If I refuse the Flu Vaccine my medical practice will be terminated.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Libertytree

How long will it be before everyone must comply with the vaccine flavor of the moment? This time they're starting with the health care workers and I think they'll try working their way down, however possible.

---

Yes, it will probably be part of Obamacare....get your shot or you will be refused medical care.

The answer is simple:

Do exactly what the Jewish Doctors do......cause i will stake my life each and every one of them is going to get a exemption or get a saline shot.

I took an mmrv recently. I transferred schools. It was $15 for the shot, $300+ for the titer. At first it didn't feel like much of anyhting,

you should give up your entire career etc. /sarcasm.

The AB2109 vaccine law just passed here in CA which was modeled on a similar one in WA, and you know that "they" will keep pushing compulsory vaccine laws until you will need them just to leave your house and go out in public. For the Greater Good of course!

A few months ago I went to a talk by one of the authors of Vaccine Epidemic, and her advice was to find your way around this problem as best as you can. If you read between the lines she was recommending that people subvert the law if it comes down to it.

In my case I know a few anti-vaccine doctors who would probably be willing to say in writing that they gave me a vaccine when they hadn't. I suggest everyone think seriously about finding a work-around like this.

However, if you find yourself in the position of having to be vaccinated here is Dr. Baylock's recommendations for detoxing from any possible side effects:

What To Do If Force Vaccinated

With much love and warmth,

Lapis

Your health is everything.

EVERYTHING

Do whatever it takes to sidestep the issue

http://thinktwice.com/vac.htm

I'm ordering five copies.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mamboni

http://thinktwice.com/vac.htm

I'm ordering five copies.

---

They are forcing employees to take a vaccine which could potentially injure them, but not accepting liability if injury occurs. Surely labor laws protect against such circumstances?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mamboni

http://thinktwice.com/vac.htm

I'm ordering five copies.

---

Why order five? You could order one copy, and read it five times. :)

Mamboni, I empathize with your dilemma here. I have grave doubts about the safety of all vaccines. I am also a strong opponent of authoritarian rule and fascism. These people will force you to make a moral choice. Their purpose is to root out those who have morals and courage. But, alas, I am also a pragmatist. If you are five years away from retirement, and you value your career, your comfort, your prestige, then I would suggest you take the semantic evasion. Don't worry too much about being a hypocrite. Our fascist dominated system forces us all to be hypocrites--to cower before authority, to go along to get along. You won't be doing much harm for your remaining five years because your heart is in the right place.

If you want to fight the system, find like minded people in your hospital milieu, and organize a surreptitious campaign of sabotage. With this policy in place, it should not be too difficult to discover others who resent the kind of choices they are being forced to make. Cultivate these people. Develop some agenda that might appeal to these people. Organize them to take advantage of opportunities to sabotage the system as it pertains to vaccines. If vaccine deliveries are intercepted and replaced with doses of saline solution, who would be the wiser? Big pharma would get their profits. People who believed that vaccines were protecting them would not have their health compromised, and the people who remove biohazard waste would see an increase in business.

There are lots of ways to fight the fascists. You could enjoy your years until retirement by doing good deeds surreptitiously. I would regard this dilemma as an opportunity to find ways to do such good deeds. If they have so little respect for you and other employees, then the public needs protection from such people. I would quietly find ways to protect the public. The right people to help in this are those who understand with just a wink and a nod. There are more of these people than you think. This is an area where working inside the system allows you to be more effective than trying to change it from the outside. If the fascists want to cultivate hypocrisy, then the height of hypocrisy is to be a 'loyal' saboteur. It'll take them a lot longer than 5 years to figure it out.


Hatha

^^I would just love to see the follow up study showing what a roaring success the mandatory flu vaccine was, when it was secretely changed to a saline solution...

Ron Paul, one of only two Congressman (and not so coincidentally both physicians) who had voted against the 1976 Swine Flu Vaccination Program:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJiTS...eature=related

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slowbell

Why order five? You could order one copy, and read it five times. :)

---

I intend one giving out copies to some key people I know, some who are co-workers. I will leave one in the lab lounge. Hopefully, my staff will pick it up and read it. There is someone in my organization who may ascend to the top power position. She and I have a special relationship of deep mutual respect and admiration. She is a Christian and a person of superlative qualities. She is intelligent, empathic, organized, a superb listener, experienced and she clearly inspires those around her. She is a natural leader - it comes off effortlessly, as if divinely ordained. She is humble and thrives on the success of others and the organization and has no interest in her own advancement. I pray that she will be the one. I would walk on fire for this woman - she is a class act and the kind of person one is proud to work for. She will be getting a copy as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Libertytree

How long will it be before everyone must comply with the vaccine flavor of the moment? This time they're starting with the health care workers and I think they'll try working their way down, however possible.

---

That is about the time that Ima opens up a can of .........

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G-EWSfJ1Pw...hoopAss375.gif

Annual Flu Deaths:
The Big Lie

By Neil Z. Miller

The Flu Vaccine: Safety & Efficacy

Swine Flu and Swine Flu Vaccines

Does the Flu Vaccine Matter? (article)

Avian Flu: Quarantine vs. Vaccine

Every year, just prior to the impending "flu season," the CDC and their acquiescent media pawns terrorize the American public with false claims regarding annual flu deaths. The CDC boldly asserts that 36,000 people die every year from the flu. Such scare tactics are calculated to increase flu vaccine sales. However, according to the CDC's own official records documented in National Vital Statistics Reports, only a few hundred people die from influenza (flu) on an average year. And many of these deaths occur in people with preexisting conditions, weakened immune systems, and the elderly. For example, in 2002, 753 people died from the flu. The year before, in 2001, just 257 people died from the flu. (Fifty-nine percent of these deaths occurred in people 75 years or older; 75 percent occurred in people 55 years or older.) To put these numbers in perspective, 3,454 Americans died from malnutrition in 2001 -- 13 times greater than the number of flu deaths! That same year, there were 4,269 deaths attributed to asthma, a condition some studies have linked to vaccines.

To rationalize this discrepancy between the true number of deaths caused by influenza every year (as documented in the CDC's own National Vital Statistics Reports) and the outrageously exaggerated bogus number of flu deaths promoted by the CDC, officials claim that flu often leads to pneumonia and that many deaths from pneumonia are really deaths caused by flu. Apparently the CDC has a secret formula for estimating how many pneumonia deaths (officially listed in the CDC's own National Vital Statistics Reports as deaths from pneumonia, not flu) are really deaths caused by flu. Adding to the confusion, influenza is caused by a virus; pneumonia is usually caused by bacteria. The CDC's own website takes great pains to emphasize their differences. More importantly, the CDC has a pneumonia vaccine. So why doesn't the CDC promote their pneumonia vaccine? In 2002, 65,231 people died from pneumonia; in 2001, 61,777 people died from pneumonia. If everyone took a pneumonia vaccine, especially the elderly and others most susceptible to the disease, wouldn't they be protected? Why is the CDC promoting a flu vaccine to protect against pneumonia, especially when one disease is caused by a virus and the other usually by bacteria? Also, how many people who died from pneumonia received a flu vaccine? How many received a pneumonia vaccine?

There are three main types of flu virus, and each type can mutate, or change, from year to year. Thus, there are literally thousands of possible strains. (Each strain is thoroughly analyzed and given a proper name, often a title associated with the place where it was initially discovered.) Every year health officials produce a new flu vaccine containing three mutated strains of flu virus. To determine which strains to use, officials travel to China at the beginning of the year to assess circulating flu viruses in that region of the world. They try to guess which strains will reach the United States by the end of the year. Production begins, and the new vaccine is usually available by October.

Flu "experts" often guess wrong. For example, in 1994 they predicted that Shangdong, Texas, and Panama strains would be prevalent that year, thus millions of people were vaccinated with a flu shot that contained these viruses. However, when winter arrived, the Johannesburg and Beijing strains of influenza circulated through society. The vaccine was ineffective. This happened again in 1996, and again in 1997. More recently, the vaccine created for the 2003-2004 flu season contained flu strains that did not circulate through society that year. Officials were once again forced to admit that millions of people were vaccinated with an ineffective vaccine. Yet, flu fatalities did not increase during these years. For example, in 1996, 857 people died from the flu; in 1997, 745 people died from the flu -- typical annual numbers.

In 2004, flu vaccine manufacturers were unable to produce enough flu shots to accommodate everyone who wanted a flu vaccine. (Several batches were contaminated and had to be destroyed.) Thus, only half of the population that is normally vaccinated against influenza (approximately 45 million people versus 90 million during an average year) received the vaccine. If influenza is truly a deadly disease, as officials claim, the 2004-2005 flu season should be catastrophic. If, as the CDC claims, 36,000 people die every year from the flu when 90 million people are vaccinated against the disease, how many more will die when only 45 million people are "protected?" I predict that flu fatalities will not increase. In fact, flu (and pneumonia?) fatalities may even decrease during this rare period when the American population is "under-vaccinated" against influenza.


Note: The article above was written in early 2005. On December 10, 2005, the British Medical Journal published a report acknowledging the veracity of this article by substantiating the claim that CDC flu death figures are completely bogus, hyper-inflated to scare the public and sell more flu vaccine.


http://thinktwice.com/flu_lie.htm

The Vaccine Liberation Army site just posted an article about the recent Special Master ruling in the Vaccine Court in favor of a young woman who got acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (“ADEM”) from the trivalent flu vaccine:

FLU SHOT CAUSED SERIOUS INJURY: MS. MURA (AGE 21) WINS COMPENSATION MAY, 2012

Link to PDF file of ruling (ETA: Also posted on the U.S. Court of Federal Claims's site.)

She started getting symptoms four days after getting the flu vaccine.

The government's medical expert Dr. Ward tried to blame a previous viral illness for the symptoms, but she had been perfectly healthy up until the vaccine and hadn't gone to a doctor for any problems (however, I don't doubt that exposure to viruses in addition to other things like environmental toxins can weaken a person and make her even more susceptible to having a bad reaction to vaccine ingredients).

Her medical records indicate that her illness

progressed from a demyelinating disorder that began four days after she received the vaccination and progressed from her distal extremities to her spinal cord and brain. This disorder made Ms. Mura comatose, quadriplegic, incontinent of urine and feces, and she required mechanical ventilation, rendering her intellectually handicapped and subject to severe whole body neurogenic pain.

This is on page five of the ruling.

Dr. Ward admitted that although it's unusual for a case of ADEM to begin within 72 hours of vaccination there were "case reports to that effect."

But they sure don't tell you about that at CVS Pharmacy!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lapis

The Vaccine Liberation Army site just posted an article about the recent Special Master ruling in the Vaccine Court in favor of a young woman who got acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (“ADEM”) from the trivalent flu vaccine:

FLU SHOT CAUSED SERIOUS INJURY: MS. MURA (AGE 21) WINS COMPENSATION MAY, 2012

Link to PDF file of ruling (ETA: Also posted on the U.S. Court of Federal Claims's site.)

She started getting symptoms four days after getting the flu vaccine.

The government's medical expert Dr. Ward tried to blame a previous viral illness for the symptoms, but she had been perfectly healthy up until the vaccine and hadn't gone to a doctor for any problems (however, I don't doubt that exposure to viruses in addition to other things like environmental toxins can weaken a person and make her even more susceptible to having a bad reaction to vaccine ingredients).

Her medical records indicate that her illness

progressed from a demyelinating disorder that began four days after she received the vaccination and progressed from her distal extremities to her spinal cord and brain. This disorder made Ms. Mura comatose, quadriplegic, incontinent of urine and feces, and she required mechanical ventilation, rendering her intellectually handicapped and subject to severe whole body neurogenic pain.

This is on page five of the ruling.

Dr. Ward admitted that although it's unusual for a case of ADEM to begin within 72 hours of vaccination there were "case reports to that effect."

But they sure don't tell you about that at CVS Pharmacy!

---

Holy shit. Can you believe these bastards. They are emotionally detached sociopaths. Where is the guilt, the shame, the personal responsibility, the moral outrage? If I were cross-examing this toady, I would have asked "Unusual? So please tell us, what is the usual onset of ADEM after receiving a vaccine?"

I just wanted to say it is VERY good to see mamboni on an anti-flu-vax-crusade. You go Doc ! Next he'll be hanging posters everywhere & distributing flyers & emailing FYI's !
WOW ! The Zios who want to try & force you into something against your will can't mess with someone who refuses to be messed with !

The thing is - the people who are pushing this are uninformed sheeple. The research is out there about vaccines if they would only take the time to inform themselves. I know they think they are doing a good thing by trying to protect others from getting the flu. That would be great IF the vaccine actually worked and IF there weren't so many additives in them that should never be injected into ones bloodstream.

Hatha - I always love your posts!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slowbell

Why order five? You could order one copy, and read it five times. :)

---

It may wear out that way

We change the world by doing the right thing............no one else will bother........

Here's another good link to keep up with information on vaccines and the law.
http://www.nvic.org/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sunshine05

Here's another good link to keep up with information on vaccines and the law.
http://www.nvic.org/

---

Turning Vaccine Exemption into Class Warfare
It is getting uglier and uglier out there, as angry, frustrated doctors inside and outside of government work overtime to foster fear and hatred of parents making conscious vaccine choices for their children. The latest political dirty trick is to brand parents, who send their children to private schools, as selfish and a threat to their communities because some private schools have higher vaccine exemption rates...
Find a Compassionate Doctor to Help You Prevent Vaccine Injuries
It is really up to parents to find a doctor they can trust, who will take the precautionary approach to giving more vaccines in the face of previous vaccine reactions, like seizures, especially if the child has symptoms of brain injury...
Merck Lawsuit Reignites Vaccine Safety Concerns
In 2010 two virologists, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, filed a lawsuit against their former employer and vaccine manufacturer Merck. The lawsuit, which was unsealed in late June, alleges that Merck defrauded the U.S. for over 10 years by overstating the MMR vaccine’s effectiveness...
Doctors Slam Parents for Vaccine Choices & FDA Licenses New Combo Vaccine
Public health doctors are slapping the label of “shot limiters” on parents giving their babies fewer vaccines. It has become fashionable in medical journals and media circles to demonize these parents, who engage in critical thinking about vaccination...
CA Bill Restricting Personal Belief Vaccine Exemption Heats Up
If this bill passes and parents do not obtain a signature from a designated doctor or medical care practitioner on the personal belief vaccine exemption form, the child will be barred from attending school...
NVAC: Parents Question Why Vaccinated Kids are Getting Pertussis
During the Washington state report, Dr. DeBolt noted that one of Washington’s biggest challenges in this outbreak were parents questioning the pertussis vaccine’s efficacy. According to Dr. DeBolt the state has been “flooded by phone calls” from parents, stating that their child was up-to-date on pertussis vaccination and had still contracted pertussis...
Feds Poised to Expand Vaccine Injury Table
The federal Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) unanimously passed recommendations made by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) Report Task Force on Updating the Vaccine Injury Table...
Americans Fight for Vaccine Choice - Vermont Keeps Exemption!
The proliferation of new vaccines that have been added in the past 25 years to the government mandated child vaccination schedule, coupled with growing awareness that many highly vaccinated children are chronically ill, is powering the new citizen activism...
NVIC Opposes FDA Fast-Tracking of Vaccines
If FDA regulatory standards are too low, the informed public will question and resist using newly licensed vaccines...
Flu Shot Mandates for Health Care Workers Recommended by Feds and Passed in Colorado
Adult influenza vaccine injury claims are the leading claim in the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The Feds and the State of Colorado do not support flexible medical, religious and conscientious belief exemptions...

Major study - no evidence of benefit/no value from flu vax - http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/201...oration-study/

You could always fake an egg allergy. No shot for those allergic to eggs.

I have a family member who ended up with Guillain-Barré after getting a flu shot.

They are in recovery still; having trouble getting around, but at least they didn't get the flu!

Hey Doc, is there any way you can find out if the board that runs your hospital is on the dole of the corporation that is delivering your batch of the flu vaccine?

I didn't see this angle posted. This is the first year, guessing from the op, that they have forced this issue. "Why now" is my thought.

http://www.anh-usa.org/flu-sho-force...ealth-workers/

Fighting this mandatory flu vaccine is worse than fighting the tide:

http://www.immunize.org/honor-roll/

After reading several papers, the risk of Guillain-Barre syndrome s/p flu vaccination is ~1-2 cases per million. I haven't found specific quality data on the other severe neurologic side-effects. CDC recommends vaccination of healthcare workers with direct patient contact; but it does not mandate or recommend a mandate. However, numerous professional societies in the link above are recommending mandatory vaccination of healthcare workers. My perusal of the medical literature says that flu vaccination has minimal effect on decreased sick days or serious illness. I can find only one study claiming decreased flu infection of patients associated with increased vaccination of health care providers, the cruxt of the entire argument for mandating vaccination:

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Nov;25(11):923-8.

Preventing nosocomial influenza by improving the vaccine acceptance rate of clinicians.

Salgado CD, Giannetta ET, Hayden FG, Farr BM.


Source

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the effects of interventions to prevent transmission of influenza and to increase employee compliance with influenza vaccination.


DESIGN:

The change in the proportion of hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed nosocomial influenza was observed over time and assessed using chi-square for trend analysis. The association between nosocomial influenza in patients and healthcare worker (HCW) compliance with vaccine was assessed by logistic regression.


SETTING:

A 600-bed, tertiary-care academic hospital.


METHODS:

After an outbreak of influenza A at this hospital in 1988, a mobile cart program was instituted with increased efforts to motivate employees to be vaccinated and furloughed when ill as well as new measures to prevent nosocomial spread.


RESULTS:

HCW vaccination rates increased from 4% in 1987-1988 to 67% in 1999-2000 (P < .0001). Proportions of nosocomially acquired influenza cases among employees or patients both declined significantly (P < .0001). Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant inverse association between HCW compliance with vaccination and the rate of nosocomial influenza among patients (P < .001).


CONCLUSION:

A mobile cart vaccination program and an increased emphasis on HCWs to receive the vaccine were associated with a significant increase in vaccine acceptance and a significant decrease in the rate of nosocomial influenza among patients.

PMID: 15566025 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnight rambler

Major study - no evidence of benefit/no value from flu vax - http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/201...oration-study/

---

Yeah, I read that study, most of it. The problem is arguing that the marginal immunity provided to health care workers isn't worth the partial prevention of nosocomial infection (i.e. doctors vaccinated less likely to transmit flu to his patient, or so the theory goes). Unless one can demonstrate significant numbers of severe neurologic side effects of the vaccine it is hard to argue against the vaccination of healthcare workers.

Mamboni, on the day they schedule to vaccinate you all, can you call in sick? That would be really funny, actually. Take a few days of rest, that flu shot day. :)

JAMA. 2012 Jul 11;308(2):175-81.
Risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome following H1N1 influenza vaccination in Quebec.

De Wals P, Deceuninck G, Toth E, Boulianne N, Brunet D, Boucher RM, Landry M, De Serres G.
Source

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. Philippe.De.Wals@ssss.gouv.qc.ca

Abstract

CONTEXT:

In fall 2009 in Quebec, Canada, an immunization campaign was launched against the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic strain, mostly using an AS03 adjuvant vaccine. By the end of the year, 57% of the 7.8 million residents had been vaccinated.
OBJECTIVE:

To assess the risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following pandemic influenza vaccine administration.
DESIGN:

Population-based cohort study with follow-up over the 6-month period October 2009 through March 2010. The investigation was ordered by the chief medical officer of health in accordance with the Quebec Public Health Act.
SETTING:

All acute care hospitals and neurology clinics in Quebec.
POPULATION:

Suspected and confirmed GBS cases reported by physicians, mostly neurologists, during active surveillance or identified in the provincial hospital summary discharge database. Medical records were reviewed and cases classified according to Brighton Collaboration definitions (categorized as level 1, 2, or 3, corresponding to criteria of decreasing certainty in diagnosis). Immunization status was verified and denominators were estimated from the provincial immunization registry (4.4 million vaccinated) and census data (total target population aged ≥6 months, 7.8 million), with a total of 3,623,046 person-years of observation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Relative and attributable risks were calculated using a Poisson model and the self-controlled case-series method.
RESULTS:

Over a 6-month period, 83 confirmed GBS cases were identified, including 71 Brighton level 1 through 3 cases. Twenty-five confirmed cases had been vaccinated against 2009 influenza A(H1N1) 8 or fewer weeks before disease onset, with most (19/25) vaccinated 4 or fewer weeks before onset. In the Poisson model, the age- and sex-adjusted relative risk was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.12-2.87) for all confirmed cases during the 8-week postvaccination period and was 2.75 (95% CI, 1.63-4.62) during the 4-week postvaccination period. Using the self-controlled case-series method, relative risk estimates during the 4-week postvaccination period were 3.02 (95% CI, 1.64-5.56) for all confirmed cases (n = 42) and 2.33 (95% CI, 1.19-4.57) for Brighton level 1 through 3 cases (n = 36). The number of GBS cases attributable to vaccination was approximately 2 per 1 million doses. There was no indication of an excess risk in persons younger than 50 years.
CONCLUSIONS:

In Quebec, the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) vaccine was associated with a small but significant risk of GBS. It is likely that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slowbell

Mamboni, on the day they schedule to vaccinate you all, can you call in sick? That would be really funny, actually. Take a few days of rest, that flu shot day. :)

---

They have multiple FREE-VACCINE days and fairs - there is no escaping it.

Print out this form and have your DR. sign it before gives the shot!

http://www.reversingvaccineinduceddi...ine-Safety.pdf

Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety
I (Physician’s name, degree)_________________________, _____________ am a physician
licensed to practice medicine in the State of ________________. My State license number is
______________, and my DEA number is _______________. My medical specialty is
________________________. I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all
the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient’s name)
___________________________, age _________, whom I have examined, I find that certain
risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk
factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:
Risk Factor __________________________________________________ ________
Vaccination __________________________________________________ ________
Risk Factor __________________________________________________ ________
Vaccination __________________________________________________ ________
Risk Factor __________________________________________________ ________
Vaccination __________________________________________________ ________
Risk Factor __________________________________________________ ________
Vaccination __________________________________________________ ________
Risk Factor __________________________________________________ ________
Vaccination __________________________________________________ ________
Risk Factor __________________________________________________ ________
Vaccination __________________________________________________ ________


I am aware that vaccines typically contain many of the following fillers:

aluminum hydroxide aluminum phosphate
ammonium sulfate amphotericin B
calf (bovine) serum animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit
brain, dog kidney, monkey kidney, chick
embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
betapropiolactone fetal bovine serum
formaldehyde formalin
gelatin glycerol
human diploid cells (originating from
human aborted fetal tissue) hydrolized gelatin
mercury thimerosol (thimerosal,
Merthiolate(r)) monosodium glutamate (MSG)
neomycin neomycin sulfate
phenol red indicator phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
potassium diphosphate potassium monophosphate
polymyxin B polysorbate 20
polysorbate 80 porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
residual MRC5 proteins sorbitol
tri(n)butylphosphate VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey
kidney cells
washed sheep red blood
and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I
have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosol causes severe
neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.
I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian
Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin’s
lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals.
I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other
live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no
substantive risk to my patient.)
I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient’s name)
___________________________________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies
(also known as “fetuses”).


In order to protect my patient’s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that
the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.
STEPS TAKEN: __________________________________________________ ____________
__________________________________________________ __________________________
__________________________________________________ __________________________
__________________________________________________ __________________________
I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am
recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.
The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, — “Physician’s Bases
for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety.” (Please itemize each recommended vaccine
separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for
administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)
The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician’s
Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles
in Support of Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.”
The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my
opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles Contrary to
Physician’s Opinion of Vaccine Safety.”
The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in
Attachment D , attached hereto, — “Physician’s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of
Adverse Scientific Opinions.”
Hepatitis B
I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose
detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of
Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS,
there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1
year age group, with 47 deaths reported.
I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after
exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have
lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but
that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.

I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become
chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with
an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic
liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific
studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children
under the age of 5 years.
__________________________________________________ _____________________
__________________________________________________ _____________________
__________________________________________________ _____________________
In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk
factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and
have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D, attached hereto, “Non-vaccine
Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors” I am issuing this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine
Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient’s name)
__________________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which
I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual
capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international
treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case. I issue this
document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is
__________________________________________________ ___, an attorney admitted to the
Bar in the State of __________________________________________________ ______.

______________________________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
_________________________________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. _____________________
Witness: ________________________________ Date: _____________________
Notary Public: ___________________________ Date: ______________________

The vaccine empire has collapsed

Tuesday, October 09, 2012 by: Jon Rappoport


You may not have heard the explosion, but it happened.

A review from The Cochrane Collaboration, a widely respected research-analysis team, went over all the evidence, and entered its conclusion:

In healthy adults, no flu vaccine delivers protection from the flu.

Boom!

It doesn't protect against transmission of flu viruses from person to person, either.

Boom!

So all the promotion and all the pandering and all the scare tactics and all the "expert medical opinion" and all the media coverage...useless, worthless, and irrelevant.

Billions of dollars of financed lies about flu vaccines were just that: lies.

It gets worse, because the entire theory about how and why vaccines work is sitting on a razor's edge, ready to fall into the abyss of discarded fairy tales.

We've been told that vaccines stimulate the immune system with a "rehearsal" of what will happen when an actual disease comes down the pipeline. When the disease does show up, the immune system will be locked and loaded, ready to destroy the attacking germ.

But since flu vaccines don't protect against flu or even stop the transmission of flu viruses from person to person, the so-called "rehearsing" of the immune system is merely somebody's fancy story. A legend. A myth.

Also, you can forget about the widely sold herd-immunity tale. How can the group be immune when vaccines are doing nothing to prevent the free movement of germs from person to person?

As always, The Cochrane Collaboration did an exhaustive review of all previous studies on flu vaccines they could discover. They rejected the studies that were badly constructed. In some cases, to expand available data, they contacted individual researchers who had conducted studies.

Therefore, Cochrane's findings represent the best of the published literature on flu vaccines. However, because the Cochrane team owes nothing to pharmaceutical companies, they analyzed the literature with sober eyes and minds.

Here is an interesting comment from the analysis: "The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions..."

Now who in the world would benefit from such manipulating?

Oh yes. One other thing.

The Cochrane review, published by John Wiley and Sons, appeared online on July 7, 2010.

Over two years ago.

We must have missed the massive mainstream media coverage. Perhaps we were fishing that day, or buying tires for the car, or vacationing on our yachts in the Mediterranean.

What? There was no massive media coverage? Impossible. I mean, surely...http://www.naturalnews.com/037471_va...airy_tale.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mamboni

Excellent site - many useful links there - thank you.

I cannot utilize the religious exemption as it were.

---

Here is an interview with Alan Phillips from the Vaccine Rights website that Sunshine05 mentioned. Religious exemptions are much broader than what many people think they are.

You can skip the first ~6 minutes without missing anything.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nbn3NWMVLDc&feature=player_embedded#t=2114 s

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Katmandu

Here is an interview with Alan Phillips from the Vaccine Rights website that Sunshine05 mentioned. Religious exemptions are much broader than what many people think they are.

You can skip the first ~6 minutes without missing anything.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nbn3NWMVLDc&feature=player_embedded#t=2114 s

---

A lot of words, no clear answers, uncertain outcome. Jeez, these lawyers will be the death of us all. I got a frickin' headache listening to this guy saying absolutely nothing concrete or actionable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mamboni

A lot of words, no clear answers, uncertain outcome. Jeez, these lawyers will be the death of us all. I got a frickin' headache listening to this guy saying absolutely nothing concrete or actionable.

---

I had the same irritation with the video. But I still did learn a thing or two, and was hoping there would be something in there that might be of use for others too.

so mamboni, how long to V-day? have they established a deadline for you and the other doctors to have received your shot?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by freespirit

so mamboni, how long to V-day? have they established a deadline for you and the other doctors to have received your shot?

---

No deadline spelled out. But after reading the medical literature, I find the potential side effects acceptable from a riak standpoint - it is exceedingly low. As to the question of taking the flu vaccine - I do not like being told that I have to do anything, especially when it impacts directly on my body. But, I cannot make a defensible case against the vaccine vis-a-vis the evidence. On a practical side, I am a private contractor. If I miss 3 days of work, the cost to me personally is in the thousands of dollars. Balance that against the flu vaccine likely reducing my chance of contracting flu by about half. From a business standpoint, the flu vaccine is a fair hedge against loss. Now there are those in the alternative media who claim that the vaccine has long term detrimental health effects (i.e. damaged immunity, increased risk of Alzheimer's disease etc.). I have investigated the peer-reviewed studies and cannot find the publications to back up these claims. The Cochrane report finds thst flu vaccine has little to no benefit to the population in general. But to the specific question of whether mandatory vaccination of healthcare workers is a net benefit vis-a-vis preventing nosocomial flu there is one paper, only one, that does show significant benefit in preventing infection of patients and reducing worker sick time. So if I try to fight the shot, I standing on empirical quicksand.