I cannot comment on what yt channel owners can or cannot do but I am getting so disgusted with YouTube and the Click bait that I have started making a list of yt channels never for which to open videos.

Seaman is getting pretty bad as far as not ever really covering Pizzagate or Pedogate. Lately he is getting back at Eric Schmidt of Google/YouTube for cutting his YT income, and he has made the point several times that Schmidt admits having been the engineer or planner of the whole Hillary Clinton campaign strategy, a strategy that miserably failed. Seaman also makes the point that Podesta's consulting/ public relations company or whatever it is had a big contract with Eric Schmidt / Google, a contract that ended sometime in 2016. So Seaman kind of throws these facts out as a way to explain why Schmidt YT is angry and it doing all these ugly algo games and why Schmidt does not want YT to have anything about exposing PIZZAgate or Pedogate on yt because there is fact that Google was paying Podesta company large amounts of money in that contract.

The implication is that Schmidt and Podesta were good friends and that they were approving, and perhaps participants, in each other's "social behaviors", but Seaman only makes veiled implications but sticks to facts on the surface.

There is a woman named Natasha yt channel who is on the Trump train and she makes the point that yt is actually stealing millions of dollars from the producers/yt channel owners. I am not clear exactly how that works in the transfer of money to yt's coffers from the ad revenue but it seemed like an important matter. She claims the whole way YT and Google are set up as corporations is unusual and has allowed them to get away with some very civilly unlawful shenanigans, also something that needs to be investigated.