Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ares

Agreed, Newtonian physics and General Relatively have a hard time explaining gravity outside of our own planet. Once you ratchet up the scale you start having to compensate for variations which are not explained by either.

I'm a hard data guy, I look at data day in and day out. Data NEVER lies, however data can be misinterpreted. :) Which is why it is helpful to have as many eyes on the data as possible to see if the same conclusion is reached. If not then help run through the data to show a different outcome.

---

I think gravity works hundred percent on a planetary scale. I have a problem seeing how it could keep a nuclear bomb star from instantaneously disintegrating. It is obvious it isn't sufficient in keeping galaxies together, behaving like they do. I think electrical universe theories fills a void here.

The gravity in the center of a galaxy is essentially zero (barred absence of a supermassive black hole, eating the galaxies newborn stars), thus an electrical vortex created by a magnetic field makes a perfect explanation for the rapidly rotating plasma staroids in the center. The magnetic field sucks in electrons and protons from surrounding space, and that is the building material of the first generation stars.

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...CsRa6HZAPexYgZ
We are not sucked into it, we are spun out of it!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neuro

I think gravity works hundred percent on a planetary scale. I have a problem seeing how it could keep a nuclear bomb star from instantaneously disintegrating. It is obvious it isn't sufficient in keeping galaxies together, behaving like they do. I think electrical universe theories fills a void here.

The gravity in the center of a galaxy is essentially zero (barred absence of a supermassive black hole, eating the galaxies newborn stars), thus an electrical vortex created by a magnetic field makes a perfect explanation for the rapidly rotating plasma staroids in the center. The magnetic field sucks in electrons and protons from surrounding space, and that is the building material of the first generation stars.

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...CsRa6HZAPexYgZ
We are not sucked into it, we are spun out of it!

---

I'm not so sure Electric Universe does answer those questions. I'm leaning more towards an unknown magnetic physics we are not aware of yet. We do not fully understand gravity or magnetics. Or even Molecular structures yet, just this past year there is a breakthrough in Hyrdogen where a company in New Jersey created a new form of Hydrogen called "Hydrino" that has immense power. They are in the process of creating an energy source called "SunCell" with it with plans to start leasing prototypes sometime this year.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ares

I'm not so sure Electric Universe does answer those questions. I'm leaning more towards an unknown magnetic physics we are not aware of yet. We do not fully understand gravity or magnetics. Or even Molecular structures yet, just this past year there is a breakthrough in Hyrdogen where a company in New Jersey created a new form of Hydrogen called "Hydrino" that has immense power. They are in the process of creating an energy source called "SunCell" with it with plans to start leasing prototypes sometime this year.

---

I would recommend you to have a look at these video's posted by vacuum in 7ths magnetic thread. If you haven't done so already...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vacuum

This guy's videos has some striking similarities to The Primer Fields videos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EPlyiW-xGI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NogyJ0k8Kw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpI6ikj1G-s

---

I saw them here a few years ago, courtesy of Horn, and I must say it changed the way I viewed the universe a lot. I wonder what happened to the guy, he kind of stopped mid-sentence with these videos.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neuro

I would recommend you to have a look at these video's posted by vacuum in 7ths magnetic thread. If you haven't done so already...

I saw them here a few years ago, courtesy of Horn, and I must say it changed the way I viewed the universe a lot. I wonder what happened to the guy, he kind of stopped mid-sentence with these videos.

---

Good question, he also disabled comments on the videos. Never a good sign when wanting to spark debate on new science but yet block the discussions... I'll give them a view when I get some time.

In the videos I have posted Thornhill EU explains Neutrinos. Facts are many explainations of the Universe become apparent with EU theory. It (the universe) also returns to a classical view of the universe. Gravity remains though replaced with by electroplasma drivers.

Many unknowns fall into place in EU.

"Dark Matter" is bologna and tries to retain relativity Big G.

Big G fusion gas driven stars are not observable, our own Sun refutes it flatly. More power is needed than Big G to drive the universe. It only makes sense that it comes from electrically driven Birkeland currents.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

In the videos I have posted Thornhill EU explains Neutrinos. Facts are many explainations of the Universe become apparent with EU theory. It (the universe) also returns to a classical view of the universe. Gravity remains though replaced with by electroplasma drivers.

Many unknowns fall into place in EU.

"Dark Matter" is bologna and tries to retain relativity Big G.

Big G fusion gas driven stars are not observable, our own Sun refutes it flatly. More power is needed than Big G to drive the universe. It only makes sense that it comes from electrically driven Birkeland currents.

---

Where is the DATA???

I don't care what someone says. I want to see the data. His claims need to be VERIFIED and that cannot happen without data.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj-qBUWOYfE

The data is provided by neutrino detection.

The only difference is how it is generated, standard theory claims it has all the answers but nothing adds up. EU theory does not claim to have all the answers though most all observed data Does line up. The data is the basis of the theory, All of it plainly observable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

The data is provided by neutrino detection.

The only difference is how it is generated, standard theory claims it has all the answers but nothing adds up. EU theory does not claim to have all the answers though most all observed data Does line up. The data is the basis of the theory, All of it plainly observable.

---

Except for Neutrino's which for the past 70 or so years indicates that Neutrinos are a by-product of a nuclear reaction. Unless you're saying that the sun is still nuclear but draws its sustained energy source from the Electric Universe?

Electric universe deals on the scale and interconnectivity of the universe. What reactions occur at the corona of the Sun are a result of universal scale reactions. Mankind certainly is not capable of reproducing those on Earth. Well maybe if any thought were directed towards it.

Ever heard of Sonoluminescence?

"Sonoluminescence is the emission of short bursts of light from imploding bubbles in a liquid when excited by sound."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminescence

The creation myth of the Biblical Genesis describes "sonoluminescence". First it begins with "And God said, let there be light" (Genesis 1:3) which is first sound (said) followed by "light", then the "waters" are divided. Genesis 1:2 says that the waters existed before God said.

"Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters." --Genesis 1:2

Where exactly does sound go to die? Or is sound transmuted into light? Science tells us that the universe and all of the planets emit continuous sound. Nature uses everything it produces. Why is it producing comstant sound & what is it utilizing that sound for?

Genesis 1 describes everything springing forth from the "waters" after the sound (frequency) began.

Sounds like sonoluminescense creates the electric universe???

Hey BB, thanks for dropping by.

I have a genuine intesrest in sonoluminescence. And I saw that vid showing the light created by a shrimp making an implosion wave/frequency. As above so below, more than ever.

The problem with scientism is that it wants everything to be verifiable, but only the unknown/hidden drives research and reality. So there is no way to prove anything in the end. Just projections, confirmed or not as time goes. That is precisely why the nobel doctrine must be terminated

But any concept probing electricity and its impact on everything gets a big support from me, as electricity drives consciousness and even DNA, which also stores data extracted from Light.

Light and Water have supranatural properties. Never mention anything esoteric about them or one gets trashed, ridiculed, burned at the stake.

fantasy creates reality... depends on what you believe in. Right!!! LOL

be well

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BarnkleBob

Ever heard of Sonoluminescence?

"Sonoluminescence is the emission of short bursts of light from imploding bubbles in a liquid when excited by sound."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminescence

The creation myth of the Biblical Genesis describes "sonoluminescence". First it begins with "And God said, let there be light" (Genesis 1:3) which is first sound (said) followed by "light", then the "waters" are divided. Genesis 1:2 says that the waters existed before God said.

"Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters." --Genesis 1:2

Where exactly does sound go to die? Or is sound transmuted into light? Science tells us that the universe and all of the planets emit continuous sound. Nature uses everything it produces. Why is it producing comstant sound & what is it utilizing that sound for?

Genesis 1 describes everything springing forth from the "waters" after the sound (frequency) began.

Sounds like sonoluminescense creates the electric universe???

---

sololuminesence has more than 3 sylablles.

Horn stays away from those and flat spots on the Earth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5MxX-rx_M0

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5MxX-rx_M0

---

Halfassed, belieforiented and convoluted. You really have to squint hard to "see" it...

The thing with gravity is, it doesn't matter if you believe in it or not, it works anyway.

He mentioned someone called Paris Boulter or something like that, that had disproved Newtons assertion that gravity is connected to the mass of the object. I googled it but couldn't find anything.

Robert Otey is one of my biggest favs, and is a total Walter Russell advocate. Look for Mark Presti, same type of teacher.

Halfassed, belieforiented and convoluted, says neuro. Many people may dislike the EU theory because it deals with pure energy as a prime cause. Just like anything else, in science, the more one probes the more one finds that everything is the result of pure energy, aka metaphysics. That is where sacred geometry fits in... look at this thumbnail, it tells the whole story. Energy follows geometry, as everything spins and vibrates. But of course, neuro doesnt know that living geometry is knowledge or doesnt want to admit it, so he tags it as a convoluted belief.

scientism wants everything materially provable. That is atheism. The Thrive documentary gets it right. The torus is what all science needs to understand first. And electricity activates the torus.

I am so through with this darwinian ape-like civilization, we are just getting what we deserve... and we need to wake up before it is too late.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5MxX-rx_M0

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neuro

Halfassed, belieforiented and convoluted. You really have to squint hard to "see" it...

The thing with gravity is, it doesn't matter if you believe in it or not, it works anyway.

He mentioned someone called Paris Boulter or something like that, that had disproved Newtons assertion that gravity is connected to the mass of the object. I googled it but couldn't find anything.

---

It should actually be easy to prove the theory of "gravity" being electrical vortices with polarities that spins around so quickly that we think it is a constant force. You just need to design a scale that measures weight continuously every milli-/micro-/nano-second whatever the speed of the change in force field is, and you would see huge weight differences measured, sometimes weightlessness, sometimes you'll weigh in at hundreds of tons when you are exactly right in the electric field vortex.

Did someone do this experiment?

was a pleasure to watch it again: please notice how the fibonacci model is collapsing mainstream physics.

In fact, my book on emotions applies this theory to human cognitive functions, that the latter always seek Cosmic Rest, or Stillness. This would shatter standard psychology as finding emotional rest is what every human struggles to achieve in life. Being centered. In short, thoughts respond electric fields, and the result of mating electric fields emanating from the left and right brain.

well, singular is into fantasy model... makes me smile

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5MxX-rx_M0

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neuro

The thing with gravity is, it doesn't matter if you believe in it or not, it works anyway.

---

living geometry works in the entire universe, 101% of the time

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by singular_me

was a pleasure to watch it again: please notice how the fibonacci model is collapsing mainstream physics.

In fact, my book on emotions applies this theory to human cognitive functions, that the latter always seek Cosmic Rest, or Stillness. This would shatter standard psychology as finding emotional rest is what every human struggles to achieve in life. Being centered. In short, thoughts respond electric fields, and the result of mating electric fields emanating from the left and right brain.

well, singular is into fantasy model... makes me smile

---

You didn't write a book.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by singular_me

living geometry works in the entire universe, 101% of the time

---

101% doesn't seem at all geometrical... ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by singular_me

Robert Otey is one of my biggest favs, and is a total Walter Russell advocate. Look for Mark Presti, same type of teacher.

Halfassed, belieforiented and convoluted, says neuro. Many people may dislike the EU theory because it deals with pure energy as a prime cause. Just like anything else, in science, the more one probes the more one finds that everything is the result of pure energy, aka metaphysics. That is where sacred geometry fits in... look at this thumbnail, it tells the whole story. Energy follows geometry, as everything spins and vibrates. But of course, neuro doesnt know that living geometry is knowledge or doesnt want to admit it, so he tags it as a convoluted belief.

scientism wants everything materially provable. That is atheism. The Thrive documentary gets it right. The torus is what all science needs to understand first. And electricity activates the torus.

I am so through with this darwinian ape-like civilization, we are just getting what we deserve... and we need to wake up before it is too late.

---

Yes let's go back to pre-civilization, ignore scientific progress, and spend our time pursuing magic and superstition instead. You really are insane.

I spent most of my time defending and promoting Electric Universe theory in this thread. It makes sense from a scientific point of view in that it explains aspects that are not readily explained by the standard gravitational model. That should be a clue to Singular to abandon it...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neuro

Yes let's go back to pre-civilization, ignore scientific progress, and spend our time pursuing magic and superstition instead. You really are insane.

I spent most of my time defending and promoting Electric Universe theory in this thread. It makes sense from a scientific point of view in that it explains aspects that are not readily explained by the standard gravitational model. That should be a clue to Singular to abandon it...

---

Ha!
At least it makes sense to some. I just need some hard data to back it up.
Singular can piss and moan all day long about Scientism, but I find it ironic that the very object of her objection is used to post on this board. Without Scientism there would be no electricity, internet, or even a computer. Without Scientism there would be no Electric Universe theory because there would be no tool to make those observations to even form the theory.

Like I said she's a Contrarian. Whatever the prevailing thought, she just HAS to be different.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ares

Ha!
At least it makes sense to some. I just need some hard data to back it up.
Singular can piss and moan all day long about Scientism, but I find it ironic that the very object of her objection is used to post on this board. Without Scientism there would be no electricity, internet, or even a computer. Without Scientism there would be no Electric Universe theory because there would be no tool to make those observations to even form the theory.

Like I said she's a Contrarian. Whatever the prevailing thought, she just HAS to be different.

---

I do agree with you that EU-theory needs to be backed up by observation. The presence of neutrino's from sun would certainly disprove a 100% electrical sun. There are things in the theory that are not easily supported by observation, like supernovas and red giants. However I am not sure these events are supported well in standard gravitational fusion model either. Why does a star need to burn through a certain amount of hydrogen before it goes supernova? Why doesn't it do that immediatelly? The red giant Aldebaran has a fluctuating size of the orbit of Jupiter or Saturn, but its mass is a mere 10-20x our suns (from memory), it means it is pretty much empty space, a vacuum, but still it is supposed to maintain a fusion reaction in its interior?

And then you have the rapidly rotating stars in center of galaxies, absent a mysterious black hole of doubtful existence, there is nothing gravitational that would make them behave like this since gravity in center of the mass of a galaxy is zero.

Sure the essence of gravity fields are not very well understood, neither are the essence of magnetic fields. One seems to be mass generated and the other electrical generated. Sure mass=energy=electricity, but it doesn't mean they should behave through the same physical laws in the different shapes of energy they are in.

If you say that I am insane, then all the religious textbooks are indeed insane, but when I show you the roots of this so-called insanity, you turn your head the other way and endorse denial.

That Newton was deep into hermetic knowledge, (so Mark Planks that came up with the term "quantum physics" because he knew that the word "esoteiricsim" would doom his work) and so where all greatest physicists, which ultimately sold their soul to atheism and it so called scientific method.

you do not get it... everything is harmful thus wrong... lies are harmful... what progress? we are destroying earth at a pace like never before. Progress? the use of oil or the invention of plastic or even building construction which now require to destroy full islands to get the sand for concrete because the desert sand isnt good enough. Progress, now robotics that is going to eliminate all jobs and which the average people are not prepared for and will ultimately riot because of the ensuing economic squeeze (right around the corner). What progress, the AI weapons that will destroy the planet if we dont stand against it. What progress? The right to plunder african subhumans and dump our etrash (worth 32BN yearly for america only) onto them?

Everything created by man since the industrialization is harming the planet to no end. And you call that "progress". ROFLOL.


YOU CALL PROGRESS WHAT IS THE RESULT OF A DARWIAN APE-LIKE LEFT BRAIN - BUT IN MUCH WORSE because man cannot even afford behaving like animal. A real civilization does NOT destroy itself. You can blame the usual suspects as much as you and continue to avoid taking responsibility. All this because the metaphysIcs of Life are not taught but primitive relIgious doctrines that 90% do NOT understand (but it was designed this way) j-- just like you.

You are talking of magic, yes if you have to explain the Torus, one has to resort to metaphysics, where is the electricity coming from (that you endorse EU or not). Once the torus is accepted to be the drive of all life, it appears everywhere.

The deeper we probe anything the more you will find space and electric fields. At a subatomic level as much as in the far space. As above so below. And this is impossible to explain this rationally, with the so-called scientific method. Trying to applying this scientific method is what corrupts scientific mindset, because everything must fit within that materialistic parameter. So all what is left is harmful.

Life itself is magic and this MAGIC HAS A LIVING GEOMETRY to prove its realness. Period. Now you can be upset as much as you want, throw a tantrum, I really dont care.

Please explain how electricity comes into existence then... and how its characteristics do affect matter.

Ohh, yeah it is how just Nature organizes itself = PURE atheistic thought.

But I am insane ??? ;D And enjoying it.



electric wave shaped by living geometry
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=...ecycle.jpg&f=1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neuro

Yes let's go back to pre-civilization, ignore scientific progress, and spend our time pursuing magic and superstition instead. You really are insane.

---

Yes you are insane. If you actually believe the bullshit you are spouting, and actually wanted to take responsibility, the only moral action would be to stop using modern technology, computers, plastic, internet, electricity. For fucks sake look yourself in the mirror before you start casting rocks. You are criticizing science (or now it became scientism), and you have no idea what science is. Not even the basics. I am aware of Newtons delving into the mystical, so what? You are now saying everything in universe is generated by electricity... Really? Love, emotions too? I don't think so...

You are a fanatic ignoramus!

thank you...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by singular_me

thank you...

---

For what?

for sharing your atheistic 2 cents

I have nothing to add anymore, but this picture, showing the symbiosis between electric currents and living geometry

see the heart beat in it? I DO!


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-f4m2jZyofX...eld_medium.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by singular_me

for sharing your atheistic 2 cents

---

You are projecting! Satanist!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by singular_me

I have nothing to add anymore, but this picture, showing the symbiosis between electric currents and living geometry

see the heart beat in it? I DO!


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-f4m2jZyofX...eld_medium.gif

---

You do realize it is CGI, don't you? And yes it's excellent Earth has a magnetic field that protect us from cosmic radiation. It even allows your stupidity to reach extradimensional heights.

Quote:

---

I do agree with you that EU-theory needs to be backed up by observation.

---

how scientific is that statement, when it doesnt take into consideration that all observation ends up hitting a brick wall because the observation of an observation of an observation (and so on at infinitum) leads to the same result: empty space (illusion of matter) and pure energy.

so anybody who only wants to deal with the visible, what can be seen with the eye, regards science as an atheistic realm. Or sophisticate computers, but then one has to rely on faith in computers too.

So there you have it, all sciences will end up dealing with the Theory of Pure Energy, that is Light and its derived components (which too influence thoughts as I have said many times now)

DIRECT 3D OBSERVATION OF ELECTRICITY CURRENTS ON EARTH
Meteorologists estimate that, at any given moment, some 1,800 thunderstorms are in progress over Earth's surface, and about 18 million a year around the world....
Read more: http://www.weatherexplained.com/Vol-...#ixzz4Uw6AsV8Q


https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=...ning14.jpg&f=1


The heart is a vortex itself that pulsates along with electric fields invisible to human eyes... magic... ???

https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=...pid%3D15.1&f=1

FIBONACCI MAKES THE HEART PULSATE.
http://www.natureinstitute.org/pub/i...C7_page15b.gif

BLOOD CIRCULATION IN THE HEART.. two opposite motions, medical cadeucus with two snakes comes also from there
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=...ortex2.jpg&f=1


yeah, life itself is magic, REAL magic... there you have it, mainstream education doesnt want you to regard life differently other than with a carrot and a stick.

enough scientism promoted by the death cult. We see today what it has achieved: planetary destruction


As Arthur C. Clarke pointed out, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."... and my emphasis: so is science
http://www.photonicwater.com/biophotons.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neuro

You do realize it is CGI, don't you? And yes it's excellent Earth has a magnetic field that protect us from cosmic radiation. It even allows your stupidity to reach extradimensional heights.

---

sure I realize that it is CGI, but do you dont even realize that the artist is aware of the physics of vortex and torus. For some reason you are not. A vortex/torus cannot motion if there is not a point of Stillness, positive and negative charges mating, as described by Otey.

mainstream science is killing earth and humanity, abandon the ship... that is my conclusion and advice.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by singular_me

sure I realize that it is CGI, but do you dont even realize that the artist is aware of the physics of vortex and torus. For some reason you are not. A vortex/torus cannot motion if there is not a point of Stillness, positive and negative charges mating, as described by Otey.

mainstream science is killing earth and humanity, abandon the ship... that is my conclusion and advice.

---

The artist is aware of the shape of the magnetic field (yes torus w vortices) and how it reacts to a wave of incoming cosmic radiation. This is the standard magnetic field around a bipolar magnet, so what? Somehow you think gravity works in a similar way, but you have no fucking evidence at all to back that up, the only thing you post is YouTube videos of nutjobs who waste my time talking about things they have no clue about, while being intentionally vague with everything they say. This isn't a fucking alternative to mainstream science, it isn't science at all, its humbug. You are actually supporting the mainstream science/political agenda by posting this bullshit, because anyone with half a brain will sooner or later come to the conclusion that this can't be true, and since you don't give any real alternative to the viewpoint of the corporations and the government, that is what is remaining for those that think they have more pressing things to concern themselves with. The stupid ones you do get, sometimes, or they go to whose voice sounds sweetest or most threatening. The smart ones reject most of your bullshit and corporate science equally with the difference they may actually examine and evaluate and research what makes sense and weigh the evidence and take the viable part of a theory. No matter what Walter Russel said.

If you want me to believe that gravity is actually the same as electromagnetism, then you need to present a viable theory on how it works. To start you off Electromagnetism has two poles of attraction/repelling, gravity has only one point of attraction, the center of the mass of the opposing object. You need to present a theory that reconcile these differences logically.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neuro

Halfassed, belieforiented and convoluted. You really have to squint hard to "see" it...

---

I am pretty sure Neuro likes the fellow producing that video, while highly theoretical, there are many points aligning in it.

Mass has lead too many theoretical travisties, when generalized or given too much "weight" in silly equations.

It might have been useful in past trajectory of war machines and fuel inhaling s.u.v.s, we're getting past those needs. Can we please leave them to Chinese and Mexicans? ;)

The Matrix "Whats Real"?

http://youtu.be/OA3WGf9pX0A

these 10 secs are really hard hitting BB, excellent.

people refuting the EU of course would deny that the micro and macro are exactly alike. Indeed, under such a circumstance, it is impossible to even start having a constructive discussion if this is not agreed upon.

Though it is the only way to see which people out there are the REAL scientists.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by singular_me

these 10 secs are really hard hitting BB, excellent.

people refuting the EU of course would deny that the micro and macro are exactly alike. Indeed, under such a circumstance, it is impossible to even start having a constructive discussion if this is not agreed upon.

Though it is the only way to see which people out there are the REAL scientists.

---

A REAL Scientist!
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...ba24f74a77.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

I am pretty sure Neuro likes the fellow producing that video, while highly theoretical, there are many points aligning in it.

Mass has lead too many theoretical travisties, when generalized or given too much "weight" in silly equations.

It might have been useful in past trajectory of war machines and fuel inhaling s.u.v.s, we're getting past those needs. Can we please leave them to Chinese and Mexicans? ;)

---

Center of mass= Center of gravity. Or do you believe there is another gravity magnetic unipol, situated some thousand miles below earths surface that the moon and the earth rotates around?
http://scienceprojectideasforkids.co...balancejpg.jpg

if this is your response to the statement of Neo (utube link) and me acknowledging it, then you surely lost all rationality. you are desperate, I can see that.... derailing this thread like this is so child-like.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neuro

A REAL Scientist!

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by singular_me

if this is your response to the statement of Neo (utube link) and me acknowledging it, then you surely lost all rationality. you are desperate, I can see that.... derailing this thread like this is so child-like

---

Says the person with a very thin grasp of reality.