'nother update from the same vlogger
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JhpJHvd4Q5Q/h...GeKfA6IxJtR27I
6:56
PizzaGate Update: Huge White House Site Cover Up!
Bait and Sketch
Streamed 11 hours ago 2,944 views
Follow up on the White House Pizza Gate petition. The petition had 94 signatures two days ago, and after hundreds of more ...
^ saying votes have only ticked up to 100; I show 101 just now. Also, vlogger says the petition is "unsearchable" via the WH site's search engine.
Regardless, I was frankly a bit underwhelmed when I read the wording of this petition:
Immediately investigate the pedophile code language found in the Stratfor and Podesta emails released by Wikileaks
Created by Z.T. on January 20, 2017
The emails released by Wikileaks from the account of John Podesta contain declassified FBI code language used by pedophiles. We the people demand a thorough, exhaustive investigation into the terrifying implications of this alleged behavior and wish that all who are involved, no matter how powerful, be prosecuted under the full extent of the law. The same code can be found in the emails of Stratfor employees also released by Wikileaks. This action must be taken to preserve the very fabric of our country and to protect children everywhere who are being abused and trafficked for the sick delight of so many powerful elites. President Trump, there is no better example of draining the swamp, than by flushing these predators down the drain.
So, petition demands that the 'pedo code language be investigated'; WTF is that going to resolve; what victim/victimizer does it indict? 'Investigate the terrifying implications...' more road-to-nowhere bs.
I ask myself, how would I word such a petition better? Tough one, but the general order of quality/reliability of 'evidence' is:
1. forensic (smoking gun, fingerprints, CC-cam video, testable blood, etc)
2. circumstantial (cui bono, life insurance policies, existing feuds, documented prior threats, people's known whereabouts when...)
3. "eye-witness" (worst, coz easiest to fabricate, IE the tall tales of holohoax sur-shysters...)
PG researchers mostly have #2, in the coded emails, & the spooky photos with more coded commentary, & spirit cooking party attendance, & Breitbart 2011 tweet re Pedo-sta, etc. We have virtually no #1 or #3.
Closest thing to #1 forensic evidence I'm aware of, would be alefantes' "pegasus museum" basement work, the hole dug, and how it relates to the alleged catacomb network beneath that location. That's something which can be physically investigated right now. Pretext could be, were "proper permits" pulled for the digging work we see in the photo? Me expects not. This "permits" question, the whole permits history of the address, is publicly accessible?
One thing I never heard anything about: was there GPS-location metadata on the "kill room" photo? That's the same metadata which pinpointed the "pegasus museum" location of the jackhammered & dug hole photo, which alefantes 'sort of' confirmed to Ryan O'Neal in their text chat. AFAIK, checking the metadata of a photo taken on a 'device', requires having a 'local' copy of the photo (file) downloaded to your comp/device, then opening the 'Properties' of that photo/file. Some PG researcher would've needed the foresight to download alefantes' instagram photos for closer (properties/metadata) inspection, very early in this PG chain of events, before alefantes locked down the account from the public.
Anyways, depressing reality is, most of the above investigative possibilities rely on the blue-pill assumption that the investigative agencies, certainly at the key highest levels of their top-down-pyramidal & compartmentalized org structures, aren't "in on it", & dirty/blackmailable themselves to ensure they stay in line.
It appears we're in road-to-nowhere's-ville, unless & until... more wikileaks evidence? If wikileaks is legit & of virtuous intent, what are they waiting for?! Their apparent 'silence' lends credence to the speculation that Assange is either dead, or in (1984's) "Room 101" somewhere, or, or, ?!![]()

![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)



Reply With Quote
