Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?

[Ares]

Back to the drawing board. Magnetic fields is the essence that draws cosmic plasma to the center of the galaxy where stars are formed each of them in essence a magnetic field, then fusion creates the electricity, and the neutrino's, and the magnetic fields. We all agree that gravity on its own can't keep the universe or even the Milky Way together, and instead of introducing occult matter into the equation let's keep it real. Black holes is a theoretical impossibility someone smarter than me calculated, besides why would they sit in the center of the galaxy and eat the freshest baby stars of the galaxy, doesn't make sense. Indeed if true I doubt we would exist out in one of the relaxing lowradiation suburbian arms of the milky way as a 4th generation recycled star, with plentyful heavy metal!

Laura Mersini-Houghton is the author of the paper that proves Blackholes do not exist. She also backed up her findings with data.

In case anyone is interested, here is her Research paper with the data: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.1837v2.pdf

Researching further William Unruh is disputing her findings:

According to Unruh, black holes don’t emit enough Hawking radiation to shrink the mass of the black hole down to where Mersini-Houghton claims in a timely manner. Instead, “it would take 10^53 (1 followed by 53 zeros) times the age of the universe to evaporate,” he explains.

“The standard behaviour by such people [who don’t understand Hawking radiation] is to project that outgoing energy back closer and closer to the horizon of the black hole, where its energy density gets larger and larger,” he continued. “Unfortunately explicit calculations of the energy density near the horizon show it is really, really small instead of being large-- Those calculations were already done in the 1970s. To call bad speculation "has been proven mathematically" is, shall we say, and overstatement.”