Earth Orbital Speed:66666mi/H- Strange Stars Pulsate According to the "Golden Ratio" [Archive] - Page 2

singular_me

21st February 2015, 03:51 AM

sure, i know i am, the law of harmonics represented by 12 octaves is perfection in sacred math. everything is vibrations and frequencies (undebunkable) in the Universe. I wished religions didnt use parables and allegories to teach their followers physics and natural laws so we wouldnt be in this global spiritual mess, but most likely that was the plan.

Meaning of the Number 12 in the Bible
http://www.biblestudy.org/bibleref/meaning-of-numbers-in-bible/12.html

looks like you have missed that posting below

BUDDHISM IN THE NUMBERS
Symbolic Significance of Numbers in Hinduism
THE NUMBERS IN THE QURAN
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF NUMBERS IN SCRIPTURE
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?82025-Earth-Orbital-Speed-66666mi-H-Strange-Stars-Pulsate-According-to-the-quot-Golden-Ratio-quot&p=760588&viewfull=1#post760588

And eggs too! You might be onto something...:D

singular_me

23rd February 2015, 09:36 AM

I had to bring back the thread ...
-----------------------
Any dedicated seeker of truth eventually stumbles upon the incredible symmetry and structure of mathematics, which is especially true in fractal geometry involving the Numbers 1-9. For a most basic example, just take a look at these nine equations:

(1 x 8) + 1= 9

(12 x 8) + 2 = 98

(123 x 8) + 3 = 987

(1234 x 8) + 4 = 9876

(12345 x 8) + 5 = 98765

(123456 x 8) + 6 = 987654

(1234567 x 8) + 7 = 9876543

(12345678 x 8) + 8 = 98765432

(123456789 x 8) + 9 = 987654321

something to chew on, man didnt invent symmetry... fractals existed long (since ever) before man discovered them

expat4ever

27th February 2015, 06:05 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwLviP7KaAc

Start at about 39:20 in. Just to point out once again the golden mean found even in mycelium.

Horn

27th February 2015, 07:27 PM

at about 25min. or so Japanese slime mold designs a most efficient subway system.

That's some spiral based sacred architecture.

http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/wiredscience/2010/01/slime_mold_2.jpg

http://www.wired.com/2010/01/slime-mold-grows-network-just-like-tokyo-rail-system/

singular_me

4th March 2015, 02:47 PM

more embedded numbers in location/site by the elite

33,000.00 feet long according to google
https://scontent-lax.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/s640x640/11050792_10153641145362977_7768491336103790506_n.j pg?oh=fed13f02f016af9e9a0c278c6aae9131&oe=558F6D16

sacred math and free energy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mduGLBxISb0&feature=youtu.be

It has been said that the ability to prove that free energy is possible is non-existent because it defies various physical laws. But what if those physical laws are not entirely correct? What if the mathematics that proves the possibility of free energy was just not known, suppressed or hidden? In the video below, Randy Powell discusses Vortex Based Mathematics, which is a concept he was taught by Marko Rodin. He suggests that this mathematics proves that free energy is possible..................
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/01/30/the-ground-breaking-mathematics-that-proves-free-energy-is-possible-has-been-discovered/

The video below is of a TEDx talk where Randy Powell describes the mathematics and its applications. he got offer$ but refuses to sell ... just want it to be available to people dedicated to the betterment of mankind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhBymLCRIU8

Red Ice Radio - Randy Powell - Hour 1 - Vortex Based Mathematics & The ABHA Torus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xtni8QF910I

Horn

4th March 2015, 04:19 PM

oooh a full 72.6 minutes of vortex 9 math discussions!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xtni8QF910I&t=123

http://ww1.theabhakingdom.com/caf/?ses=Y3JlPTE0MjU1MTQzNjQmdGNpZD13dzEudGhlYWJoYWtpb mdkb20uY29tNTRmNzlmN2MwNjk3ZjAuNzI4Mjk3NDAmZmtpPTI 3MTkxMDU3OCZ0YXNrPXNlYXJjaCZkb21haW49dGhlYWJoYWtpb mdkb20uY29tJnM9Zjk3OTc2NjU1ZjJkNzU4NjRmZDUmbGFuZ3V hZ2U9ZXMmYV9pZD0z&query=Free%20Energy%20Generator&afdToken=CsgBChMI78uQ6_aPxAIVSR8fCh2wTQABGAEgAFD81 6ABUPruogFQj9H5AVD_ksAHUPWt9g9Qs4P3D1CPjJ4QUMaNrxB QgKabEVCi7_8TUMTttxVQveuEG1C_64QbUNHY5CVQh-LaJlCzutcvULW61y9Qt7rXL1C_iu6XAVDTiu6XAVDUi-6XAWj816ABaPruogFxxAmKnUYrbRuCARMIhZ2X6_aPxAIVERsf Ch3KHQACjQHimcL9kQGEKe-vDQGdMZEB6xteuvpOvEMSGQBtOoqQFeiUBKVgVl3S1hH2j-dB6VDqtSs

singular_me

4th March 2015, 04:39 PM

started watching it but then decided to keep it for this evening....

yes, many people are catching up, got this one on the FB's vortex Based Mathematics

Horn

4th March 2015, 06:12 PM

This one looks more informative,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eMBw3yiO_4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sApt-vRx_A

singular_me

4th March 2015, 07:30 PM

yes, the vid you found is more on the topic than mine which sounds more about his spiritual journey. His teacher Marko Rodin has also many vids on utube

I see the vw logo in there which gives my gallileo quote legs

http://i-cdn.phonearena.com/en/user-avatar/73442-thumb/vw-logo.jpg

oooh a full 72.6 minutes of vortex 9 math discussions!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xtni8QF910I&t=123

http://ww1.theabhakingdom.com/caf/?ses=Y3JlPTE0MjU1MTQzNjQmdGNpZD13dzEudGhlYWJoYWtpb mdkb20uY29tNTRmNzlmN2MwNjk3ZjAuNzI4Mjk3NDAmZmtpPTI 3MTkxMDU3OCZ0YXNrPXNlYXJjaCZkb21haW49dGhlYWJoYWtpb mdkb20uY29tJnM9Zjk3OTc2NjU1ZjJkNzU4NjRmZDUmbGFuZ3V hZ2U9ZXMmYV9pZD0z&query=Free%20Energy%20Generator&afdToken=CsgBChMI78uQ6_aPxAIVSR8fCh2wTQABGAEgAFD81 6ABUPruogFQj9H5AVD_ksAHUPWt9g9Qs4P3D1CPjJ4QUMaNrxB QgKabEVCi7_8TUMTttxVQveuEG1C_64QbUNHY5CVQh-LaJlCzutcvULW61y9Qt7rXL1C_iu6XAVDTiu6XAVDUi-6XAWj816ABaPruogFxxAmKnUYrbRuCARMIhZ2X6_aPxAIVERsf Ch3KHQACjQHimcL9kQGEKe-vDQGdMZEB6xteuvpOvEMSGQBtOoqQFeiUBKVgVl3S1hH2j-dB6VDqtSs

Glass

4th March 2015, 10:35 PM

So what happened to that guy. He seems to have disappeared of the face of the internet.

Horn

5th March 2015, 07:32 AM

So what happened to that guy. He seems to have disappeared of the face of the internet.

Interesting, he does sort of look like mossad. lol

He mentions the "Rodin Coil" i've done some searching on that and "vortex math coil" found some linkage.

http://disinfo.com/2013/07/can-vortex-mathematics-lead-to-free-energy-or-is-it-just-more-fluff/

Torrid type coils are not new i've seen them used as stabilizers and other such insulators/filters in electronics.

Many home electric buffs are toying with the notions in multiplying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_uXemXEq_A

Glass

5th March 2015, 09:10 AM

I didn't see anything he did since 2010. I did find another video of a presentation he did last year. Don't have the link handy but it looked like about 1.5 hrs and said he had done some new stuff. I'll find and post when I can.

There does seem to be a lot of people playing around with these toroids. Toroids are interesting. They are used in radio as a choke for frequencies. They are used to block some frequencies from progressing up the line. They get to the toroid and and can't go any further. Used in other circuits and in devices for similar reasons.

Reading all of this material reminds me of all the material I posted on harmonics back a couple years ago. I need to go back over some of that info and see how it looks with this kind of thing in mind. I'd especially like to take a look at things like stonehenge and a few other ideas I have floating around.

singular_me

5th March 2015, 09:28 AM

ps: I am still kinda pondering that one
------------------------------
the following remarkable fact was discovered by Cody Birsner, a student at the University of Oklahoma, in the fall of 1994. The discovery arose out of work for a term paper on the Fibonacci series. http://www2.math.ou.edu/~dmccullough/teaching/miscellanea/miner.html

The decimal expansion of 1/89 is just the Fibonacci series, added together in an appropriate fashion.

Specifically, think of the Fibonacci series as being a sequence of decimal fractions, arranged so the right most digit of the nth Fibonacci number is in the n+1th decimal place. Then add:

.01
.001
.0002
.00003
.000005
.0000008
.00000013
.000000021
.0000000034
.00000000055
.000000000089
.0000000000144

+ .
----------------
.01123595505...
As you can easily check, 1/89 = .01123595595... Bizarre, eh?

Glass

5th March 2015, 09:56 AM

Here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQ5I5mLeAaU

haven't watched yet

singular_me

5th March 2015, 11:27 AM

this torus vortex math is a turning point that makes me think that I have now commenced the real study part of it. I wished they all would take the electric theory into account though.

in the meantime
(mixing some mainstream elements with plasma concepts)
Implosion Group's website about Dan Winter- Sacred Geometry & Coherent Emotion
http://goldenmean.info/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnIJVUQ3leM

Horn

5th March 2015, 12:13 PM

I wished they all would take the electric theory into though]

I'm not a proffesional scientist, but imagine if your base assumption is skewed. Your current project will be a tangent downwards from there.

Coincidently enough in the shape of a 9 ;)

Horn

5th March 2015, 01:31 PM

Here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQ5I5mLeAaU

haven't watched yet

Yeah, that's probably the best of the lot.

Begs a response from those less or more critical of holding efficiency as a sacred teaching.

singular_me

5th March 2015, 02:42 PM

he demonstrates quite efficiently why numbers are not arbitrary but geometric in nature defining space and time, and definitely can use short cuts to explain efficiently the torus' energy flow. I'd think it is credible theory, which I am sure is a little more complex than the presentation.

about time for science to come up with another word for black hole.

awesome animation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_h7XK-spxKo'

more of them, pretty cool
https://www.youtube.com/user/ieoie

Here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQ5I5mLeAaU

haven't watched yet

on FB, I recommend
The Extended Fibonacci Series - a Universal Language.

Vortex Based Mathematics

Applied Sacred Geometrics

The Numerical Universe

Cosmic Creations

singular_me

5th March 2015, 04:01 PM

the biblical 144,000 people going to heaven after the apocalypse showing up again?

Platonic Solids: a triangular number study of total angles
https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfa1/v/t1.0-9/1526412_536933386451487_9160923121079100325_n.jpg? oh=85932def2c9e76559c7b5db7a02de0c6&oe=55947D3C&__gda__=1434576236_df03293bf68e67e26f5b5e2d710d3a6 c

Horn

5th March 2015, 04:51 PM

mathematicians keep the origin of numbers loose in definition to appease the science Gods,

the same way countries keep "loose" criminal network loopholes open, so they can create closed spy networks upon each other and evade taxation.

Glass

5th March 2015, 09:42 PM

144000 is a gavitational number. It's a harmonic of C or speed of light. I'm rusty on how it applies. I need to revisit my notes or that harmonics thread. I'm sure I went over it in that thread. Using Pi there is a reciprocal of gravity against the speed of light.

singular_me

6th March 2015, 03:24 AM

Glass... hope you find it.

have you seen the latest with Santos Bonacci ?
in this one he also says that we cannot see the sun once passed the atmosphere layer, that is cold and hollow, what'd make him an electric universe theory follower (13:56)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3W4R7w6f8rQ&feature=youtu.be

Glass

6th March 2015, 06:55 AM

I started listening. will have to come back to it. the word association is a bit misinformed. Tele means distance. Not tell. And I don't get the Warner Bros thing. And it doesn't mean warn. Family business. Pleased to see he is not in jail. I wonder what happened to his fines matter. I looked a couple times but didn't find any news. I might poke that thread with some local news soon.

Bruce Cathie was one of the people who saw the relationship of gravitational forces being inverse to lightspeed. Or maybe better explained it than Einstein did. If he did. If light slowed it would be synonymous with time slowing. The book was The Harmonic Universe something. I've got it around here some where. A quick google on the number and him should pull up a couple pages from his book where he shows his calcs. That's all you get unless you buy a ebook.

singular_me

10th March 2015, 08:34 AM

by the way: scientists' darwinian double talk... darwin is a scam. period. Meanwhile, they finally find values in the spiral geometric shape...
-----------------------------------------------------------
Grand tree of life study shows a clock-like trend in new species emergence and diversity
Mar 03, 2015

http://cdn.phys.org/newman/gfx/news/2015/grandtreeofl.jpg
The tree of life compiled by Temple University researchers is depicted in a new way -- a cosmologically inspired galaxy of life view -- and contains more than 50,000 species in a tapestry spiraling out from the origin of life. Credit: Temple University

The study also challenges the conventional view of adaptation being the principal force driving species diversification, but rather, underscores the importance of random genetic events and geographic isolation in speciation, taking about 2 million years on average for a new species to emerge onto the scene.

"This finding shows that speciation is more clock-like than people have thought," said Hedges. "Taken together, this indicates that speciation and diversification are separate processes from adaptation, responding more to isolation and time. Adaptation is definitely occurring, so this does not disagree with Darwinism. But it goes against the popular idea that adaptation drives speciation, and against the related concept of punctuated equilibrium which associates adaptive change with speciation."

Besides the new evolutionary insights gained in this study, their Timetree of Life will provide opportunities for researchers to make other discoveries across disciplines, wherever an evolutionary perspective is needed, including, for example, studies of disease and medicine, and the effect of climate change on future species diversity.

Researchers around the world utilize molecular clocks to estimate species divergence times, calculating DNA mutational rates with species divergence times from gene and genomic sequences, that together with the fossil record and geological history, provide a constantly improving view of Darwin's "grandeur of life."
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-03-grand-tree-life-clock-like-trend.html#jCp

Horn

10th March 2015, 10:00 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Zu5st8QpJ8

mick silver

10th March 2015, 10:03 AM

http://apocalypse-how.com/images/rotate%20earth.gif

singular_me

11th March 2015, 05:00 PM

why so many 6s encoded? is 666 really the number of the beast? Or does it represent the "danger" of knowledge and the temptation to commit sin?

secrets in plain sight does it again! and this time using kms too
https://scontent-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/11070380_10153661675062977_6034972003272204510_n.j pg?oh=4dbf7e1494b61a68ab567d81248e9b33&oe=5587845F

from another poster (numbers 9 and 6)
Your work and that of Bernard Pietsch led me to spend some time studying the Washington Monument...
Interesting Facts about the Washington Monument
1. WM base area / inner base area inside the walls = 3.2
2. WM height in inches / solar year ≈ √333
3. WM capstone weighs 3300 pounds
4. WM height / base length = 10.08
5. WM height in feet x 72 = earth meridional circumference in kilometers (99.97% accurate)
6. WM base length in feet x 72 ≈ earth equatorial radius in miles (99.9% accurate)
7. WM height in inches x 6 = earth meridional circumference in kilometers (99.98% accurate)

RE secrets in plain sight:
The WM height is the same distance as the edge of an equilateral triangle inscribed inside the Great Pyramid. Perhaps this explains the resonances with the cosmos. It was all encoded in the Great Pyramid millennia ago.

expat4ever

11th March 2015, 05:45 PM

cool video from the space station, they need to clean the camera lense though.

Horn

11th March 2015, 06:54 PM

Whatever happened with that diode crater on Ceres, did it wink at them on approach?

expat4ever

11th March 2015, 08:11 PM

I think better pics are still 3 weeks off IIRC. I think they said April.

Horn

11th March 2015, 08:18 PM

What contrast, more than just reflection from what I could say.

It would have to be mirror finish with the Sun directly behind, but that's not the case, the light comes from other angle.

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7409&stc=1

singular_me

12th March 2015, 05:59 AM

another evidence of sacred math being patterns

https://scontent-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10401364_894700223926203_6169300821084423811_n.jpg ?oh=c25415eeea9601923ee482b46351ee84&oe=5571BBB2

aeondaze

12th March 2015, 08:02 AM

How is adding three in consecutive summations somehow sacred?

Its called simple arithmetic.

You have basically decided to make 111 into 3.

So then if you are adding 111 each time (which you've called three) then essentially you're adding three. What do you magically get?

3 + 3 = 6

6 + 3 = 9

9 + 3 = 12

12 + 3 = 15

15 + 3 = 18

18 + 3 = 21

21 + 3 = 24

24 + 3 = 27

Its no secret, but you somehow get transfixed when it moves up into the tens units. But its no secret, its simply a property of three being indivisible evenly in the decimal system because when you get to nine, and add three you move into the next units column, hence there is now a 1 in the tens column (placeholder) and a two in the units column (the remainder), which of course you now want to add together in your simple pidgin math way, so you get three again and the whole magical fairyland maths starts allover....BIG DEAL?

THIS IS SIMPLY A PROPERTY OF TEN BEING INDIVISIBLE BY THREE.

Lets try it with 11, (or 2 as you put it in retard pidgin math...)

11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
1 3 5 7 9

Doesn't work the same does it? NO.

Thats because ten IS divisible by 2.

How is this sacred again? :rolleyes:

It isn't.

AND for what its worth it isn't because its NOT CONSISTENT! You cannot apply the same rules to 11 (or two in your ignorant parlance) as you can to 111 (or as you foolishly say, 3)

Horn

12th March 2015, 08:15 AM

https://scontent-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/11070380_10153661675062977_6034972003272204510_n.j pg?oh=4dbf7e1494b61a68ab567d81248e9b33&oe=5587845F

That 66.6degree angle of rotation is actually more sacred than the 66666 mph thing

singular_me

12th March 2015, 10:17 AM

It is not my theory but that of finonacci and the like that you are trashing

Trinity means 3 (triangle), so finding the pattern of each number repeated 3 times, is important.

read my quote and ponder what even Gallieo meant...

10 =1

11 = 2

22 = 4

33 = 6

and so on

if you reduce any number to a single digit, patterns will appear, not always the same but 3, 6 and 9 are highly prevalent throughout the cosmos.

here is another example, choose whatever number then add all digits together:
87325
8+7+3+2+5 = 25
87325 - 25 = 87300 = 18 = 9

no matter HOW long your number is, if you apply this calculation, you will find 9... why? because 9 is the ultimate number in sacred math.

But I dont expect you to grasp this... that God is math.

Plato: let none enter who is ignorant of geometry, that applies to you, I am afraid

Why do ALL religions embed math in their texts/scriptures? If you cannot answer this, just go away

It is not me you are after but something bigger than you, that's why you stalk me with your insults. Is your atheism showing cracks somewhere?

How is adding three in consecutive summations somehow sacred?

Its called simple arithmetic.

You have basically decided to make 111 into 3.

So then if you are adding 111 each time (which you've called three) then essentially you're adding three. What do you magically get?

3 + 3 = 6

6 + 3 = 9

9 + 3 = 12

12 + 3 = 15

15 + 3 = 18

18 + 3 = 21

21 + 3 = 24

24 + 3 = 27

Its no secret, but you somehow get transfixed when it moves up into the tens units. But its no secret, its simply a property of three being indivisible evenly in the decimal system because when you get to nine, and add three you move into the next units column, hence there is now a 1 in the tens column (placeholder) and a two in the units column (the remainder), which of course you now want to add together in your simple pidgin math way, so you get three again and the whole magical fairyland maths starts allover....BIG DEAL?

THIS IS SIMPLY A PROPERTY OF TEN BEING INDIVISIBLE BY THREE.

Lets try it with 11, (or 2 as you put it in retard pidgin math...)

11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
1 3 5 7 9

Doesn't work the same does it? NO.

Thats because ten IS divisible by 2.

How is this sacred again? :rolleyes:

It isn't.

AND for what its worth it isn't because its NOT CONSISTENT! You cannot apply the same rules to 11 (or two in your ignorant parlance) as you can to 111 (or as you foolishly say, 3)

singular_me

12th March 2015, 10:36 AM

Indeed nobody can explain why the rotation angle is exactly that number.

That 66.6degree angle of rotation is actually more sacred than the 66666 mph thing

singular_me

12th March 2015, 01:31 PM

just ran across that guy.... I 99.9% :) agree with 1st video, but havent listen to the others yet. We need to understand a lot more about electricity and electromagnetism he says.
===========
Published on Nov 3, 2014

All-round scientist Johan Oldenkamp PhD gives a short introduction to Wholly Science. Wholly Science is the reunification of pure science and true spirituality, as science without true spirituality is uninspired and exanimate, while spirituality without pure science is fantasy and ungrounded.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwR-p9JH7y8&feature=youtu.be

Removing the Veil - by Johan Oldenkamp, PhD
Is there more to the world than the physical reality?
In order to answer this question, this video presentation starts with Plato's famous allegory of the cave. In this allegory, the shadows on the cave wall represent the reality of the physical manifestation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWBfsUatAoc

Johan Oldenkamp presents "Nine Levels of Creation"
In this video Dr. Johan H. Oldenkamp shares his interpretation of these 9 hierarchical layers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot713JgDX8Y&feature=youtu.be

Neuro

12th March 2015, 02:38 PM

Indeed nobody can explain why the rotation angle is exactly that number.
Actually most of the time it isn't...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/14/Obliquity_of_the_ecliptic_laskar.PNG
:)

Glass

12th March 2015, 05:47 PM

but from the orbital equator it is 66.6. aka the alignment with Sol.

90 - 23.4 = 66.6
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/61/AxialTiltObliquity.png/391px-AxialTiltObliquity.png

aeondaze

12th March 2015, 05:49 PM

here is another example, choose whatever number then add all digits together:
87325
8+7+3+2+5 = 25
87325 - 25 = 87300 = 18 = 9

no matter HOW long your number is, if you apply this calculation, you will find 9... why? because 9 is the ultimate number in sacred math.

But I dont expect you to grasp this (we'll see about that!)... that God is math.

You are the most annoying poster on the internet. You think you've found the holy grail but all you've really found is modular mathematics and digital roots.

Here is the equation for the digital root of a number n:

Dr(n) = n - 9((n-1)/9)

So now in your spastic 'magicness', what you're doing is subtracting the digital root of a number (n) from itself, then finding the digital root of that number, then repeatedly finding the digital root until its a single digit.

therefore the first step will look something like this:

n - (n - 9((n-1)/9)) = 9((n-1)/9)

now we want the digital root of this number, (the n's cancel each other out and bracketed part becomes positive!), then we have:

9((n-1)/9) - 9[(9((n-1)/9)-1)/9]

Can you see where this is going? I doubt it...

Thats right, when you eventually solve this type of equation, WHICH IS WELL ABOVE YOUR GRADE :D the answer is 9.

Note: this is by no means exhaustive, the above equation is ONLY relevant when dealing with a single iteration to find A SINGLE DIGIT digital root. This would need to be repeated until the digital root becomes a single number, but as you can see this equation quickly becomes massively cumbersome for large numbers.

This is not a mystery. Its not a mystery by any real stretch of the imagination. Only someone who hasn't got a clue about mathematics but think they do (yes a fool like you!) would think this is mystical, magical or heaven forbid 'sacred'.

NOW don't go and say something stupid like "see how simple and elegant my math is, while yours is bloated and incomprehensible" Because that would be VERY stupid.

Your pidgin equations do not show any PROOF that the answer is ALWAYS 9, mine does. Thats the difference. You leave it out as some big mystery, because your pea brain cannot understand it any other way.

The truth is MY math is the ACTUAL PROOF as to why the answer will always be 9.

MASSIVELY BIG DIFFERENCE.

See, this is why I have a tertiary level understanding of mathematics and you are stuck in sixth grade, lol :rolleyes:

AND your statement "I don't expect you to understand this" is WRONG on all accounts and actually applies to you not me!

So stop with your magical modular mathematics of which you understand VERY little, unless you are going to show us a proof all you're doing is prooving what a mental retard you can be.

Horn

12th March 2015, 05:52 PM

The only remedy for this is a new circle with 500 degrees in it.

Neuro

12th March 2015, 06:56 PM

but from the orbital equator it is 66.6. aka the alignment with Sol.

90 - 23.4 = 66.6
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/61/AxialTiltObliquity.png/391px-AxialTiltObliquity.png
If you look at the graph I posted above, you'ld see that 2000 years ago, which is probably the time when the 666 magical mystery number of the beast was invented by the BLT's, that the orbital angle was around 23.6°, so back then it was 66.4°, or if you go back to 9000 years ago 7000 BC it was 24.2°, so 65.8°.

The only reason the BLT's gained any power through numerology, is because other people are morons and thought that there is a certain magical significance to some numbers, just like singular me is trying to convince us now...

Glass

12th March 2015, 07:35 PM

The only reason the BLT's gained any power through numerology, is because other people are morons and thought that there is a certain magical significance to some numbers, just like singular me is trying to convince us now...

Maybe it's the other way around? It's because we are morons that we don't get it. I think a few of you guys get your backs up over something that is not really that big a deal. It's a discussion about number patterns that repeat in multiple situations. As I have stated earlier, I think it makes sense as a simple repeatable calculation, if you want to be able to do something over and over again and have a very low error rate.

Do we want to split the hairs of a few points of a degree based on measurements done by ancient people 2000 years ago. They were able to work something like this out 2000 years ago? I don't know, did they? You suggest they did, coming up with the 666. Numerology might not mean anything to us but for some it's a language and for the masons and kabbalists it is something very important to them.

As for convincing. I don't think anyone is trying to "Convince" anyone else on this or any other topic discussed here. With a big picture view as I usually have, I can see a lot of opportunity for these calcs if you were going to manufacture things.

aeondaze

12th March 2015, 08:37 PM

I think a few of you guys get your backs up over something that is not really that big a deal. It's a discussion about number patterns that repeat in multiple situations.

EXACTLY!

It should essentially be a discussion about mathematics, not some bloody minded assertion that what we see at work in these numbers is the hand of a god or that this is all so very sacred and that the masons and BLT's have some awesome incomprehensible power.

Do we want to split the hairs of a few points of a degree based on measurements done by ancient people 2000 years ago. They were able to work something like this out 2000 years ago? I don't know, did they? You suggest they did, coming up with the 666. Numerology might not mean anything to us but for some it's a language and for the masons and kabbalists it is something very important to them.

As for convincing. I don't think anyone is trying to "Convince" anyone else on this or any other topic discussed here. With a big picture view as I usually have, I can see a lot of opportunity for these calcs if you were going to manufacture things.

No this is BULLSHIT.

Someone is making assertions here that are flat out incorrect. Any disagreement on principle is viewed by them as tantamount to some virulently warped form of new age heresy.

How then is one to respond?

Particularly when its clearly been pointed out that the ones making the assertions have NO understanding whatsoever of the mathematical concepts that constitute their so called 'sacred' theories.

We doubters are not the heathens here, we're the ones bringing enlightenment to the subject.

Horn

12th March 2015, 09:33 PM

If you look at the graph I posted above, you'ld see that 2000 years ago, which is probably the time when the 666 magical mystery number of the beast was invented by the BLT's, that the orbital angle was around 23.6°, so back then it was 66.4°, or if you go back to 9000 years ago 7000 BC it was 24.2°, so 65.8°.

The only reason the BLT's gained any power through numerology, is because other people are morons and thought that there is a certain magical significance to some numbers, just like singular me is trying to convince us now...

I fail to see anyone gaining power over others thru numerology (or belief in numerology), or more or less succumbing to numerology.

If you believe that is somehow a true result, I'd call you a moron.

Which you're displaying quite clumsily, by ignoring a mean average of efficiency.

Horn

12th March 2015, 10:00 PM

We doubters are not the heathens here, we're the ones bringing enlightenment to the subject.

All any of you have proved is that there in an efficient way living organisms evolve and matter assembles. Nothing more.

Efficiency ≠ sacred

Ahh a regular Lucifer. By all means, thank you for the introduction.

Nice fangs, btw. Have you managed to spread the sunshield evenly, lately?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98PcJ8ymGvA

Those who desecrate the alters of light and efficiency shall be strung up by the hind quarters, hung, than stretched to dry on a cross.

This is my new age sacred biblical code.

You are a regular joeking, who has fondness for spacejunk, and lacks any regard for efficiency. Quite simply put genetic mud sludge.

singular_me

12th March 2015, 10:28 PM

Horn

12th March 2015, 10:33 PM

My God, there's nothing I hate more than someone who desecrates the sacredness of efficiency.

This entire planet is filled with these fat heads.

Like the state of Friggin China gobbling up tons of raw material to produce nothing but cheap throwaway crap in 2 year junk.

This is their model design to happiness, shipping boatloads of junk thru cyberspace.

singular_me

12th March 2015, 11:28 PM

first off Neuro, you always speak as if I am the one behind this knowledge while I am clearly not. If everybody knew about it, nobody could use it to harm nor to gain power.

It is kind of mind boggling that you are able to see the harmful side effects of secrecy raping societies, yet when it comes down to the mathematical Secrets of the Universe, instead of having an open mind, you just show the opposite.

If the germans had known about the reversed swastika (subverted harmony symbol), they would NEVER have followed hitler. Too much knowledge in the end of the few will always have disastrous consequence. Same with the "all seeing eye" on the one dollar bill of course. The problem you see, is that once one starts digging, one also grasps that the Knowledge is being subverted and that the latter can be also used for the betterment of mankind.

The language of Nature/God is math and that is why the elites and religions are bent on it - and subvert it. And this language represents the hidden part of the iceberg. Galileo is absolute right.

And I really do not think 666 is the number of the beast but that of Man, the number of perfection. God created man the 6th day... repeated 3 times, the Trinity. 666 as offered in the bible is subverted. And it did wonders: look at all the hatred in the world, the so many believing that those not sharing the same faith are the anti-christ.

Today it is clear that religion is politics and to extricate us from this giant mess, going back to the roots of all religions, the Numbers embedded in all of them and how they relate to the Cosmos, is unavoidable.

NEURO: The only reason the BLT's gained any power through numerology, is because other people are morons and thought that there is a certain magical significance to some numbers, just like singular me is trying to convince us now...

aeondaze

12th March 2015, 11:37 PM

If everybody knew about it, nobody could use it to harm nor to gain power.

Everybody does know about it.

Its not a secret

How many times do we need to go over this?

The reason these cretins get away with it is through psychological manipulation AND physical intimidation.

Believing its somehow 'secret' knowledge is a complete and total cop-out.

aeondaze

13th March 2015, 12:07 AM

Refuting this video makes you look as an ignorant, I am afraid. Right there in your face and you still do not see anything. You just hate the idea of a theory unifying sciences and spirituality. You, bringing enlightenment ??? You still havent overcome the fact as how fibonnaci found about his sequence, have you?

I'm not refuting that mathematics plays a MAJOR part in our understanding of the universe, I'm refuting that it somehow has its origin in sacredness.

You need to differentiate here. You are blinded by the common sense of our position.

No, the idea of a unifying theory makes perfect sense theoretically, but we don't live in a a purely theoretical world! :rolleyes:

What I actually hate, is that a pompous ingnorant fool like yourself thinks they've discovered the secret to the universe and that the rest of the well read and learned people of the world (Neuro and myself in this instance) haven't the faintest clue.

This is a most annoying combination of hypocrisy mixed with an over inflated sense of worth.

you still have not answered the question: WHY do all religions embed numbers in their teachings? And moreover, why are those numbers/patterns embedded in the Cosmos? Yeah, right "it just is"... that is how nature organizes itself, just as Life came out of the blue.

What answer should I give when I've stated my assertion that there are no 'sacred' numbers in these texts. These are linguistic metric devices like iambic pentameters in the king James bible version, BIG DEAL?

There are also Vedic meters in the Vedic texts or in the case of Homers Odyssey, a dactylic hexameter <----YOU NEVER MENTION THAT ONE DO YOU?

And the reason these are set out in certain linguistic metrics?

They are MNEMONIC DEVICES, they are used by BARDS to facilitate memorisation! Its all VERY simple and has nothing to do with somehow being 'sacred'

Now seriously, how would you name the "force/phenomenon" that makes matter assemble... other than it just is... define the IT, please . And if you cannot, go away

What's in a name anyway, SERIOUSLY? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

Unless it is essential in classifying a concrete phenomena so as to differentiate from another then its utterly superfluous. Which is EXACTLY the case in this situation.

There is no sacred phenomena that magically made these things happen! There are physical universal laws and these are ALREADY well defined!

The only things you bring to the subject are just ignorant assertions, pure speculation and gross misrepresentation.

No I won't go away, but your dumb theories will, guaranteed. In fact they already have, its just that you have your head stuck so far up your ass that you cannot see it.

http://patrick.net/forum/content/uploads/2014/02/head-up-the-ass.jpg

;)

To further make my point. I asked for specific proof of how Fibonacci came up with his supposed understanding of the nature of the universe without the aid of a telescope. And did you provide proof?

NO

Unlike you, I actually provide proof.

You don't. Anyone on the internet that chances upon these threads will INSTANTLY see that.

Sucks to be you...lol :p

Glass

13th March 2015, 02:16 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L777RhL_Fz4

Interesting video. nearly half way through.

singular_me

13th March 2015, 09:19 AM

aeon, you just are a major waste of time... and additionally you have a double face. You never would start threads on atheism to defend your stance but easily jump into spiritual oriented threads and trash them.

Fibonascci just had a deep knowledge of sacred geometry, but since you reject spiritual math, there is no proof convincing enough for you. You do not even see the sacred knowledge involved in the pyramids.

The silly pic that you posted is exactly how I regard atheism by the way, so we are even.

EVERYTHING is sacred, because the phenomenon /energy sustaining Life IS. Nothing came out of the blue, and this includes Numbers and the alphabet, and that is the common aspect shared by spiritual belief systems. All the knowledge that exists is *sacred* and this sacredness can only be understood with math... it is the shabby secret of the world elites that is deeply harming mankind.

Keep up throwing your immature fits because you cannot accept the "sacred mystery" of Life itself. It is precisely why sciences as a whole have gone so wrong, because they are completely disconnected from the spiritual aspect since atheism rules over the entire mainstream academia

I'm not refuting that mathematics plays a MAJOR part in our understanding of the universe, I'm refuting that it somehow has its origin in sacredness.

singular_me

13th March 2015, 09:26 AM

thanks Glass... obvious the political/religious elites know something very important that masses dont.

Interesting video. nearly half way through.

singular_me

13th March 2015, 09:49 AM

sacred math for the betterment of society, it also tells us what kind of medicine is suited for man
----------

RADIO SHOW:
http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2013/06/RIR-130607.php

Ibrahim Karim & Pier Paolo Alberghini - Hour 1 - BioGeometry
June 7, 2013
With his experience as an architect and a scientist Ibrahim Karim has synergized aspects of Pythagorean harmonics, subtle energy sciences, radiesthesia, geobiology, building biology, sacred architecture & modern wave theories to produce a new Physics of Quality from which the science of BioGeometry has emerged. Since 2002 Pier Paolo Alberghini has been working with a new approach to achieve well-being for the users of the buildings he designs, by applying the science of BioGeometry. Alberghini and Karim have collaborated successfully in BioGeometry projects in Europe and North America. We'll discuss how BioGeometry bridges science and spirituality to produce a natural harmony into the environment. In the first hour, Ibrahim and Pier Paolo explain how BioGeometrical shapes interact with Earth's energy to produce a balancing effect on all energy levels of biological systems. Karim talks about his research into shapes of body organs which led to the discovery of the relationship between organ function, energy pattern, and shape. These patterns called "BioSignatures" produce, through resonance, a balance of energy and immunity that support orthodox and alternative medicine. We'll discuss how BioGeometry provides a viable solution in transforming the quality of the effect that electromagnetic radiation has on living systems. In the second hour, we ll discuss the Physics of Quality in more detail. Well also hear about the relationship between electromagnetic fields and morals. Karim and Alberghini discuss their solutions to rebalance with nature.

-----------------------
"BioGeometry is a Science based on the resonance of geometrical shapes, numbers and colors invented by Dr. Ibrahim Karim, an Egyptian architect based in Cairo, Zurich and Montreal.

This first-ever published collection of writings by Dr. Ibrahim Karim reflects the holistic essence of his worldview. Dr Karim is the founder of the Science of BioGeometry in the early 1970s. BioGeometry is the science that uses shapes, colors, motion and sound to induce harmony into the subtle energy qualities of the environment. At the core of this harmony is a subtle energy quality found in the transcendental centers of the forming process of nature and is the main quality in sacred power spots of humanity that give a spiritual dimension to the timeless monuments erected since the dawn of humanity. With his experience as an architect and a scientist Dr. Karim has synergized aspects of Pythagorean Harmonics, Subtle energy sciences, Radiesthesia, Geobiology, Building Biology, Sacred Architecture & modern wave theories to produce a new Physics of Quality from which the science of BioGeometry emerged. *BioGeometry bridges science and spirituality to produce a natural harmony into the environment. *BioGeometry provides a viable solution in transforming the quality of the effect that electromagnetic radiation has on living systems. Successful projects in Switzerland in collaboration & acknowledgment of Swiss authorities prove its efficiency to take our modern science into the future. *BioGeometry provides new solutions to Earth Radiation, which is a serious health hazard if not acknowledged in the location and design of our buildings. * A new energy-quality-based analysis of the Great Pyramid in Giza, reveals new knowledge on the foremost of the wonders of the world and on the essence of the great Ancient Egyptian civilization.

(amazon.com)

Horn

13th March 2015, 01:13 PM

Right, a definition of sacred coming fom those most unholy really has no bearing whatsoever.

Is like lawyer telling you the difference between right and wrong.

I can tell simply by looking at the glyphs themselves that they were created as sacred.

Neuro

13th March 2015, 03:22 PM

first off Neuro, you always speak as if I am the one behind this knowledge while I am clearly not. If everybody knew about it, nobody could use it to harm nor to gain power.

It is kind of mind boggling that you are able to see the harmful side effects of secrecy raping societies, yet when it comes down to the mathematical Secrets of the Universe, instead of having an open mind, you just show the opposite.

If the germans had known about the reversed swastika (subverted harmony symbol), they would NEVER have followed hitler. Too much knowledge in the end of the few will always have disastrous consequence. Same with the "all seeing eye" on the one dollar bill of course. The problem you see, is that once one starts digging, one also grasps that the Knowledge is being subverted and that the latter can be also used for the betterment of mankind.

The language of Nature/God is math and that is why the elites and religions are bent on it - and subvert it. And this language represents the hidden part of the iceberg. Galileo is absolute right.

And I really do not think 666 is the number of the beast but that of Man, the number of perfection. God created man the 6th day... repeated 3 times, the Trinity. 666 as offered in the bible is subverted. And it did wonders: look at all the hatred in the world, the so many believing that those not sharing the same faith are the anti-christ.

Today it is clear that religion is politics and to extricate us from this giant mess, going back to the roots of all religions, the Numbers embedded in all of them and how they relate to the Cosmos, is unavoidable.
I don't think you are behind this so called knowledge. Neither do I believe it is very important in the elites agenda against the rest of the population. How do you feel about Lucifer, Goldissima?

Horn

13th March 2015, 05:14 PM

If there's anyone guilty of preying upon Lucifer in this thread, its the 11 Nihilists.

That is 2 select individuals.

Neuro

13th March 2015, 06:28 PM

If there's anyone guilty of preying upon Lucifer in this thread, its the 11 Nihilists.

That is 2 select individuals.
Damn, why do you have to take it so personally when I am preying on Lucifer?

Horn

13th March 2015, 09:00 PM

http://m.youtube.com/results?q=pink%20floyd%20crying%20song&sm=12

singular_me

14th March 2015, 09:34 PM

knowing about the most prevalent sacred numbers in the Universe, looks like the powers that be embedded them wherever they can

1 furlong = 660 feet
1 chain = 66 feet;
1 acre = 1 furlong x 1 chain = 660 feet x 66 feet = 43560 square feet....

4+3+5+6+0 = 18 = 9

this secret in plain sight guy is really "wired"
https://scontent-sea.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/p261x260/11063939_10153670299912977_4366713766128232384_n.j pg?oh=a64480dbc3800492e008ff971724558d&oe=55877EC8

mean distance
noun, Astronomy
1.
the arithmetic mean of the greatest and least distances of a planet from the sun, used in stating the size of an orbit; the semimajor axis

aeondaze

14th March 2015, 09:50 PM

knowing about the most prevalent sacred numbers in the Universe, looks like the powers that be embedded them wherever they can

1 furlong = 660 feet
1 chain = 66 feet;
1 acre = 1 furlong x 1 chain = 660 feet x 66 feet = 43560 square feet....

4+3+5+6+0 = 18 = 9

this secret in plain sight guy is really on a roll

And he is WRONG!

1 furlong = 660 feet
1 chain = 66.000132001 feet;
1 acre = 1 furlong x 1 chain = 660 feet x 66.000132001 feet = 43560.08712066 square feet....

You cannot get the digital root of an irrational number!

THIS IS TECHNICALLY INCORRECT!

You will say this is insignificant, but the truth is that .08712066 square feet is equal to a difference of...

12.545 square inches! OR a square with sides of 3.54"

WHICH IS A LOT!

singular_me

14th March 2015, 10:03 PM

go away.... 3 decimals is acceptable as all the calculations accept .1% error margin

he stated that at the beginning of the thread. (I copied/pasted my discussion with him)

the same with Pi, 3.14 is COMPLETELY acceptable and commonly used...

go away, you are such a waste of time...

And he is WRONG!

1 furlong = 660 feet
1 chain = 66.000132001 feet;
1 acre = 1 furlong x 1 chain = 660 feet x 66.000132001 feet = 43560.08712066 square feet....

You cannot get the digital root of an irrational number!

THIS IS TECHNICALLY INCORRECT!

You will say this is insignificant, but the truth is that .08712066 square feet is equal to a difference of...

12.545 square inches! OR a square with sides of 3.54"

WHICH IS A LOT!

aeondaze

14th March 2015, 10:10 PM

go away.... 3 decimals is acceptable as all the calculations accept .1% error margin

he stated that at the beginning of the threat. (I copied/pasted my discussion with him)

the same with PI, 3.14 is acceptable.

Hahaha, its not that easy for you! Someone has to hold your feet to the fire with this inane bullshit.

In who's language is this acceptable, ignoramuses like yourself and this dude?

You see, the thing about three decimal places is that when its multiplied by 660, it becomes a BIG difference.

In the real world you ONLY round off a number AFTER your final calculation so as to preserve the integrity of said calculation.

You bozos think you can just do it before the first calculation has been made, AND you do it because it fits your misguided purpose!

Its just WRONG on all accounts!

One ONLY uses 3.14 when it is irrelevant to do so ie: when you're performing a rough calculation.

When it MATTERS you use the irrational number to at least six or seven decimal places, or even sometimes MORE!

I don't imagine you or this fool will choose to do that, because you haven't a single clue as to what your doing and besides it DESTROYS your arguments!

singular_me

14th March 2015, 10:16 PM

you are just splitting hair because seeing mysterious/sacred patterns is something your atheism cannot fathom.

even the great pyramid is very slightly off... so are you going to say that it is not a pyramid because of that perhaps ??... your attempt is ludicrous

Pi = 3.14 159 26 535 8 979 323 8 462 64 33 832
Pi = 3.14 (commonly used everywhere)

Moreover, do you think that ALL calculations in astrophysics/astronomy are not a little off ???

you are disingenuous to say the least.

the secret in plain sight guy is HONEST

Hahaha, its not that easy for you! Someone has to hold your feet to the fire with this inane bullshit.

In who's language is this acceptable, ignoramuses like yourself and this dude?

You see, the thing about three decimal places is that when its multiplied by 660, it becomes a BIG difference.

In the real world you ONLY round off a number AFTER your final calculation so as to preserve the integrity of said calculation.

You bozos think you can just do it before the first calculation has been made, AND you do it because it fits your misguided purpose!

Its just WRONG on all accounts!

aeondaze

14th March 2015, 10:26 PM

you are just splitting hair because seeing mysterious/sacred patterns is something your atheism cannot fathom.

even the pyramid is very slightly off... so are you going to say that it is not a pyramid because of that perhaps... your attempt is ludicrous

So what your saying is that all those calculations that scientists do down to a high degree of significance is splitting hairs?

You're an idiot!

They do it because that is whats required to get an ACCURATE figure.

What your really saying by this is that you have no intention of wanting to get an accurate figure, so really its just a silly little thing that you're doing, a bit of fun, you know something NOT meant to be taken seriously.

OK then...or do you want to be taken seriously with this shit?

Then you'll use a high degree of significance with your calculations!

...and when you do that, your silly theory is WRONG!

:rolleyes:

A pyramid is a pyramid is a pyramid. It doesn't have to be 'perfect' to be classed as a pyramid, where did you get that idea, the same place you got all of those other dumb theories?

singular_me

14th March 2015, 10:31 PM

as an example: your stance is that somebody claiming that Pi =3.14 is a liar

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

the secret in plain sight guy ADMITTED that the error margin was .01%... meaning if you cannot deal with it, yes you are splitting hair.

So what your saying is that all those calculations that scientists do down to a high degree of significance is splitting hairs?

You're an idiot!

They do it because that is whats required to get an ACCURATE figure.

What your really saying by this is that you have no intention of wanting to get an accurate figure, so really its just a silly little thing that you're doing, a bit of fun, you know something NOT meant to be taken seriously.

OK then...or do you want to be taken seriously with this shit?

Then you'll use a high degree of significance with your calculations!

...and when you do that, your silly theory is WRONG!

:rolleyes:

A pyramid is a pyramid is a pyramid. It doesn't have to be 'perfect' to be classed as a pyramid, where did you get that idea, the same place you got all of those other dumb theories?

aeondaze

14th March 2015, 10:38 PM

the secret in plain sight guy is HONEST

Yeah OK.

I can see that within your little pea brain you need to think that way, else you need to face the cold hard REALITY of the truth which your mind is utterly incapable of considering let alone accepting.

Sucks to be you, running around in your little fantasy world of make believe, holding your hands tightly over your ears shouting "blah, blah, blah, blah I can't hear you"

:D

Horn

14th March 2015, 10:39 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YN8M0gCmxY

http://hiddenmessagejournal.com/pdfs/grand_unification_of_modern_and_ancient_mathematic s_systems.pdf

http://www.gabitos.com/DESENMASCARANDO_LAS_FALSAS_DOCTRINAS/template.php?nm=1426281924

singular_me

14th March 2015, 10:40 PM

and if I were you, I'd wonder why the elites have chosen using 6s to define such measurements

1 furlong = 660 feet
1 chain = 66 feet

any idea?

aeondaze

14th March 2015, 10:46 PM

the secret in plain sight guy ADMITTED that the error margin was .01%... meaning if you cannot deal with it, yes you are splitting hair.

Don't you get it?

Margin of error in this instance is ONLY reserved for the FINAL figure from a calculation.

This guy has got the cart completely before the horse and decided he'll accept a margin of error on a figure BEFORE he's performed the damned calculation!

You think that a square with sides of 3.54" is splitting hairs?

BULLSHIT!

THIS IS 3.54" ------>

----------------------------------------------------

Thats NOT insignificant!

You and the guy you rode in on are BULLSHIT artists!

aeondaze

14th March 2015, 10:50 PM

and if I were you, I'd wonder why the elites have chosen using 6s to define such measurements

1 furlong = 660 feet
1 chain = 66 feet

any idea?

1 chain doesn't equal 66'

1 chain = 66.000132001'

ADMIT IT! You're just wrong....;)

singular_me

14th March 2015, 10:53 PM

such as my Pi example... anybody saying that Pi = 3.14 is wrong ;D

Pi = 3.14 159 26 535 8 979 323 8 462 64 33 832

give me a break.

he admitted the .01% error and you go after that, thinking you can win the argument and calling him an idiot.

sacred math are 10,000yo... and we are surrounded by it 24/7, yet you trash the whole topic continually. The brick wall is coming, watch out

1 chain doesn't equal 66'

1 chain = 66.000132001'

ADMIT IT! You're just wrong....;)

aeondaze

14th March 2015, 11:00 PM

such as my Pi example... anybody saying that Pi = 3.14 is wrong ;D

give me a break.

Pi = 3.14 159 26 535 8 979 323 8 462 64 33 832

Yes technically it is wrong, it is a ROUGH ESTIMATE.

It is not used in calculations by anyone that wishes to be taken seriously.

What you're really saying is that you don't want to be taken seriously, and yet miraculously here you are wanting to be taken seriously, defending this point with the fervor of an acolyte enthralled by some warped and ugly new age dogma.

GET REAL...o)(~

Horn

14th March 2015, 11:12 PM

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8e/PIA18274-Saturn-NorthPolarHexagon-Cassini-20140402.jpg

aeondaze

14th March 2015, 11:15 PM

he admitted the .01% error and you go after that, thinking you can win the argument and calling him an idiot.

sacred math are 4000yo... and we are surrounded by it 24/7, yet you trash the whole topic continually. The brick wall is coming, watch out

Yes, Dude you're an IDIOT.

Why would you go and round down a number right before you're about to multiply by a large number like 660?

You round down (or up) AFTER having performed the multiplication to preserve the INTEGRITY of your calculation so that the margin of error is SIGNIFICANTLY reduced.

But I don't expect this guy to know much of anything about integrity because he's nothing more than a CHARLATAN leading all you idiots around by the nose...hahah

:p

Yea, yea I know sacred math bla bla bla, the wall is coming down bla bla bla...still waiting for this amazing revelatory moment you keep promising...o)(~

singular_me

14th March 2015, 11:24 PM

66.000132001 vs 66 causes a rough estimate. LOL

he made his doc 3 years ago, has 6 millions of hits and not yet debunked so far... so what are you waiting for, go ahead, make a doc too debunking his material... I cannot wait to watch it.

Yes technically it is wrong, it is a ROUGH ESTIMATE.

It is not used in calculations by anyone that wishes to be taken seriously.

What you're really saying is that you don't want to be taken seriously, and yet miraculously here you are wanting to be taken seriously, defending this point with the fervor of an acolyte enthralled by some warped and ugly new age dogma.

GET REAL...o)(~

Horn

14th March 2015, 11:30 PM

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7425&stc=1

aeondaze

14th March 2015, 11:34 PM

66.000132001 vs 66 causes a rough estimate. LOL

YES.

While the whole time you omit to declare that the VERY next calculation you multiply by 660.

That means that you have now just gone and rounded the number down not by 0.000132001 but 660 times that amount or 0.08712066.

BTW, This is when you would round off your number, and you would round it UP, not down and make it 0.09 or maybe even 0.1 if it wasn't of consequence

0.1 of a square foot is not insignificant, not by any stretch. It is WHOLE freaking inches.

If this guy was a surveyor marking property boundaries he'd be out by 3.54" AND thats on TWO sides. People would be VERY pissed off about it!

But this gets lost on you...because it shatters your silly little myopic world view...how VERY stupid and childish!

Horn

14th March 2015, 11:44 PM

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7426&stc=1

singular_me

14th March 2015, 11:47 PM

1 acre = 1 furlong x 1 chain = 660 feet x 66.000132001 feet = 43560.08712066 square feet....

vs

1 acre = 1 furlong x 1 chain = 660 feet x 66 feet = 43560 square feet.... = rough estimate. Laughable

aeondaze

14th March 2015, 11:48 PM

he made his doc 3 years ago, has 6 millions of hits and not yet debunked so far... so what are you waiting for, go ahead, make a doc too debunking his material... I cannot wait to watch it.

Yes he's material has been debunked, I just did! Hahaha.

Thanks for the show of support however, I'm not interested in making any documentaries, so you'll just have to wait....forever! Hahaha :D

Horn

14th March 2015, 11:52 PM

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7427&stc=1

aeondaze

14th March 2015, 11:53 PM

1 acre = 1 furlong x 1 chain = 660 feet x 66.000132001 feet = 43560.08712066 square feet....

vs

1 acre = 1 furlong x 1 chain = 660 feet x 66 feet = 43560 square feet....

= rough estimate. Laughable

Yea right. Its laughable when you're a charlatan making BULLSHIT doco's, but NOT if you were doing a REAL job in the REAL world like surveying...

If this guy was a surveyor marking property boundaries he'd be out by 3.54" AND thats on TWO sides. People would be VERY pissed off about it!

Do you seriously think that people would just go, "meh, the guy just diddled me 3.54" on both boundaries, but hey, what does it matter?"

GET REAL!

singular_me

14th March 2015, 11:56 PM

you didnt accomplish anything because sacred geometry is about finding geometric patterns in numbers... you said it yourself, even if the pyramid is very slightly off, it remains a pyramid... same here. ;D

1 acre = 1 furlong x 1 chain = 660 feet x 66.000132001 feet = 43560.08712066 square feet....

vs

1 acre = 1 furlong x 1 chain = 660 feet x 66 feet = 43560 square feet.... = rough estimate. Laughable

aeondaze

15th March 2015, 12:00 AM

you didnt accomplish anything because sacred geometry is about finding geometric patterns... you said it yourself, even if the pyramid is very slightly off, it remains a pyramid... same here.

WTF?

Have you just gone and lost you're mind? I don't even know what you're trying to say here or what point you think you a trying to make.

It makes about as much sense as your dumb theories, so in that regard it makes sense.

I guess the take home here is that by default you've admitted defeat.

To a surveyor 3.54" on EACH property boundary is a BIG DEAL and cause to be sued.

singular_me

15th March 2015, 12:13 AM

feel sorry for you that you may ever, never understand fibonacci and the like, aeon, you are missing the big picture, but it is your choice... sacred math establishes patterns in numbers above all and nothing else.

EDIT:
attacking a theory because of the digits following the 3 first three zero decimals is laughable... you are clearly wasting your energy.

Have the courage of your opinion and start an atheism thread, and challenge people opposing you for pages long. Lets see how long you'd last with your "that just is, that's how nature organizes itself, it comes out of nowhere, etc"..

WTF?

Have you just gone and lost you're mind? I don't even know what you're trying to say here or what point you think you a trying to make.

It makes about as much sense as your dumb theories, so in that regard it makes sense.

I guess the take home here is that by default you've admitted defeat.

To a surveyor 3.54" on EACH property boundary is a BIG DEAL and cause to be sued.

singular_me

15th March 2015, 02:54 PM

for those who might be interested in only:
----------------

http://www.cosmicpolymath.com/uploads/1/1/3/3/11338668/header_images/1398864668.jpg

‬Cosmic Polymath*” ‬will encompass* ‬a wide variety of interesting esoteric subjects and also the work* ‬of the true scientific Polymaths such as Nikola Tesla,* ‬Walter Russell,* ‬Wilhelm Reich and Leonardo Da Vinci,* ‬to name a few.* Also the exploits of the indomitable and brilliant “Victorian era” gentlemen explorers and naturalists as well as cryptozoological research into the natural world.

The* ‬ability* ‬of these brilliant men to be astute observers of nature*’‬s secrets has helped unlock the mysteries of the cosmos,* ‬from the mightiest galaxy to the smallest bacteria.

Here we will study Russell’s and Da Vinci’s concepts of the nature of the universe,* ‬and their study of the spiralling* ‬forms and vortexes of galaxies,* ‬water and blood,* ‬Tesla's extraordinary mind-power and super-science as well as the many other eccentric researchers and natural philosophers that have revealed hitherto unknown* ‬concepts and discoveries into the workings of the cosmos and the natural world.* ‬We will look at how its power may be harnessed* ‬for the benefit of mankind and eliminate his dependence on the destructive sources of energy such as coal,* ‬gas and nuclear power.* ‬Viktor Schauberger’s brilliant insights and theories into water sciences and his implosion technology are an exciting example of this*!‬ As Schauberger said* ‬-*“‬This civilisation is the work of man,* ‬who high-handedly and ignorant of the true workings of nature,* ‬has created a world without meaning or foundation,* ‬which now threatens to destroy him*"‬.*

Many of these* “ ‬Polymaths* ” ‬where so ahead of their time,* ‬that* ‬it could be said that they were* ‬“like a man who awoke too early in the darkness,* ‬while the others were all still asleep*”‬ - Sigmund Freud’s description of Leonardo Da Vinci.* ‬They were all true* ‬‘Renaissance Men*’‬.

" This philosophy, both speculative and active, is not only to be found in the volume of nature, but also in the sacred scriptures, as in Genesis, Job, Psalms, Isaiah and others. In the knowledge of this philosophy, God made Solomon the greatest philosopher in the world " - Isaac Newton's search for the Prisca Sapientia (sacred wisdom.

Like Leonardo of old,* ‬a man of unquenchable curiosity,* ‬Schauberger,* ‬Russell and Reich pioneered a rebirth of the true* ‘‬science of nature to the enlightenment of mankind*’‬.* ‬The human mind is stimulated by making new discoveries.
*Nikola Tesla described it best when he said:* “‬I am not an inventor.* ‬ I am a discoverer of new scientific principles*”‬ -* ‬ Nikola Tesla

Walter and Lao Russell’s excellent book and my personal favourite, “Atomic Suicide”, contains possibly the cream of his work. In it they warn against mankind’s catastrophic misuse of it’s nuclear power plants and that radioactivity is the “death principle” of creation. It also contains fascinating "Russelian science” with many of Walter’s scientific charts - illustrations and also his concepts on the nature of the universe. “You may command Nature to the extent only in which you are willing to obey her” - Walter Russell

Grab your free copy of the classic 19th century book, "Design in Nature" by the Scottish naturalist James Bell Pettigrew. This historical and lavishly illustrated volume with engravings and photographs is for anyone interested in fractal or sacred geometry and the spiraling* ‬vortexes found in nature. As well as receiving your copy of this brilliant and historical book, subscribers will receive my bimonthly Newsletter, 'Cosmic Polymath'!

http://www.cosmicpolymath.com/

Glass

17th March 2015, 03:58 AM

been thinking on one of those child like kind of questions. If the universe is a vacuum, why doesn't it collapse on itself. A balloon would, a plastic container, a steel container might. But for a vacuum to collapse does it need an opposing non vacuum to force down on it? The atmosphere sucked away etc

There must be something to propel against. Anyway there's a reasonable scientific explanation.
A False Vacuum
http://www.askamathematician.com/2012/07/q-what-is-the-false-vacuum-and-are-we-living-in-it/

Caveat:

It’s worth mentioning that the idea of a false vacuum is wild speculation and that there is no indication, not even a little, that the vacuum of the universe is a false vacuum and not the true ground state.

Physicist: The False Vacuum is just another item on the long list of things to worry about, that are not worth worrying about, and that nobody can do anything about. If you have any other worries, worry about those first.
http://www.askamathematician.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/definitelythegroundstate.jpg
In any physical system there’s a lowest energy state called the “ground state”. If you allow the energy to drain out of a system, then it will approach its ground state.

In any physical system you’ll find that there’s an energy “ground state” that the system tries to approach. For example, if you pour water into a bathtub there are a lot of ways that the water could arrange itself, but it will rapidly try to assume the ground state: being as low and still as possible.

Gravitational potential (the energy that something on a high shelf has more of, and that’s released when things fall) is the easiest example of an energetic system to picture. Being on the ground is the lowest gravitational potential a thing can have (without digging); thus the name.
But in the tub example, the water in the tub doesn’t “know” about the drain or the area around the tub. Given the chance the water would flow out of the tub and into a new, lower, ground state.
http://www.askamathematician.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/psych.jpg
There’s no good way to find out if you’re in a local “false” ground state or a true ground state.

In fancy-math-speak, you’d say that the water in a tub is in a “local energy minimum”. Within the tub, water definitely assumes the only ground state it can find. However, if it jumped out of the tub, or somebody pulled the plug, then it would try to find a new, lower ground state and would find that it gained a bunch of new energy in the process (what with the flowing and splashing and whatnot).

So I should worry about other stuff. Because the universe not being a true vacuum doesn't matter? What constitutes a vacuum? How do you measure one. If I were in a bubble in a vacuum would the bubble expand because the air was trying go to the vacuum? I've seen Sci Fi movies where people explode in their helmets. that suggests increased pressure. I'd expect them to be sucked out the suit. or is there not enough air to allow time for that? Once the small amount of air is gone you have balance, neutral pressure?

If it is not a true vacuum, there must be something else filling the void.

singular_me

18th March 2015, 06:33 AM

information about the 2 bulges would be appreciated

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/1526550_10153680559492977_1223365161462306533_n.jp g?oh=6c334cfa2243b937346b36923b77d63f&oe=5572E8EC&__gda__=1433752275_7268d7513362040cfbd72fbe268c9d8 c

(christian baptism requiring water could make sense here)
For a detailed explanation of where Earth's water is, look at the data table below. Notice how of the world's total water supply of about 333 million cubic miles (1,386 million cubic kilometers) of water
http://water.usgs.gov/edu/watercycle.html

the Sun is 333,000x more massive than Earth, ..
http://homepages.wmich.edu/~korista/Newton-Kepler.html

Earth’s distance from the sun varies between 91.4 million miles – in January – and 94.4 million miles – in July. (so the average = 9.3 million miles - 99% accuracy)

------------

also in response of earth rotating angle being different 1000's years ago, it is completely normal as our universe is in motion constantly. Patterns form and undo (nothing lasts forever)... but more than 2000 years of the same rotating angle is enough to take it into account.

singular_me

18th March 2015, 06:46 AM

to me it is clear that the cosmos is filled with aether which is the conduit of electricity/electromagnetism which holds matter together...

we have our (very patriarchal oriented) trinity here... holy ghost/aether... the son-sun/electricity... and father/matter. The more balanced view is that the aether is neutral (Oneness), electricity masculine and matter feminine. Thats why everything is dual.

considering the seize of an helmet, not so sure if we can assume that an helmet would explode, that might be an hollywood special effect. Otherwise bodies would explode too... and we often see in scifi flicks bodies floating away... contradiction ???

been thinking on one of those child like kind of questions. If the universe is a vacuum, why doesn't it collapse on itself. A balloon would, a plastic container, a steel container might. But for a vacuum to collapse does it need an opposing non vacuum to force down on it? The atmosphere sucked away etc

There must be something to propel against. Anyway there's a reasonable scientific explanation.
A False Vacuum
http://www.askamathematician.com/2012/07/q-what-is-the-false-vacuum-and-are-we-living-in-it/

Caveat:

So I should worry about other stuff. Because the universe not being a true vacuum doesn't matter? What constitutes a vacuum? How do you measure one. If I were in a bubble in a vacuum would the bubble expand because the air was trying go to the vacuum? I've seen Sci Fi movies where people explode in their helmets. that suggests increased pressure. I'd expect them to be sucked out the suit. or is there not enough air to allow time for that? Once the small amount of air is gone you have balance, neutral pressure?

If it is not a true vacuum, there must be something else filling the void.

Neuro

18th March 2015, 07:35 AM

also in response of earth rotating angle being different 1000's years ago, it is completely normal as our universe is in motion constantly. Patterns form and undo (nothing lasts forever)... but more than 2000 years of the same rotating angle is enough to take it into account.
It hasn't been the same the last 2000 years. 2000 years ago it was 23.7° 1300 years ago it was 23.6° and 600 years ago it was 23.5°. The pattern it is in is a pattern of constant oscillation. Do you ever do any research before speaking?

singular_me

18th March 2015, 07:56 AM

okay I wasnt recalling your posting fully, sorry... but if you expect debunking sacred math because of it, you just wont. (2 sentences deleted until I get more info from the secret in plain guy)

I have been researching sacred math for 4 years now... have you? Enough to lead to the conclusion that geometry is embedded in the Universe

It hasn't been the same the last 2000 years. 2000 years ago it was 23.7° 1300 years ago it was 23.6° and 600 years ago it was 23.5°. The pattern it is in is a pattern of constant oscillation. Do you ever do any research before speaking?

Horn

18th March 2015, 07:56 AM

It hasn't been the same the last 2000 years. 2000 years ago it was 23.7° 1300 years ago it was 23.6° and 600 years ago it was 23.5°. The pattern it is in is a pattern of constant oscillation. Do you ever do any research before speaking?

Per your chart it was 23.4 at 2000 yrs. ago, not 23.7.

And lets face it, the oblique angle's mean average 66.6 at the birth of christ year 0 sounds better to state for purposes of this thread.

23.4 average mean is ok though, cause it adds up to 9. even though your statement was in error for failure to research your own data.

singular_me

18th March 2015, 08:26 AM

I am going to ask him where he got this math and will post his answer.

not expecting his research to be 100% accurate ... it may too have a 1% error margin.

23.4 average mean =9... excellent observation, Horn

Per your chart it was 23.4 at 2000 yrs. ago, not 23.7.

And lets face it, the oblique angle's mean average 66.6 at the birth of christ year 0 sounds better to state for purposes of this thread.

23.4 average mean is ok though, cause it adds up to 9. even though your statement was in error for failure to research your own data.

aeondaze

18th March 2015, 08:41 AM

There are plenty of things that are not represented by the numbers 3, 6 or 9! FACT

Days of the week, days in a month, days in a year. I could go on and on....

If you really think the numbers 3, 6, 9 or whatever is so important then you need to start to taking into account things which decidedly aren't.

Only then can you start to grasp if its just an coincidental anomaly or not. Other than that you are just getting yourself all worked up over what is essentially coincidence which is hardly the place to start formulating theories.

This has been the common sense approach that's been advocated for some time on this forum, but strangely it seems to get you guys all worked up into a lather and that I don't understand...?

Sobriety and equanimity are whats required when dealing with these matters.

o)(~

Horn

18th March 2015, 08:49 AM

There are 366 dawns every year.

singular_me

18th March 2015, 08:56 AM

sure there are other patterns but which all derived from 3,6 and 9 more precisely... but here is why 3, 6 and 9 are the most common patterns in the universe... it all comes down to the cell ... as above so below.

kaballist-masons didnt invent anything... they just know about Nature and keep it secret. The Flower of Life is universal, from mesopotania to china to india...

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/e8/64/5d/e8645dd3f18c9275e1dd62749d44f3d9.jpg

aeondaze

18th March 2015, 10:33 AM

sure there are other patterns but which all derived from 3,6 and 9 more precisely... but here is why 3, 6 and 9 are the most common patterns in the universe... it all comes down to the cell ... as above so below.

NO! The image of cells dividing clearly shows a GEOMETRIC SEQUENCE with a common ratio of 2...

1,2,4,8,16.... there is no multiple of three! Where did you get that idea?

Look at the Earths solar cycle, its not based on 3, 6 or 9. Its close, but thats not the same thing. The truth is that like in the previous example about furlongs, irrational numbers rule the day. Irrational numbers like the natural log, or pi or the golden ratio (there you go!).

They are IRRATIONAL, I know you hate that word, you hate it because you somehow think that its has an emotive component, but it doesn't!

It stems from the concept of 'rationalising' something, it is a MATHEMATICAL construct devoid of any human like emotions. Its silly to think like that because it was never meant in that sense. lets have a look at what rationalisation means:

In elementary algebra, root rationalisation is a process by which surds in the denominator of an irrational fraction are eliminated.

These surds may be monomials or binomials involving square roots, in simple examples. There are wide extensions to the technique.

An irrational number comes about when the surds cannot be eliminated!

So it turns out that most things in nature are based on irrational numbers, not integers such as three!

Even the phenomena you claim are based in integers are not. They're convenient integer approximations, not accurate figures, thats why this guy is just peddling baloney.

In the end there is no such thing as perfection. There are close approximations. Even Newton conceded this point when he invented calculus, he realised that to get close to the perfect integral one would need to divide up the function into infinite parts, which is in and of itself slightly absurd. The closer you got to an infinitesimally small change the closer your approximation becomes to the actual answer.

Here see for yourself...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e3/Riemann_Integration_and_Darboux_Lower_Sums.gif/300px-Riemann_Integration_and_Darboux_Lower_Sums.gif

Do you see what is happening here?

Anyhow I digress, suffice to say believing that everything is somehow a multiple or factor of three or even just positive integers is puerile and its just not true.

:)

singular_me

18th March 2015, 10:43 AM

aeondaze

18th March 2015, 11:07 AM

aeon, you have proven a long time ago that you are not wired on sacred math. I just told you that they are other patterns... I showed you why the cell/circle is ruling all over the universe... and that all other shapes derive from either triangle or circle, or both. Hence the prevalence of 3, 6 and 9

did you watch secrets in plain sight yet?

No, what I've proven is that sacred math is a non-sequitur. All of your theories are based on false assumptions, I've proven it time and time again. I understand that a part of you needs to think that there is, but that doesn't mean there actually is.

You make these assertions about triangles and circles but I could equally make those about the hexagon.

Its what most of cyclic carbon chemistry is based on, its the most efficient form of packing structure atomically, a circle fits neatly inside it, you can get lots of triangles out of it, bees use the shape to make hives. and when a cell divides (as above) it makes that shape when you line up the nucleus' at a particular stage.

Why is it no less the structure of all life over other shapes?

The real answer is because its silly to try to perform such a gross redux on what is essentially a VERY complex universe. SIMPLE. Its not about how I think, its about the way the universe actually is.

singular_me

18th March 2015, 03:23 PM

modern math is corrupt because the spiritual elements were taken out... no wonder so many scientists do not see the problems they are causing.

No, what you've proven is that sacred math is a non-sequitur... in your small atheistic bubble aeon... nothing will do to prove you anything since you do not recognize the sacred design in nature to start with.

it is not MY theories... but that of plato, pythagoras, gallileo, fibonacci, leonardo da vinci etc... numbers' theory embedded in architecture and all religions and ancient myths from all round the world. .. and unfortunately subverted by the PTBs since ever.

------------------------------------------
why should anyone study sacred geometry? because it is the invisible architecture of Creation

See, these relationships are fundamental to, basically, the structure of our consciousness. It’s not like this is something that we invented, this is something that we discovered. It’s intrinsic within the fabric of nature itself. And the proportions that we find that govern nature are also the proportions that govern our consciousness. And so, in effect, what Plato understood, and what everybody I think understood about it, that studied Sacred Geometry was, that in effect, it was a way of developing your consciousness as well…Because there are certain fundamental patterns of harmony.

Here is a brief video of Randall Carlson answering the oft-asked question, What is Sacred Geometry?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0NTWNexrBQ

Horn

18th March 2015, 04:24 PM

Where's the next Gsus meetup taking place? In australia?

aeondaze

18th March 2015, 04:30 PM

modern math is corrupt because the spiritual elements were taken out... no wonder so many scientists do not see the problems they are causing.

No, what you've proven is that sacred math is a non-sequitur... in your small atheistic bubble aeon... nothing will do to prove you anything since you do not recognize the sacred design in nature to start with.

it is not MY theories... but that of plato, pythagoras, gallileo, fibonacci, leonardo da vinci etc... numbers' theory embedded in architecture and all religions and ancient myths from all round the world. .. and unfortunately subverted by the PTBs since ever.

You can't corrupt something that exists in the abstract. Show me how math is corrupted?

As I've said there is nothing 'sacred' about our universe or existence at all, other than what we instill it with in our 'humanness' and nothing you've posted has even come close to proving this point.

None of the scholars you listed had any grand notions about sacredness, in fact all of them started from a common sense and practical point to arrive at their positions, counter to the superstition of the day .

Has it ever occurred to you that 'numbers theory' as you put it is supposedly 'embedded' in architecture and literature because both structural engineering and linguistic metrics have their basis in number patterns to begin with. Number theory is innate in these disciplines, so rather than being secretly coded into them , they're actually the basis from which they are derived?

Jewboo

18th March 2015, 07:03 PM

modern math is corrupt because the spiritual elements were taken out...

http://i.imgur.com/pHxhC08.jpg

singular_me

18th March 2015, 07:15 PM

aeon will have to pay my round trip flight ticket for that one. ;D

Where's the next Gsus meetup taking place? In australia?

Horn

18th March 2015, 07:51 PM

aeon will have to pay my round trip flight ticket for that one. ;D

Shrimp's on the Barby...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ef4qDrRULjI

Horn

18th March 2015, 08:09 PM

I filmed one second every day of 2012.

https://vimeo.com/56599373

Cebu_4_2

18th March 2015, 08:44 PM

https://vimeo.com/56599373

Long seconds there.

Horn

18th March 2015, 09:18 PM

Its the dividing spaces in between, Cebu

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7433&stc=1

https://books.google.co.cr/books?id=catSBwAAQBAJ&lpg=PT137&ots=XN9N0QTCyx&dq=366%20pyramid&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false

singular_me

19th March 2015, 06:33 AM

here is his answer: as you can see he is aware of the 23.4°, he wasnt trying to fool anybody on that.

Scott Onstott
The angle between Earth's equator and its orbital plane is 23.4°. Less commonly known is the complementary angle: it measures 66.6° from Earth's axis to its orbital plane. 23.4 + 66.6 = 90. It seems more fundamental to measure to the Earth's axis of rotation rather than to the equator.

ps: I am sure that many tried to debunk his work, after 4 years and 6+ million hits, it is no longer worth trying, really, especially if an institution like Sacred Geometry International recognizes his work.

It hasn't been the same the last 2000 years. 2000 years ago it was 23.7° 1300 years ago it was 23.6° and 600 years ago it was 23.5°. The pattern it is in is a pattern of constant oscillation. Do you ever do any research before speaking?

aeondaze

19th March 2015, 07:27 AM

I am sure that many tried to debunk his work, after 4 years and 6+ million hits, it is no longer worth trying, really, especially if an institution like Sacred Geometry International recognizes his work.

Oh please, its embarrassing. You fawn over this guy like some love sick teenager.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHmvkRoEowc

As I said, he's a charlatan. Irrational numbers rule the universe and there ain't anything you or he can do about it!

Here you go, you know you want it, this is what you've been looking for....

The Earths axial tilt is 23.439281°

Hahaha, its not 23.4, its 23.4391281 which means....drum roll please....

90 - 23.439281 = 66.56°

NOT 66.6....only when you round up, SO ITS ALL JUST A CONVENIENT APPROXIMATION!

The guy is a fraud and an idiot!

singular_me

19th March 2015, 08:32 AM

quit insulting because you do not understand...
your assignment: watch secrets in plain sight 10 times, than debunk it as much as you can. Here is the chance for you to become famous.

he used another parameter, which obviously you are/were not aware of. period. Less commonly known is the complementary angle

there is no such a thing as irrational numbers in the Universe. But at least now you speak differently: "rule the universe"... thank you, there is progress, you start adopting the language of astrophysicists saying that Phi is irrational because they are afraid of using the word "divine proportion". LOL..

23.439281° = 24.4 = 0.1 - 0.01% inaccuracy, what he has stated many times in his work... so keep going after decimals because you are pissed off, that you feel your atheism threatened.

remember YOUR lie/exaggeration with the ozone layer hoax ??? that is how far you are willing to get because you are misinformed about so many things

because you think that when Nasa gives us the earth-moon distance it is 100% accurate perhaps - or even earth's circumference ??? right, they NEVER round up or down... ;D all of bunch of liars and charlatans. LOL

sacred geometry = patterns of harmony...

Oh please, its embarrassing. You fawn over this guy like some love sick teenager.

As I said, he's a charlatan. Irrational numbers rule the universe and there ain't anything you or he can do about it!

Here you go, you know you want it, this is what you've been looking for....

The Earths axial tilt is 23.439281°

Hahaha, its not 23.4, its 23.4391281 which means....drum roll please....

90 - 23.439281 = 66.56°

NOT 66.6....only when you round up, SO ITS ALL JUST A CONVENIENT APPROXIMATION!

The guy is a fraud and an idiot!

aeondaze

19th March 2015, 08:40 AM

quit insulting because you do not understand...
your assignment: watch secrets in plain sight 10 times, than debunk it as much as you can.

he used another parameter, which obviously you are/were not aware of. period.

there is no such a thing as irrational numbers in the Universe. But at least now you speak differently: "rule the universe"... thank you, there is progress, you start adopting the language of astrophysicists saying that Phi is irrational. LOL..

Whats that you're saying? I can't seem to hear you over the ACTUAL angle of earths tilt which is

23.439281°

Sorry, IRRATIONAL numbers rule the universe, you're just going to have to get used to it! lol:D

singular_me

19th March 2015, 09:03 AM

you can't argue because he clearly says why he made his choice for this calculation... either you agree or not... being a liar/charlatant is when one HIDES information.

But you are not yet a sacred geometry master as far as I am concerned. Try to become one if you really want to make the difference. It is impossible to debunk a topic unless one knows enough about it. So there is a long way to go, but I encourage you really. It has been 4 years that I am into it.

It is like your previous example... when the 3 first decimals were zeroes, but started arguing about the decimals coming after them.

REPEAT:
because you think that when Nasa gives us the earth-moon distance it is 100% accurate perhaps - or even earth's circumference right, they NEVER round up or down... all of bunch of liars and charlatans. LOL

23.4 = 23.4391281 --> approximation ;D

thank you for stating again that irrational numbers rules the Universe, it is definitely the first step toward the acknowledgement that "divine proportions" exist. Now we finally begin to agree on a fact.

Whats that you're saying? I can't seem to hear you over the ACTUAL angle of earths tilt which is

23.439281°

Sorry, IRRATIONAL numbers rule the universe, you're just going to have to get used to it! lol:D

singular_me

19th March 2015, 09:15 AM

wowow... now finally aeon admits that the Universe is r-u-l-e-d by Numbers... because without irrational numbers there cannot be any rational numbers of course - and otherwise..

The circumference of the earth at the equator is 24,901.55 miles... so anybody saying 24.9 is a charlatan. ... 2+4+9= 15 = 6 ;D

singular_me

19th March 2015, 09:27 AM

regardless of what you think, aeon... this theory does exist... so what now ??

These two angles (40° and 50°) are
Complementary Angles, because they add up to 90°.

http://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/images/complementary-angles.gif

http://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/complementary-angles.html

Plato a charlatan?
http://image.slidesharecdn.com/sacredgeometry-110501225626-phpapp02/95/sacred-geometry-2-728.jpg?cb=1304309412

aeondaze

19th March 2015, 09:44 AM

Hahaha, you seem to think you are giving me a lesson in math? Thats truly funny, lol :rolleyes:

The universe isn't ruled by ANY numbers! Numbers are purely a man made construct invented to understand the universe better.

My statement was purely metaphorical in a crass vernacular that you would understand. But it is amusing how you cock things up none the less. :D

You've been trying to make the point that integers rule the universe and in particular specific ones like 3, 6 and 9. I countered your assertion that this is the case and specifically stated that irrational numbers are more likely to be found when investigating the universe.

Then you said and I quote

"there is no such a thing as irrational numbers in the Universe."

What are you on about? Numbers don't actually exist anyway, you do realise this?

They are merely ABSTRACT REPRESENTATIONS OF QUANTITY.

You are getting yourself confused and in fact contradicting yourself the further we go down this path. This is because you don't really understand math and for that matter the universe.

You need to do a crash course in sixth grade math, that would be a good start. :)

Neuro

19th March 2015, 09:47 AM

here is his answer: as you can see he is aware of the 23.4°, he wasnt trying to fool anybody on that.

Scott Onstott
The angle between Earth's equator and its orbital plane is 23.4°. Less commonly known is the complementary angle: it measures 66.6° from Earth's axis to its orbital plane. 23.4 + 66.6 = 90. It seems more fundamental to measure to the Earth's axis of rotation rather than to the equator.

ps: I am sure that many tried to debunk his work, after 4 years and 6+ million hits, it is no longer worth trying, really, especially if an institution like Sacred Geometry International recognizes his work.
He didn't adress the gist of what I was stating at all, which is that the angle is 66.6° only now and let's say +/-300 years. Most of the time it isn't 66.6°. The angle changes! This is like talking to a Rubber boot!

singular_me

19th March 2015, 09:49 AM

yes he did because he uses the complementary angle theory, who even if the axis angle changes, the complementary angle does not

but I feel like you should join his FB page and ask him any questions you may have directly

He didn't adress the gist of what I was stating at all, which is that the angle is 66.6° only now and let's say +/-300 years. Most of the time it isn't 66.6°. The angle changes! This is like talking to a Rubber boot!

singular_me

19th March 2015, 09:51 AM

yes I know sacred math is disorienting many because it is an "awareness challenge".. you need a crash course on divine proportions.

Hahaha, you seem to think you are giving me a lesson in math? Thats truly funny, lol :rolleyes:

The universe isn't ruled by ANY numbers! Numbers are purely a man made construct

REPEAT:
because you think that when Nasa gives us the earth-moon distance it is 100% accurate perhaps - or even earth's circumference right, they NEVER round up or down... all of bunch of liars and charlatans. LOL

when you resort to insults, I know you feel wrong but wont admit it... now go ahead, throw a tantrum and post another silly pic

23.4 = 23.4391281 --> approximation

aeondaze

19th March 2015, 09:54 AM

He didn't adress the gist of what I was stating at all, which is that the angle is 66.6° only now and let's say +/-300 years. Most of the time it isn't 66.6°. The angle changes! This is like talking to a Rubber boot!

The funny thing is Neuro, it isn't even 66.6 now. This is merely a convenient approximation that suits their agenda.

In all truth, is was probably 66.60000 for about an hour at most back in 1952!

(honestly that last line made me laugh pretty hard :cool:)

aeondaze

19th March 2015, 09:56 AM

yes I know sacred math is disorienting many because it is an "awareness challenge".. you need a crash course on divine proportions.

No, thats not it. Its simply just puerile and stupid. ;)

singular_me

19th March 2015, 09:57 AM

No, thats not it. Its simply just puerile and stupid. ;)

REPEAT:
because you think that when Nasa gives us the earth-moon distance it is 100% accurate perhaps - or even earth's circumference right, they NEVER round up or down... all of bunch of liars and charlatans. LOL

23.4 = 23.4391281 --> approximation

you are the one being childlike, trashing a knowledge has had existed since the beginning of time...

aeondaze

19th March 2015, 10:09 AM

Maybe they do round up or down when its of no consequence, who cares?

This sort of approximate material is reserved for what is known as "light science digests" you know, for neophytes to give then a rough gist of the concepts.

No one would be stupid enough to take these approximations and use as a basis to try and formulate some kind of new age religious movement would they? Oh wait...

Yet here you are wanting to use these approximate figures as rock solid data, you really do have a lot to learn, haha. Too funny :D

singular_me

19th March 2015, 10:27 AM

aeon, your mindset is really that of a primitive atheist, sorry. There is no direct consequences in believing in sacred math (however the image of a cell proves that the circle (90, 60 and 30 degrees, and so 9, 6 and 3 are recurrent cosmic patterns, undeniable)... because there are other ways to understand The Divine Universe... all the rivers lead to Ocean... there only is an Invisible Architectural Design of the Universe, for those who can see it. And such people will also use it for the betterment of mankind, such as Biogeometry

http://www.biogeometry.org/page22.html

so why is the elites so bent in encoding these patterns in many in their buildings - why do all religions and ancient myths embed those Numbers in their teachings ?? You cannot blast sacred math as new age... OR, wait, are all the world cultures/religions new age then? Is the term new age truly relevant? Until you have sorted out these questions, you will **ever-never** have a good grasp on the topic. Really. You still havent figured out how fibonacci got his sequence because questioning it, is just something you canT fathom.

there is no rock solid data because knowledge constantly evolves, so I do not expect sacred geometry to be 100% accurate... it is however up to 99% accuracy. Better than that one cannot get ;D

so go ahead and split hair for the remaining 1%, you are NOT out of the wood just yet.

Maybe they do round up or down when its of no consequence, who cares?

This sort of approximate material is reserved for what is known as "light science digests" you know, for neophytes to give then a rough gist of the concepts.

No one would be stupid enough to take these approximations and try and formulate some kind of new age religious movement would they? Oh wait...

Yet here you are wanting to use these approximate figures as rock solid data, you really do have a lot to learn, haha. Too funny :D

aeondaze

19th March 2015, 10:40 AM

haha, thanks for the advice, its gave me a good chuckle, lol :D

But sorry, I don't take advice form people who support silly puerile theories and believe that they are somehow sacred, magic or powerful.

The answer is its easier to lead people when there is a belief that their leaders have supernatural abilities and are omnipotent.

That is why they do what they do.

Its nothing more than a grand gesture meant to consolidate their power, to impress upon the followers that they have some sort of divine connection and that fate has chosen them to lead and that the universe has sanctioned their deeds.

Its all just an elitist bullshit wank off meant to mesmerize the peons, much like how you're enthralled with their architectural works and are certain they are somehow imbibed with some sacred supernatural power or divine significance. But in essence its nothing more than slight of hand and trickery. These people are only flesh and blood, they eat and defecate just like everybody else. Its the fear of the many finding this out that drives them construct such bombastic architectural monstrosities.

The size, detail and intricacy of their works is directly proportional to their fear of being discovered to be exactly the same as everyone else.

You can fall for it all you like. After all, thats the very reason they do it.

Me?

I don't buy any part of it and see it as nothing more than a giant charade! ;)

EDIT: I've have answered this question before...but either your puny little pea brain is incapable of grasping this truth or it is simply suffering from the same feebleness that infects your weak and puerile theories, so don't ask again!

Horn

19th March 2015, 10:45 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyYiJB58V8Q

aeondaze

19th March 2015, 10:54 AM

so why is the elites so bent in encoding these patterns in many in their buildings - why do all religions and ancient myths embed those Numbers in their teachings ?? You cannot blast sacred math <--- HERE IS YOU FALLING FOR THEIR BULLSHIT SLIGHT OF HAND

haha, thanks for the advice, its gave me a good chuckle, lol :D

But sorry, I don't take advice form people who support silly puerile theories and believe that they are somehow sacred, magic or powerful.

The answer is its easier to lead people when there is a belief that their leaders have supernatural abilities and are omnipotent.

That is why they do what they do.

Its nothing more than a grand gesture meant to consolidate their power, to impress upon the followers that they have some sort of divine connection and that fate has chosen them to lead and that the universe has sanctioned their deeds.

Its all just an elitist bullshit wank off meant to mesmerize the peons, much like how you're enthralled with their architectural works and are certain they are somehow imbibed with some sacred supernatural power or divine significance. But in essence its nothing more than slight of hand and trickery. These people are only flesh and blood, they eat and defecate just like everybody else. Its the fear of the many finding this out that drives them to construct such bombastic architectural monstrosities.

The size, detail and intricacy of their works is directly proportional to their fear of being discovered to be exactly the same as everyone else.

You can fall for it all you like. After all, thats the very reason they do it.

Me?

I don't buy any part of it and see it as nothing more than a giant charade! ;)

EDIT: I've have answered this question before...but either your puny little pea brain is incapable of grasping this truth or it is simply suffering from the same feebleness that infects your weak and puerile theories, so don't ask again!

singular_me

19th March 2015, 11:06 AM

unfortunately Aeon, atheism is too heavily promoted by the same elite you trash below, so would you be attacking your belief system by the same token ??

just google up: key words: atheism, new world order...

Its nothing more than a grand gesture meant to consolidate their power, to impress upon the followers that they have some sort of divine connection and that fate has chosen them to lead and that the universe has sanctioned their deeds.

I don't buy any part of it and see it as nothing more than a giant charade! ;)

EDIT: I've have answered this question before...but either your puny little pea brain is incapable of grasping this truth or it is simply suffering from the same feebleness that infects your weak and puerile theories, so don't ask again!

I am asking over and over because you fail to see my point, so "your feebleness infecting your weak and puerile theories" are sent back to you.

that is where it all boils down to: belief or disbelief in God. And because you are a non believer, it gives you the right to trash because of a 1% inaccuracy? as a matter of fact, additionally you arent even true to yourself because I never saw you start threads about atheism, engage in an insult free debate with christians and others on here. It tells a lot about your rock solid belief system. But I am a much easier "prey" since my stance is to bridge sciences and spirituality. Got it... what are you so really afraid of?

IF YOU CANT GET THIS, YOU CANNOT GRASP SACRED MATH. the image of a cell proves that the circle 90, 60 and 30 degrees, and so 9, 6 and 3 are recurrent cosmic patterns, undeniable... microcosm=macrocosm and otherwise.

http://40.media.tumblr.com/4de5803a5656e5a66e37143643ba6a78/tumblr_n1zaxdv3vI1tszua7o1_500.jpg

Now keep chatting with yourself

singular_me

19th March 2015, 11:50 AM

interesting, just wonder about how he got his "quantum sacred math"...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyYiJB58V8Q

Horn

19th March 2015, 12:05 PM

http://www.worldtruth.org/file/pic/photo/2014/01/bf5b43f3901576783df7991c5725e9a4_1024.jpg
http://unhypnotize.com/attachments/religion/736d1400108931-6-electrons-6-protons-6-neutrons-secret-man-beast-carbonatom-jpg

Horn

19th March 2015, 12:23 PM

He didn't adress the gist of what I was stating at all, which is that the angle is 66.6° only now and let's say +/-300 years. Most of the time it isn't 66.6°. The angle changes! This is like talking to a Rubber boot!

yes, you are correct Neuro, most of the time it oscillates about its mean average of 66.6666666666

Now you can close your Pi hole, philio.

singular_me

19th March 2015, 12:44 PM

hey horn, looks like you really got hooked on the topic. Excellent finds... all of them.

yes the carbon atom is very essential to Life as much as water... 666 in all its splendor. ;D

architecture of nature
https://nanohub.org/site/resources/2013/02/17079/slides/015.01.jpg

and yes, pregnancy lasting 9 months... completion number for humans.

in fact there is a sacred geometry chart for the periodic elements table, and which is quite different.... searching... will post it when I find it.

-----------------------
just to show one of the implications of sacred math -- another genius many didnt hear about.
------------

The Sustainable & Sacred Geometry of Buckminster Fuller.
Have you ever had a mysterious attraction to a particular historical figure without really knowing why. . . until one day you find out something about their life and “bam!” it all makes sense? I recently had this experience with the twentieth century design pioneer Buckminster Fuller (1895-1983) .
http://mettamorphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/buckminster-fuller-300x281.jpg

http://magazine.enlightennext.org/2009/11/06/buckminster-fuller-was-a-mystic/

Neuro

19th March 2015, 01:38 PM

yes, you are correct Neuro, most of the time it oscillates about its mean average of 66.6666666666

Now you can close your Pi hole, philio.
Did you 'round' that up or down?

Horn

19th March 2015, 02:10 PM

hey horn, looks like you really got hooked on the topic.

Its rather old ground that I've tread before,

But one cannot simply standby idly, allowing the "faithless dogs of inefficiency" and "current nihilistic deniers in frequency"

to continue their vampire dark blood feast sapping upon the light.

singular_me

19th March 2015, 02:13 PM

It is not the table I was looking for but this one deserves attention. I have to acknowledge that when sacred math is applied to chemistry, it gets a little too complex for me... but I easily can assume that the "conventional table" is a (subverted) chart that sent science off its path, hence explaining why so many PhDs do not see any errors and end up supporting the NWO led academic research

The ADOMAH PT, also known as Tetrahedral Periodic Table
http://perfectperiodictable.com/Images/TETRAHED.JPG

Surprisingly, when elements were placed in rectangular boxes Unit Square, instead of traditional square boxes, perimeters of s,p,d and f blocks became equal!

(refer to "Description" page for more discussion on proportions of the blocks).

Since electrons tend to form pairs and each element corresponds to one characteristic electron, it is logical to place elements in 1/2x1 rectangular cells, so two such cells would form 1x1 unit. This adjustment resulted in block perimeters equal to 18 units:

s-block is 1 unit high and 8 units long (or wide) (1+8 = 9, is half of the perimeter);

p-block is 3 units high and 6 units long (3+6 = 9);

d-block is 5 units high and 4 units long (5+4 = 9);

f-block is 7 units high and 2 units long (7 +2 = 9);

Therefore, perimeter of each block: P=2x9=18 units.

Those are the only four possible rectangles that could have perimeter of 18 (if only natural numbers are used). What can it possibly mean? Could it be just a coincidence?
http://perfectperiodictable.com/novelty.html

Horn

19th March 2015, 02:21 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBBH-xyUxjo

Glass

19th March 2015, 08:52 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyYiJB58V8Q

I'd love to know what software these guys are using. The guy did another video tribute to Eric Laithwaite

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Eric+Laithwaite
Some topics are:
River of magnetism
Circle of magnetism
Gyroscopes and how they worl

Circles was interesting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tJfqMYHaQw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tJfqMYHaQw

Horn

19th March 2015, 09:34 PM

Good stuff, reminded me of this smoke video.

He doesn't even need the electric.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOSLV2SbcTg

singular_me

19th March 2015, 09:55 PM

I have added Rodin to my FB favs several weeks ago, good stuff posted there... definitely worth one's time

edit: Horn, I expected something more obvious but indeed, something is happening.

Glass

19th March 2015, 10:54 PM

baby donuts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ntN1JdIF9U

Actually its how to make a Rodin coil using fisher price baby donuts. I think they are the plastic rings that you chuck on a spike.

You need 72 feet of wire per winding. Actually 72 seems a bit random. He reckons it uses ~ 68ft.

singular_me

19th March 2015, 10:57 PM

ok since you added to your posting, i deleted my question

You need 72 feet of wire per winding.

Glass

19th March 2015, 11:11 PM

I can see a lot of people make notched templates in the shape of a disk. The disks are positioned so they cross section the coil and the notches are where you run your cable. I think the smoke video used that kind of template. Both look fairly complicated. Need to stay focused so you don't lay the wires incorrectly and get out of pattern.

Instead of notches this guy is using push pins for his notches.

Here's another guy using coils and messing about. He seems to be making hydrogen with them and also playing with frequencies

https://www.youtube.com/user/advancedhydrogen/videos

aeondaze

20th March 2015, 02:16 AM

Its funny watching you guys get all excited about a current passing through a toroidal winding when you don't really know what its actually doing, but hey

"something is happening"

Too funny...:p

Horn

20th March 2015, 08:50 AM

Its funny watching you guys get all excited about a current passing through a toroidal winding when you don't really know what its actually doing, but hey

"something is happening"

Too funny...:p

Singular was responding to the vid where there was no current passing thru the coil. and wasn't that excited by it.

What does "the omnipotent one" have as an answer there?

dipshit

Jewboo

20th March 2015, 10:22 AM

Singular was responding to the vid where there was no current passing thru the coil. and wasn't that excited by it.

What does "the omnipotent one" have as an answer there?

dipshit

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02678/rabbi-philip-berg_2678060a.jpg
"Horn" tag-teaming with Singular Me to pollute GSUS with their jew mysticism

:rolleyes:

Horn

20th March 2015, 11:18 AM

Apparently now,

jew mysticism is what is emanating from the center of experimental Rodin magnetic coils based on vortex math.

another dipshit.

singular_me

20th March 2015, 05:17 PM

"Horn" tag-teaming with Singular Me to pollute GSUS with their jew mysticism

I dont see any jewish mysticism here but a global trend , which explains why **all** religious leaders band together to conceal Knowledge, I repeat all of them. So here is the dilemma: either one goes down the rabbit hole no matter what and gets branded as a jew enabler or/and a new ager... or.. one continues to cultivate ignorance and allows more religious wars/xenophobia/fundamentalism helping shape our our global dictatorship.

Either you are with us or against us. As a matter of fact those Numbers explain the *Intelligent Design* of the Universe and Life. It is a Knowledge that is dangerous in the sense that if taught, religious and political monopolies would be history almost overnight. So the question really boils down to: are humans able to handle this Knowledge?... if no, then we will ever-never get rid of the NWO. Do we really need the Revelation to come true to grasp this? Looks like time is running out however.

EXAMPLES
Jesus arose from the dead on the third day.[Genesis 1:9-13]
Jesus' ministry lasted three years, covering three Passovers [John 2:13; 6:4; 11:55-12:1].
Saul was blinded for three days [Acts 9:9]
Jesus was missing for three days when He was 12 years old [Luke 2:46]
Four rivers flowed out of Eden [Genesis 2:10]
Four women gave birth to the fathers of the 12 Tribes of Israel
The sixth commandment in the Ten Commandments is the sin of murder [Exodus 20:13]
Jesus suffered on the cross for six hours (as he suffered that man might be saved); from 9 AM, (see Mark 15:25) the hour of the first daily sacrifice in the Temple to 3 PM,
There are multiple sevens in the Book of Revelation: There are 55 sevens and 5 sevenths, 5x7 (35) phrases of sevens in the Book of Revelation. List of "sevens" in the Book of Revelation
It was the ninth hour, Jewish time (3PM) when Jesus gave up His life on the cross for the sins of the world [Matthew 27:46].
144,000 servants of God (12 times 12) [Revelation 7:4].

AND A LOT MORE
http://agapebiblestudy.com/documents/The%20Significance%20of%20Numbers%20in%20Scripture .htm

ADDITIONAL DATA
New Testament numbers
http://www.biblenumbers.org/index/category/nt/
https://rightdivision.com/study/numbers-new-testament

Old Testament numbers
http://www.bible-history.com/old-testament/bookofnumbers.html

Both
http://theoldtestamentandthenewtestament.com/category/the-bible/old-testament/numbers/
http://www.biblestudy.org/bibleref/meaning-of-numbers-in-bible/3.html
http://listverse.com/2012/09/20/top-10-significant-numbers-in-biblical-numerology/
http://christianity.about.com/od/biblefactsandlists/qt/Bible-Numerology.htm\
http://christianity.about.com/od/booksofthebible/qt/Prophetic-Books.htm
http://biblenumbersforlife.com/

MISC
Author: Moses was the author of the Book of Numbers.
http://www.gotquestions.org/Book-of-Numbers.html
http://www.tldm.org/bible/Old%20Testament/numbers.htm

---------------------------------

THE NUMBERS IN THE QURAN
http://www.quranmiracles.com/2011/05/the-numbers-in-the-quran/
http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/mathematical_03.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwGb32LaFQw
http://www.harunyahya.com/en/Miracles-of-the-Quran/27639/numbers-of-significance-in-the

---------------------------------------
NUMBERS IN BUDDHISM
http://www.urbandharma.org/udharma7/numbers.html
http://www.khandro.net/about_numbers.htm
http://www.thezensite.com/ZenEssays/Miscellaneous/Buddhism_by_Numbers.html
http://buddhaspace.blogspot.com/p/buddhism-by-numbers.html
http://mysticalnumbers.com/number-4-in-buddhism

-----------------------------------
NUMBERS IN HINDUISM
http://topyaps.com/n-sacred-numbers-in-hinduism
http://articles.holydrops.com/significance-of-the-number-108-in-hinduism-80.htm
http://www.hinduwebsite.com/numbers.asp
http://www.sanatansociety.org/vedic_astrology_and_numerology/indian_numerology_5.htm

ps: the curse and the blessing of Knowledge is that we all have to help each others. Jesus' message of Love is Universal.

aeondaze

20th March 2015, 05:39 PM

You aren't the fount of knowledge, so give it a break.

Your simplistic world view is of no use to anyone. While you portray yourself as the savior of humanity you infect them with this jewish filth.

Its obvious to anyone who is switched on, you can't fool everyone...;)

Jewboo

20th March 2015, 05:40 PM

As a matter of fact those Numbers explain the *Intelligent Design* of the Universe and Life.

http://dailybail.com/storage/610x.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1251718743942
Goldissima is distracting the goyim with "sacred" numbers...ha ha

:rolleyes: explain their magical jew numbers Goldi

singular_me

20th March 2015, 06:22 PM

... the global trend evidence is there for you to look at. Thats a freewill universe after all.

Goldissima is distracting the goyim with "sacred" numbers...ha ha[/COLOR]
explain their magical jew numbers Goldi

singular_me

20th March 2015, 06:28 PM

you are another one who cannot look at a trend that is heavily documented and ask yourself the right questions

You aren't the fount of knowledge, so give it a break.

Your simplistic world view is of no use to anyone. While you portray yourself as the savior of humanity you infect them with this jewish filth.

Its obvious to anyone who is switched on, you can't fool everyone...;)

aeondaze

20th March 2015, 07:49 PM

you are another one who cannot look at a trend that is heavily documented and ask yourself the right questions

Haha, you really are a self righteous twit aren't you.

No evidence, no documentation. Data thats beat up by rounding up or rounding down so it fits your NWO kabbalist agenda.:rolleyes:

Horn

21st March 2015, 12:42 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKPx2J4Geow

singular_me

21st March 2015, 05:32 AM

Islam worshiping a cube? How can a cube be attributed to paganism ?... or maybe did pagans know something that has been concealed. Most muslims are completely unaware of the the real story behind it, merely think that the stone of Kaaba has mysterious powers. All religions have superstitions.

The real question here is what is that stone doing in a cube, another sacred geometrical shape?

--------------------------
NUMBER 4 IN THE BIBLE
Four cardinal directions N, S, E, W. with four Angels keeping watch at the four corners of the earth, holding back the four winds of the world [Revelation 7:1]

The Covenant People of God had four divisions of the day associated with the daily liturgical sacrifice of the Tamid (Dawn - 9AM; 9AM-Noon; Noon - 3PM; 3PM - Sunset)

Four heavenly creatures surround God's heavenly throne. [Revelation 4:6-8]

Bible has four-fold division of mankind: lands, tongues, families and nations [Revelation 13:7]
http://agapebiblestudy.com/documents/The%20Significance%20of%20Numbers%20in%20Scripture .htm
----------------------

The Mysterious Black Stone of Kaaba - Red Ice Creations
The Black Stone is a Muslim relic, which according to Islamic tradition dates back to the time of Adam and Eve. Historical research claims that the Black Stone marked the Kaaba as a place of worship during pre-Islamic pagan times.
http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=17158

https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-SEzqdmCAXwY%2FUUdIqCn37fI%2FAAAAAAAAC5E%2FTHgxCbpO gmg%2Fs1600%2FKaaba%2BHD%2BWallpapers%2B2013%2B%28 4%29.jpg&f=1

In the center, Prophet Muhammad, with two long hair plaits, places the stone on a carpet held at the four corners by representatives of the four tribes, so that all have the honor of lifting it. The carpet is a kelim from Central Asia. Behind, two other men lift the black curtain which conceals the doors of the sanctuary. Wikipedia ............

What is immediately apparent upon seeing the relic is the obvious likeness to the female aspect. The stone and casing resembles nothing so much as a vagina or vulva.

’A principal sacred object in Pagan Arabian religion was the stone... Such stones were thought to be the residence of a god; hence the term applied to them by the Byzantine Christian writers of the fifth and sixth centuries: ’baetyl’, from bet’el, ’the house of god’.’ [1]

Camphausen, in his article [3], reveals that the misogynic Muslim religion has its origins in the worship of goddess. Allah is a revamped version of the ancient goddess Al’Lat, and it was her shrine, which has since continued with little change, as the Kaaba. The known history of Mohammed reveals that he was born around 570 CE into a tribe of the Koreishe (Quraysh), who not only worshipped the goddess Q’re, but were the sworn guardians of her shrine. By 622, Mohammed was preaching the ways of his god, Allah, and was driven out by his own tribe as a result.
http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_img/17157mohammedstone.jpg

The Black Stone of Kaaba or Mecca in Arabic, is called Al-hajar Al-aswad. The word Kaaba - Ka’ba - Ka’bah - means Cube.
http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_img/17157metatroncube.gif

(sure texts are apocryphal ;D)
Sacred Geometry: Metatron's Cube
The name of Metatron's Cube makes reference to Metatron, an angel mentioned in apocryphal texts including the Second Book of Enoch and the Book of the Palaces.[1] These texts rank Metatron second only to the Abrahamic God in the hierarchy of spiritual beings. Wikipedia

------------------------------------------
if the topics approached here have gotten your attention, there is enough materials in this thread to start your own investigation....

singular_me

21st March 2015, 02:11 PM

forget about religions' allegories that dont tell anything diligently about the invisible architecture of Nature but fill their texts with Numbers meant to be repeated to feel closer to God.

People into sacred math, regard the 'intelligent design' with a scientific approach and humility. The scientist below is absolutely right, 'knowing the shapes" improves the understanding of Nature and therefore health treatments in this particular case.

--------------

After 400 years, mathematicians find a new class of solid shapes
Feb 18, 2014

Since Plato's work, two other classes of equilateral convex polyhedra, as the collective of these shapes are called, have been found: Archimedean solids (including truncated icosahedron) and Kepler solids (including rhombic polyhedra). Nearly 400 years after the last class was described, researchers claim that they may have now invented a new, fourth class, which they call Goldberg polyhedra. Also, they believe that their rules show that an infinite number of such classes could exist.

Platonic love for geometry

Equilateral convex polyhedra need to have certain characteristics. First, each of the sides of the polyhedra needs to be of the same length. Second, the shape must be completely solid: that is, it must have a well-defined inside and outside that is separated by the shape itself. Third, any point on a line that connects two points in a shape must never fall outside the shape.

Platonic solids, the first class of such shapes, are well known. They consist of five different shapes: tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, dodecahedron and icosahedron. They have four, six, eight, twelve and twenty faces, respectively.

http://cdn.phys.org/newman/gfx/news/2014/3-after400year.jpg

Playing with shapes

Such mathematical discoveries don't have immediate applications, but often many are found. For example, dome-shaped buildings are never circular in shape. Instead they are built like half-cut Goldberg polyhedra, consisting of many regular shapes that give more strength to the structure than using round-shaped construction material.

However, there may be some immediate applications. The new rules create polyhedra that have structures similar to viruses or fullerenes, a carbon allotrope. The fact that there has been no "cure" against influenza, or common flu, shows that stopping viruses is hard. But if we are able to describe the structure of a virus accurately, we get a step closer to finding a way of fighting them.

If nothing else, Schein's work will invoke mathematicians to find other interesting geometric shapes, now that equilateral convex polyhedra may have been done with.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-02-years-mathematicians-class-solid.html#jCp

Glass

21st March 2015, 06:11 PM

somebody else worships that stone as well. The Druids? Or maybe the Catholics or both. They wear a black cube on a tiara head band kind of thing which I think has a snake figure in the head band at the front. The stone has an occult meaning. Been spoke about here before I think.

singular_me

21st March 2015, 08:09 PM

quick observation as there was a solar-polar total eclipse yesterday, I read that the diameter of the Sun is about 400 times larger than the Moon's but it also just happens to be about 400 times closer to the sun than earth. Interestingly they look the same size from earth. And this is no coincidence. I am hoping that the secrets in plain sight guy will find some interesting patterns

-----------------------------------
I think I just went down another rabbit hole searching about the "black" cube, which has little to do with sacred geometry, beside the shape. The "black" cube is the symbol of saturn which is associated with the "force of darkness".

They really have corrupted everything... even mothers' day, which is in fact the day of the goddess isis. Just found out about it, and they made it international!
http://filipinobook.com/the-ancient-history-of-mothers-day/

http://worldtruth.tv/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/416px-shelroshme3.jpg

more cubic architecture

santa ana
https://mysteryoftheinquity.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/cube-in-santa-ana.jpg?w=590

danmark/swenborg
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQW4S5m2cqBVzBBjCHNAiyvnP-RzbqjldkEAVedtPvLbV7aqO4L

Astor Place Cube, NYC
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iur/?f=1&image_host=http%3A%2F%2F0.tqn.com%2Fd%2Fgonyc%2F1% 2F0%2F6%2FW%2Fastor_cube_01.jpg&u=http://0.tqn.com/d/gonyc/1/S/6/W/astor_cube_01.jpg

hamburg, germany
https://mysteryoftheinquity.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/black_cube_by_gregor_schneider_in_hamburg_01.jpg?w =950

somebody else worships that stone as well. The Druids? Or maybe the Catholics or both. They wear a black cube on a tiara head band kind of thing which I think has a snake figure in the head band at the front. The stone has an occult meaning. Been spoke about here before I think.

singular_me

21st March 2015, 08:48 PM

dont know anymore if we have it in this thread... read last paragraph.
--------
A New Form Has Been Discovered in Sacred Geometry — Meet The Chestahedron
August 30, 2014 /71252 views

chestahedron-blue-model

Apparently the heart doesn’t pump blood but is the vortex regulator of the blood as the blood flows through the arteries and veins. Frank Chester studied Rudolf Steiner and discovered through his understanding of the Platonic forms the geometry of the heart.

The article below is titled The Mysterious Heart and was published in a German Magazine,

The Discovery of the Chestahedron

A European journey in the 1990’s led Frank Chester, the San Francisco retired teacher, sculptor and geometer, to Dornach in Switzerland. Prior to this journey he had never heard anything about Rudolf Steiner or Anthroposophy. He was immediately impressed by Steiner’s two-dimensional, seven-sided planetary seals, and equally by his seven-sided capitals on top of the columns within the model of the first Goetheanum. While gazing upon these forms a question arose in him: Could a three-dimensional, seven-sided form exist that might also demonstrate the harmonic nature of a platonic solid?

This solid has seven surfaces with exactly the same surface area. It consists of four equilateral triangles and three additional, four-sided surfaces which resemble kites. It shares the same property with the five regular platonic solids in that each of the seven surfaces has the same area. It is unique in that it contains two different shapes and two different side lengths while in the five platonic solids these are always the same. Interestingly, Chester could utilize two circles in the ratio of the golden section (Phi) to lawfully and reproducibly develop the surfaces of his form.

Understanding Earthly Phenomena

Subsequently Frank Chester found phenomena which appeared to confirm his suggestion that the Chestahedron acts as a fundamental geometric form within our earth. If one follows a lawful transformation involving surface-point-surface mapping, it can be shown that the Chestahedron has a cube as its foundation (ed.: within it). With reference to the dimensions of the earth, this cube has the same diameter as our moon (the earth’s core has a diameter of 3400 km; the diameter of the moon is 3474 km). In 2008, scientists at Uppsala University in Sweden published findings that appeared to confirm that the core of the earth is a cube (Translator note: Specifically, the round earth’s core has a cubical iron crystalline structure and not a hexagonal one as assumed in older models).

more/long/pic
http://earthweareone.com/a-new-form-has-been-discovered-in-sacred-geometry-meet-the-chestahedron/

Frank Chester The Chestahedron The Wonder of Seven
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfeaH2ekFvw

---------------------------
2008
Swedish researchers have presented evidence to support their new theory about the structure of the earth's core. "We found that the body-centered cubic structure of iron is the only structure that could correspond to the experimental observations," says Börje Johansson, professor of condensed-matter theory at Uppsala University.
http://images.sciencedaily.com/2008/02/080208091314.jpg
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080208091314.htm

Horn

21st March 2015, 08:57 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiuqoHlSb3M

aeondaze

21st March 2015, 09:32 PM

They really have corrupted everything... even mothers' day, which is in fact the day of the goddess isis. Just found out about it, and they made it international!

No. You will believe ANYTHING that supports your stupid theories. There is Mothers Day, and there is International Mothers day. They are separate dates. There is no actual Internationally recognised 'Mothers day'. There are LOTS of different dates for this celebration. The actual picture is hardly what you portray. You always make a cock up of it under the assumption that it fits some preconceived worldview you mistakenly hold.

Apparently the heart doesn’t pump blood but is the vortex regulator of the blood as the blood flows through the arteries and veins.

This one is a corker! Do you really believe this drivel?

What then is a 'vortex regulator' and how is it functioning in this instance?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR4t__B-Zwg

What a completely asinine and absurd thing to believe.

If this has any validity then please enlighten us as to what a 'vortex regulator' is and how it differs from a plain old vanilla type pump?

Your brain doesn't even critically engage anymore. As long as it uses some new fan-dangled word that has no actual meaning then you embrace it shouting "see, everything is corrupted, behold here is the truth!"

A 'vortex regulator', you would have to be brain dead to believe that, lol...:p

Horn

21st March 2015, 09:50 PM

Seventh Son available from Land of Ti Chi.

http://viooz.ac/movies/26351-seventh-son-2014.html

Dogman

21st March 2015, 09:57 PM

No. You will believe ANYTHING that supports your stupid theories. There is Mothers Day, and there is International Mothers day. They are separate dates. There is no actual Internationally recognised 'Mothers day'. There are LOTS of different dates for this celebration. The actual picture is hardly what you portray. You always make a cock up of it under the assumption that it fits some preconceived worldview you mistakenly hold.

This one is a corker! Do you really believe this drivel?

What then is a 'vortex regulator' and how is it functioning in this instance?

YouTube Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR4t__B-Zwg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR4t__B-Zwg)

What a completely asinine and absurd thing to believe.

If this has any validity then please enlighten us as to what a 'vortex regulator' is and how it differs from a plain old vanilla type pump?

Your brain doesn't even critically engage anymore. As long as it uses some new fan-dangled word that has no actual meaning then you embrace it shouting "see, everything is corrupted, behold here is the truth!"

A 'vortex regulator', you would have to be brain dead to believe that, lol...:p

Some have the cards in their deck stuck together, along with the possibility of a few missing ones!

Good entertainment tho !

BTW!
Have not forgotten you! Just have other priority's right Now!

Got to admit she has a backbone which is always a good thing!

;)

Glass

22nd March 2015, 12:55 AM

and some peoples pack of cards is more like snap.

So no snake on the head band thing. Still must have some meaning we don't know about as it's all over the place.

A vortex is a spiraling flow of liquid. So the heart is ejecting/injecting blood in a vortex fashion into the arteries. It is not just pushing a wave of blood down the line. it is putting a spin on it as it goes. I wonder if it spins the opposite way if you are northern or southern hemisphere?

Don't know if that's right or not. Have not looked into it but my immediate interpretation would be along those lines.

aeondaze

22nd March 2015, 01:22 AM

A vortex is a spiraling flow of liquid. So the heart is ejecting/injecting blood in a vortex fashion into the arteries. It is not just pushing a wave of blood down the line. it is putting a spin on it as it goes.

WTF are you talking about. The heart is a fucking pump. PERIOD.

What does it matter of its parting a component of angular momentum onto the fluid? Its purpose is to PUMP against gravity, which without you'd pass out...o)(~

'Vortex regulator' my ass...yeah thats a good one...:p

You guys are unbelievable.

Always trying to impress upon the weak minded what great discoveries you've made by inventing new stupid terminology.

Horn

22nd March 2015, 08:45 AM

Spiral flow turbulence is a preferred type of turbulence, when and if things should become turbulent. Yes, some apparatus set in place to ensure its direction needed.

Stipes of bull kelp manage turbulence, allowing optimized flow by flexing into a logarithmic spiral.

Spiraling nautilus shells, swaying kelp, and skin pores all share a fundamental spiral geometry. This same spiral moves fluids more efficiently than the rotors and impellers humans have been designing for centuries. The pervasive logarithmic spiral pattern found throughout the natural world is an optimal flow form, allowing fluids to travel as fast as possible without transitioning from a laminar to turbulent flow.

http://www.asknature.org/strategy/2427168e0c258cdc5863d8bb553eaf9a#.VQ7UQPnjJCg

aeondaze

22nd March 2015, 09:33 AM

Spiral flow turbulence is a preferred type of turbulence, when and if things should become turbulent. Yes, some apparatus set in place to ensure its direction needed.

And....?

It doesn't mean the heart isn't a pump.

As I said, so what if the heart imparts a component of angular momentum on the flow, still doesn't mean its not a pump

Besides, I suspect your starting to get a little out of your field here...particularly with that turbulence remark.

allowing fluids to travel as fast as possible without transitioning from a laminar to turbulent flow.

There is no, certain types of turbulence as remarked by you. There is laminar flow and there is turbulent flow. Of which a specific Reynolds number marks the boundary.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/80/Moody_diagram.jpg

Nice try though...lol :D

singular_me

22nd March 2015, 11:36 AM

there is nothing wrong with celebrating whatever... as long as one is told the truth. I wonder how many people would celebrate the goddess isis if they knew. Also the very fact is that most of our customs have mythological/pagan origins. Why isnt it not openly spoken about? What you didnt get is that the "date" doesnt really matter but the evidence of mythologies still influencing world societies, and the problem is that the elites are bent on it (and they are the ones imposing the dates, just like xmas which is the celebration of the winter equinox... so there IS an agenda). One just has to be aware of corporate logos to grasp this.

Have you made a search on the origins of santa claus?

-------------------

For most moms, the second Sunday in May is all about breakfast in bed, handmade gifts and fresh flowers. But Mother’s Day has its roots in ancient Egyptian and Roman pagan celebrations. It got its start in the US nearly a century and a half ago as a day that brought mothers together in peace against war. Only later did it become the holiday we know and love today.
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/05/02/the-history-of-mothers-day/
also
http://www.goddessgift.com/great-goddess.html

No. You will believe ANYTHING that supports your stupid theories. There is Mothers Day, and there is International Mothers day. They are separate dates. There is no actual Internationally recognised 'Mothers day'. There are LOTS of different dates for this celebration. The actual picture is hardly what you portray. You always make a cock up of it under the assumption that it fits some preconceived worldview you mistakenly hold.

singular_me

22nd March 2015, 11:51 AM

the whole Universe is a vortex (and every galaxy/planet has a vortex) and since humans are a mini version of it, they too are responding the vortex principles, with the heart being the center of the vortex. We also find this vortex at the center of every atom, which is why cells are not static. ... brain dead? ;D
------------------------
Muscle consists of about 75% water. The spiraling and looping pattern of the heart fibers, including the beautiful heart vortex, is an image of fluid movement. The blood streaming through the heart also creates loops and vortices. Like the fibers of the heart, this movement is very complex and intricate. In a sense, what the blood does as a fluid has become formed in the muscular structure of the heart (see figure 3).
http://www.natureinstitute.org/pub/ic/ic7/heart.htm

Vortex Heart- Frank Chester
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBF964E10CD13D91A

Frank Chester is a genius of this era in that he “empirically” confirms what Walter Russell taught in their Cosmic Science and philosophies… the human heart is a twin opposing vortex… a powerful energy conduit and the seat of the human soul. Frank demonstrates in this video series that the sacred magnetic and geometrical construction of the electric universe is very real.
(Steiner College Part 1 - Lecture 5-16-12 3 videos)
https://urbanshakedowns.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/the-vortex-heart/

THE HEART IS NOT A PUMP:
A REFUTATION OF THE PRESSURE PROPULSION PREMISE OF HEART FUNCTION
http://www.rsarchive.org/RelArtic/Marinelli/

It is like the electric universe theory asserting that the sun is cold inside... willing to bet with you that it will be accepted by the mainstream within the next 10 years.

This one is a corker! Do you really believe this drivel?

What then is a 'vortex regulator' and how is it functioning in this instance?

What a completely asinine and absurd thing to believe.

If this has any validity then please enlighten us as to what a 'vortex regulator' is and how it differs from a plain old vanilla type pump?

Your brain doesn't even critically engage anymore. As long as it uses some new fan-dangled word that has no actual meaning then you embrace it shouting "see, everything is corrupted, behold here is the truth!"

A 'vortex regulator', you would have to be brain dead to believe that, lol...:p

Horn

22nd March 2015, 11:55 AM

There is no, certain types of turbulence as remarked by you. There is laminar flow and there is turbulent flow. Of which a specific Reynolds number marks the boundary.

No, your chart reflects "complete" turbulence, so there is indeed certain types of turbulence.

As is stated by your chart and you, in the transitional region to complete regions.

Those being transitional types of turbulence.

Nice try though, tryhard...

singular_me

22nd March 2015, 12:01 PM

he just told me that he mentioned that fact in secrets in plain sight volume 1, in the paris episode. Vid available on utube

quick observation as there was a solar-polar total eclipse yesterday, I read that the diameter of the Sun is about 400 times larger than the Moon's but it also just happens to be about 400 times closer to the sun than earth. Interestingly they look the same size from earth. And this is no coincidence. I am hoping that the secrets in plain sight guy will find some interesting patterns

singular_me

22nd March 2015, 12:10 PM

excellent vid... 5 star rating - one doesnt need to agree on everything but lots of food for the thought, very rich/dense information.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiuqoHlSb3M

Horn

22nd March 2015, 12:35 PM

excellent vid... 5 star rating - one doesnt need to agree on everything but lots of food for the thought, very rich/dense information.

Fibonaciously informative , i agree.

Truth must be falsifiable.

Neuro

22nd March 2015, 12:53 PM

The sun is cold? ;D You're not in the mainstream of electric universe theory are you?

singular_me

22nd March 2015, 01:04 PM

The sun is cold? ;D You're not in the mainstream of electric universe theory are you?

dark and cold on the inside...

one of the many vids out there
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKq33m4oP0U

plasma/electric theories are the future, IMHO

Horn

22nd March 2015, 02:07 PM

dark and cold on the inside...

one of the many vids out there
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKq33m4oP0U

plasma/electric theories are the future, IMHO

Its already evident as colder on the inside, "COLD" is relative though.

Colder than the outside is better ethics. :)

Glass

25th March 2015, 05:43 PM

The CERN Haldron collider is nearing the end of the power upgrades and they will be firing it up soon.

So the atheists are going after the GOD particle. The particle that exerts the force that causes things to solidify. Come into existence. The aether, the orgone, the chi, the holy spirit, the higgs boson.

They are expecting to bleed energy into parrallel universes as part of their experiments. Should be interesting. Will they attract something to the energy they bleed in? Will they make a black hole?

singular_me

25th March 2015, 06:14 PM

each level of awareness demands its own level of knowledge, otherwise it is like placing the cart before the horse, goes nowhere or can be used as a weapon by the very few in the know.

either it is going to fail for whatever reason or consequences will be devastating. Or they even might make up the results to claim scientific supremacy. Just like the moon landing hoax.

Seeking for the God particle when there is so much suffering on earth remaining unaddressed ??? I call this looking for the forces of darkness.

The CERN Haldron collider is nearing the end of the power upgrades and they will be firing it up soon.

So the atheists are going after the GOD particle. The particle that exerts the force that causes things to solidify. Come into existence. The aether, the orgone, the chi, the holy spirit, the higgs boson.

They are expecting to bleed energy into parrallel universes as part of their experiments. Should be interesting. Will they attract something to the energy they bleed in? Will they make a black hole?

Horn

13th April 2015, 12:18 PM

https://mortusvox.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/albert-pike.jpg

singular_me

13th April 2015, 09:51 PM

masons have mastered the inversion of Knowledge....

didnt you mean to put in the african thread?

Neuro

14th April 2015, 12:23 AM

masons have mastered the inversion of Knowledge....

didnt you mean to put in the african thread?
You're so smart, aren't you?

Glass

15th April 2015, 07:50 PM

Ah ok. Some interesting things here

Earth ate a Mercury-like body early in its history, study finds

A Mercury-like body smashed into a young Earth and gave our planet's core the radioactive elements necessary to generate a magnetic field, two Oxford geochemists say.

Without that magnetic field, there would be no shield to protect us from the onslaught of radiation constantly bombarding Earth from space, making the existence of life as we know it impossible, scientists say.

The study, published in the journal Nature, offers insight into how Earth's magnetic field, and perhaps its moon, came to be.

Our planet is thought to have formed from small rocky bodies like the ones in the asteroid belt today, study co-author Bernard Wood, a geochemist at the University of Oxford, said in an interview. It's a theory that fits quite well with what's been studied on Earth, though it's not a perfect fit, he said.

"That sort of roughly works, but there are all kinds of little questions that don't quite work," Wood said, "and one of them is, what is the energy source that drives the Earth's magnetic field?"

Here's the problem. To drive Earth's magnetic field, you need radioactive elements like potassium, thorium or uranium - elements that give off heat as they decay - in the planet's churning iron core. Those elements are attracted to oxygen and combine with it to make oxides, but oxides are really light and would float toward the planet's surface; they wouldn't be heavy enough to stay in the core. These elements also avoid contact with iron.

"They love oxygen so much and they hate being metals so much that they shouldn't go into the Earth's core," Wood said.

So there's no good way, under current models, to keep enough radioactive material in Earth's centre to power our vital magnetic field, which creates a conundrum for planetary scientists.

But Wood and Oxford colleague Anke Wohlers realised that if you had a source of reduced sulfides (sulfur compounds that don't have oxygen) in the iron core, it would make it easier for these iron-hating radioactive elements to co-exist with the metal.

"We said OK, we'll recreate those conditions in our high-pressure apparatus and we'll look and see whether the radioactive elements uranium and thorium, and also some of the so-called rare earth elements, would partition into the sulfur-rich metal under those conditions," Wood said. "And we found much to our pleasure and surprise that uranium very strongly partitions into sulfur-rich metal under those very oxygen-poor or reducing conditions."

The theory also explains why the ratio of samarium to neodymium (two rare earth elements), is higher in the crust and mantle than it is in the rest of the solar system, he added. Because neodymium mixes with iron sulfides more easily than samarium, it more easily sinks into the core, leaving relatively more samarium behind in Earth's upper layers.
But how did Earth, which is full of oxides, get all these reduced sulfides in the first place? It probably came from a body that looked a lot like Mercury, which is rich in sulfur and very poor in oxygen.

Rest of the story @ the Age (http://www.theage.com.au/world/earth-ate-a-mercurylike-body-early-in-its-history-study-finds-20150416-1mm5iu.html)

Another admission about space travel? A admission that something powers the earth but we don't know what but we can think up a few theories.

Horn

16th April 2015, 12:52 AM

aeondaze

16th April 2015, 03:14 AM

I'd go back to that statement where a molten core as "magnetic" would not hold a charge due to the mercury point on that one, Glass.

Its all newton gravity based derivative theoreoms there... or meant to reinforce gravity as the driver.

Where were you horn? :confused:

You missed all the action when Goldie got her Tutsie ass handed to her on a platter?

I guess you just aren't as close an ally as she likes to think....lol

BTW, you spelt theorems wrong. :cool:

No need to thank me.

Jewboo

20th December 2015, 08:14 PM

as you can see geometry has a lot more to show than what we learn in high school.

Plato: let none enter who is ignorant of geometry

Sacred Geometry holds the secret of the Universe, God expressing himself in PURE mathematical language. That is why all spiritual texts contain (sacred) numbers.

http://i.imgur.com/KjBG2iF.jpg

:o Goldissima was right all along!

Shami-Amourae

20th December 2015, 08:18 PM

:o goldissima was right all along!

LMFAO.
:)ss

singular_me

22nd December 2015, 11:43 AM

good one, book... but when geometry is in sync with facial/bodily features, universal traits of handsomeness and prettiness are generally acknowledged. Geometry and symmetry are deemed aesthetic paramount.

Trump is far from being handsome ;D

More than anybody else, da vinci knew
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmonalisa.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F09%2F02-ml-ps-emlgoldenspiral-03-940x1234-228x300.jpg&f=1

http://www.just-true.com/wp-content/plugins/wcache/images/Os%20mitos%20e%20verdades%20sobre%20a%20propor%C3% A7%C3%A3o%20%C3%A1urea%20-Just%20True-Urandir-Pesquisa-Ciencia-Ufologia-Tecnologia-%20654d_Mona-Lisa-e-proporcao-aurea-falsa.jpg

Horn

22nd December 2015, 12:19 PM

Trump is far from being handsome ;D

I call BS, singular would give anything to run her fingers thru Trump's coif.

singular_me

22nd December 2015, 04:53 PM

I call BS, singular would give anything to run her fingers thru Trump's coif.

have such a wiggy hairstyle fetish , I admit.

my avatar sez it all LOL

Horn

4th January 2016, 10:36 PM

Mainstream science tries to execute numerology, but fails here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBorBKDnE3U

singular_me

5th January 2016, 09:20 PM

I cannot confirm his analysis as I dont have a phd in physics
but at 27mins he seems to ridicule the black hole theory with his numerological applications.

Mainstream science tries to execute numerology, but fails here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBorBKDnE3U

Horn

5th January 2016, 11:19 PM

I cannot confirm his analysis as I dont have a phd in physics
but at 27mins he seems to ridicule the black hole theory with his numerological applications.

He tears into the mathematics of general relativity theory. He's too fast I think for most, but does prove the fallacy of general relativity by showing that its mathematics are hocus pocus that just rely only on pure belief to make it work. There's no substance to it whatsoever, yet its still taught as the most standard form of physics theory world over.

Well because they have tunnel (black hole) vision, solely believing falsely has appeared to work so far.

Neuro

6th January 2016, 03:24 AM

Mainstream science tries to execute numerology, but fails here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBorBKDnE3U
Basically he is saying that cosmologists (Einstein included) are practicing Talmudism number games with false math. Further a black hole is theoretically impossible, because you need infinite gravity with an event horizon radius of zero, and that is impossible... I think he is right! Seems solid to me.

singular_me

6th January 2016, 06:34 AM

yes he is extremely fast but did play the whole thing in the background while drafting a few emails and rewinded a few times.

I have been listening to several vids/podcasts with Robert Otey (into russellian science) last weekend, in one of them he is basically saying that the electric universe theory exposes algebra as mostly erroneous or even a fraud. Otey didnt expound on this that much but hopefully I'll ran across a podcast of his in which he offers more insights.

But basically I can grasp why he is saying that and to me it makes sense. He is another new fav of mine.

Everything has boundaries, and algebra may be too on its death bed as the old cosmology model is imploding slowly. It is a common occurrence when the paradigm changes, the old doesnt serve anymore.... hence a reason to keep a flexible mind at all time.

mathematics is a language and having the correct math depends on the proper interpretation. But my guess is that as long as sacred maths (showing the relationship between numbers) are not taught mainstream scientists will keep doing the wrong mathematical mistakes and we'll continue to see theories falling apart one after another... hopefully the electric universe theory will pick up in a big way and put an end to scientific monopolies

russellian science, how sacred math really works, platonic solids at a cosmic level
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Ftse2.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.M da33983a3c806e20ba42fc16c431f2cfH0%26pid%3D15.1&f=1

https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Ftse3.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.M 8f7d3b32d04eda0533e28c94f587be5ao0%26pid%3D15.1&f=1

walter russell, the father of the electric theory
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia-cache-ec0.pinimg.com%2F736x%2Ffd%2F09%2Ffe%2Ffd09fec2501 bd2f50d1c8496b5383de3.jpg&f=1

This is an ELECTRIC universe of motion, not a Newtonian gravitational universe.
http://www.walter-russell.com/

He tears into the mathematics of general relativity theory. He's too fast I think for most, but does prove the fallacy of general relativity by showing that its mathematics are hocus pocus that just rely only on pure belief to make it work. There's no substance to it whatsoever, yet its still taught as the most standard form of physics theory world over.

Well because they have tunnel (black hole) vision, solely believing falsely has appeared to work so far.

Horn

6th January 2016, 09:42 AM

You will probably find this one much more tranquil than the math. Observational science at its max, entertaining and insighted.

Earth as a Stellar Transformer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiM_gLRIuGc

singular_me

6th January 2016, 12:10 PM

thats an excellent find but he sounds like a mainstream climate denier. LOL. Very concise and and no need to have any degree to get this.

what I find interesting is that he is speaking of earth as an electric transformer emitting heart beats. So let's push it further, the whole universe electrically pulsates, charge and discharge switching polarities... the heart beat of God. At this point the connectedness of everything is established scientifically.

You will probably find this one much more tranquil than the math. Observational science at its max, entertaining and insighted.

Earth as a Stellar Transformer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiM_gLRIuGc

Horn

6th January 2016, 01:13 PM

36days for solar rotation and another 4 for Earth to catch up.

40 days and nights for Noah. :)

aeondaze

6th January 2016, 03:01 PM

Everything has boundaries, and algebra may be too on its death bed as the old cosmology model is imploding slowly. It is a common occurrence when the paradigm changes, the old doesnt serve anymore.... hence a reason to keep a flexible mind at all time.

mathematics is a language and having the correct math depends on the proper interpretation. But my guess is that as long as sacred maths (showing the relationship between numbers) are not taught mainstream scientists will keep doing the wrong mathematical mistakes and we'll continue to see theories falling apart one after another... hopefully the electric universe theory will pick up in a big way and put an end to scientific monopolies

I don't know why you keep repeating this, but your so called "sacred maths" is taught. What makes you think it isn't? They teach the math, they just don't foolishly call it "sacred".

Algebra on its deathbed, you're joking right?

If a + a ≠ 2a then what does it equal?

This is a serious question to you. You make the claim that algebra may be quote "on its deathbed" then please clarify for me what it equals.

The electric universe theory has nothing going for itself. As far as dispproving relativity, there is a whole lote more physical proof that this phenomena is real than there is that its false.

Continually posting these amateurs musings without ANY solid physical proof doesn't make your case in the slightest, you need some physical proof, otherwise its merely silly speculation.

:rolleyes:

Cebu_4_2

6th January 2016, 03:07 PM

If a + a ≠ 2a then what does it equal?
:rolleyes:

6?

.

aeondaze

6th January 2016, 03:27 PM

6?

Thanks Cletus!

http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/simpsons/images/9/99/Tapped_Out_Unlock_Cletus.png/revision/latest?cb=20141121004820

singular_me

6th January 2016, 03:48 PM

aeon, there is a big problem. the law of thermodynamics applied to the stars responsible for our obsession to burn fuel and newton's gravitation theory will be falling apart, when the electric theory will be declared the next winner.

what will happen to algebra when that happens, when all the equations must be rewritten from a to z. Because as it stands it seems to be either inaccurate...... or a fraud.

Glass

6th January 2016, 04:14 PM

Basically he is saying that cosmologists (Einstein included) are practicing Talmudism number games with false math. Further a black hole is theoretically impossible, because you need infinite gravity with an event horizon radius of zero, and that is impossible... I think he is right! Seems solid to me.

On a few occasions of watching these kinds of things, this one by Steve and another one I can't recall who by, Similar topic and it was as if they had a very small blind spot. Something that they just overlooked which would change the whole perspective.

I'm wondering about this escape velocity. Is he saying that the escape velocity according to Einstien is the speed of light? I would have thought at the event horizon, going at the speed of light would be the speed needed to stay right there on the horizon, the edge. To escape I think you would need SoL+1 or more. I'm not sure if that is correct but if it were it would change many things.

Steve doesn't like Einstien. I have some thoughts on historical views of people like Einstien now they are dead. Its clear there is a question about Einstiens work but equally there is a question about us....including students of Einstien, when he was alive and now he is gone. Blindly following along. If as Steve says at least one of these formulas is so stupid and that it is obvious on the face of it even a 15yr old H.S. student should see it, then it begs the question.

Was Einstien really the fake, fraud or just poor scientist they are saying he is or was he looking for something, some one. How do yo find the needle in the hay stack? How do you carry on your work after you are dead? Will it stagnate in time as everyone parrots it but no one stretches it. Will it be forgoten? Can you leave hooks, traps or clues to draw fresh minds in.

We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. there seems to be a few variations to that quote.

Anyway I think there are a couple ways to look at it.

Horn

6th January 2016, 04:46 PM

On a few occasions of watching these kinds of things, this one by Steve and another one I can't recall who by, Similar topic and it was as if they had a very small blind spot. Something that they just overlooked which would change the whole perspective.

Its incorporating infinity as a basis of theory that flags general relativity for the pseudoscience that it is.

Steve i think is quite aware of what general relativity misses... Einstein relativism is what has lead science into the religious ditch so to speak. It reinforces the "mysticism" of our world. Cause its simply false on most other levels. Except that of religious celebrity. "Gravity or the Big G" remains an unsolved unopposed force due to that religion.

“After all, to get the whole universe totally wrong in the face of clear evidence for over 75 years merits monumental embarrassment and should induce a modicum of humility.”

Einstein’s famous equation, E = mc2, demonstrated that mass and electromagnetic energy are directly related. But mystification resulted when the earlier concept that related mass to ‘quantity of matter’ was unconsciously substituted. Textbooks and encyclopaedias today slip unnoticeably into the error of using the words ‘mass’ and ‘matter’ interchangeably. A NASA educational website tells us that “mass is a measure of how much matter a planet is made of.” It shows that the confusion of mass with quantity of matter infects astrophysics.

“The Standard Model of particle physics would appear to fail in nearly every possible way, and all of its failures seem to stem from the early 1930s. By all indications science seems to have taken a wrong turn about this time. After three hundred years of progressively simplifying the description of the universe, with fewer entities and simpler laws, it suddenly turned the other way, with complexity and entities multiplying like rabbits.” “We are about to enter the 21st century but our understanding of the origin of inertia, mass, and gravitation still remains what has been for centuries – an outstanding puzzle.”

http://www.holoscience.com/wp/electric-gravity-in-an-electric-universe/

Neuro

7th January 2016, 04:53 AM

On a few occasions of watching these kinds of things, this one by Steve and another one I can't recall who by, Similar topic and it was as if they had a very small blind spot. Something that they just overlooked which would change the whole perspective.

I'm wondering about this escape velocity. Is he saying that the escape velocity according to Einstien is the speed of light? I would have thought at the event horizon, going at the speed of light would be the speed needed to stay right there on the horizon, the edge. To escape I think you would need SoL+1 or more. I'm not sure if that is correct but if it were it would change many things.

Steve doesn't like Einstien. I have some thoughts on historical views of people like Einstien now they are dead. Its clear there is a question about Einstiens work but equally there is a question about us....including students of Einstien, when he was alive and now he is gone. Blindly following along. If as Steve says at least one of these formulas is so stupid and that it is obvious on the face of it even a 15yr old H.S. student should see it, then it begs the question.

Was Einstien really the fake, fraud or just poor scientist they are saying he is or was he looking for something, some one. How do yo find the needle in the hay stack? How do you carry on your work after you are dead? Will it stagnate in time as everyone parrots it but no one stretches it. Will it be forgoten? Can you leave hooks, traps or clues to draw fresh minds in.

there seems to be a few variations to that quote.

Anyway I think there are a couple ways to look at it.
basically for Gravity to overcome the speed of light, it needs to be infinite, as speed of light is the fastest possible speed. And to get that either the mass needs to be infinite, or the event horizon needs to be zero distance from the center of gravity, both notions really are absurd. Sure you can go around it by claiming that gravity isn't a function of mass, like Goldie does, contrary to all evidence it is. Or if speed of light isn't the limit.

Black holes aren't possible, unless gravity is mass-independent and/or the speed of light is the limit.

Cosmology would have even greater problem if the gravity-mass correlation or speed of light limit was thrown out.

Glass

21st January 2016, 06:30 PM

I'm doubting that gravity is a thing based on mass. I'm fairly confident it is some thing else going on there.

I'm sure this has been discussed before but I could not turn up a post anywhere.

Einstien plagerist story

He was three years old before he started speaking, and it took him several more years before he was fluent.
He did not read until he was seven, and his poor performance in elementary school caused many people to suspect he was mentally retarded.
When called upon, the boy would take forever before answering, often silently mouthing the words to himself before slowly uttering the words aloud. Most believe that it would be highly unlikely that Albert Einstein would ever succeed at anything.

When he tried to get into the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, he failed the entrance exam and was required to take it again. His doctoral dissertation was rejected by the university as “irrelevant and fanciful.” After graduation, Einstein landed a position as a clerk in a patent office. He liked the job because it allowed him to enough free time to research some of his scientific theories.

Again, it seemed he might not achieve much more than this position since he was known for being incredibly absent-minded. For example, he would often forget to put on his socks and even misplaced a $1500 check after he used it as a bookmark.
It was not until after the first of Einstein’s theories was published, the Special Theory of Relativity, that he was truly recognized by the scientific community. However…what if it was all…Plagiarized Information.

What if the only thing he was good at, was stealing other peoples ideas. In some cases, even years after they were published?
What if his ‘Theory of Relativity’ really belonged to his best friend, who sent him a copy of it before he had it published?
Why if someone had published ‘The Theory of Relativity’ weeks before Einstein, were they ignored by the Media, and gave all credit to Einstein, even when proved it belonged to someone else?

Link here

(http://truedemocracyparty.net/2013/03/einstein-fraud-plagiarist-documented-the-einstein-fraud-thief-liar-borderline-retardation-judaic-media-created-celebrity-hero/)We have heard the stories of the rocket launches he over saw that killed a few people when it all went pear shaped.