Horn, acquiescence means you think the other person is correct.
For me to do that would mean I think Book is correct, when in fact I do not think he is correct. So why should I have to agree with him just so he doesn't go off the deep end?....like General did.
BTW, just so you all know, I sent Gaillo a PM and said that he need not ban General over anything he posted to me.
The fact everyone else on here saw how he responded to with his potty mouth is good enough for me. ie it lets them see his character in the bright light of day.
http://www.easyfreesmileys.com/smile...mileys-404.gifhttp://www.easyfreesmileys.com/smile...mileys-448.gifbook & ximmy to the rescue...
I second this. I'd like to see an answer to this question as well. It seems it's OK for Book to put folks on the defensive, by manipulating posts. Joe just sees right through that and points it out, in a non confrontational manner.
I'd like to see a straight up answer to this question.
No one else seems to stand up to Books brutality. So I will.
If it's ok for him to do what he does to me and to anyone else he wants to, I can do it to him. Him and his friend just don't like it.