Police use Assault Weapons and Tank against Home School Mom wanting to protect

[Awoke]

I posted about this conspiracy years ago, in a GIM thread entitled "Cattle Children", because of the Children in Maryland that were herded in and forced vaccinations at gunpoint.

Here is that story: Link

This is not a new tactic. It is a police state which is set to to destroy the family unit, acting in conjunction with policy makers, in this case, the schools.

The formula is simple:
- Make it policy to vaccinate all students
- Make it illegal to not have your child enrolled into a brainwashing institution

If a parent (Such as this lady in Detroit) knows that the vaccinations are deadly, she refuses to get her child injected. Now her child can't attend public school. Being that she is stuck in detroit, likely single, she probably can't afford homeschooling or a private school. (All assumptions on my part)
Now the Child kidnapping services say she is not a provider. The kidnappers see it as child abuse if your child isn't enrolled into a sanctioned brainwashing institution (BWI).

So they steal your kid, destroy the family, and the kid is raised by the state. Ta-da!

This plan is old old old. Destruction of the family has always been a top priority for the conspirators. Forced subordination to the police state is a tool to be used for an end.

Anyways, around the time that I made a huge post on the Cattle Children incident, there was a massive attack going on throughout the different states on Homeschooling. The PTB were doing their utmost to make it nearly impossible to get their kids OUT of the public BWI's. There was a lot of heated discussion. It was a great thread.

The shills were saying the same shit in that thread in 2007 as the shills are saying in this thread now.

The plan is old, my friends.

[po boy]

Good morning oh grouchy nemesis, hehe

It is well know that those who sleep on the duty to protect rights will lose them all. American's have been asleep at the wheel for far to long and now are not happy with the results and are looking for anyone to blame but themselves for the loss of rights they themselves failed to protect.
In a happy fun fun world there are no evil plots and planners but realistically it's always been a rugged struggle.

You can call me names and bitch about the evils of the state all you want, but until you quit CONSENTING to be governed and learn how to defend yourself from the tyrants without violence you'll remain a slave raising the states kids.

[Joe King]

That is your excuse, huh? Piss poor. A google search is not a contract. It obligates no one to anything.

How is it not? Those are the rules you have to agree to if you want your kid in it. You either agree to it, or your kid doesn't get into public school.
How do plan on enrolling your kid? At the point of a gun, or what?

Based on your logic I could make a link and title it: how to debate on message forums with dysgenic. Then all I would have to do is explain in my link that every time someone makes a stupid nonsensical comment in a debate against me, they owe me $1000. You'd owe me a fortune under your scenario.
You seem to be arguing that a school has the power to rule by decree. Guess what? They don't.

dys

That's a pretty weak analogy, dys. I showed you links to random school districts that all require a parent to make a legal determination as to their childs status and spells out the other requirements for enrolling a child in their school.
Same as what the lady in the OP faced.

Call it whatever you want, but you still have to agree to abide by their rules if you want to have your kids enrolled in their school. Don't want to abide by the rules? Fine. Send your kids to private school or home school them.

I posted about this conspiracy years ago, in a GIM thread entitled "Cattle Children", because of the Children in Maryland that were herded in and forced vaccinations at gunpoint.

Here is that story: Link

This is not a new tactic. It is a police state which is set to to destroy the family unit, acting in conjunction with policy makers, in this case, the schools.

The formula is simple:
- Make it policy to vaccinate all students
- Make it illegal to not have your child enrolled into a brainwashing institution

If a parent (Such as this lady in Detroit) knows that the vaccinations are deadly, she refuses to get her child injected.

You must be trying to confuse the issue because she did in fact get her kid vaccinated. She did not refuse that.

Now her child can't attend public school. Being that she is stuck in detroit, likely single, she probably can't afford homeschooling or a private school. (All assumptions on my part)

My assumption is that the child will get into public school now.

Now the Child kidnapping services say she is not a provider. The kidnappers see it as child abuse if your child isn't enrolled into a sanctioned brainwashing institution (BWI).

So they steal your kid, destroy the family, and the kid is raised by the state. Ta-da!

Why did they leave her alone and not "steal" her kid prior to now?
The obviously didn't bother the lady for 13 years. Why didn't they "kidnap" the girl before now? Why wait 'til she's 13?

Is it possible that they didn't get involved until the mom made certain decisions that basicly invited them into her life?

This plan is old old old. Destruction of the family has always been a top priority for the conspirators. Forced subordination to the police state is a tool to be used for an end.

How was it forced? She was left alone prior to her mom asking for State benefits.
ie she asked for the State to get involved, and it did.

[iOWNme]

I googled "how to enroll public school". One of the first links I got was this.
http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/info/enroll/

It clearly says that....
Parents registering their children for the first time in a Montgomery County public school must provide proof of age, identity, county residency and immunizations, unless homeless. Required immunizations must be completed within 20 days of registration.

Excuse me Mr Law Professor, but do you know the Lawful definition of 'Must' and 'Required'?

You have proved it over and over, You know NOTHING about the Law.

[po boy]

Excuse me Mr Law Professor, but do you know the Lawful definition of 'Must' and 'Required'?

You have proved it over and over, You know NOTHING about the Law.

Those are required for those wishing to enroll in public school.

There are private schools and home schooling.

[dys]

How is it not? Those are the rules you have to agree to if you want your kid in it. You either agree to it, or your kid doesn't get into public school.
How do plan on enrolling your kid? At the point of a gun, or what?.

It is not a contract because there is no signature attached to it. And even if there were a signature attached to it, it STILL wouldn't be a valid contract for 2 reasons:
1. coercion.
2. the school has 0 authority to enforce policy that is against the law (example: forced vaccinations). The real law, not the fake law, btw.

That's a pretty weak analogy, dys. I showed you links to random school districts that all require a parent to make a legal determination as to their childs status and spells out the other requirements for enrolling a child in their school.
Same as what the lady in the OP faced.

This is a lie. Nowhere in that link did the school ask the parent to make a legal determination of status.

Call it whatever you want, but you still have to agree to abide by their rules if you want to have your kids enrolled in their school. Don't want to abide by the rules? Fine. Send your kids to private school or home school them.

You most certainly do NOT have to agree to their rules, not if their rules are against the law.

dys

[Joe King]

It is not a contract because there is no signature attached to it. And even if there were a signature attached to it, it STILL wouldn't be a valid contract for 2 reasons:
1. coercion.
2. the school has 0 authority to enforce policy that is against the law (example: forced vaccinations). The real law, not the fake law, btw.

How was she coerced to enroll her child into public school? Per the article, she requested it.
How do they require the other students to get theirs?
...and either way, you are arguing a moot point because because she did not refuse vaccinations.

Try try again. lol

This is a lie. Nowhere in that link did the school ask the parent to make a legal determination of status.

Yes, it does.
http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/info/enroll/

If you'd read the link you'd see that the parents are specifically asked about citizenship status, identity, and residency. {as well as other things}
The answers to those questions are made by the parent after having made a legal determination on behalf of their child.
ie the parent gets to decide what the answers are, and then the school acts accordingly.

You most certainly do NOT have to agree to their rules, not if their rules are against the law.

dys

Within the regulatory system the school operates in, the Courts have ruled they can make rules like those.



If it's truly un-Constitutional and you can prove it, take the school system to Court and get it all overturned....should be easy to do if you are in fact a party to the Constitution. Are you?

[DMac]

Try try again. lol

You find it funny. You really are a sociopath.

[Joe King]

You find it funny. You really are a sociopath.

What's funny is dys trying to make this about refusing vaccinations.
ie he was attempting to twist the topic of the thread to fit his personal agenda, just like Book would do, and I told him to try try again.

[DMac]

What's funny is dys trying to make this about refusing vaccinations.
ie he was attempting to twist the topic of the thread to fit his personal agenda, just like Book would do, and I told him to try try again.

dys used vaccinations as an example. The specific, and very much related, problem in this case were the SSRI meds the child was forced to take.