Is the clot shot gene therapy or not??

[midnight rambler]

I got into an argument today with someone over whether the depop shot is gene therapy. I've been unable to find any conclusive, reliable answer(s) in a quick web search, all info seems to be divided between the two camps.

Can someone please give me some direction?

TIA

[ziero0]

"Can someone please give me some direction?"

To All Whom These Presents Come - Greetings. The author of this Notice, Midnite Rangler, is seeking facts capable of proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that COVID related vaccines and boosters have no function in altering DNA or genes in the pricked recipient. Anyone possessing such information must contact Midnite at ________ by February 15th or be barred from future responses on the same topic. [Note: names have been altered to protect the not so innocent or partially guilty]

Run that in the legal section and see what response you get.

Notice is the first part of due process and endows Honored Recipient with an opportunity and right to inquire and if they choose not to exercise that right and opportunity it means they agree. Get the entire Public Domain to agree and see if you now have something akin to a FACT.

Of course you must look logically at the question posed. If nobody can prove there is no DNA or genes altering then doesn't it follow that there IS DNA or genes altering?

Proofs of negatives are difficult.

[vacuum]

It is


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qowDwaYx7vI

[ImaCannin]

What exactly is gene therapy?

[midnight rambler]

What exactly is gene therapy?

On Moderna’s website they call the depop shot “an operating system” (like for a computer).

Pfizer CEO refers to it as “gene editing”

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PPclXdGmHGSN/

[vacuum]

Think of it like this.

In the past, with traditional vaccines, they would take preexisting organisms (packages of genetic code) and’s give that to your body to develop an immunity against.

With mRNA, they no longer are running code from nature on your body, but rather they are running their own arbitrary code on your body. Just like software, they can put both malicious code as well as good code in the same software payload.

Would you let someone run arbitrary closed source proprietary code on your computer? Why would you let it be run on your body? If it’s from a natural source like a dead virus then at least the likelihood of malicious back doors is low.

[steel_ag]

20211230162449170_AFLDS amicus brief in support of emergency applications re OSHA ETS cases.pdf (supremecourt.gov) (https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21A243/207048/20211230162449170_AFLDS%20amicus%20brief%20in%20su pport%20of%20emergency%20applications%20re%20OSHA% 20ETS%20cases.pdf)

[dys]

I wish I had more time to devote to this- VERY short on time these days.

Here is how you can prove it-

1. Read one of Pfizer or Moderna MRNA patents. In the patents, they explicitly admit that they use CRISPR CA-9 technology.
2. Now watch a video right from Moderna or Pfizer or what CRISPR technology is. They admit that it's gene editing tech! The videos are still out there but they probably won't be for long. While you are at save it the proof somewhere where it won't get memory holed.

Yes, I've done this before but I never organized it like I should have.

Peace out, cub scout.

[keehah]

The first clot-shot mRNA injections basically generate prions in the injected.

Prions -any of a group of tiny infectious agents composed mainly or entirely of protein: though lacking in demonstrable nucleic acid, prions are capable of self-replication and are thought to be the cause of various degenerative diseases

Later clot-shot therapy saRNA injections are basically 'lab leak virus' or virus that come from a lab and include segments of natural/actual virus self-replication coding combined with lab mRNA coding for prion shedding. They are also reportedly more stable compounds.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: A new generation of vaccines based on alphavirus self-amplifying RNA (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7474593/)

"2020 Sep
DNA or mRNA vaccines have potential advantages over conventional vaccines since they are easier to manufacture and have higher safety profiles. In particular, self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) derived from alphavirus expression vectors has shown to be very efficient to induce humoral and cellular responses against many antigens in preclinical models, being superior to non-replicating mRNA and DNA. This is mainly due to the fact that saRNA can provide very high expression levels and simultaneously induces strong innate responses, potentiating immunity. saRNA can be administered as viral particles or DNA, but direct delivery as RNA represents a safer and more simple approach...

Most saRNAs used in vaccination studies derive from alphaviruses, including Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV), Semliki Forest virus (SFV), and Sindbis virus.

Because saRNA being basically virus, exponentially self-replicating in the host, less prion generating injeculate is needed, however these lab virus's expression of prion particles in any particular host can vary even more greatly, by several orders of magnitude.

pharmaphorum.com: First self-amplifying mRNA vaccine reaches Europe (https://pharmaphorum.com/news/first-self-amplifying-mrna-vaccine-reaches-europe)

14 February, 2025
Arcturus Therapeutics and CSL's COVID-19 vaccine Kostaive has been approved for marketing in the EU, becoming the first based on self-amplifying mRNA (sa-mRNA) to clear that threshold.

While entering a market that has reduced dramatically in size since the end of the pandemic, Kostaive is being billed as a technological advance on current mRNA shots like Moderna's Spikevax and Pfizer/BioNTech's Comirnaty as it stimulates longer-lasting immunity.

Unlike regular mRNA vaccines, sa-mRNA vaccines – as their name suggests – instruct the body to make more mRNA and protein to boost the immune response, rather than relying on a finite dose which results in protection waning over time.

Arcturus and CSL say they have clinical trial data showing Kostaive (formerly ARCT-154) offers superior immunogenicity and antibody persistence for up to 12 months post-vaccination compared to conventional mRNA jabs. It is targeted at the JN.1 subtype of Omicron variant BA.2.86, which is still one of the main strains currently circulating in Europe.

The lipid nanoparticle-formulated shot, given in two doses 28 days apart, has been shown to be effective against multiple ancestral strains of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that caused COVID-19. In phase 3 trials, it showed more than 95% efficacy in the prevention of severe COVID infections.

The EU isn't the first market where Kostaive is approved. It has also been given the green light in Japan, where it is being distributed by Meiji Seika Pharma and started rolling out in the 2024/25 COVID-19 immunisation campaign.

The first sa-mRNA vaccine to reach any market was Gennova Biopharmaceuticals' Gemcovac, which was launched in India in 2022 on the back of an emergency approval as the pandemic was still in full swing.

A launch in Europe isn't imminent, however, as CSL wants to make changes to Kostaive's formulation to "better meet the needs of healthcare professionals and their patients," according to Jonathan Edelman, head of CSL's vaccine innovations unit...

CSL licensed rights to the Arcturus-developed vaccine in 2022, paying $200 million upfront to access the San Diego, US-based biotech's sa-mRNA platform for COVID-19 as well as other respiratory diseases including influenza.

Arcturus said at the time it was eligible to receive more than $4.3 billion in milestone payments if certain development and commercial objectives were met, plus a 40% net profit share for COVID-19 vaccines.

[keehah]

time.com: Trump Administration to Wind Down mRNA Vaccine Development (https://time.com/7307775/mrna-vaccines-rfk-jr-hhs/)

Aug 5, 2025
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said on Tuesday that it will start winding down mRNA vaccine development efforts under a federal health agency focused on developing medical countermeasures to address public health emergencies.

mRNA vaccines have been credited by public health experts with saving millions of lives during the COVID-19 pandemic, and many infectious disease experts have stressed that years of research have shown the shots are both safe and effective. But HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent vaccine skeptic, claimed in a statement accompanying HHS’s announcement that “data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu.”

The move, which HHS said comes after “a comprehensive review of mRNA-related investments initiated during the COVID-19 public health emergency,” will involve canceling and de-scoping various contracts under the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). The “wind-down” will impact 22 projects that come out to a total of nearly $500 million, according to HHS’s press release...

Kennedy has faced widespread criticism from public health experts over the years for spreading medical disinformation, including about vaccines. His nomination by President Donald Trump in November to lead HHS sparked outcry from the science and medical communities, but he was ultimately confirmed to the role in February.

nypost.com: Are mRNA vaccines safe and effective? What to know as RFK Jr. halts funding (https://nypost.com/2025/08/06/health/what-to-know-about-mrna-vaccines-as-rfk-jr-halts-funding/)

Aug. 6, 2025
Several studies have demonstrated that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were more than 90% effective at preventing severe illness and death.

Vaccine researchers immediately took issue with the fiscal gutting, calling it a major setback for science.

“I don’t think I’ve seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business,” said Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations...

In his statement, Kennedy said that mRNA vaccines will be phased out in favor of whole killed virus vaccines, a traditional approach that uses entire pathogens that have been inactivated through heat, radiation or chemicals.