![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)
(Does use silver...)
Brilliant Light Power
(Does use silver...)
Brilliant Light Power
Attachment 8271
About time for another push for vapor power production, just add money to the kitty to develope it, and become mega rich...
Attachment 8273
"My reading no matter how transient is a dagger in the heart of ignorance."
See 53-58 minutes.
Still not bitting...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliant_Light_Power
"My reading no matter how transient is a dagger in the heart of ignorance."
It is controversial, check out the 8 archives in the TALK section.Originally Posted by Dogman
Followed it (Them) back when called blacklight, I will pay more attention when and if they can hit breakeven and above in power production. Power in = more power out than in = effective despite the % above and beyond the input power level = net gain= useful !
Hell breakeven would be great. power in = power produced = self substaining = hot brick
"My reading no matter how transient is a dagger in the heart of ignorance."
Before investing aunties inheritance, read this...
http://goodmath.scientopia.org/2014/...-hydrino-saga/
the only thing I disagree with is the patent aspect. Not necessary to include a full set of instructions, schematics of the workings etc. That doesn't counter that it looks a lot like a smoke and mirrors, magical process scam for people who don't understand. To me it sounds like a static electricity generator and as the writer points out it seems to deal with measuring only an instant of time/energy, a flash if you will and claiming that as evidence of a continual process. Almost like a lightening strike enhanced by highly dense water vapor.
Great minds discuss Ideas, Average minds discuss Events, Small minds discuss People. E.R.
Anytime I'm in doubt I go outside and give it a little shake.
Liberty Tree.
Without any doubt in my mind, its a at least equal to perpetual energy along with using water for power in gas engines.
Sure you can use Electrolysis to separate the hydrogen and oxygen and then burn the hydrogen. But the process uses more power input for the process than can be extracted for useful work which = net loss of power, which = non viable.
But it is a total hoot and grin, watching people try and scam or not others out of their money and time trying to make any form of perpetual energy work. Not saying it can not happen, but am saying it has not happened yet, despite people trying all over the world throughout all of these years. And some truly believe they can make such a system work, along with others that are only in it to make a buck off the back from others.
Got popcorn ?
"My reading no matter how transient is a dagger in the heart of ignorance."
Since basic physics classes in skool was replaced with climate change political correctness you can fool people with fairy tales...Without any doubt in my mind, its a at least equal to perpetual energy along with using water for power in gas engines.
Sure you can use Electrolysis to separate the hydrogen and oxygen and then burn the hydrogen. But the process uses more power input for the process than can be extracted for useful work which = net loss of power, which = non viable.
But it is a total hoot and grin, watching people try and scam or not others out of their money and time trying to make any form of perpetual energy work. Not saying it can not happen, but am saying it has not happened yet, despite people trying all over the world throughout all of these years. And some truly believe they can make such a system work, along with others that are only in it to make a buck off the back from others.
Got popcorn ?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote