PDA

View Full Version : Something I noticed about Bing's "safe" filter



Bullion_Bob
3rd May 2011, 06:38 PM
Ok check this out, Goto Bing www.bing.com

Do a search for cute blonde, then select the images tab, and you should get this message:

The search "cute blonde" may return explicit adult content and has been filtered by your Bing SafeSearch settings.
Your current Bing SafeSearch setting filters out results that might return adult content. To view those results as well, change your SafeSearch setting

The only way you can get see ANY of your search results to is to change the safe filter settings to off.

When everyone inevitably turns the filter off, it's essentially page after page of porn.
i.e. http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=cute+blonde&go=&form=QBIR&filt=custom#x0y0

Google mysteriously no longer returns a result for the term "cute blonde" as an image search:
i.e. http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=cute+blonde&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi

Yahoo is what normal used to be:
http://ca.images.search.yahoo.com/search/images;_ylt=A0oG75z3qcBN3ecAlNzrFAx.?ei=UTF-8&p=cute%20blonde&fr2=tab-web&fr=yfp-t-715


Bizarre

osoab
3rd May 2011, 06:45 PM
Blonde Fetish?

ximmy
3rd May 2011, 06:47 PM
Not bizarre... Planned...

Jewish Professor of American History at Aberdeen University in UK, Prof. Nathan Abrams. He boasts that Jews were the driving force of the modern pornographic industry and that their motivation is in part to destroy Gentile morals.

Jewish Professor Says Porn Industry is a Weapon used by Jews Against Gentiles


http://www.davidduke.com/general/jewish-professor-boasts-of-jewish-pornography-used-as-a-weapon-against-gentiles_1811.html

vacuum
3rd May 2011, 07:02 PM
They probably do it for pragmatic reasons.....when you've got the filter on, you expect zero porn results. For example, maybe a kid doing a book report is searching. How can you guarantee zero porn results with that search term? Its pretty darn difficult.

Bullion_Bob
3rd May 2011, 07:19 PM
They probably do it for pragmatic reasons.....when you've got the filter on, you expect zero porn results. For example, maybe a kid doing a book report is searching. How can you guarantee zero porn results with that search term? Its pretty darn difficult.


There is no nudity at 10+ pages deep of the same term using yahoo.

Not coincidental it seems.

I'm wondering how come yahoo can still manage it, but Google now suddenly appears broken on any filter setting with that term.

Google used to return normal results just like Yahoo.


Ironically I was looking for a hot blonde pic for Ponce (so he wouldn't have nightmares) after book posted "the pregnant woman" in another thread. ;D

The term "hot blonde" "a la Bing" is even worse.

willie pete
3rd May 2011, 07:19 PM
Not bizarre... Planned...

Jewish Professor of American History at Aberdeen University in UK, Prof. Nathan Abrams. He boasts that Jews were the driving force of the modern pornographic industry and that their motivation is in part to destroy Gentile morals.

Jewish Professor Says Porn Industry is a Weapon used by Jews Against Gentiles


http://www.davidduke.com/general/jewish-professor-boasts-of-jewish-pornography-used-as-a-weapon-against-gentiles_1811.html



actually the top porn companies ARE jewish owned/managed.....just like Hollywood .....TCM is repeating thier multi-episode documentary: hollywood moguls.... it's about the genesis of hollywood and the begining of the movie making business at the turn of the century.....virtually everyone of them were jews

Book
3rd May 2011, 07:20 PM
Google mysteriously no longer returns a result for the term "cute blonde" as an image search:
i.e. http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=cute+blonde&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi



Starting three days ago Google Image does not return ANY image for ANY search term for me. I just keep getting that link you posted.

:dunno I started using Bing three days ago because of this and it behaves as you describe

ShortJohnSilver
3rd May 2011, 07:26 PM
"cute blonde" , "cute brunette", "cute redhead" all return the same warning about explicit content.

And the Bing results for "cute jewess" are hilarious!

ximmy
3rd May 2011, 07:34 PM
"cute blonde" , "cute brunette", "cute redhead" all return the same warning about explicit content.

And the Bing results for "cute jewess" are hilarious!


note the term "cute" would be used more by a child or teen... "Cute girl" leads to pornography too.


at least when I type in nazi-jew I still get some good clean images...

http://ts2.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=819977332125&id=cc79801bf057334e12302e96ed41c97d&url=http%3a%2f%2f3.bp.blogspot.com%2f_znbn40nPiVI% 2fS9sCNPRdYFI%2fAAAAAAAAB3E%2fM-wDCw7VNgE%2fs1600%2fsionismo%2bigual%2bnazismo.jpg LOL

Bullion_Bob
3rd May 2011, 08:22 PM
Google mysteriously no longer returns a result for the term "cute blonde" as an image search:
i.e. http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=cute+blonde&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi



Starting three days ago Google Image does not return ANY image for ANY search term for me. I just keep getting that link you posted.

:dunno I started using Bing three days ago because of this and it behaves as you describe




In your case, I think it's them specifically blocking you for downloading every single picture that is currently available on the internet. ;D

I think Google is using the same algorithm $tyle as Bing but they're working out the detail$ of allowing what they have behind the magic filter to be $een. ;)

Ponce
3rd May 2011, 09:29 PM
Hey Bullion? I do love blonds.........but not pregnant of course ;D

TheNocturnalEgyptian
5th May 2011, 07:32 AM
It was proven a month or two ago that bing as using google's search results, and effecting the SEO listings in a way that I forget at the moment. They've probably done some revamping since that was revealed - who knows how it sorts now?

Ash_Williams
5th May 2011, 08:02 AM
I get pages of results on google images (.com and .ca) when searching cute blond with safesearch on moderate or strict.

Bing gives me nothing.

I went back and looked at the results for "cute blond" with safesearch and a few of them would be considered explicit by some people. As vacuum says, it's probably difficult to be certain not to show something that will offend certain people with a search term like that. I'd imagine 95+% of "cute blond" images on the net are porn.