High Ranking US Major General Exposes September 11 High

[joboo]

Yes, because it is illogical to conclude that you could achieve the high priority target with a Boeing 757.

Stopped at 460ft above sea level.

Dude, you're missing the most fundamental concept here. This is what kills me with this whole missile angle, and people still refuse to think about it.

What happened to the plane?? Where did it go?

The flight recorder data shows the plane stopped there...but you're saying it flew away somewhere else.

Ok, well... then flight data is fake.

The flight recorder data is total BS if that's what happened.

Full stop.

Why do you keep using it like it's the truth, it's if it's not, according to your own logic?

You keep tripping up on the most fundamental logistical concept here over, and over again.

[Horn]

Why do you keep using it like it's the truth,

Now you're practicing your jewjitsu witchcraft again, Obiwan.

The only truth you need is a Boeing turning to zero pitch from 15degrees within the space of its own wingspan.

Unfortunately that truth can only be created in your fantasy, as it is impossible in our real world.

[joboo]

Now you're practicing your jewjitsu witchcraft again, Obiwan.

The only truth you need is a Boeing turning to zero pitch from 15degrees within the space of its own wingspan.

Unfortunately that truth can only be created in your fantasy, as it is impossible in our real world.

It has nothing to do with anything but pure common sense.

The flight data shows the plane stopped there, but you're saying it didn't because it's impossible...it flew right over top away somewhere else.

Ok, then the flight data has to fabricated. It's a lie then. This is what you yourself are saying with your own words.

So if it's a lie, then why are you cherry picking parts of a lie, and claiming it to be the truth?

[Horn]

So if it's a lie, then why are you cherry picking the parts of a lie, and claiming it to be the truth?

You were presenting the flight data recorder as truth. I defeated the notion of it as a truth.

The only truth is the front sloped face from the pentagon hole to the highway bridge.

No other truths are needed to present the impossible flight path.

[joboo]

You were presenting the flight data recorder as truth. I defeated the notion of it as a truth.

The only truth is the front sloped face from the pentagon hole to the highway bridge.

No other truths are needed to present the impossible flight path.

You just posted a video above saying that "crash impossible says flight recorder data"

Where did you defeat the flight path recorder data as a notion? You were using it specifically.

Anyhow, when the reality of that logistically becomes inconvenient, the whole thing is still impossible because the angle of the crash makes it "appear" to be impossible?

You're going to have to elaborate on that.

How did the passengers get in the building, and when?

[Horn]

You just posted a video above saying that "crash impossible says flight recorder data"

Where did you defeat the flight path recorder data as a notion? You were using it specifically.

Anyhow, when the reality of that logistically becomes inconvenient, the whole thing is still impossible because the angle of the crash makes it "appear" to be impossible?

You're going to have to elaborate on that.

How did the passengers get in the building, and when?

The angle doesn't make anything appear, it is what it is, and makes it impossible for a Boeing 757.

There's nothing further to elaborate on as far as the question of the thread is concerned, flight recorder, or not.

[joboo]

The angle doesn't make anything appear, it is what it is, and makes it impossible for a Boeing 757.

There's nothing further to elaborate on as far as the question of the thread is concerned, flight recorder, or not.

Show how it's impossible then.

[Horn]

Show how it's impossible then.

Flight 77 would then have been over Pentagon grounds with about 500 feet remaining to level out and to strike the Pentagon "slightly below the second floor slab" at "an angle of approximately 42 degrees".


The Columbia Pike and VA-27 intersection, and the terrain West of the intersection, present a barrier in the alleged path of Flight 77.
According to the "Pentagon Building Performance Report" (page 14), "The first photograph (figure 3.3) captured an image of the aircraft when it was approximately 320 ft (approximately 0.42 second) from impact with the west wall of the Pentagon. Two photographs (figures 3.3 and 3.7), when compared, seem to show that the top of the fuselage of the aircraft was no more than approximately 20 ft above the ground when the first photograph of this series was taken."


Leaving aside the discrepancies between the official account of Flight 77, and the Flight Data Recorder (which NTSB refuses to answer), Pilots for 9/11 Truth calculated the force on the Boeing 757 at 34 Gs, i.e. 34 times the force due to gravity, at the point that it would have to transition from its downward flight to level flight.


With a virtual weight of about 8.5 million pounds, Flight 77 could not have leveled off before striking the Pentagon. It would have crashed at the intersection of Columbia Pike and VA-27. This alone is sufficient to refute the official account of "Flight 77" -- Flight 77 cannot have violated the law of s .

http://www.twf.org/News/Y2010/0911-Pentagon.html

[joboo]

http://www.twf.org/News/Y2010/0911-Pentagon.html

They're using the flight path data which also shows the plane stopped there.

So where did the plane go?

Where is it?

The flight data says the plane stopped there.

Did it land on top of the building, on a dime from 500mph, then enable it's cloaking device, and sit there long enough for them to somehow remove the flight data recorder, then smash it up all convincingly, and toss it in the building then fire off the missile, and recover the data recorder later?

Is this what you're expecting people to believe happened?

...and were not even touching on how the people got in there yet.

Play out the logic. You're either going to use the flight data as being true, or it's a fabrication.

Pick an angle and stick with it.

You're still trying to have it both ways.

There's obviously a huge glaring problem with the flight recorder data, because there's no plane there.

Surely you realize this by now.

Show the evidence that says it's completely impossible without using the flight recorder data.

[Horn]

You have dyslexia.

Leaving aside the discrepancies between the official account of Flight 77, and the Flight Data Recorder (which NTSB refuses to answer),

Any and all flight patterns over the bridge or through the woods apply to the laws of science.

A Boeing is not capable to produce the hole in the side of the building after traversing the rise of the highway, as was evident by the hole in the wall, and the rise to the highway.