Making money on Youtube

[Glass]

I think the reference in lyrics to Moonlight says a lot.

Most people think songs are, well just songs. But in reality most are hymns. If you read the lyrics you can't really conclude otherwise.

some obvious ones,
Hotel California
Stairway to heaven
Original sin
Sacrifice
obviously anything ""death metal"

I sound like one of those old Biddies from the 1950's but unfortunately they were right.

[PatColo]

David Seaman,

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/On330gjjP2U/h...eGra7IzcpKkwKA 7:03
Google Is Destroying YouTube w/ Algorithmic Censorship

• 4,163 views
• 4 hours ago

Separately, anyone know if after a vlogger up's a video, chooses the title, & fills in any "More info", do they still have the ability to change the title later on? Ditto more info? Coz I see one re-upper, "Intense 5" who's fond of putting the "BREAKING..." clickbait buzzword in their titles, inappropriateness be damned. So are they stuck with that, or can they change it later on? Looking back over Intense 5's stolen & sexed/clickbaited-up vid cache, they either can't change it, or have no interest... and given that they're well aware the real vid creator's 'story' is no longer 'breaking' by the time intense gets around to DL & re-upping it, that same premeditated deceptiveness obviously means they'll never be amending their "BREAKING..." lie. But, CAN THEY?

I tried to filter Intense 5 out of my daily P*Gate searches, but for some reason adding their particular handle to the list, causes the whole search to return zero results. Remove their handle, search works again.

[Dachsie]

I cannot comment on what yt channel owners can or cannot do but I am getting so disgusted with YouTube and the Click bait that I have started making a list of yt channels never for which to open videos.

Seaman is getting pretty bad as far as not ever really covering Pizzagate or Pedogate. Lately he is getting back at Eric Schmidt of Google/YouTube for cutting his YT income, and he has made the point several times that Schmidt admits having been the engineer or planner of the whole Hillary Clinton campaign strategy, a strategy that miserably failed. Seaman also makes the point that Podesta's consulting/ public relations company or whatever it is had a big contract with Eric Schmidt / Google, a contract that ended sometime in 2016. So Seaman kind of throws these facts out as a way to explain why Schmidt YT is angry and it doing all these ugly algo games and why Schmidt does not want YT to have anything about exposing PIZZAgate or Pedogate on yt because there is fact that Google was paying Podesta company large amounts of money in that contract.

The implication is that Schmidt and Podesta were good friends and that they were approving, and perhaps participants, in each other's "social behaviors", but Seaman only makes veiled implications but sticks to facts on the surface.

There is a woman named Natasha yt channel who is on the Trump train and she makes the point that yt is actually stealing millions of dollars from the producers/yt channel owners. I am not clear exactly how that works in the transfer of money to yt's coffers from the ad revenue but it seemed like an important matter. She claims the whole way YT and Google are set up as corporations is unusual and has allowed them to get away with some very civilly unlawful shenanigans, also something that needs to be investigated.

[PatColo]

I cannot comment on what yt channel owners can or cannot do but I am getting so disgusted with YouTube and the Click bait that I have started making a list of yt channels never for which to open videos.

that's the point of my YT P*Gate search excluding a list of 'terms'; in this case, the channel names I want it to filter out of the search results. Brush up on "Boolean search", https://duckduckgo.com/?q=boolean+search&t=ffab&ia=web

Click my search, and notice the YT search box on the results page begins with *pizzagate, the keyword I'm searching. The asterisk '*' is a wildcard, so there can be a # sign before pizzagate or not, the wildcard will pick up both instances.

then after that, it's a bunch of channel names, each preceded by a minus sign (aka hyphen). If the channel name has a space in it anywhere, then the whole name must be inside quotation marks. If channel has no spaces, then the minus sign followed by the single word (sans quote marks) is sufficient. Place a blank space between each excluded channel name.

my YT PG search above, which also filters for "Today", presently returns 33 results. When I remove all the excluded channel names, & use the same "Today" filter, IE https://www.youtube.com/results?q=%2...IIAg%253D%253D -- it presently returns 49 results. So that's 16 clickbait bandit vids which I was spared having to sift through, and/or maybe view a bit of before realizing they're old BS.

test this out, do your favorite YT search which returns a bunch of clickbait bandits, pick one of their handles, amend your search as described above where your exclude the bandit's channel name, and see if they're still in the results page or not.

[Glass]

David Seaman,

Separately, anyone know if after a vlogger up's a video, chooses the title, & fills in any "More info", do they still have the ability to change the title later on? Ditto more info? Coz I see one re-upper, "Intense 5" who's fond of putting the "BREAKING..." clickbait buzzword in their titles, inappropriateness be damned. So are they stuck with that, or can they change it later on? Looking back over Intense 5's stolen & sexed/clickbaited-up vid cache, they either can't change it, or have no interest... and given that they're well aware the real vid creator's 'story' is no longer 'breaking' by the time intense gets around to DL & re-upping it, that same premeditated deceptiveness obviously means they'll never be amending their "BREAKING..." lie. But, CAN THEY?

I tried to filter Intense 5 out of my daily P*Gate searches, but for some reason adding their particular handle to the list, causes the whole search to return zero results. Remove their handle, search works again.

Its a good question. I don't know the answer myself but I have noticed that some channels simply steal and re-upload another channels content, as if it is their own.

What I have seen is that If the original content producer discovers their content has been stolen, they sometimes change their original. They can certainly change the thumbnail, but I don't recall if they have been able to change the title. I also don't know if they do this by editing what is uploaded or if they are deleting/replacing what is already on line.

The altered content is in the same place / time line as the original but that doesn't tell us if they are able to replace something or only edit it. It's probable thumbnails are separate images to the video file, not selected frames within the video. I've noticed with the Worst Fails, stupidest idiots, dumbest drivers etc videos, the thumbnails are not taken from the content but unrelated.

[PatColo]

^ the thumbnails are definitely a diff image file now; the steal, sex-up & re-up bandits are expert at the enticing thumbnail images. AFAIK, in YT's older daze, they automatically took the center-most frame from the full duration of the vid (obviously with some default instruction if the vid had an even # of total frames), and that was the thumbnail. Now any image file the vlogger specifies can be the thumb; though I believe when the vlogger doesn't specify any image file for the thumb, YT still defaults to grabbing that middle video frame.

Back in the mid/late '00s when I paid attention to 911blogger.com, someone made an instructional blog there telling how to edit a 911T vid for YT uploading, where the center split-second of run time, was a still image of say, a hot babe or something enticing. Then upload with a misleading title, and in combination with what would appear as the thumbnail, you could reel in thousands of peeps who would then find themselves watching say, WTC7's CD, with commentary. At the center of the duration, that split-second sexy still image would flash by. 911Blogger user who made this instructional blog said a few obligatory words about the "ethical question"; and of course rationalized that this is an info war, after all... which I was sympathetic to, in that specific case. The (((JSM))) who the click-dupes got all their 911/warrenterra-hoax beliefs from, are knowing & premeditating deceivers, right? Fire with fire; ethics rules is for fools, when the opponent/enemy ignores them!

[Glass]

^ the thumbnails are definitely a diff image file now; the steal, sex-up & re-up bandits are expert at the enticing thumbnail images. AFAIK, in YT's older daze, they automatically took the center-most frame from the full duration of the vid (obviously with some default instruction if the vid had an even # of total frames), and that was the thumbnail.

Yes the number of bikini bum thumbnails that have resulted in disappointment is immeasurable.

Here's a way to make money on YT. Crash your motorbike for the second time sending you to hospital for months....again. Then sell T shirts and start a Go Fund me. Tough luck to the porsche guy who's car you wrecked.

[PatColo]

SGT Report:

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/BHpm3YPJ9fk/h...VLSabIScwMx32U 12:18
PROOF: Something Very NEFARIOUS is Going On At You Tube

• 3,974 views
• 54 minutes ago

Published on May 9, 2017
It has now become crystal clear that the You Tube 'Adpocalypse' is just phase one of a far more sinister plan to sabotage successful You Tube channels in order to kill competition, robber Barron style, so that the corporate, legacy and mainstream media can yield more power, control and eyeballs on You Tube. What's being done to the SGT Report You Tube channel can be quantified by alarming statistics which prove, the fix is in. As John D. Rockefeller famously boasted, "Competition is a sin."

Random Ryan, as ref'd in the SGT vid above,

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/81iICLqb4jE/h...uXHf3bPav6_P-U 5:38
The YouTube ad revenue/subscriber censorship has his CRISIS LEVELS ADPOCALYPSE

• 1,390 views
• 5 days ago

[Glass]

I think YT are simply keeping the money. I don't think advertisers are pulling that many spots. They are probably removing subscriptions along with hitting the stats of channels, views, likes, shares, new video alerts, eyeball times etc. This will keep those channels low in their algorithms for whats trending, popular etc.

There's a new alternative based on P2P / torrent type platform. Gab is also out of beta testing. Haven't tried it yet because I'm not really into twittering but I think it will get some level of traction even if it's not really going to challenge the big ones. The issue I see is getting the message out to the ignorant won't be possible if you're not using the same channels the ignoramuses are using.

[Dachsie]

I think YT are simply keeping the money. I don't think advertisers are pulling that many spots. They are probably removing subscriptions along with hitting the stats of channels, views, likes, shares, new video alerts, eyeball times etc. This will keep those channels low in their algorithms for whats trending, popular etc.

There's a new alternative based on P2P / torrent type platform. Gab is also out of beta testing. Haven't tried it yet because I'm not really into twittering but I think it will get some level of traction even if it's not really going to challenge the big ones. The issue I see is getting the message out to the ignorant won't be possible if you're not using the same channels the ignoramuses are using.

I think YouTube AND the corporate sponsors are one and same entity. THEY both intend to CONTROL the ideas and entertainment of the masses. It is not about money at this point. We know THEIR game.

David Seaman is putting videos on a new video platform but can't think of its name right now but he says the one bad thing about it is that it is owned by Twitter and really Twitter is in with the same YouTube game -- Limiting our choices and eliminating our exposure to the free and open exchange of information -free speech.