Stormfront II emerging

[philo beddoe]

[/quote]Why would I want to be corrected by your voodoo?
[/quote]

You think the Bible is voodoo. That's OK with me, but why do you pretend to be interested in what the Bible says?
[/quote]Why do you pretend your holy?
[/quote]

greenbear and StackerKen, I always enjoy reading your posts. But it seems there is no point in dealing with this [fill in the blank].

philo beddoe, you just got owned!

:D

[/quote]option-p has been sittin' on the sidelines waitin' to tell me this? oh boy

[greenbear]

oooohhhhh...you got me.....doing the bidding of your joo masters again? I notice you ignore the other four points also////like Paul never met Jesus



Get a clue philo beddoe

ever hear of the Road to Damascus?
Why don't you tell me about it?

why don't you read Acts 22 and 26 for yourself?
Why would I want to do that?



oooohhhhh...you got me.....doing the bidding of your joo masters again? I notice you ignore the other four points also////like Paul never met Jesus


Get a clue philo beddoe

ever hear of the Road to Damascus?


Why would I want to do that?

So you could be corrected.
Why would I want to be corrected by your voodoo?


You think the Bible is voodoo. That's OK with me, but why do you pretend to be interested in what the Bible says?
Why do you pretend your holy?


I can only guess at your age but it just has to be in the single digits. lol

[philo beddoe]

oooohhhhh...you got me.....doing the bidding of your joo masters again? I notice you ignore the other four points also////like Paul never met Jesus



Get a clue philo beddoe

ever hear of the Road to Damascus?
Why don't you tell me about it?

why don't you read Acts 22 and 26 for yourself?
Why would I want to do that?



oooohhhhh...you got me.....doing the bidding of your joo masters again? I notice you ignore the other four points also////like Paul never met Jesus


Get a clue philo beddoe

ever hear of the Road to Damascus?


Why would I want to do that?

So you could be corrected.
Why would I want to be corrected by your voodoo?


You think the Bible is voodoo. That's OK with me, but why do you pretend to be interested in what the Bible says?
Why do you pretend your holy?


I can only guess at your age but it just has to be in the single digits. lol
And you don't know anything about Christ. His philosophy was so simple, but voodoo priestesses like yourself make a mystery of it. And let's not forget your saint Paul. For he told you to remain in silence and submission. "for the woman was thoroughly fooled"
I Timothy 2:11

[Horn]

You all will continually slaughter each other attempting to reacquire what you never had to begin with or acquire what you never will.

Quoted for accuracy.

[greenbear]

oooohhhhh...you got me.....doing the bidding of your joo masters again? I notice you ignore the other four points also////like Paul never met Jesus



Get a clue philo beddoe

ever hear of the Road to Damascus?
Why don't you tell me about it?

why don't you read Acts 22 and 26 for yourself?
Why would I want to do that?



oooohhhhh...you got me.....doing the bidding of your joo masters again? I notice you ignore the other four points also////like Paul never met Jesus


Get a clue philo beddoe

ever hear of the Road to Damascus?


Why would I want to do that?

So you could be corrected.
Why would I want to be corrected by your voodoo?


You think the Bible is voodoo. That's OK with me, but why do you pretend to be interested in what the Bible says?
Why do you pretend your holy?


I can only guess at your age but it just has to be in the single digits. lol
And you don't know anything about Christ. His philosophy was so simple, but voodoo priestesses like yourself make a mystery of it. And let's not forget your saint Paul. For he told you to remain in silence and submission. "for the woman was thoroughly fooled"
I Timothy 2:11

You Christian Identity youngsters know we're on an internet forum and not one of your KKK worship services, right? ;D

[keehah]

The path of least resistance within the constraints of the Universe looks like a wave.

The top is riding the wave and the bottom is the surfboard.

http://www.deathwaves.com/images/waves.42.jpg

[philo beddoe]

You think the Bible is voodoo. That's OK with me, but why do you pretend to be interested in what the Bible says?
Why do you pretend your holy?
[/quote]

I can only guess at your age but it just has to be in the single digits. lol
[/quote]And you don't know anything about Christ. His philosophy was so simple, but voodoo priestesses like yourself make a mystery of it. And let's not forget your saint Paul. For he told you to remain in silence and submission. "for the woman was thoroughly fooled"
I Timothy 2:11
[/quote]
You Christian Identity youngsters know we're on an internet forum and not one of your KKK worship services, right? ;D


[/quote]Why don't you remain in silence and submission like your saint told you? Or how bout this one......The man is the head of the family, as Christ is head of the man. Go obey your man......

[keehah]

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:jassfLeuJe8ylM:http://www.adventureblog.org/images/kayak-surfing1_45.jpg

[madfranks]

Is your job irrelevant posts?



Nobody is listening, grandma's melon's.



That's certainly not what I said. Unlike Book, you have no quotes, just bullsh*t.


philo beddoe gets a 7 day ban for multiple personal attacks in this thread. This is not the first time philo has been temp-banned for personal attacks. If he keeps it up after this one, we may perma-ban him.

[art vandelay]

Is your job irrelevant posts?



Nobody is listening, grandma's melon's.



That's certainly not what I said. Unlike Book, you have no quotes, just bullsh*t.


philo beddoe gets a 7 day ban for multiple personal attacks in this thread. This is not the first time philo has been temp-banned for personal attacks. If he keeps it up after this one, we may perma-ban him.
Good call madguy. I really like philo..but that blondie on his avatar was getting to me I want to see some men! I guess i'll have to go fly my airplane now.

[art vandelay]

Remember folks that when ever you are using the word "Jew" you are really referring to the Zionist Israelis, which is a political party, and not about the "real" Jews of the Bible.

The above does not mean that the Jews of the Bible were saints but only about what we talk about.
Well they are using the same tricks they were taught in the bible. Joseph and the Egyptians, Esther and the Persians. Infiltrate and destroy.


This from someone who made the argument that Paul was not an authentic Apostle because he wasn't ordained by Cardinals like the other apostles were.
I see you know a lot about the bible. Can someone like me be saved, or do I have to give up my manfriends? I would hate to have to quit flying to Thailand.

[Libertarian_Guard]

Vandelay

Enough already, you've repeatedly made the point about your sexual preference, can you talk about anything else???

[Liquid]

Vandelay

Enough already, you've repeatedly made the point about your sexual preference, can you talk about anything else???


I think he needs some 'our time' with Mr. Hand.

[k-os]

Something smells weird.

[madfranks]

Is your job irrelevant posts?



Nobody is listening, grandma's melon's.



That's certainly not what I said. Unlike Book, you have no quotes, just bullsh*t.


philo beddoe gets a 7 day ban for multiple personal attacks in this thread. This is not the first time philo has been temp-banned for personal attacks. If he keeps it up after this one, we may perma-ban him.
Good call madguy. I really like philo..but that blondie on his avatar was getting to me I want to see some men! I guess i'll have to go fly my airplane now.


art vandelay is permanently banned as we discovered his account is a sock puppet of philo beddoe. Anyone surprised?

[Liquid]

art vandelay is permanently banned as we discovered his account is a sock puppet of philo beddoe. Anyone surprised?


Nice job madfranks, excellent moderating.

[k-os]

art vandelay is permanently banned as we discovered his account is a sock puppet of philo beddoe. Anyone surprised?


I am sorry that you have to babysit children, and you don't even get paid for it. I'd like to thank you for a mostly thankless job.

[Libertarian_Guard]

Vandelay was new to me, I didn't know much about him, except that he was a repeater with the 'gay' thing.

But I've long known that philo was a sick puppy. The man is in need of a good mental health expert, he has issues that are deep. He gave new meaning to the term antisocial.

[StackerKen]

art vandelay is permanently banned as we discovered his account is a sock puppet of philo beddoe. Anyone surprised?


I am sorry that you have to babysit children, and you don't even get paid for it. I'd like to thank you for a mostly thankless job.


I 2nd that.

Good work Mad Franks. Thanks

[Dave Thomas]

art vandelay is permanently banned as we discovered his account is a sock puppet of philo beddoe. Anyone surprised?


Are you guys correlating IP addresses to accounts being created? That's something that was beyond the ability of those who ran GIM.

They would have multiple accounts and would keep posting, and no one bothered to check from what IP they were coming.

I'd almost go as far to write an IP tables policy on the webserver and just drop their packets.

[Brent]

Vandelay was new to me, I didn't know much about him, except that he was a repeater with the 'gay' thing.

But I've long known that philo was a sick puppy. The man is in need of a good mental health expert, he has issues that are deep. He gave new meaning to the term antisocial.


So how is this not a personal attack?

At least be consistent. Also Greenbear commenting that Philos age must be in the single digits. Again how is that not a personal attack?

Edit: Found it



I can only guess at your age but it just has to be in the single digits. lol



To me it seems like the above is worse than or at the very least equal to Philos comment that someones job was "irrelevant posts".

I know its hard being a mod and obviously this comment is only a suggestion but I would like to see equality under this silly rule. (Personally I think its pathetic people need a babysitter in order to not get their feelings hurt but thats just me.)

[Desolation LineTrimmer]

There is a double standard being played out here with the "no personal attacks" rule. Maybe because one is reported but the other isn't. But now the other has been reported so ... Lets be fair. I also want to add the caveat that moderation is a difficult job and I appreciate the work.

[greenbear]

Vandelay was new to me, I didn't know much about him, except that he was a repeater with the 'gay' thing.

But I've long known that philo was a sick puppy. The man is in need of a good mental health expert, he has issues that are deep. He gave new meaning to the term antisocial.


So how is this not a personal attack?

At least be consistent. Also Greenbear commenting that Philos age must be in the single digits. Again how is that not a personal attack?

Edit: Found it



I can only guess at your age but it just has to be in the single digits. lol



To me it seems like the above is worse than or at the very least equal to Philos comment that someones job was "irrelevant posts".

I know its hard being a mod and obviously this comment is only a suggestion but I would like to see equality under this silly rule. (Personally I think its pathetic people need a babysitter in order to not get their feelings hurt but thats just me.)


Hey Brent, are you insinuating I went crying to a mod? You make that comment while quoting me. Maybe because Philo/art vandelay told me I should be silent because I'm a Christian woman, or any other lame maneuvers to try to censor me through verbal abuse by a handful of posters? Sorry, you're wrong. Never reported or complained to a mod about anything, ever, on GIM, GSUS, or on any board, or in real life. Go ahead- ask them.

[madfranks]

Vandelay was new to me, I didn't know much about him, except that he was a repeater with the 'gay' thing.

But I've long known that philo was a sick puppy. The man is in need of a good mental health expert, he has issues that are deep. He gave new meaning to the term antisocial.


So how is this not a personal attack?

At least be consistent. Also Greenbear commenting that Philos age must be in the single digits. Again how is that not a personal attack?

Edit: Found it



I can only guess at your age but it just has to be in the single digits. lol



To me it seems like the above is worse than or at the very least equal to Philos comment that someones job was "irrelevant posts".

I know its hard being a mod and obviously this comment is only a suggestion but I would like to see equality under this silly rule. (Personally I think its pathetic people need a babysitter in order to not get their feelings hurt but thats just me.)


I try to be consistent. There is a difference though, between philo and the others. You can't argue that with philo the name calling is endemic, while with L_G and greenbear not so much. Regarding greenbear, that comment doesn't warrant a ban on it's own, in the same way if philo's attacks were limited to the "irrelevant posts" comment, neither would that warrant a ban. So greenbear gets a warning, to be careful in the future to not post personal attacks, even mild ones. Regarding L_G, since philo and art had just been banned, perhaps he thought that the rule about no personal attacks was no longer valid since philo is a temporary non-member. My personal opinion is that even temp-banned members fall under the rules of the forum, but maybe this is something we can discuss or bring to the "board communications" section if anyone wants to discuss it further. And so L_G gets a warning, that until further notice, even temp-banned members are afforded the protection of the GSUS constitution and personal attacks are not allowed.

[madfranks]

There is a double standard being played out here with the "no personal attacks" rule. Maybe because one is reported but the other isn't. But now the other has been reported so ... Lets be fair. I also want to add the caveat that moderation is a difficult job and I appreciate the work.


It's not a double standard so much as it is the fact that mods are not omniscient. I don't see every personal attack on the forum, where you might see one that we missed and note that there were no consequences, hence the perceived double standard. I did see L_G's comment above but like I said there might be some confusion over what rights are retained by banned members. I try to afford the members a warning before any bans occur, but if it's multiple offenses then it's a different story.

[Desolation LineTrimmer]

There is a double standard being played out here with the "no personal attacks" rule. Maybe because one is reported but the other isn't. But now the other has been reported so ... Lets be fair. I also want to add the caveat that moderation is a difficult job and I appreciate the work.


It's not a double standard so much as it is the fact that mods are not omniscient. I don't see every personal attack on the forum, where you might see one that we missed and note that there were no consequences, hence the perceived double standard. I did see L_G's comment above but like I said there might be some confusion over what rights are retained by banned members. I try to afford the members a warning before any bans occur, but if it's multiple offenses then it's a different story.


I see. It is not really my place to second guess how you run this site anyway.

[Large Sarge]

Art Vandelay showed up at the Golden agora, for awhile, I cannot remember if we banned him or not?

I do not know if that was another philo beddoe sock puppet back then??

[Libertarian_Guard]

Madfranks

Now I'll admit, I've never read the 'rules' of this forum, I just go on common sense. But I thought 4 sure that Philo had a permanent ban when you discovered he is registering multiple 'in the closet' accounts. In my mind, this was a no brainer. Even now I can't believe he will be welcome back? It is your forum, and you can run it however you see fit. But when someone has shown themselves as a trouble maker, why let 'em stick around?

All you did was put a 7 day ban on one handle, and boot the other. So it seems to me that members can't be permanently baned, only some of their handles will be baned. I see a revolving door of trouble with this.

[StackerKen]

LG made a really good point there^^^^

Again I will say, Your doing great job MadFranks

[Large Sarge]

I will say this, being a moderator is a thankless job (I did my thankless tour).

so thanks for doing it to all the mods here.

I am loathe to ban anyone, unless they blatantly do the porn, advertising (spam), threatening comments

personal attacks are quite subjective.

one person could see it as sarcasm/wit, and another could be deeply offended.

my advice to everyone here, if someone ticks you off, just ignore them

the folks that are sincere and honest, will show themselves over time

take what you want from this place, and just leave the rest (selfish as that sounds)
LOL

[Horn]

Hollywood's found a new star...

[MAGNES]

I will say this, being a moderator is a thankless job (I did my thankless tour).

so thanks for doing it to all the mods here.

I am loathe to ban anyone, unless they blatantly do the porn, advertising (spam), threatening comments

personal attacks are quite subjective.

one person could see it as sarcasm/wit, and another could be deeply offended.

my advice to everyone here, if someone ticks you off, just ignore them

the folks that are sincere and honest, will show themselves over time

take what you want from this place, and just leave the rest (selfish as that sounds)
LOL


Blatant personal attacks of a swearing nature, that is what it should be.

Those comments are pretty tame, what about the precedent,
first comment is a like minded response.

I know Ben has had some warnings.

If Ben spoofed Art, ?, Art was a poster that had beefs with Ben
on agora, Art on agora got caught up in the troll battles.
Right now I don't believe Art on agora was a troll,
I befriended him on here by accident and apologized.

[Brent]

Hey Brent, are you insinuating I went crying to a mod? You make that comment while quoting me. Maybe because Philo/art vandelay told me I should be silent because I'm a Christian woman, or any other lame maneuvers to try to censor me through verbal abuse by a handful of posters? Sorry, you're wrong. Never reported or complained to a mod about anything, ever, on GIM, GSUS, or on any board, or in real life. Go ahead- ask them.


I can see where it would seem that way but no I did not mean to imply that you went crying to a mod. My comment was meant to be directed towards everyone who seems to think there is a need for the mods to protect other members feelings. It is my view that everyone should steel themselves when coming online to post. The Internet is full of pissed off people who believe they are speaking anonymously this leads to a lot of what would be considered by most to be personal attacks.

But as Large Sarge pointed out earlier (Btw LS so glad to see you here, I love your posts) a personal attack could be considered by the person that made it to be mere sarcasm/wit but the person on the other end might take deep offense. Therefore it seems impossible to be able to fairly moderate such "attacks".

Personally as I have said before I don't believe in this rule but I do believe that if we have rules they need to be enforced equally.

In reply to Madfranks post: Thank you for taking the time to reply as well as for taking on this crappy job as I said in my first post what I posted was merely a suggestion, obviously as a representative of the site owner your opinion and interpretation is all that matters here. Oh and you are more than correct that Philo was being quite obtuse and basically asking for it. My issue was that I felt a few of his "attacks" were so very lame that I couldn't imagine anyone being offended by them.

[madfranks]

In reply to Madfranks post: Thank you for taking the time to reply as well as for taking on this crappy job as I said in my first post what I posted was merely a suggestion, obviously as a representative of the site owner your opinion and interpretation is all that matters here. Oh and you are more than correct that Philo was being quite obtuse and basically asking for it. My issue was that I felt a few of his "attacks" were so very lame that I couldn't imagine anyone being offended by them.




Yeah, it's a fine line we walk as mods. I get reported posts in my inbox every day, a lot of them from people offended at things that maybe you or I wouldn't really be bothered by. As site mod/representative, it's my obligation to try and enforce the rules as best I can. I don't do it perfectly, I admit it, but I do my best. Members who make a lot of "noise" by making multiple posts calling others names get the most attention, are at a higher risk for disciplinary action and lower chance of getting off with a warning.

[StackerKen]

Members who make a lot of "noise" by making multiple posts calling others names get the most attention, are at a higher risk for disciplinary action and lower chance of getting off with a warning.



Makes good sense ^^^^^^^^^^^

[1970 Silver Art]

In reply to Madfranks post: Thank you for taking the time to reply as well as for taking on this crappy job as I said in my first post what I posted was merely a suggestion, obviously as a representative of the site owner your opinion and interpretation is all that matters here. Oh and you are more than correct that Philo was being quite obtuse and basically asking for it. My issue was that I felt a few of his "attacks" were so very lame that I couldn't imagine anyone being offended by them.




Yeah, it's a fine line we walk as mods. I get reported posts in my inbox every day, a lot of them from people offended at things that maybe you or I wouldn't really be bothered by. As site mod/representative, it's my obligation to try and enforce the rules as best I can. I don't do it perfectly, I admit it, but I do my best. Members who make a lot of "noise" by making multiple posts calling others names get the most attention, are at a higher risk for disciplinary action and lower chance of getting off with a warning.


All you can do is your best. You are doing a good job IMO. You are always going to have a few rotten apples in the bunch and GSUS is no different than any other forum in that sense. +1 Karma for you for doing the best job that you can as a mod.

[greenbear]

You think the Bible is voodoo. That's OK with me, but why do you pretend to be interested in what the Bible says?
Why do you pretend your holy?


I can only guess at your age but it just has to be in the single digits. lol
And you don't know anything about Christ. His philosophy was so simple, but voodoo priestesses like yourself make a mystery of it. And let's not forget your saint Paul. For he told you to remain in silence and submission. "for the woman was thoroughly fooled"
I Timothy 2:11
[/quote]
You Christian Identity youngsters know we're on an internet forum and not one of your KKK worship services, right? ;D


[/quote]Why don't you remain in silence and submission like your saint told you? Or how bout this one......The man is the head of the family, as Christ is head of the man. Go obey your man......
[/quote]
[/quote]
I am and I do. He's a great man. He is too secure in himself to be a control freak, he has respect for my opinion, and he is way for truth, like me. :) We have that in common. We want the truth no matter how disturbing or inconvenient it may be. We kind of see things in the same way. I saw in him the most intelligent, insightful person I'd ever met, and he was a Christian. So I decided I'd be a fool not to marry him! Thanks for your concern about the inner workings of our marital relationship, though.

[Awoke]

Is there a Douchbag 101 class that I can take to become a douchebag? Is there a Douchebag for Dummies book that I can buy from Barnes and Noble? Anything that will help me get 1000 smites by December 31, 2010.


I'm sorry, but you're too honest and good to be a douchebag. Even if there was a cource on douchebaggery, you would fail it. It's just not in you to be a douche.



At one time there was even a Jewish Pope in the Vatican........not a Zionist Pope but a "real" Jew.


There have been many. They are excommunicated as 5th column heretics. 2nd vatican counsel is when they finally injected their poison into the Catholic Church, and it has never been the same since.



Where would you expel them to? The State of Israel? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought you were against the Jews having their own homeland.


I never said that I am against the jew having their own homeland. I don't agree with the way it was magically "Founded" out of thin air, and handed over to them with the muscle of the LoN/UN backing them up, regardless of how the current occupants of that land felt about it.



If the Joos (uh, Turkish Khazars) are are such a plague upon the earth, what good would it do to simply expel them out of one's own country?


That is why I said that the only thing people can do is continue to expose them for everything they do, all the time, everywhere. Expulsion has been tried and tried and tried so many times in the past, and failed miserably every time, due to their infiltration tactics and secret double-identity techniques.
Only through constantly educating the tavistock-numbed masses can we unveil the ugly head of the conspiracy. When people understand them for what they are, all over the world, they will not be able to destoy Churches, Countries or Cultures from within, because everyone will be wary of the jew. This has all happened in the past. That's why our history books are so kosher. Not many people know "real and true" history, just the doctored version.



And if you expelled the Joos from America, would you not be depriving them of personal property? Who do you propose to take ownership of their property once they're gone? How did Hitler's Germany handle the logistics of this transfer of property?


How did the philo-semetic countries handle those same issues for the indiginous people that were already established in the middle east before the fiat state of israel was gifted away?

[Neuro]

Awoke and Ponce, or anyone else for that matter...

I would like to learn more about Jewish Roman Catholic Popes/Cardinals/Bishops... Sounds fascinating!

[Gypsybiker45]

People that are disruptive and offer nothing to the OP are the main problem in this matter. thats how I was baned last week in this thread. Comments were made regarding paragraph structure and I let loose on them and was banned for it. Trolling is trolling. Now Im going to close this thread as its turning into an argument thats completely off topic.