Quote Originally Posted by Neuro View Post
Do they even mention the bias of magnetic polarity. One side of earth would get more negatively charged particles, the other more positive....,
Doesn't the polarity flip on a regular basis? Or is that the Sun?

I'm not sure I grasp the issue they have raised. Are they saying that the star systems behind us are older when in fact they should be younger because they are traveling behind us, meaning they came out of the big bang after us, making them younger?

or is it a rotational direction bias? Systems rotating predominately in one direction when there should be a mix of directions?