Geocentrism

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnQPublic

Not likely. The authors are attempting to claim some type of bias, such as different telescopes being used in the southern and northern hemispheres.

---

Do they even mention the bias of magnetic polarity? One side of earth would get more negatively charged particles, the other more positive....,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neuro

Do they even mention the bias of magnetic polarity. One side of earth would get more negatively charged particles, the other more positive....,

---

Doesn't the polarity flip on a regular basis? Or is that the Sun?

I'm not sure I grasp the issue they have raised. Are they saying that the star systems behind us are older when in fact they should be younger because they are traveling behind us, meaning they came out of the big bang after us, making them younger?

or is it a rotational direction bias? Systems rotating predominately in one direction when there should be a mix of directions?

"more later galaxies" sounds like a 50/50 statement.

probably observed on the debatable "redshift notion", if that is the case, then it certainly is a 50 percent correct statement... light bending in the direction you're heading does not seem too very improbable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Glass

Doesn't the polarity flip on a regular basis? Or is that the Sun?

I'm not sure I grasp the issue they have raised. Are they saying that the star systems behind us are older when in fact they should be younger because they are traveling behind us, meaning they came out of the big bang after us, making them younger?

or is it a rotational direction bias? Systems rotating predominately in one direction when there should be a mix of directions?

---

Polarity of earth magnetism flips every 10 or 100,000 years or so, sun flips every 11 years or so... give or take two-three... No they haven't measured a shift in earths magnetism since we started to be able to think rationally.