It's a disinfo site intended to fuck with people. It's best to avoid it entirely.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitz
Printable View
It's a disinfo site intended to fuck with people. It's best to avoid it entirely.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitz
Whatever it is its also showing in this video at 1:10Quote:
Originally Posted by Steal
And here
Attachment 4227Attachment 4228http://diversityhuman.com/hollywood/...ime=1355512947Attachment 4229
This one's tight... no show?
http://thumbnail.newsinc.com/2399162...pect=nostretchAttachment 4230
Sumtin's chunky there where it should be...^
http://www.cnycentral.com/news/ndnvi...0#.UNz1h6xj3dU
Video showing hypocrisy of Hollywood actors who made the "Demand a Plan" video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1SZurGArxE
http://media.spokesman.com/picture_s...24b72ce48bf775http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/l...sandy_hook.jpg
Now you see it, now you don't.
Maybe it was a piece of Lanza's skull?
Let's start with the f-ing moron's movies where the good guy always hits his target at 100 yds. while tumbling, and the bad guy can't hit the side of a barn at 20 feet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SW7-8C8kL4Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnQPublic
Fricken troll, WTF prick, you think you own this place? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnQPublic
To Stop Mass Killings, Limit the First Amendment, Not the Second!
Posted on December 27, 2012 by kbarrett
http://truthjihad.com/news/wp-conten...12/lynchTV.jpg
Time to lynch the corporate monopoly media?
The Bill of Rights is a beautiful thing. The First Amendment protects freedom of expression and freedom of religion, while the Second Amendment mandates that the people ARE the military – in other words, the only kind of military allowed to exist in the USA is the “well-regulated militia” consisting of THE PEOPLE, self-organized, and their privately-held weapons.
No other interpretation of the Second Amendment makes any sense whatsoever. If you don’t like it, amend the Constitution – don’t torture logic!
Today, the First Amendment is on life support. Since the coup d’état on September 11th, 2001, the USA has gone to war against the religion and people of Islam. So much for freedom of religion. And many thousands of people, including Sami al-Aryan and Tarek Mehanna, have been imprisoned for their political opinions as well as their religion. So much for freedom of expression.
But the First Amendment isn’t entirely dead. Enough of it survives in the hearts of minds of the people that many serious dissidents, including yours truly, are still on the loose.
The Second Amendment, however, is as dead as Monthy Python’s proverbial parrot. (Except maybe in Switzerland, where the “Swiss Army” consists of the entire adult population of Switzerland, every one of whom is required to own a machine-gun and keep it in a locked box in case someone is stupid enough to invade that country and challenge its “well-regulated militia.”)
Nobody, not even Hitler and Napoleon, is ever dumb enough to invade Switzerland.
The whole point of the Second Amendment was to prevent any armed bureaucratic organization, whether “police” or “military,” from ever raising its ugly head. The Founders (at least the smart ones) knew that unless the people ARE the military and police, they will be oppressed and exploited by the bureaucracies that control the guns.
In other words, power does indeed grow out of the barrel of a gun. The only way for the people to have the power, is for the people to have the guns. It really is that simple.
Unfortunately, the USA, unlike Switzerland, is in an advanced state of civilizational decline. Loonies, Operation Gladio style false-flag killers, and various combinations thereof regularly commit mayhem with the relatively light weapons they are able to obtain.
And since the real meaning of the Second Amendment is so profoundly at odds with today’s reality, after every massacre, an anti-gun mob starts howling for even more restrictions on privately-held guns – without ever calling for the Operation Gladio professional killers, and all of the other armed bureaucracies including police and military agencies, to be similarly disarmed, as the Second Amendment mandates.
Meanwhile, the so-called “gun nuts” of the NRA respond by touting the talking points of the firearms industry.
Any way you slice it, the gun nuts are right about one thing: Banning and regulating weaponry is not going to stop crazy, evil people from committing massacres. Anybody who wants to can easily massacre at least a couple of dozen people, maybe more, without using any “weapons” at all.
Regulating and restricting privately-held firearms – which the Second Amendment would seem to prohibit – cannot possibly stop massacres. But regulating and restricting free speech – i.e. violating the First Amendment – probably could.
Here’s how: Simply pass a law prohibiting any professional media outlet from covering any massacre.
When crazy people commit these massacres, it is because they have seen similar massacres in the media, and gotten excited about them (like everybody else, only more so). They see that committing a massacre is by far the easiest ticket to fame. Any idiot can make their name a household word simply by murdering a whole bunch of innocent people.
And when Operation Gladio professionals commit these massacres, their purpose is to use the media coverage to manipulate popular opinion in service to an authoritarian political agenda.
Any way you slice it, the real culprit in these massacres is THE MEDIA.
Who says that twenty-six deaths in a school is nationwide news, while twenty-six deaths on the highways are ignored? THE MEDIA. Why? Because by hyping the exciting, melodramatic nature of school massacres, and whipping up fear and hysteria, they can MAKE MONEY.
The media are getting rich by lapping up the blood of the murdered children of Newtown, Columbine, and all the other places where lucrative wall-to-wall coverage has, in effect, celebrated the exploits of a mass killer.
It gets worse. Believe it or not, the media are often directly involved in the Gladio-style operations that massacre civilians. For example: The corporate-monopoly media, owned by 9/11 conspirators, was profoundly complicit in the terrorist attacks of 9/11. If you don’t believe it, check out the pre-scripted performances of Harley Guy, Jerome Hauer, Ehud Barak, and Jane Standley of the BBC; or watch the evidence of foreknowledge broadcast shortly before 9/11 in these episodes of The Lone Gunman and The Simpsons.
The film V for Vendetta got this exactly right.
Today, the corporate monopoly media are the real terrorists. They are the ones who are terrorizing us. They brainwash us into fearing “Islamic terrorism,” even though you’re far more likely to be struck by lighting than to be killed by any kind of terrorist; and even though Muslims commit less terrorism than radical Jews, leftists, and hispanics.
Maybe it’s time for President Obama to use his insanely unconstitutional power to order drone strikes against suspected terrorists, and “take out” every key player in every major US corporate media outlet. I mean, if you’re going to shred the Constitution, you might as well go all the way.
Yes, some might call that a violation of the First Amendment. But compared to the violations that have made the Second Amendment a dead letter, executive assassination of every significant player in every significant corporate media organization would be a relatively minor transgression.
And if you think that’s going too far, we could always just prohibit big media from covering massacres (including “terrorist attacks”). Word could still leak out through the non-professional internet media, so we’d all still know what was going on. In fact, we’d probably have a more accurate idea of what really happened at Newtown, or 9/11 for that matter, if everything went straight from those involved to the non-professional media, without the filtering of the professional liars and propagandists.
Severely restricting big media would actually enhance freedom of expression overall. One could even argue that if we really want to respect the spirit of the First Amendment, we should completely shut down the Orwellian corporate media propaganda machine.
And if that’s going too far, maybe we could at least start by convincing the media to act responsibly, and turn the volume way, way down on its coverage of massacres.
Obviously, if we did that, the attacks would stop.
But does anybody, in our corporate-media-brainwashed society of the spectacle, really want them to stop?
http://truthjihad.com/news/?p=249
I don't get this. The 2nd Amendment isn't about huntingQuote:
Originally Posted by BrewTech
No, and it was pretty awsome hearing Jessie Ventura say exactly what it is for on national tv in front of Piers Morgans smug ass face.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glass
Per Zerohead at ZeroHedge (Lanza used pistols, not a rifle, right?):
the local paper quotes the school principal (original deleted this is the
goog cache)
Sandy Hook School Principal Dawn
Hochsprung told The Bee that a masked man entered the school with a rifle and
started shooting multiple shows – more than she could count – that went "on and
on." http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:xDwcObxapXIJ:newtow...
only problem is she was killed
now I don't know bout you but the little local paper that was on the scene, I
Munson-Lovetere Funeral Home was no match for the mourners of Dawn
Hochsprung, the principal of Sandy Hook Elementary School who died Friday
lunging at the gunman to try to stop his terrorizing attack.
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-12-19/national/35929806_1_math-t...
mean do you think they made that up and quoted the principal knowing she was
dead?
PS this is the redacted article from the little local paper with no mention
of ms. Hochsprung http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=&d=27025525379957592&mkt=en-US&setlang=...
By the way, I want to give a big thumbs up to everyone here digging up and posting the real relevant info. You guys are all better investigative reporters that any of the mass media "reporters" reading their scripts handed to them by the controllers. This thread illustrates why mainstream media reporting is dead and/or dying across the nation. This is what journalism is supposed to be!
Has anyone seen any pictures of dead bodies? Or injured people? How do we know the whole thing wasn't just a big'exercise'?
Hatha
Interestingly ANY evidence from the crime scene at Sand Hook School is extremely tightly controlled, as in NONE being available. We've gotten a few overhead shots from a nooz helicopter and that's IT. That is so surreal and bizarre.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatha Sunahara
Meanwhile one can find all sorts of photos of the school massacre in Russia (Beslan) including plenty of dead bodies and photos of the wounded children (without their faces obscured).
Also, what is strange, if you recall the photos after the Colorado theater shooting, there was blood everywhere, stained all over the sidewalks. And here, almost 30 people dead but no blood anywhere to be seen. Not just on the ground, but on the people too, not a single photo of blood stained hands or clothes, that I have seen.Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
So I think this image was taken
http://diversityhuman.com/hollywood/...ime=1355512947
before this one
http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachme...0&d=1356658665
Why those splotches disappear is beyond me. I noticed in one of the images a sherrif is stepping right on top of the splot near the front of the car. Anyway it's clear something is being redacted.
Some other forums had quite a bit of discussion and disection of all the info. These seem to have been steam rollered now so no discussion could be had.
I'm not sure about claims:
the Parker father was an actor.
the girl was photographed after death - with Obama no less
the Ryans have been on TV before as parents of a child during another event - I thought I saw 2 photos supporting this but cannot locate now
the Pshycologist, weird or scared witless. Story doesn't make sense and some comments he made could be read a couple ways
the car is not shooters mothers car. A big argument about this but I thought someone looked this up and matched the towed car to Christopher Rodia
No the car belongs to the felon they found in the woods. Let me try and find it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glass
Glass this is what I found so far and then found this other video just lambasting that fucking kike Rosen as a lying acting sack of shit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs8ITUoe07I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keOG2piLGsM
Fucken horrible shell game being played here but people are figuring this out.
What makes you think the splotches were taken away, or without was a later one?Quote:
Originally Posted by Glass
My thinking was someone through down some patch tar to cover up something.
Another photo of the car.
Attachment 4236
Maybe it was a garment, or something? this angle it has more of a 3d relief.
http://tribwpmt.files.wordpress.com/...hook.jpg?w=900
I looked up the "father" of one of the "victims", Mark Barden. He has a website, is in the music business markbarden.com. He has a memorial fund on his site, bardenfund.com. I looked up the website registration and Dravot Carnehan / Peter Barossi set up the site.
He is involved in film and photography. He worked on a film called Loop Dreams created by Captured Time Productions. http://peterbarossi.com/production/
List of clients:
http://peterbarossi.com/about/clients/
They definitely have some agendas, a film about abortion and a film about globalism. Barossi worked on "Loop Dreams". I find it interesting - the link to films and photography and Hollywood in light of the weirdness surrounding Sandy Hook.
http://www.capturedtimeproductions.com/
ETA: Barossi's website
Many of the people are wearing black or dark jackets, maybe a few of them got warm and left their coats on the ground for a while... ? Just thinking out loud.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
After they've completed their investigation the school will probably be demolished and shipped to China.
I'm just thinking out loud too.
A lot of shit in this video that hasn't been discussed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EEKqcRELz4&feature=player_embedded
I only have patience to watch the first half right now. But that is not a professional medical examiner; that guy is an actor and a loon on psychotropric drugs. Seriously, the ME's conduct is so inappropriate and wrong. As for the father: he acts like it's a big hoax or joke. Then he goes into the "I'm devastated" act.
Something is not right about this whole shooting incident.
Where are graphic images of bloodied bodies?
Why is the staging area half a mile away at the Firehouse?
Why is there a private company that specializes in depicting realistic public scenes of mass murder by lone gunmen using professional actors? Who the heck came up with this business model and who are his clients? Who pays these people? Who needs this type of service? How the heck would the viewer on TV know a mock mass murder from a real one? It's entirely dependent on what the media says it is. Think about that. Is this Sandy Hook incident a false flag? After all, all you know is the images shown to you and the narration provided by the media, the same media that said arab terrorists brought down the twin towers with box cutters.
This is so so wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunshine05
it fits in with the demographics of Connecticut. it's about 10% Jewish, and a lot of the towns, including Newtown, are bedroom communities for people who work in New York City.
the daily routine for many of them is - drive to the train station, take the train into New York City.
same thing in reverse at the end of the day.
it's logical that there would be some 'media outposts' in bedroom communities like Newtown. NYC might be one of the primary hubs for the the media & entertainment & advertising industries (Jew Central), but there's plenty of tentacles in Westchester ... White Plains ... Stamford ... Westport - etc.
They haven't even shown us the surveillance videos from the front of the building, photos from the scene, even the front entrance - nothing. We heard the lengthy dispatch video but NO actual 911 calls from the school. Not even photos of the girl who was covered in blood from head to toe, the one who was "playing dead".
The fact is that they can get away with this - creating news stories that are completely fabricated because the majority of Americans believed the official story and have since moved on.
Ha, yeah let me just hang my coat on the shooters car here for a while... lolQuote:
Originally Posted by madfranks
I dunno, the things clearly look out of place there anyway, like GoD said that one photo looked touched compared to the others.
Then the one without any "sploch" has sumtin lumpy in there. Maybe covering with plastic until forensics gets there?
Yes, something is seriously wrong in the photo. They were hiding something.
Sandy Hook School was PERFECTLY situated in such a way as to completely isolate the 'crime scene' from prying eyes, hence the firehouse was the perfect 'staging area'. (and actually the firehouse is ~1/4 mile from the school, not 1/2 mile)Quote:
Why is the staging area half a mile away at the Firehouse?
Ready to prosecute independent thinkers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4CT4boLPrU
If it doesn't come from this microphone it is not official.
Where is Chad and his take on his friend of a friends child?
In this photo the item lying in front of the car. I think you are right. possibly some kit from one of the military guys, who seem to be everywhere in that photo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
The thing is though that one at the front is not in the same position as the blotch on other images. If you drew a line from that kit straight up towards all those soldiers to the very next yellow line, that would be about where the redacted bit was.
So when are they going to prosecute the lying coroner who said that the kids were killed with a long rifle?.Quote:
Originally Posted by palani
Who says they weren't?Quote:
Originally Posted by collector
NBC News http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98TV7OFazFU who has recently been told by both sate and federal officialsQuote:
Originally Posted by palani
it doesn't mean they weren't, but your question is valid. To keep up the narrative there should be a fix there. Either the guys lying or everyone was killed with a long gun. The ME does qualify what he says by saying "all the ones I have seen". So at that time either he hadn't finished looking at everyone or he wasn't going to look at all of them and delegated some to another ME. It's likely there'd be more than on examiner. I'd like to know how many he looked at.Quote:
Originally Posted by collector
Why anyone would lay anything down in that area (other than to protect evidence from elements) is beyond me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glass
Right, see what you mean, as it appears larger in the other photos.. why that one soldier is crossing over the area is also strange.
http://lonelyconservative.com/wp-con.../Newtown-2.jpghttp://tribwpmt.files.wordpress.com/...hook.jpg?w=900