New Zealand institutions in regards to isolation/purification of a number of other alleged “viruses”, i.e. “HIV”, “Ebola virus”, “Zika virus”, “XMRV”, “HTLV1”, “HTLV-III/LAV”, 2003 “SARS-COV”, any common cold “coronavirus”, any “virus” on NZ’s “immunization” schedule. Again, none have yielded any records or citations of records describing the isolation/purification of any virus.

    [We also await responses from the CDC re: “measles virus”, “polio virus”, “MERS virus”, “HPV” and any alleged “virus” on their child or adult “vaccine” schedules.

    As this next link you will see a “no records of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification” FOI response from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR), dated November 2, 2020:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...e-Scrubbed.pdf
    On March 1, 2021 once again the CDC made clear that they still have no records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation performed by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever… just not in so many words. Instead, the CDC absurdly implied that isolation of “SARS-COV-2” would require the replication of a “virus” without host cells and thus is impossible.
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...e-Redacted.pdf
    March 3, 2021: CDC again fails to provide/cite any records describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification by anyone anywhere ever… BUT will no longer simply say so (as they did back on November 2nd); instead they give song and dance and cite their own fraudulent study (by Harcourt et al.):
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CDC-March-3-2021-SARS-COV-2-purification-FOI-response.pdf

    [Note that someone kindly forwarded another FOI response from the CDC dated December 30, 2020 re the alleged 2003 “SARS-COV-1” and all “common cold coronaviruses” – the CDC has no record of any having been isolated. Here is a temporary pdf of the redacted letter…. a better pdf one will follow:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...oronavirus.pdf

    And… March 15, 2021 CDC FOIA response: no records of any “Ebolavirus” isolation/purification by anyone, anywhere, ever:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...No-Records.pdf

    And… March 19, 2021, U.S. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) admit they have no record of any “Zika virus” isolated/purified from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-isolation.pdf

    And… March 23, 2021 CDC admitted in a FOIA response that they have no record of any “HIV” purified/isolated from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever.

  2. #2
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,822
    Thanks
    2,225
    Thanked 4,501 Times in 2,050 Posts

    Re: Virus Isolation (No Evidence via FOI requests)

    [Please note: you might notice a strange reference to “influenza” in my FOIA request, however this detail did not effect the request in any way because the reference was in the context of me giving any example of the sort of record I was looking for. The reference was the result of sloppy editing on my part … I had recycled my earlier FOI request to the CDC re purification of any “influenza virus”, and neglected to edit that part when adapting the text for my HIV request.]
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...March-2021.pdf]
    CDC has no record of “XMRV” purification/isolation:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...t-response.pdf
    CDC has no record of “HTLV-1” purification/isolation:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...t-response.pdf
    CDC has no record of “HTLV-III/LAV” purification/isolation:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...t-response.pdf
    April 12, 2021: CDC admits they have no record of any “influenza virus” isolated/purified from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...rification.pdf
    Ron Bublitz asked the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH) the question shown below. His correspondence is posted at the following link, along with the evasive response provided by the NIH/NIAID Section Chief for Controlled Correspondence and Public Inquiries, Legislative Affairs and Correspondence Management Branch. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/has-c...n-ron-bublitz/ Here is a pdf showing the text and a photo of the actual emails: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-isolation.pdf
    Ron kindly provided a screenshot of his communications with NIAID, shown below.
    Note that NIH/NIAID failed to answer any of Ron Bublitz’s questions and merely cited a CDC study that indulged in the typical fraudulent “monkey business” approach to so-called “isolation” – as shown in the screenshot below). NIAID’s response strongly suggests that they too have no records of any isolated/purified “SARS-COV-2”.
    This is the same study that Dr. Thomas Cowan recently wrote about (“Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’“) where he also addressed the fraudulent nature of the authors’ fabricated “SARS-COV-2 genome” (as shown in the screenshot below).
    May 22, 2021: Ministry of Health and Social Protection, Republic of Colombia admits they have no record re purification of “SARS-COV-2” from a patient sample, by anyone anywhere. Full letter:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...ds-package.pdf
    May 3, 2021: Indian Council of Medical Research (ICRM, “the apex body in India for formulation, coordination & promotion of biomedical research”) has failed to provide/cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification for the requester (who asked to keep both their name and file # private); instead they cited a typical example of “monkey-business” fraud. Note that ICRM had fraudulently claimed to have been tracking “the virus” across India, to have isolated the imaginary UK variant, has developed a COVID-19 quackcine, shares ownership rights on the quackcine and is a member of guess WHO’s Global Health Workforce Network. Full response:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...y-redacted.pdf
    I personally cannot read these Czech documents, but was told:
    Univerzita Karlova: “This from the No.1 university in Czech R. As answer, they inform us, that “there is broad consensus in the international scientific community” about precise RNA sequence of SARS-Cov2, about its chemical and protein structure and it causing COVID19.”
    Thus Univerzita Karlova failed to provide any record proving the purification or existence of “the virus”:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...university.pdf

    Czech Ministry of Health: “This is the response of Czech ministry of health. When a proof of existence of the SARS-Cov2 virus was requested…”
    The references cited by the Ministry are in English and do not describe purification of an alleged virus, let alone scientific study of such. Full letter:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-of-health.pdf
    The Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport provided/cited for the requester no records of actual purification and control experiments to show “SARS-CoV-2” exists:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c.../FOI-RIVM2.pdf

    New Zealand’s Ministry of Health and NZ’s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research admitted they have no records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/new-...-and-research/
    Here are 5 pages of pure gold, evidencing masterful evasion plus stunning incompetence and/or fraud from New Zealand’s Ministry of Health. Instead of providing the requests records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification and proof of accurate diagnostic tests, they blathered about genomes and cultures of the never-isolated imaginary virus; stated that PCR tests have been validated around the world and are the gold standard; and cited a February 2020 preliminary report (“The Pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 Transgenic Mice”) that used the so-called “SARS-COV-2” strain that had been concocted by Zhu et al. and claimed that Koch’s Postulates had been fulfilled.
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...no-records.pdf


    No records describing isolation of SARS-COV-2 from a sample not already adulterated with other genetic material, admits New Zealand’s Department of the Prime Minister & Cabinet: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...e-scrubbed.pdf
    March 22, 2021, New Zealand’s Ministry of Heath, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and the NZ Cabinet confirm they still have no record describing purification of “the virus” and hence zero proof of its existence, and they choose to cite fraudulent studies instead (the infamous Harcourt et al. study mentioned above and the Australian paper cited at the top of this page). Full pdf response:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...2-redacted.pdf
    April 19, 2021, responding to a request that had been forwarded to them by Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern‘s Office, the New Zealand Ministry of Heath confirms that no record describing purification of “SARS-COV-2” is held by the Ministry or by any “agency subject to the Act”. Full pdf response: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...t-Redacted.pdf
    April 23, 2021 Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern‘s Office, New Zealand, again confirms they have no record describing purification of “SARS-COV-2” by anyone, anywhere, ever. Full pdf response:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...8-Redacted.pdf
    New Zealand’s University of Auckland was disappointingly non-cooperative, the only institution as of October 8th failing to simply admit that they have no such records, opting instead for a sketchy “refusal” of my colleague’s request. Let’s face it, if the University actually had any such records (that no one else on the planet appears have) and they are publicly available, the University of Auckland would have proudly provided links/citations. But they didn’t. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...FOI-emails.pdf
    New Zealand’s University of Otago, where Professor Miguel Quiñones-Mateu, Ph.D. claimed months ago to have “isolated the virus”, responded that they too have “no records” describing isolation of SARS-COV-2 from a sample not already adulterated with other genetic material: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/new-...y-anyone-ever/
    March 30, 2021 New Zealand’s University of Otago confirm they still have no record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification, by anyone anywhere. Full response pdf here:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/2021-03-30-University-of-Otago-Purification-of-SARS-COV-2-redacted.pdf

    [BONUSES:
    New Zealand‘s Ministry of Health admits to having no records describing isolation of ANY virus listed on NZ’s Immunisation Schedule: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...2-scrubbed.pdf;
    NZ’s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research also admits to having no records describing isolation of ANY virus listed on NZ’s Immunisation Schedule, and equates “isolation” with culturing:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...t-Response.pdf
    New Zealand‘s Ministry of Health obviously has no record describing the isolation of the alleged 2003 “SARS-COV” or any “common cold coronavirus” by anyone, anywhere, ever, but wasn’t willing to admit such. Instead they falsely implied that Michael S. had asked for things he had not asked for.
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...e-redacted.pdf]
    New Zealand’s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research once again equates “isolation” with culturing and this time admits to having no record re isolation of “SARS-COV-1” or any “virus” on NZ’s Immunisation Schedule and simply “ignored” a query re isolation of any “common cold coronaviruses”. I think we know the answer though, don’t we?
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...ommon-cold.pdf
    March 9, 2021: New Zealand’s Institute of Environmental Science and Research admits that they still have no record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification (performed by anyone on the planet, anywhere, ever):
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...n-Redacted.pdf
    One of New Zealand’s Associate Ministers of Health Jenny Salesa has “no records”:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...e-scrubbed.pdf
    Another of New Zealand’s Associate Ministers of Health Julie Anne Genter has “no records”:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...e-scrubbed.pdf
    And another of New Zealand’s Associate Ministers of Health Peeni Henare has “no records”:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...e-scrubbed.pdf
    Same, “no records” says Bay of Plenty District Health Board, Tauranga Hospital, New Zealand:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...e-scrubbed.pdf

  3. #3
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,822
    Thanks
    2,225
    Thanked 4,501 Times in 2,050 Posts

    Re: Virus Isolation (No Evidence via FOI requests)

    At this next link you will find an interesting “no records” FOI response from Australia’s Department of Health:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/aust...virus-isolation/
    Same admission from Australia’s Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity (which had publicly claimed to have “isolated the virus”).
    Same admission from Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation – CSIRO (“Australia’s national science research agency”), which is involved in “COVID-19” vaccine trials using the so-called “SARS-COV-2 isolate” from Doherty Institute:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...e-scrubbed.pdf
    March 22, 2021, Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation still has no record of any “SARS-COV-2” purified from a patient, by anyone, anywhere:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/no-records-CSIRO-SARS-COV-2-Purification-Redacted.pdf

    The next FOI letter shown in the screenshot below is in response to a request that was submitted on the advice of Australia’s Department of Health, and has come to us via John Blaid. Addressed to Mary-Jane Liddicoat, the formal but undated letter was authored sometime after March 9, 2021 by Dr. Nick Coatsworth, Executive Director of Medical Services, Canberra Health Services (CHS), ACT Government (Government of the Australian Capital Territory).
    [When reviewing Coatsworth’s response, bear in mind the following facts provided us by Darren Christison, a journalist in Sydney, Australia: “This is the same Dr Nick Coatsworth who is the ‘poster boy’ for the Australian government’s push to vaccinate everyone until they urinate the poison, and has been a permanent fixture on TV and online in recent months (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aep_RKawTWc). He’s also the same Dr Nick Coatsworth who recently, according to The Sydney Morning Herald, ‘admonished a “hardcore rump of activist doctors” spreading misinformation and undermining vaccine confidence” (https://www.smh.com.au/national/form...14-p57s1u.html).]
    Coatsworthadmitted that Canberra Health Services holds no records relevant to the topic of isolating (aka purifying) the alleged “SARS-COV-2”. His entire letter is here:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...March-2021.pdf
    [BONUS: Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation – CSIRO (“Australia’s national science research agency”) also admits to having no record describing the isolation of ANY virus on Australia’s national “immunization” schedule, by anyone, anywhere, ever:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...e-Redacted.pdf]
    No records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation, admits the U.K. Department of Health and Social Care (note: there are not 1, not 2, not 3, but 4 such responses from DHSC – the most recent dated November 23, 2020): https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/u-k-...rus-isolation/
    [Note The U.K. Department of Health and Social Care has kept us waiting for 2 months already on an FOI request for (at most) 3 days worth of analysis on their alleged “new variant” announced by Matt Hancock on December 14 2020: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...ed-variant.pdf]
    UK’s Government Office for Science has no record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/uks-...y-anyone-ever/
    Same, from the UK’s Cabinet Office and the UK Prime Minister’s Office, in response to a query from Marc Horn. See here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...0121-Reply.pdf and here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...SARS-COV-2.pdf
    Here is a sketchy FOI reply from the U.K. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (obtained by Mr. Athanasios Kandias). The agency provided/cited no records re “SARS-COV-2” isolation. Their response includes an (apparently fraudulent) claim that such records are available in the public domain, but they provided zero links/citations despite having been asked for the location of any such records. Excerpts are shown below. Full response: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/reque...coming-1670059
    Pdf: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...on-records.pdf
    May 4, 2021: University of Warwick (UK) admits that they hold no record describing “SARS-COV-2” purification from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...May-4-2021.pdf

    Regarding “BNT162b2”, the mRNA ingredient in the Pfizer-BioNTech “Covid-19 vaccine”, that is allegedly transcribed from the the alleged corresponding genetic template that allegedly encodes the alleged viral spike (S) protein of the alleged “SARS-COV-2 virus”, U.K. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency admitted to investigative journalist Frances Leader that: the genetic template on which it (“BNT162b2”) is based “does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person“, rather it “was generated via a combination of gene synthesis and recombinant DNA technology“. The email exchange is available here:
    https://hive.blog/worldnews/@francesleader/email-exchange-with-uk-mhra-exposing-the-genomic-sequence-of-sarscov2
    and in a pdf here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...mails-w-FL.pdf.
    No EM photos of purified “SARS-COV-2”, no peer reviewed paper with the genome of purified “SARS-COV-2”, no proof that “the virus” causes “COVID-19”, etc — says UK’s Cabinet Office in response to the queries shown below from Bartholomeus Lakeman; full letter here: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/reque..._passthrough=1 and preserved here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-FOI-reply.pdf
    No records re isolation of “SARS-COV-2” from an unadulterated sample, says the UK’s House of Commons, in response to a query from Marc Horn: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...SARS-COV-2.pdf
    Same, from the UK’s House of Lords, in response to a query from Marc Horn: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...SARS-COV-2.pdf
    (Click here to see a series of “COVID-19” FOI requests submitted by Marc Horn to various agencies: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/user/marc_horn)
    Same, from Public Health Scotland in response to Athanasios Kandias: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...020-000133.pdf
    Same, for the 2nd time from Public Health Scotland in response to my colleague in NZ: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...020-000158.pdf
    Public Health Wales provided Dr. Janet Menage a sketchy excuse for not properly assisting with her request (Dr. Menage has submitted a complaint to the PHW ‘Corporate Complaints’ team); see PHW’s response here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...Sars-COV-2.pdf

    Here is a 2nd & more recent dodgy response from Public Health Wales yielding no record, or citation of any record, of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification done by anyone, anywhere, ever. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...12/PHWales.pdf
    Below is a screenshot of a Freedom of Information response from the University College Dublin, explaining thatIreland’s National Virus Reference Laboratory has no records describing “how the Novel Coronavirus was purified. Click the link for more details.
    Statens Serum Institut, Denmark told Alex Holmsted that (translation): “The Statens Serum Institut can state that we have now carried out a journal search for documentation that has convinced the Statens Serum Institut about the real existence of SARS-CoV-2, the alleged cause of COVID19 and moreover, we have in some other way tried to locate relevant documents. Statens Serum Institut can note that we are not in possession of the requested documents...”https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-08162__1_.pdf
    April 2020: Public Health England admits using fake virus material to evaluate “COVID-19” tests, the gold standard is not isolated virus, and more https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/publ...ing-questions/
    No records re isolation of “SARS-COV-2” from an unadulterated sample, Public Health England told Andrew Johnson, a Technology Tutor at a UK University: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/reque...V%202.pdf.html. This is Andrew’s write-up on his FOI request: https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/...ment-and-more/.
    Months ago, the StandUpX Science Committee published an open letter dated June 22, 2020 to the British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson. Below is a screenshot from their letter, demanding scientific proof of the alleged “COVID-19 virus”. (Their entire letter can be viewed and/or downloaded here: https://kevinpcorbett.com/onewebmedi...definitive.pdf)
    StandUpX Committee member Piers Corbyn also made the demand verbally outside the headquarters of the UK government; video footage of the demand is available at this url (not the embedded video below – that is a different video featuring Peirs Corbyn; WordPress would not embed the footage of the demand for some reason, so please click on this url to see the demand, not on the image below): https://youtu.be/4FpuzGBa36c
    Below is footage of Piers Corbyn calling out the UK government for the non-isolation of their theoretical “SARS-COV-2 virus”. https://www.bitchute.com/embed/1eDDh...ret=fSiAIVe09M ERRATUM: In the description underneath the video (on the bitchute page) the authors of the publication on the Drosten PCR test are referred to has ‘Drosten et al’ when it should read ‘Croman et al’.
    StandUpX has a petition entitled If there’s no proof the virus exists end all Lockdowns/Masks/Trax/Vax actions“. If you can tell the difference between isolation and fraudulent monkey business, please consider signing it, here: https://www.gopetition.com/petitions...actions-2.html
    In April StandUpX committee member Dr. Kevin Corbett MSc PhD (@KPCResearch on Twitter) published a paper describing issues around the non-isolation of the theoretical SARS-COV-2 virus. Below is a screenshot from his paper entitled “WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE ‘NOVEL CORONAVIRUS’, ‘SARS-CoV-2’, AND THE ACCURACY OF THE TESTS?”, which you may access here:
    https://kevinpcorbett.com/onewebmedi...S%20FINAL2.pdf

  4. #4
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,822
    Thanks
    2,225
    Thanked 4,501 Times in 2,050 Posts

    Re: Virus Isolation (No Evidence via FOI requests)

    Guess “WHO” advised Public Health England (and the rest of the world) not to isolate “the virus” as a routine diagnostic procedure, and “WHO” encourages the conflation of isolation with culturing? See the screenshots below from page 4 of the Interim Guidance document dated March 2, 2020 “Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in suspected human cases” kindly provided by Dr. Corbett of StandUpX: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...2020.4-eng.pdf and page 8 of the Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 Interim guidance 11 September 2020 https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uplo...Guidelines.pdf
    Update, October 1, 2020: My colleague in New Zealand recently received a “no records” response from Public Health England – identical to the “no records” response above that was already provided to Andrew Johnson. You may access this 2nd response from PHE here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...d-scrubbed.pdf
    Update November 1, 2020: Marc Horn also queried Public Health England for records describing “SARS-COV-2 isolation” from a sample not unadulterated with additional genetic material. Response: no records. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-isolation.pdf
    Another “no records” FOI response from Public Health England dated November 3, 2020, in response to a request from Athanasios Kandias for records (re SARS-COV-2 isolation) held by the National Biological Standards Board.
    https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/reque..._passthrough=1 (Preserved here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-isolation.pdf)
    No records supporting the claim that the alleged “SARS-COV-2 virus” causes “COVID-19” symptoms says Public Health England, in response to a query from Marc Horn. Note that PHE cited 3 publicly available studies, none involving isolation of “SARS-COV-2” from a sample not unadulterated with additional genetic material. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...f-COVID-19.pdf
    No records supporting the claim that the alleged “SARS-COV-2 virus” causes “COVID-19” symptoms, says the UK’s House of Commons, in response to a query from Marc Horn: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-causation.pdf
    No records supporting the claim that the alleged “SARS-COV-2 virus” causes “COVID-19” symptoms , says the UK’s House of Lords, in response to a query from Marc Horn: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-causation.pdf
    Britain’s Health and Safety Executive confirmed for Athanasios Kandias on November 3, 2020 that they hold no information relating to isolation of “SARS-COV-2”.
    https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/reque...ng_sars_cov2_3
    (Preserved here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-Executive.pdf).
    Imperial College London managed to provide/cite zero records in their wildly un-informative Freedom of Information response dated March 12, 2021 re: isolation/purification of the imaginary “SARS-COV-2” (by anyone, anywhere, ever):
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-isolation.pdf
    Kepa Ormazabal submitted a Freedom of Information request to Spain’s Ministry of Health for bibliographic records of studies describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation (“the term “isolation” is used in the sense given by the Real Academia Espanola Dictionary”); the Ministry’s response yielded no records:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...ranslation.pdf
    The Director of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Andrea Ammon, has admitted to having no documentation, even for the ECDC’s methodology to prove that a virus exists, let alone proof of SARS-COV-2: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...D-RESPONSE.pdf
    According to the website of Slovenia’s University of Ljubljana, the Faculty of Medicine there has been involved in…implementation of the latest molecular diagnostic procedures; an attempt to isolate the virus in cell cultures [oxymoron], which is a precondition for testing anti-viral agents and vaccines…“. The Faculty formally admitted on November 30, 2020 to having no record (even obtained from others) of “SARS-COV-2” isolation or proving a causal link to “COVID-19”; also that 40 PCR cycles have been used across Slovenia since the beginning of testing. The Faculty’s original response and an English translation are available here:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-isolation.pdf
    More recently, Slovenia’s Ministry of Health stated that they had no records re “SARS-COV-2” purification, PCR tests, etc. and transferred an FOI request to the Institute of Microbiology and Immunology (IMI) at the Univerisy of Ljubljana. The IMI eventually admitted in February 2021 that they have no records re “virus” purification and that PCR tests have been conducted using up to 40 cycles. Bother letters are here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-40-PCR-CT.pdf
    Hall of Shame

    The FOI request shown below was submitted to Germany’s Federal Ministry of Health by Michael S. on August 9, 2020 and has been completely ignored. I think we know the answer though, don’t we?
    Pdf: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...t-redacted.pdf

    On February 15, 2021 Kepa Ormazabal submitted an FOI request re isolation/purification of the phantom “virus” to the Basque Country (Spain) Office of the President and Department of Health and all dependent institutions. Months later Kepa wrote:
    “According to the law, they have 30 days to respond; 60 if the question is especially complex. Today is May 2nd and I have not heard from them.”
    On March 30, 2021 Kepa Ormazabal submitted another FOI request re isolation/purification of the phantom “virus” to the flagship of Spanish research, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas /Higher Council of Scientific Research (the image below indicates the reception of the request by the institution). Months later Kepa writes: Again, they have not responded and, therefore, their silence is refusing access to the information they may hold in regards to my question.
    “The CSIC and the Basque government are public institutions and, therefore, must comply with the Ley de transparencia, buen gobierno y acceso a la información pública/Law of transparency, good governance and access to public information. Article 20.4 of this law states that, if after 30 days there has been no response from the public administration, this silence is to be understood as meaning that the request to access the public information solicited has been refused.”
    Here is an exasperating email exchange between myself and Imperial College London, home of the disgraced “COVID-19” modeller Professor Neil Ferguson and Public Health England’s Deputy Director of National Infection Service and Director of Reference Microbiology Services, British virologist, Professor Maria Zambon FMedSci FRCPath. The College clearly has no records describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification but is unwilling to admit such:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...-isolation.pdf
    Back-Up FOI Repository

    This collection of FOI responses is being kindly backed up by a friend, here: https://jumpshare.com/b/05F75HqalwFSRBB8Axsw
    So “What The Hell Is Going?

    At this point you might be scratching your head and wonder what on Earth is going on. If so, the collection of presentations, articles and facts (not theories) on the page linked below will reveal the fraud and trickery that’s behind the fake pandemic known as “COVID-19”.

    Would you like to help?

    If you would like to submit your own FOI request to another institution, or obtain an updated response from an institution that has already been FOI’d, here is a suggested template that may assist you:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/temp...-foi-requests/.
    Please share with me any responses that you receive!)
    And finally…
    On November 26, 2020 at a protest in Toronto, I was given a spur-of-the-moment opportunity to deliver a message to the Canadian government re their handing of “COVID-19”, via the mainstream media. Enjoy:
    https://www.facebook.com/667080161/p...770715162/?d=n
    On November 28, 2020 I gave a speech at The Line Canada‘s anti-lockdown protest; it begins at the 19 minute mark in this video:

    In early December 2020, Kevin J. Johnston invited me to discuss the FOI documents on his weekly podcast:
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/ruvRPMZtSCTI/
    If you would like to receive email updates re new FOI responses, let me know at Christine.Massey@protonmail.com.
    Connect with me (CM) on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChrisMasseyFOIs

  5. #5
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,822
    Thanks
    2,225
    Thanked 4,501 Times in 2,050 Posts

    Re: Virus Isolation (No Evidence via FOI requests)

    This heroic woman who has been doing all the FOI requests around the world, also posted about South Africa NOT having the virus isolates:


    Greetings! The hearing of today, 27th May 2021 is over! Thank you to all who were at court today and to all who were with us in spirit. Much appreciated! A judge of the High Court of the Western Cape has ruled that it is not an urgent matter that the government of the Republic of South Africa produce the evidence for its claim that a virus called Sars-CoV2 actually exists!!


    The video of the post-hearing discussion with Ricardo Maarman, Prof. Dolores Cahill and Connell Loggenberg is on this page
    Thanks again. All of the best.
    Dr. Faiez Kirsten (working in association with Ricardo Maarman on this matter)
    And I just found this:

    https://twitter.com/KaiLightBringer/...21182562226178
    SPEAKS VOLUMES & EXPOSES THE SCAMDEMIC!!!!!!!!
    JUST IN | Maarman vs State The case is simply asking the ANC government to show proof of the virus. Yet the state has postponed 3 times & still playing games. It should be a simple request.
    Just shows the court systems everywhere are totally controlled (just like here).

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Amanda For This Useful Post:

    midnight rambler (30th May 2021)

  7. #6
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,138
    Thanks
    2,730
    Thanked 1,754 Times in 1,041 Posts

    Re: Virus Isolation (No Evidence via FOI requests)

    THE COURTS


    The Judiciary comprises two types of court venues; a corporate “administrative court”, and a Common Law “court of record”. A judge in an “administrative court” does not act judicially but as an administrator to settle contractual disputes. A judge in a “court of record” sits judicially with a “jury of the People” to remedy harm to other living people. The courts are attended by “Commercial List Judges”, some of whom are designated as “jury” judges able to sit in a Common Law “court of record”.

    Common Law acknowledges the LAWFUL Rights possessed by living Men and Women.
    Statutes prescribe Legislation to administer artificial LEGAL “Persons”.
    A Statutory “administrative court” is for commerce, in practice (de facto).
    It is a place of corporate banking offering “a dispute resolution service for consenting parties”, where living men and women (unwittingly) consent to be joined to (joinder) artificial legal “persons”, obligated to settle the accounts of commercial (adhesion) contracts. The Judge does not sit “judicially”, but acts as a corporate “administrative officer”. “Administrative courts” are not sanctioned by Parliament, and are not part of the de jure laws and usages of the realm. All “administrative courts” are UNLAWFUL because they do not have a jury present.

    ANY COURT WITHOUT A JURY PRESENT IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT!
    'The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is NO authority for administrative courts
    in this country, and no Act can be passed to legitimise them.' - Halsbury's Law 2011
    A Common Law “court of record” is for justice with a jury, in law (de jure). It is a place of real world criminal evidence where a jury of one's peers examines what is true in fact, in order to determine what is right or wrong, just and fair. The parties are living men and women, and their decisions attempt to remedy harm or loss suffered by one or more injured parties, and to provide protections for living people and their community of life. The Judge sits “judicially”. The only venue of “justice” for a living man or woman is a Constitutionally sanctioned Common Law “court of record” with a jury of one's peers.




    “Administrative courts” are collection and enforcement agencies for the “Crown”, where a man or woman may contract to “act” in the fictional “role” of an “artificial person” to deliver a “performance” in the “theatre of commerce”. Spectators can usually view the drama from a gallery. The attending Bar Association members are corporate officers.

    All members of the private Bar Association swear an Oath to serve the Bar Association, which presents a conflict of interest in matters of de jure governance and justice. This subversion of the Common Law courts supports the crime of “personage”, which is misrepresenting a living man or woman as a fictional “person” causing unwitting “joinder” to the “artificial person” NAME. The crime of “personage” is compounded by “barratry”, the crime of bringing false claims in court. The term “barratry”, appropriately, comes from the “Bar Association”.


    All Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association of the Crown Temple, located within the 677-acre, independent sovereign state known as The City of London, or simply “The City.” The bonded indebtedness of YOURNATION (INC.) is held by this “Crown”. Any court without a Constitutionally sanctioned jury of one's peers, is a “Crown” court.
    Well over 90 percent of the people Hitler locked up were German's. Only 2 to 3 percent were Jews and most of those Jews were elevated to running the concentration camps.
    http://www.controversyofzion.info/

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Bigjon For This Useful Post:

    Amanda (30th May 2021)

  9. #7
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,822
    Thanks
    2,225
    Thanked 4,501 Times in 2,050 Posts

    Re: Virus Isolation (No Evidence via FOI requests)

    Latest from Christine Massey, who has been sending out all of the FOI requests:


    This afternoon I received 4 FOIA responses from the CDC (all dated today, June 7, 2021) to requests for records of "virus" purification (by anyone, anywhere) from a patient sample via maceration, filtration and use of an ultracentrifuge.

    They provided a straightforward response to each one, admitting they have no record of such for the following “viruses”:

    “SARS-COV-2”:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/CDC-FOIA-request-response-no-records-SARS-COV-2-purification.pdf


    “HPV”:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/CDC-FOIA-request-response-no-records-HPV-purification.pdf


    “Measles virus” (note they made an error on the file number in this response, using the SARS-COV-2 file number, and I've requested an corrected letter which will eventually be added to the pdf at this link):
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/CDC-FOIA-request-response-no-records-re-measles-virus-purification.pdf


    Any “virus” targeted by the CDC’s childhood or adult “vaccine” schedules:
    [Note: there was a reference to “influenza” in this request, but it doesn't affect the request in any way because it was in the context of an example of the sort of record I was looking for… sloppy editing on my part when recycling my earlier “influenza virus” FOIA request.]
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/CDC-admits-no-records-re-purification-of-any-virus-on-vax-schedules.pdf


    For Truth, Freedom and Sanity,

    Christine Massey,

    Peterborough, ON Canada

    FOI responses from 69 institutions (including Public Health Agency of Canada, US CDC, UK Depart of Health and Social Care, Indian Council of Medical Research) in 20 countries/jurisdictions show that health/science institutions have no record of "SARS-COV-2" isolation/purification from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever:

    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois...-purification/

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Amanda For This Useful Post:

    Bigjon (30th June 2021),midnight rambler (7th June 2021),monty (7th June 2021),Tumbleweed (8th June 2021)

  11. #8
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,453
    Thanks
    394
    Thanked 1,247 Times in 847 Posts

    Re: Virus Isolation (No Evidence via FOI requests)

    I have experience chasing rabbits down holes and here is what I concluded:

    You are limiting yourself to one infinitely small agency when you send an inquiry such as FOIA or if you personally appear at a counter and ask for anything a sheeple wouldn't inquire about.

    In law there are principles of laches and those of estoppel.

    LACHES. This word, derived from the French lecher, is nearly synonymous with negligence.
    In general, when a party has been guilty of laches in enforcing his right by great delay and lapse of time, this circumstance will at common law prejudice, and sometimes operate in bar of a remedy which it is discretionary and not compulsory in the court to afford. In courts of equity, also delay will generally prejudice.


    ESTOPPEL, pleading. An estoppel is a preclusion, in law, which prevents a man from alleging or denying a fact, in consequence o his own previous act, allegation or denial of a contrary tenor. Steph. Pl. 239. Lord Coke says, "an estoppel is, when a man is concluded by his own act or acceptance, to
    say the truth." Co. Litt. 352, a. And Blackstone defines "an estoppel to be a special plea in bar, which happens where a man has done some act, or executed some deed, which estops or precludes him from averring any thing to
    the contrary.

    Joined together these two principles are quite powerful. You can use them by either sending notice to one legal entity at a time or you can place everyone in the world on notice by a precisely worded legal notice in a newspaper of county wide circulation. This approach is much more 'bang-for-the-buck'.

    The government uses this method all the time and I bet you didn't even know it.

  12. #9
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,453
    Thanks
    394
    Thanked 1,247 Times in 847 Posts

    Re: Virus Isolation (No Evidence via FOI requests)

    Another point ...

    A FOIA filing is a benefit available only to U.S. citizens. You accept this status at your peril. FOIA is a B.E.N.E.F.I.T.

  13. #10
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,822
    Thanks
    2,225
    Thanked 4,501 Times in 2,050 Posts

    Re: Virus Isolation (No Evidence via FOI requests)

    Here's Christine's latest mailing:

    Greetings and best wishes,

    Apologies for a long email. Proton doesn't allow mass mailings, thus I'm forced to send each email out in 6 smaller batches with waits in between each one, which gets time-consuming. So several items are crammed into this one.

    June 7 2021: Uruguay Ministry of Public Health failed to provide or cite for requester María Bettina Galo any record of “SARS-COV-2” purified from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever and claimed they can't understand the request:
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...s-377-2021.pdf


    June 3, 2021:

    Public Health Ontario (mandate: "provide scientific and technical advice and support to clients working in government, public health, health care, and related sectors") has provided their reason for failing to respond to a "SARS-COV-2" purification FOI request dated July 16, 2020: too busy with "COVID-19".
    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-c...st-2020-08.pdf

    Dr. Faiez Kirsten, Ricardo Maarman, Dr. Stefan Lanka on the Virus Isolation Court Case in South Africa, Pseudoscience & Non-existent Viruses
    Part 1: https://www.brighteon.com/fab3819d-e...b-bec6de934995

    Part 2: https://www.brighteon.com/a65939ec-a...e-09228272a2a4


    Informative court case website: support is needed!
    https://www.showusthevirus.info/about

    Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Tom Cowan's webinar Covid-19 Myths: Pathogenic Priming, Genome Sequencing & New Genetic Vaccines isnow available to the public along with a video response to Tom Baldwin's failed attempt to "debunk" the dynamic duo:

    https://drtomcowan.com/covid-19-myths

    (A note re the MUC-1 isolate used in the paper cited by Baldwin.)

    Excellent 20 min. video based on teachings of Drs. Lanka, Cowan and Kaufman etc:

    Final refutation of virology:
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/jw3D3fexbCij/


    The Smoking Gun?

    Study: ‘Virus’ Is Identical to Normal Cell ‘Structures’

    by Dr. Tom Cowan, June 10, 2021

    https://drtomcowan.com/the-smoking-g...732sj5Qen24xdk

    Dr. Cowan's video discussion of the above paper: https://www.bitchute.com/video/IptvuaxgYKuY/

    The paper: Appearances can be deceiving - viral-like inclusions in COVID-19 negative renal biopsies by electron microscopy

    For Truth, Freedom and Sanity,

    Christine Massey,

    Peterborough, ON Canada

    FOI responses from 70 institutions (including Public Health Agency of Canada, US CDC, UK Depart of Health and Social Care, Indian Council of Medical Research) in 20 countries/jurisdictions show that health/science institutions have no record of "SARS-COV-2" isolation/purification from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever:

    https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois...-purification/

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Amanda For This Useful Post:

    Bigjon (30th June 2021),midnight rambler (14th June 2021)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •