Feathercoin

[Horn]

Attachment 5767

[Shami-Amourae]

Exactly what do you think has prevented these bankers from buying up the majority of the mined bitcoins during the last year what's the 300 dma of bitcoins? $80? If they did, you can rest assured it will stay, but manipulated and diluted, with bitcoin futures, derivatives, ETF's, where they can soak up any increase in demand, by just issuing more junk paper, and they make their money on being perpetually short. The only difference with gold and silver is that they are tangible, and they are not replaceable with a similar looking metal in the periodic table, like crypto-coins are. And there are not a virtually endless supply of new metals waiting to be introduced into the periodic table.

Look I do understand your sentiment, I really think I do at least, but crypto-currencies can as easily be controlled by banksters as gold, probably more so (as it is much cheaper to buy into 12 million bitcoins at $80-150, than 5 Billion ounces of gold at $12-1500, and thus they are not a good vessel for our liberation. Silver may actually be a better liberty liner since probably most of it above ground is in common mans possession, and it has been too cheap for the über-rich to consider it as a store of wealth (a ton is only $650,000 a thousand tons is $650 million, which for many über-rich is a small part of their wealth).

A banker can sell a naked paper short of Silver into market, artificially lowering the price of Silver and "increasing" the supply. You can't do that with a Bitcoin. You buy what exists, not what you write down on a ledger. We don't know exactly how much Gold/Silver ounces are above ground. We know exactly all the Bitcoins in existence. If these fuckers try to do a centralized version, people will know and most likely not buy into it.

All they can do is buy up Bitcoins and sell them. If that happens you've pretty much just made a bunch of Libertarians and Crypto-Anarchists rich, and they will take their new wealth and form a new cryptocurrency.

[Horn]

Silver may actually be a better liberty liner since probably most of it above ground is in common mans possession, and it has been too cheap for the über-rich to consider it as a store of wealth (a ton is only $650,000 a thousand tons is $650 million, which for many über-rich is a small part of their wealth).

Silver is the only option for Free Republics since the beginning of time and civilization.

When its coinage purity becomes lessened and dilluted you are not living in a free republic anymore. When you you are living in a Gold controlled nation you are trading wood nickels, while pharaoh trades gold.

Some things never change.

Did I mention it kills masons?

[Neuro]

A banker can sell a naked paper short of Silver into market, artificially lowering the price of Silver. You can't do that with a Bitcoin. You buy what exists, not what you write down on a ledger. We don't know exactly how much Gold/Silver ounces are above ground. We know exactly all the Bitcoins in existence.

All they can do is buy up Bitcoins and sell them. If that happens you've pretty much just made a bunch of Libertarians and Crypto-Anarchists rich, and they will take their new wealth and form a new cryptocurrency.

Explain to me why a banker can't do what they did with silver and gold and apply that to bitcoins. I agree with buying what exists, but most folks thinks it is probably safer and more convenient and easy to buy the banker guaranteed ETF, or a low fee down future or derivative of the real thing, because that way they can maximize the profit on their 'investment', meanwhile the banker ass rape them...

[Shami-Amourae]

Silver is the only option for Free Republics since the beginning of time and civilization.

When its coinage purity becomes lessened and dilluted you are not living in a free republic anymore. When you you are living in a Gold controlled nation you are trading wood nickels, while pharaoh trades gold.

Some things never change.

Did I mention it kills masons?

If given a choice, do you think they would buy Silver coins or Bitcoins?
http://www.mobilemarketingwatch.com/...gh-300x225.jpg

[Neuro]

If given a choice, do you think they would buy Silver coins or Bitcoins?
http://www.mobilemarketingwatch.com/...gh-300x225.jpg

Shoes!

[EE_]

Shoes!

And make-up

[Horn]

If given a choice, do you think they would buy Silver coins or Bitcoins?

If all things were good and proper, in a free republic we keep real money away from women.

Maybe allow them to carry a few doubloon bells around their ankles, as the height of fashion...http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/smilies/smiley.gif

Attachment 5768

Though there are exceptions to every rule...

[EE_]

Explain to me why a banker can't do what they did with silver and gold and apply that to bitcoins. I agree with buying what exists, but most folks thinks it is probably safer and more convenient and easy to buy the banker guaranteed ETF, or a low fee down future or derivative of the real thing, because that way they can maximize the profit on their 'investment', meanwhile the banker ass rape them...

What could you do if you took control of the printing presses for one month? Really?
I know what I'd do and it would raise holy hell on earth for certain groups of people.

[Horn]

I seriously doubt whether many americans will be even able to keep their lights on let alone along with internet and cellular service

long enough to give e-coins a chance.

The Chinese elite are just gambling with all their useless dollars currently.

Until they open up the streets to them.