If I refuse the Flu Vaccine my medical practice will be terminated.

[slowbell]

Mamboni, on the day they schedule to vaccinate you all, can you call in sick? That would be really funny, actually. Take a few days of rest, that flu shot day.

[mamboni]

JAMA. 2012 Jul 11;308(2):175-81.
Risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome following H1N1 influenza vaccination in Quebec.

De Wals P, Deceuninck G, Toth E, Boulianne N, Brunet D, Boucher RM, Landry M, De Serres G.
Source

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. Philippe.De.Wals@ssss.gouv.qc.ca

Abstract

CONTEXT:

In fall 2009 in Quebec, Canada, an immunization campaign was launched against the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic strain, mostly using an AS03 adjuvant vaccine. By the end of the year, 57% of the 7.8 million residents had been vaccinated.
OBJECTIVE:

To assess the risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following pandemic influenza vaccine administration.
DESIGN:

Population-based cohort study with follow-up over the 6-month period October 2009 through March 2010. The investigation was ordered by the chief medical officer of health in accordance with the Quebec Public Health Act.
SETTING:

All acute care hospitals and neurology clinics in Quebec.
POPULATION:

Suspected and confirmed GBS cases reported by physicians, mostly neurologists, during active surveillance or identified in the provincial hospital summary discharge database. Medical records were reviewed and cases classified according to Brighton Collaboration definitions (categorized as level 1, 2, or 3, corresponding to criteria of decreasing certainty in diagnosis). Immunization status was verified and denominators were estimated from the provincial immunization registry (4.4 million vaccinated) and census data (total target population aged ≥6 months, 7.8 million), with a total of 3,623,046 person-years of observation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Relative and attributable risks were calculated using a Poisson model and the self-controlled case-series method.
RESULTS:

Over a 6-month period, 83 confirmed GBS cases were identified, including 71 Brighton level 1 through 3 cases. Twenty-five confirmed cases had been vaccinated against 2009 influenza A(H1N1) 8 or fewer weeks before disease onset, with most (19/25) vaccinated 4 or fewer weeks before onset. In the Poisson model, the age- and sex-adjusted relative risk was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.12-2.87) for all confirmed cases during the 8-week postvaccination period and was 2.75 (95% CI, 1.63-4.62) during the 4-week postvaccination period. Using the self-controlled case-series method, relative risk estimates during the 4-week postvaccination period were 3.02 (95% CI, 1.64-5.56) for all confirmed cases (n = 42) and 2.33 (95% CI, 1.19-4.57) for Brighton level 1 through 3 cases (n = 36). The number of GBS cases attributable to vaccination was approximately 2 per 1 million doses. There was no indication of an excess risk in persons younger than 50 years.
CONCLUSIONS:

In Quebec, the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) vaccine was associated with a small but significant risk of GBS. It is likely that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks.

[mamboni]

Mamboni, on the day they schedule to vaccinate you all, can you call in sick? That would be really funny, actually. Take a few days of rest, that flu shot day.

They have multiple FREE-VACCINE days and fairs - there is no escaping it.

[ImaCannin]

Print out this form and have your DR. sign it before gives the shot!

http://www.reversingvaccineinduceddi...ine-Safety.pdf

Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety
I (Physician’s name, degree)_________________________, _____________ am a physician
licensed to practice medicine in the State of ________________. My State license number is
______________, and my DEA number is _______________. My medical specialty is
________________________. I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all
the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient’s name)
___________________________, age _________, whom I have examined, I find that certain
risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk
factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:
Risk Factor __________________________________________________ ________
Vaccination __________________________________________________ ________
Risk Factor __________________________________________________ ________
Vaccination __________________________________________________ ________
Risk Factor __________________________________________________ ________
Vaccination __________________________________________________ ________
Risk Factor __________________________________________________ ________
Vaccination __________________________________________________ ________
Risk Factor __________________________________________________ ________
Vaccination __________________________________________________ ________
Risk Factor __________________________________________________ ________
Vaccination __________________________________________________ ________


I am aware that vaccines typically contain many of the following fillers:

aluminum hydroxide aluminum phosphate
ammonium sulfate amphotericin B
calf (bovine) serum animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit
brain, dog kidney, monkey kidney, chick
embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
betapropiolactone fetal bovine serum
formaldehyde formalin
gelatin glycerol
human diploid cells (originating from
human aborted fetal tissue) hydrolized gelatin
mercury thimerosol (thimerosal,
Merthiolate(r)) monosodium glutamate (MSG)
neomycin neomycin sulfate
phenol red indicator phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
potassium diphosphate potassium monophosphate
polymyxin B polysorbate 20
polysorbate 80 porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
residual MRC5 proteins sorbitol
tri(n)butylphosphate VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey
kidney cells
washed sheep red blood
and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I
have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosol causes severe
neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.
I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian
Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin’s
lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals.
I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other
live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no
substantive risk to my patient.)
I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient’s name)
___________________________________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies
(also known as “fetuses”).


In order to protect my patient’s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that
the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.
STEPS TAKEN: __________________________________________________ ____________
__________________________________________________ __________________________
__________________________________________________ __________________________
__________________________________________________ __________________________
I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am
recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.
The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, — “Physician’s Bases
for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety.” (Please itemize each recommended vaccine
separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for
administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)
The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician’s
Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles
in Support of Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.”
The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my
opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles Contrary to
Physician’s Opinion of Vaccine Safety.”
The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in
Attachment D , attached hereto, — “Physician’s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of
Adverse Scientific Opinions.”
Hepatitis B
I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose
detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of
Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS,
there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1
year age group, with 47 deaths reported.
I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after
exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have
lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but
that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.

I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become
chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with
an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic
liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific
studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children
under the age of 5 years.
__________________________________________________ _____________________
__________________________________________________ _____________________
__________________________________________________ _____________________
In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk
factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and
have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D, attached hereto, “Non-vaccine
Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors” I am issuing this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine
Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient’s name)
__________________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which
I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual
capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international
treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case. I issue this
document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is
__________________________________________________ ___, an attorney admitted to the
Bar in the State of __________________________________________________ ______.

______________________________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
_________________________________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. _____________________
Witness: ________________________________ Date: _____________________
Notary Public: ___________________________ Date: ______________________

[Serpo]

The vaccine empire has collapsed

Tuesday, October 09, 2012 by: Jon Rappoport


You may not have heard the explosion, but it happened.

A review from The Cochrane Collaboration, a widely respected research-analysis team, went over all the evidence, and entered its conclusion:

In healthy adults, no flu vaccine delivers protection from the flu.

Boom!

It doesn't protect against transmission of flu viruses from person to person, either.

Boom!

So all the promotion and all the pandering and all the scare tactics and all the "expert medical opinion" and all the media coverage...useless, worthless, and irrelevant.

Billions of dollars of financed lies about flu vaccines were just that: lies.

It gets worse, because the entire theory about how and why vaccines work is sitting on a razor's edge, ready to fall into the abyss of discarded fairy tales.

We've been told that vaccines stimulate the immune system with a "rehearsal" of what will happen when an actual disease comes down the pipeline. When the disease does show up, the immune system will be locked and loaded, ready to destroy the attacking germ.

But since flu vaccines don't protect against flu or even stop the transmission of flu viruses from person to person, the so-called "rehearsing" of the immune system is merely somebody's fancy story. A legend. A myth.

Also, you can forget about the widely sold herd-immunity tale. How can the group be immune when vaccines are doing nothing to prevent the free movement of germs from person to person?

As always, The Cochrane Collaboration did an exhaustive review of all previous studies on flu vaccines they could discover. They rejected the studies that were badly constructed. In some cases, to expand available data, they contacted individual researchers who had conducted studies.

Therefore, Cochrane's findings represent the best of the published literature on flu vaccines. However, because the Cochrane team owes nothing to pharmaceutical companies, they analyzed the literature with sober eyes and minds.

Here is an interesting comment from the analysis: "The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions..."

Now who in the world would benefit from such manipulating?

Oh yes. One other thing.

The Cochrane review, published by John Wiley and Sons, appeared online on July 7, 2010.

Over two years ago.

We must have missed the massive mainstream media coverage. Perhaps we were fishing that day, or buying tires for the car, or vacationing on our yachts in the Mediterranean.

What? There was no massive media coverage? Impossible. I mean, surely...http://www.naturalnews.com/037471_va...airy_tale.html

[Katmandu]

Excellent site - many useful links there - thank you.

I cannot utilize the religious exemption as it were.

Here is an interview with Alan Phillips from the Vaccine Rights website that Sunshine05 mentioned. Religious exemptions are much broader than what many people think they are.

You can skip the first ~6 minutes without missing anything.

[mamboni]

Here is an interview with Alan Phillips from the Vaccine Rights website that Sunshine05 mentioned. Religious exemptions are much broader than what many people think they are.

You can skip the first ~6 minutes without missing anything.

A lot of words, no clear answers, uncertain outcome. Jeez, these lawyers will be the death of us all. I got a frickin' headache listening to this guy saying absolutely nothing concrete or actionable.

[Katmandu]

A lot of words, no clear answers, uncertain outcome. Jeez, these lawyers will be the death of us all. I got a frickin' headache listening to this guy saying absolutely nothing concrete or actionable.

I had the same irritation with the video. But I still did learn a thing or two, and was hoping there would be something in there that might be of use for others too.

[freespirit]

so mamboni, how long to V-day? have they established a deadline for you and the other doctors to have received your shot?

[mamboni]

so mamboni, how long to V-day? have they established a deadline for you and the other doctors to have received your shot?

No deadline spelled out. But after reading the medical literature, I find the potential side effects acceptable from a riak standpoint - it is exceedingly low. As to the question of taking the flu vaccine - I do not like being told that I have to do anything, especially when it impacts directly on my body. But, I cannot make a defensible case against the vaccine vis-a-vis the evidence. On a practical side, I am a private contractor. If I miss 3 days of work, the cost to me personally is in the thousands of dollars. Balance that against the flu vaccine likely reducing my chance of contracting flu by about half. From a business standpoint, the flu vaccine is a fair hedge against loss. Now there are those in the alternative media who claim that the vaccine has long term detrimental health effects (i.e. damaged immunity, increased risk of Alzheimer's disease etc.). I have investigated the peer-reviewed studies and cannot find the publications to back up these claims. The Cochrane report finds thst flu vaccine has little to no benefit to the population in general. But to the specific question of whether mandatory vaccination of healthcare workers is a net benefit vis-a-vis preventing nosocomial flu there is one paper, only one, that does show significant benefit in preventing infection of patients and reducing worker sick time. So if I try to fight the shot, I standing on empirical quicksand.