Printable View
I believe Cedar Rapids is the center of Czech country. I did a couple of jobs there delivering computer systems to Rockwell Collins. Nice town, had a great time, flew down from Mpls on a Saab puddle jumper, bumpy ride both ways.Quote:
Originally Posted by ziero0
So are you retired as you seem to have a lot of time for banter?
My passport is a United States of America Passport applied for online at the Dept. of State website, issued to me at the Dept. of State Consulate in Los Angeles, California and delivered to me in my hand. I got the official passport photo at the Post Office.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigjon
https://s19.postimg.cc/dnu8f0jjn/24_..._A31270_B8.jpg
https://s19.postimg.cc/kfknhi5ur/E6_...B2092_D271.jpg
Yep. Try their Czech-Mex food sometime.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigjon
Retirement is an institution established for the living un-dead. I find non-participation to be a logical course of action unless I develop an insane desire to be taken care of.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigjon
Well I am still having a go at Anna, because her Post Office issued Passport application form does not seem to exist.Quote:
Originally Posted by monty
She's not answering, but she is pretty busy writing one missive after another.
If the Post Office issues Passports, the door to walk through is pretty hard to find.
OK, how big is your tractor? Does it have air conditioning?Quote:
Originally Posted by ziero0
Anna von Reitz
Yesterday at 12:11 PM ·
The Civil War Fraud
-- This is a reprint of an article that explains a small but important part of what went on after the Civil War and it places a glaring spotlight on the mis-administration of our country that went on then and which has continued under the auspices of the Territorial and Municipal United States Governments ever since. ENJOY ---- and thanks to Bill Ward:
The Civil War Fraud
By Bill Ward
When the War Between the States ended, the victorious Northerners viewed Jefferson Davis, as the former President of the Confederate States of America, much differently than others who had served the Confederacy.
For example, when Robert E. Lee surrendered to U.S. Grant at Appomattox Court House, the meeting between the two generals was amicable. Lee was received and treated with courtesy as a senior officer. The terms were so apparently lenient, with Grant conceding to Lee’s requests on behalf of his soldiers, the surrender was referred to as “a gentleman’s agreement.”
However, even after signing a loyalty oath, Lee and other former Confederate Army officers and members of the CSA government were later disenfranchised and treated as second-class citizens. But in the eyes of the northern public, Jefferson Davis was set apart for still a different kind of treatment.
On May 10, 1865, about a mile from the town of Irwinville, Georgia, Federal troops captured Davis. With his arrest on that spring morning, his government ceased to exist. His wife, Varina, and their children were sent to Savannah, where she was kept under virtual house arrest and forbidden to leave the city. Because the soldiers, carpetbaggers and Union supporters treated the Davis children so badly, Varina arranged for them to go to Canada along with her mother.
Davis had been taken back to Virginia and imprisoned in Fort Monroe, where he would stay for the next two years. At first, he was bound in leg irons. Guards watched him around the clock but were not permitted to speak to him. He was allowed no visitors; a light burned in his cell day and night; and his only reading material was a Bible. His treatment was a clear violation of the Bill of Rights.
Many Northern Congressmen and newspapers were nothing short of vicious in their public attacks of Davis. They wanted to see him tried for treason and hanged. In one article, and in one very long sentence, the New York Times referred to Davis by every insulting comment and offensive name that was fit to print. Rhetoric far outran legal reasoning.
But if Davis was in an unusual legal predicament, so was the United States government. The dilemma faced by Washington was how to handle the Davis case. The government under Lincoln had created its own major obstacles by spending four years proclaiming that secessionists were “traitors and conspirators.” The U.S. military had silenced opposition to the administration by closing down newspapers that dared challenge the party line or to make the slightest suggestion that secession might be legal. Thousands of Northerners had been jailed for exercising their First Amendment rights, and those thousands had friends with long memories in the Northern bar.
Northern lawyers were angry for having their clients locked in prison with no civil rights as guaranteed by the Constitution; having civilians tried by military courts for non-existent crimes; having a government that ignored the Supreme Court, setting itself above the constitutional plan of checks and balances. They didn’t like having to beg the president for justice for clients convicted by phony courts-martial or locked up for long periods without any trial. Under Lincoln, the U.S. government had become tyrannical, and certainly anything but a free and constitutional society.
The best lawyers of the day were willing to volunteer to defend Jefferson Davis, because they were angry at the way Lincoln’s government had trampled the Bill of Rights and the Constitution for four years. Even those who didn’t believe in secession were repulsed by the conduct of the Republican administration and the U.S. military.
Charles O’Connor of New York, one of the most famous trial lawyers of the era and a man of great stature in the legal profession, volunteered to be Davis’s counsel. Salmon P. Chase, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, would be the trial judge.
But interesting things began to happen, and the government’s dilemma became even worse. University of Virginia Law Professor, Albert Bledsoe, published a book, “Is Davis a Traitor?” Bledsoe methodically took apart the case against secession, delivering a solid blow to the prosecutors and dampening their zeal to try Davis. Prosecutors actually began to look for a way to avoid trying him without vindicating the South.
Then another method was decided on for prosecution. The attorney general would bring in outside, independent counsel, as we have seen in modern times, such as in Watergate or the Clinton scandals. The government needed someone of great standing in the legal community to be the lead prosecutor. It chose John J. Clifford. But after reviewing the case, Clifford withdrew citing “grave doubts” about the validity of the case. The government could “end up having fought a successful war, only to have it declared unlawful by a Virginia jury,” where Davis’s “crime” was alleged to have been committed.
President Johnson, Lincoln’s successor, thought the easiest way out would be to pardon Davis, as he had pardoned many other Confederates. But Davis refused, saying, “To ask for a pardon would be a confession of guilt.” He wanted a trial to have the issue of secession decided by a court of law — where it should have been decided to begin with — instead of on battlefields. Most Southerners wanted the same.
Northerners either forgot or were unaware of a great secessionist tradition in America. Southerners were not alone in their view that each state had the right to determine its own destiny in the Union. The procedure for joining the Union also applied to withdrawing from the Union.
That thought harkens back to an editorial by the Cincinnati (Ohio) Daily Inquirer, in the summer of 1861, after the “traitor” label was let loose by the North: “The Republican papers are great on treason. . . . It is treason to circulate petitions for a compromise or peaceful readjustment of our national troubles . . . to question the constitutional powers of the President to increase the standing army without authority of law . . . to object to squads of military visiting private houses, and to make search and seizures. . . to question the infallibility of the President, and treason not to concur with him. . . It is treason to talk of hard times; to say that the war might have been avoided. It is treason to be truthful and faithful to the Constitution.”
A year after John Clifford withdrew, the government appointed another special counsel, Richard Dana of Boston, who had written the novel, “Two Years Before the Mast.” But after reviewing the evidence, he agreed with Clifford; the case was a loser. Dana argued that “a conviction will settle nothing in law or national practice not now settled…as a rule of law by war.” Dana observed that the right to secede from the Union had not been settled by civilized means but by military power and the destruction of much life and property in the South. The North should accept its uncivilized victory, however dirty its hands might be, and not expose the fruits of its carnage to scrutiny by a peaceful court of law.
Now, over two years after Davis’s imprisonment and grand jury indictments for treason, the stage was set for the great public trial of the century. Davis had been released from prison on a $100,000 bond, supported by none other than Horace Greeley, the leading abolitionist writer in the North and a former Lincoln supporter. Greeley and a host of others were outraged at the treatment Davis had received, being locked up in a dungeon for more than two years with no speedy trial.
Since two famous special counsels had told the government its case was a loser, finally, none other than the Chief Justice, in a quirk of Constitutional manipulation, devised an idea to avoid a trial without vindicating the South. His amazing solution was little short of genius.
The Fourteenth Amendment had been adopted, which provided that anyone who had engaged in insurrection against the United States and had at one time taken an oath of allegiance (which Davis had done as a U.S. Senator) could not hold public office. The Bill of Rights prevents double jeopardy, so Davis, who had already been punished once by the Fourteenth Amendment in not being permitted to hold public office, couldn't be tried and punished again for treason.
Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase secretly passed along his clever argument to Davis’s counsel, Charles O’Connor, who then made the motion to dismiss. The Court took the motion under consideration, passing the matter on to the Supreme Court for determination.
In late December 1867 while the motion was pending, President Johnson granted amnesty to everyone in the South, including Davis. But the Davis case was still on the docket. In February 1868, at a dinner party attended by the Chief Justice and a government attorney, they agreed that on the following day a motion for non-prosecution would be made that would dismiss the case. A guest overheard the conversation and reported what was on the minds of most Southerners: “I did not consider that he [Davis] was any more guilty of treason than I was, and that a trial should be insisted upon, which could properly only result in a complete vindication of our cause, and of the action of the many thousands who had fought and of the many thousands who had died for what they felt to be right.”
And so, the case of United States versus Jefferson Davis came to its end — a case that was to be the trial of the century, a great state trial, perhaps the most significant trial in the history of the nation — that never was.
Anna von Reitz
23 hrs ·
Pernicious Confusion About Milligan Ex Parte
The Supreme Court decided Milligan Ex Parte in 1866, a year after the creation of quasi-military courts in ten military districts covering eleven Southern States in May of 1865.
These courts were formed by the Rump Congress immediately following Lee's surrender at Appomattox, Virginia, in April of 1865.
Basically, a General "of at least the rank of a Brigadier" was put in charge of appointing civilians loyal to the North to act as Judges in Southern Courts: carpetbaggers.
These people were all either transported to serve as judges in these new quasi-military courts or they were hated members of their own communities --- Yankee Sympathizers --- who were given plenary power over their defeated neighbors, to rape, pillage, and plunder whatever property was left in the South.
It caused such an outcry that Milligan Ex Parte was rushed through the United States Supreme Court for remedy just a year later. The Court clearly stated that when civilian courts resumed operations in the military districts, the quasi-military tribunals were to shut down.
Instead, by a process of fraud based on similar names deceit and usurpation, the civilian courts were surreptitiously replaced by these same quasi-military tribunals operating throughout the nation.
That's where we find ourselves today, still cluelessly wrestling with the unresolved detritus of the so-called Civil War, still putting up with quasi-military courts --- which we could replace simply by operating our own civilian courts and invoking Milligan Ex Parte.
Recently, people unaware of this history, have brought forward Milligan Ex Parte and attempted to use this as an argument against President Trump's proposed use of military tribunals to try civilian criminals ---- however this reasoning is based on false assumptions that derive from ignorance about which courts Milligan Ex Parte is talking about, and assumes that it is addressing military courts in general.
As you can see, instead, it is only addressing the quasi-military civilian tribunals created in May 1865, not the actual military courts at all.
In my opinion, President Trump is acting correctly and Milligan Ex Parte has nothing to do with it. The vast majority of the criminals he is dealing with are US Territorial or Municipal citizens and they are subject to military courts as a result.
As for the rest of us, it is long overdue for us to stir our stumps, get our own political status records corrected, form our Jural Assemblies, and shut down the quasi-military courts operated by the Territorial United States using Milligan Ex Parte in its correct place and interpretation to do so.
Anna von Reitz
23 hrs ·
Demand and Decree
To boil it down pure and simple --- the Federal Government was created to exercise certain "Delegated Powers".
Three different levels of Federal Government were created --- the actual Federal Government operated by the States of America formed in 1781, which was moth-balled under conditions of deceit and fraud in 1868, the Territorial Government designed to administer new territorial acquisitions under the Northwest Ordinance and such Insular States and possessions (like Puerto Rico and Guam) and the Municipal Government to administer Washington, DC.
Over the last three years, all three levels of this "Federal Government" have been rendered incompetent. The actual Federal Government is still dormant pending completion of its "reconstruction". Both the Territorial and Municipal Government have gone bankrupt.
By Operation of Law, the Delegated Powers have returned to the source Delegating those Powers in the first place ---- The United States of America, its member States, and its People.
The text of The Demand and Decree accepting and acknowledging the return of these Powers and demand for the return of our assets is dated June 6, 2018 and the actual pdf copies and mailing receipts are being posted on my website: http://www.annavonreitz.com/
http://annavonreitz.com/demand/Deman...20page%201.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/demand/Deman...Receipt%20.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/demand/Deman...%20Mailing.pdf
Anna von Reitz
16 hrs ·
Native Leaders -- Use Your Heads
If I had gone along with the "deal" Chief Fasthorse was promoting, I would have been signing your death warrants instead of welcoming you to the table. Most likely, I would have been signing my own death warrant, too.
You have to think things through and not just from your own perspective.
There is no way for 15 million Native Americans from at least 100 different tribes to come in and establish a superior claim and take away the land rights of 350 million other Americans without a bloodbath.
Such a thing would create a reason--- that otherwise doesn't exist--- for the final decimation and destruction of the Native Nations.
About the time you swaggered up some guy's driveway and told him that you were the new "owners" of his property, the same old war would begin, and there is no reason to think that the results would be any better or different.
Instead, you get to come home to the land and soil jurisdiction and get out of the "Second Class Citizen" status you were all stuck in, and are now able to live and stand on the land again as free men and women.
There are other reasons, too.
The United States of America is the established lawful government of this country. We have contracts and agreements with these "High Contracting Powers" that we can exercise ---- and not only treaties, but commercial contracts and trusts that we are heir to already. We don't have to recreate any wheels, fight any wars, or cause any problems. All we have to do is invoke what already exists and operate the General Government already owed to this country.
Any sort of new Native Super State would have none of that in place and would be prey to any number of foreign alliances coming against it and all sorts of traditional tribal squabbles and internal power struggles, on top of having 95% of your neighbors mad at you.
What chance would such a new "Indigenous Nation" have?
Not much.
You cannot hope to address injustices that occurred in the past by creating new injustices against other people in the present. Number One --- that doesn't work. Number Two -- all it does is create more injustice.
Injustice against anyone is a form of violence and violence just begets more violence. So if you want peace and plenty in your lifetimes, give justice to others who have paid their dues to be here, too, whose bodies have come from this land, and whose bodies will return to it when they die, just the same as yours. And stop fighting a war that ended 150 years ago.
You have a rich heritage and thanks to the work of The Living Law Firm, it can finally be a happy and abundant heritage, too.
As for me, I have always valued the great compliment that the local Winnebago Tribe, the Ho-Chunka Nation, gave to me as a youngster. It's an honor to be considered a member of the tribe, but we all know that I will never be a Winnebago by blood and so, we would be building a new nation on another "fib" of sorts, an honorary title "as" a Winnebago. That's not good enough to form the foundations for a new start for a whole country.
Finally, I want to point out that I have retrieved the "Natural and Unalienable Rights" our forefathers fought for from the dust bin of history, and if I were to turn my back on The United States of America [Unincorporated] I really would be committing treason against this country and its people----all of them, of every color and creed --- who have fought and died and suffered for it.
How many lures do you have in your tackle box and do you use worms, minnows or stink-bait? Do you fish for the sport or to survive?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigjon
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziero0
Stink-bait of course.
This is a sporting event.
Well we know your not a scandinavian, because no scandinavian could pass up a lure like that. You live in Czech land, eat beef and are not retired.Quote:
http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Bigjon http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/b...post-right.png
Norwegian's like Jews, want to know just who we are dealing with. What strange foods does this guy eat? Ever eaten lutefisk?
Farming is a part time job and with GMO there is no need to walk the beans anymore, so that's my best guess.
Could you define the space within a cube in a spherical coordinate system?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigjon
Short answer is no.Quote:
Originally Posted by ziero0
I do have the book, somewhere. I believe I studied that in vector analysis about forty years ago.
Is there a good reason why I would want to?
Or is this a hint as to what it is that you do for a living?
Do you teach it or use it?
Consider for a moment the space in a spherical coordinate system to be analogous to EQUITY.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigjon
Consider also that the space in a cartesian coordinate system to be analogous to LAW.
Now both systems can define the same space but it would be difficult to convert a shape such as a cube in the cartesian system into spherical coordinates. The same statement is true of a sphere easily defined in spherical space but not so easily defined in cartesian coordinates.
You waltz into EQUITY court acting like a cube don't be surprised when they define you as a number of balls each with a radius of r fitted into the cube as r approaches zero. You might want to be treated like a cube but EQUITY is going to treat you as a ball because they have difficulty dealing with cubes.
There you go, taking the sport out of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ziero0
And I thought this would be a fun topic:
http://www.eas.uccs.edu/~mwickert/ec...es/N3110_3.pdf
The logical answer is they are not our courts, as I'm not a corporation. Therefor stay out of them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l0BTV06s9A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l0BTV06s9A
Anna von Reitz
22 mins ·
By Operation of Law
I highly recommend that those who are just encountering this information read our book, "You Know Something Is Wrong When.....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause" as a starting place. It gives the overall basics in an easy-to-read illustrated format and provides very handy information in the Appendix. This book gives references and citations as it goes through its narrative. It is available on Amazon.com as are all the other books.
If you are a more hard-charging "Just the Facts Ma'am" executive type, the same basic information is covered in a sound-bite format in our book "America: Some Assembly Required". If you need to get up to speed fast and can take in information in 30-second or less increments and build the picture as you go, this book will summarize the situation and the history for you in about an hour and a half. This book doesn't give a references and citations that have been provided elsewhere so includes only one or two new citations covering additional topics.
Behind, before, and underlying these two books is the first book, "Disclosure 101", which is the history of how I got involved, how I addressed the problem, and ultimately where it all led. This book includes publication of basic documents I or others issued in pursuit of remedy and gives eleven pages of underlying citations and references.
President Trump has, since the publication of these books, sicced teams of lawyers on the information and combed the National Archives. As a result, it has all been newly confirmed. At the highest levels of international government there has never been any disagreement about the facts, there has only been a divide between those who knew and those who didn't know. President Trump now knows and has the proof of the facts we have brought forward.
Despite what is apparent in the external world, many people think that our country functions under one government. It doesn't and except for five years early on, it never has.
Examine what happened between 1776 to 1781. During those years The United States of America
[Unincorporated] was the sole face of our country to the external world. It was and is an unincorporated Federation of States, which are also unincorporated entities. The members of The United States of America Federation are known simply as: Wisconsin, Illinois, Massachusetts, Virginia, and so on.
Five years after the States and the original Federation were formed, a
Confederation of States of States was formed under The Articles of Confederation.
The members of the Confederation were all doing-business-as entities belonging to the Federation States. These "States of States" did business as "The State of Florida", "The State of Wisconsin" and so on. They were all members of the "States of America" and were called "Confederate States" long before the Civil War.
It was these original States of States that were party to The Constitution for the united States of America and they, together, were intended to exercise the nineteen Powers delegated to them by the sovereign States and The United States of America.
And then came the Civil War. The Confederation of States of America was torn apart. After the mercenary conflict (never a true war) ended, the original States of States needed to be "Reconstructed" --- hence the "Reconstruction Era".
Britain saw its chance to usurp --- again --- against our lawful government, and via fraudulent means substituted Territorial "States of States" to replace the actual Federal States of States, and used that as a means to commandeer our Federal Government and exercise our Delegated Powers for its own benefit. The Territorial "States of States" have operated under names styled like this: "the State of Vermont", "the State of Florida" and so on ever since.
Millions of innocent Americans assumed that the "State of Florida" was the same as "The State of Florida" but in fact a terrible change had taken place.
The actual Federal States of States were moth-balled and converted into State Land Trusts doing business as, for example, the Florida State, the Ohio States, and the Michigan State.
And every year the renegade Territorial United States Congress votes to "set aside" the actual Constitution owed to our General Government and pretends that our Federal Government --- which never exercised anything but Delegated Powers in the first place --- is "in abeyance" and that their Territorial Government therefore takes its place.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
In fact, by Operation of Law, when an agent exercising delegated authority becomes incompetent to exercise that authority, it does not evaporate or bump down the railroad tracks to the next lower level of government. It reverts to the government that delegated the power in the first place ---- The United States of America and its member States.
The problem is that we were never notified of all these changes purportedly being made "for" us and were in fact purposefully deceived by international Trustees acting in Gross Breach of Trust against us and against our interests.
As a result, the "Reconstruction" of our Federal States of States has remained incomplete since 1868. We were purposefully misled into thinking that the Reconstruction was over and done, but in fact, nothing but a fraudulent substitution had taken place.
In the last two years both the Territorial United States and the Municipal United States have been bankrupted and also become incompetent to function under their own power, albeit for different reasons.
So all three levels of the Federal Government created to exercise the Delegated Powers and manage the Territorial Possessions and provide a government for Washington, DC, have been rendered incompetent.
By Operation of Law, the Delegated Powers have reverted to The United States of America, it's member States, and their People. To us, in other words. We have stepped forward in a timely fashion and acknowledged and accepted the return of our Delegated Powers. We have arranged for President Trump to enter the legitimate though long-vacant Office of the President of The United States of America and extended a month-by-month service contract in support of the American military and basic services as outlined by our original Constitution.
Everything else that you are seeing go on -- all the fire and nonsense of the political parties, all the investigations into this and that, all the fear-mongering and posturing and arguments ongoing in Washington, DC --- are the stuff that dreams and illusions are made of --- the corporate politics of legal fiction entities.
And all of it is completely foreign to us. It has nothing whatsoever to do with our actual government. It's the Kitchen Staff amusing itself and beginning to sober up after a long debauch and improper occupation of the actual Landlord's estate.
Our Government is not and has never been a "democracy". Our people don't "vote" --- they elect. We don't convene Congresses of "States of States". We convene Congresses of States. Likewise, our Congressional Delegates are "Deputies" of our State Legislatures --- that is, Fiduciary Officers owing their allegiance to us and our States, not "Representatives" owing allegiance to political parties and corporate bottom lines.
It is this last point that deserves special Notice and mention. A Fiduciary Deputy
working for our actual State of the Union is accountable for the way they spend your money and can be "recalled" by the State Legislature if they fail to meet the Prudent Man Standard.
A mere "Representative" claiming to "represent" your State of the Union in an agency capacity has no such accountability or office, and as a result these Territorial Congressional Delegations have been spending like drunken sailors and racking up Odious Debt against you and your State --- and getting away with it for 150 years --- simply because you didn't wake up and object. Instead, you were misled and duped into participating in their fraud and thereby seeming to support their insubordination.
And now we come to a New Day, not a New Deal.
The Delegated Powers have returned to us and to our States by Operation of Law.
You have been informed of the situation and are called upon to correct your political status records which have been conveniently falsified "for" you, and to return to reclaim your birthright and operate your actual State.
The means to convey your Trade Name back to the land and soil of your birth state and to seize control of your affairs and to assert your "reversionary trust interest" has been provided for you. Go to Article 928 on my website: www.annavonreitz.com and record your claim to your Good Name and Estate.
Recording your claim to your own Name and re-conveying it back to the land and soil jurisdiction of your state is Step One. Seizing control of all the Derivative NAMES and expatriating them back to the land and soil jurisdiction is Step Two.
Denying all Powers of Attorney and assigning your Trade Name as the only Attorney in Fact is Step Three.
Rebooting your lawful County Jural Assembly is Step Four. And Reconstituting your State Jural Assembly is Step Five.
This is a lot to take in and a lot of work to do.
But Americans have done more with less.
All of you who have ancestors who were living in this country prior to the Civil War are automatically "grandfathered in" to the guarantees of the original Constitutions and the National Trust --- you merely have to accept and claim your birthright and heritage and record a "Claim for the Life - Lineage Treaty".
We took the pre-caution of locating a cadre of men qualified to claim each and every State over two years ago, so that under the Last Man Standing Rule, we have effectively claimed back the entire country from the verge of loss to foreign bank creditors. That does not relieve anyone of their responsibility as Americans to assemble and operate their lawful government.
That this situation even exists should be eloquent enough warning to all of you to
(1) take action to preserve your own protections and exemptions and property rights and
(2) pay attention and get involved in assembling your local county and state units of government.
Those things operating "as" counties and "as" States of States aren't your government. You are your government.
That is what "self-governance" means.
So get your records straight and get busy, or a bunch of
European sharpies will be more than willing to claim everything you think of as yours as payment for debts you don't owe.
And now one final plug. The research that led to these conclusions and actions and which have served to protect you and your family and bring forward the actions that have been taken to preserve your country and your property rights and your State of the Union --- has all been done by people like me, working away for free for years at a time, not all those people on your payroll.
We get nothing ---- no pay from the renegade "government" and in fact, many of us have suffered and died and been attacked by these criminals and prosecuted under deliberately constructed false legal presumptions.
Many of us have spent time in jail --- not for our "political beliefs" --- but because we had the temerity to assert our birthright and claim our property and our exemptions.
In doing this, we protected all of you and even protected those persecuting us, because without this, all our land, all our rights, all our freedoms would have been lost.
The international bankers actually thought they were going to pull it off, and claim that our entire continent was "abandoned" assets, up for grabs.
If you have any sense of just how close this entire country and the rest of the world has come to disaster --- get going. Reclaim your Good Name and your rightful political status and then, boot up your local assemblies.
And if you can, send a donation our way. Because our accounts were commandeered along with everything else and bungled up and commingled as part of these infernal bankruptcies --- we still have no money to operate on.
Everything is being boot-strapped. Everything is being done by volunteers. Our researchers and our lawyers are making huge sacrifices. The least we can do as a nation is to pay their out of pocket costs --- materials, court fees, postage, travel, electricity.
Our PayPal is the same as my email address: avannavon@gmail.com. Snail mail for donations is: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652.
The point of my example is you want to operate in LAW but EQUITY can only treat you as a sphere or as a cube approximated by a number of spheres. I am presuming here that a sphere in sphere space operates in a set of legal rules not entirely compatible with those a cube operates on in cube space. EQUITY will know you desire to be treated like a sphere because only spheres ever show up in their space.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigjon
Now you take the remedy ole Jonah is suggesting in the BC. He seems to want to suggest that your best position is to admit (and surrender) to EQUITY by proclaiming yourself the executor of your estate because, well, you have been presumed dead over seas for all these years you have been sending payments into the government. You aren't proclaiming yourself a cube where EQUITY laws have no application. You proclaim yourself an OFFICER of EQUITY in a position of being a trustee of an estate. You are abandoning your cubeness in favor of a round solution.
Just some thoughts. Used to be EQUITY was the position you wanted to be in when LAW was too harsh. Now you select EQUITY because they become too hard on you when you choose LAW.
I don't understand why you say 'be a trustee of the estate'?
I was told trustee's always pay.
And never be the trustee,always be the beneficiary or the administrator.
Make the court be the trustee. Is that not right?
I once sent in paperwork to appoint the court trustee and the judicial actor made it clear I didn't have the authority.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigjon
In regards to the estate established by the BC I would hold the administrator and trustee to be equivalent terms. But you could be right. Perhaps if the definitions of each were established?
I have no idea.
I would have to read law books. Just no fun, I'd rather bs on the internet.
You don't need a lawbook to let you know what your law is. A lawbook is useful to let you know what others law is. As there are some ideas you might not have thought of exposure to other ideas can be useful. Just as I have no authority to appoint a court trustee the court has no authority to impose it's concepts upon me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigjon
Anna von Reitz
23 hrs ·
The Big Switch
So how did your nationality get combined with citizenship? A friend from Australia recently sent me a nicely summarized list of legislative acts from the 1920 through the late 60's, and what it very neatly summarizes is a fundamental change that happened in the 1940's and which has never been corrected.
At the beginning of the legislative history there were numerous "Nationality Acts" in the 1920's and 30's. Then, beginning in the 1940's all of these became "Nationality and Citizenship Acts". This is where your nationality got confused and "lumped together" with your political status as a "citizen" or not.
The organizations passing all these "Nationality and Citizenship Acts" were all functioning in Territorial jurisdictions, so it was no big leap for them to include "citizenship" presumptions with the topic of "nationality". For them, the two are synonymous.
If you live your life as a "resident" (temporary sojourner) in the "State of Wyoming" (a Territorial State of State) you are a federal "citizen" by definition, so that your nationality and citizenship are tied together.
If you live your life at home in Wyoming, you may or may not be a "citizen". It is entirely possible to live your entire life and never be employed by any "federally connected" employer and to never hold any office related to any federal corporation.
And that is the fundamental difference between "us" and "THEM".
We have no natural obligation to serve and obey the government. The government has a natural obligation to serve and obey us. Our nationality is not tied to any obligatory citizenship, but theirs is. And therein lies the rub and the misunderstanding.
People presume that you must be a citizen, because they are, but in fact this is merely a self-interested and unconscionable presumption on the part of the Territorial United States Government that began in the 1940's and which deserves to be soundly rebutted and refused now.
When you are born on the land of a sovereign State, say, New York -- you are under no obligation to act or serve as a Federal Citizen of any kind. They merely "presume" on the basis of a long-vanished war that you are a volunteer willing to assume "Territorial political status".
So that's how your nationality got balled up with the issue of citizenship, which is by nature entirely different.
We now know that the same thing happened worldwide during the Second World War and that "Nationality Acts" in places as diverse as Italy and Australia and the United States underwent the same kind of change to "Nationality and Citizenship Acts" at the same time. This implies in turn at that the participants were acting in Territorial capacity and that people were never returned to their natural birthright political status as non-citizen nationals after the Second World War.
This parallels what went on with the so-called Victory Tax. Prior to the Second World War, only Federal Citizens and federal corporations (like the big railroad corporations) were subject to pay "federal income taxes".
During the war the Territorial United States Congress passed the "Victory Tax" which allowed average non-Federal citizen Americans to "voluntarily" contribute an amount equal to that paid by Federal Employees as part of the war effort.
The sunset clause on this legislation stated "the end of hostilities" which by most reckoning means September 1945, but instead, the Territorial United States Congress just left everything in place as if the Second World War was still going on and people were still "volunteering" to pay federal income taxes as part of the effort to win it.
Eighty years later and millions upon millions of Americans have been deprived of their natural birthright nationality which does not include any obligations of citizenship and have paid trillions of dollars worth of federal income taxes they never owed.
It's easy enough to see why the Territorial United States Government wanted everyone to be in "citizenship" status so as to be able to control and commandeer the labor force during the Second World War. It is also easy to see why they wanted the extra income from American workers and why they acted in simple greed and continued on with both these false presumptions after the War---- both Territorial "citizenship" and "voluntary federal income tax" have been foisted off and presumed upon millions of Americans without their knowledge or consent.
And now has come the objection from the lawful government and from the people to this situation and the need to: (1) cease and desist these false presumptions and (2) make amends for them.
It is within our power as individual Americans to reclaim our "reversionary trust interest" in our own birthright prior to when the Territorial Government agents changed our fundamental nationality and citizenship status. We can revert back to being Americans standing on the firm foundation of our land and soil without any citizenship obligations and without any Territorial attachments to our earnings.
And this is why when we talk about Jural Assemblies it is so important for people to grasp what has been done to them in terms of damage to their natural capacities and political status, and why it is necessary for everyone involved in the Jural Assembly process to recoup their natural birthright political status which does not include any obligations of Territorial citizenship.
You were born in Vermont, not Puerto Rico. Say so and inherit the land and soil of your birth, your guaranteed exemptions and immunities, your Natural and Unalienable Rights, and be set free from the obligations of Territorial citizenship.
Run, don't walk, to the Recorder's Office and establish your claim. And if anyone tells you that it isn't "necessary" for you to make this change, tell them it isn't necessary to wipe your butt, either, but the consequences of not doing so have obvious drawbacks.
Anna von Reitz
August 15 at 10:29 AM ·
Important Point:
A couple weeks ago, I published an Article called "This is the Big One"---- in which I observed that:
(1) in commerce, the truth is established by Affidavit, and
(2) that corporations cannot possibly give an Affidavit because they have no "voice" or motive force enabling them to do such a thing, and
(3) since you have been "defined" to be operating in the capacity of a corporation (JOHN DOE, JOHN M.DOE, JOHN MARK DOE) you have therefore been deprived of having any voice or ability to make an Affidavit. Thus, YOU are helpless and cannot defend yourself or present the Truth in a commercial court.
So some people missed the point entirely, and others could not reason their way forward to a solution for this conundrum.
You will note that the exact verbiage of the Maxim is-- "Truth in commerce is established in the form of an Affidavit".
Thus, when you wish to act in the capacity of a Living Man in a commercial court, you do not offer an Affidavit --- because in the current scenario that allows them to ignore every word you say or write.
Instead, you offer "Living Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit".
You follow the "form" of an affidavit which is to swear or affirm for the Public and Private Record and from without the United States that your testimony is true, correct, and not misleading-- and then you enumerate your facts: 1, 2, 3, 4....
This allows the Court to hear your facts and gives de facto rebuttal to the presumption that you are acting in the capacity of a corporate franchise.
And since your opponent is a corporation, it has no ability to answer your Living Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit with any countering Affidavit--- and your facts stand as Truth in Commerce by default.
If the opposing attorney attempts to say anything or make any further argument in the case, ask how a corporation pretends to issue any opposition to your Living Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit?
They are caught in their own net.
A corporation can't make an affidavit and as officers of the court, they are all operating as corporations, including the JUDGE and the Prosecutor and the PLAINTIFF.
Plus, the Prosecutor/Prosecuting Attorney has no first-hand knowledge so cannot serve as a Witness or make any statement in evidence.
Soooo...... that's what we call "end game".
Anna von Reitz
August 15 at 12:56 PM ·
For Doctors, Lawyers, and Indian Chiefs
The doctors, lawyers, and Indian Chiefs among us --- as the old poem goes ---have an extra stumbling block between them and their freedom.
The corporations that we have been dealing with "as" our governments set "Public Policies" which are then enumerated into Administrative Code --- as in "Federal Code" and State of State Statutes.
In order to become Public Law these Public Policies/Administrative Codes have to be published in the Congressional Record and enumerated in the CFR and enrolled. Titles 17 through 50 have never passed this test, because the so-called Revised Statutes have never been enumerated and enrolled.
The point of this is that Title XXXVII (37) which causes all the problems for civilian "Uniformed Officers" is part of the Revised Statutes that have never been rendered into Public Law. They remain merely the private "policy" of the governmental services corporations masquerading as our government.
So--- all the "requirements" that doctors and lawyers and Indian Chiefs be "registered" and/or licensed, or that they have to belong to some club or union like the American Bar Association or be approved as a member of the American Medical Association are nothing more than Public Policy of a corporation and its literal franchises, the States of States organizations.
People think its "law" but it's not.
That is the First Issue.
The Second Issue is that a corporation does have the right to set Public Policy for itself and its employees. Your employer can make you wear an ugly brown uniform and an orange gingham apron as a condition of your employment.
In this case, they can demand that in order to take advantage of company-sponsored insurance, their employees can only receive treatment from a "licensed" professional the Company approves of and licenses for that purpose.
So who are their employees?
Obviously, all the federal civilian and military workers and their dependents.
But, thanks to the Great Fraud, they also claim that everyone who has ever been "registered" in their system is a corporate franchisee, with the result that they claim that all Social Security participants are government employees and subject to their rules, too.
You can "retire" from this presumption any time you like, but you also need to know that this is being presumed against you before you have any motivation to object and notify Social Security and the IRS and the rest of the alphabet soups that you made "a mistake" and/or that you have "retired".
With nearly everyone enrolled by fraud and error in their corporation's "Social Security" program they have a mighty hammer to use against us until we "retire" and serve notice of our return to our birthright political status, or serve notice that we made a mistake and were not meaning to or required to enroll in Social Security. Or both.
The end result is that if you are seeking medical care and expect Social Security to pay for it or Medicare or Medicaid or any other government program, the Company has a right to demand that the provider is "licensed" and meets their criteria. Which they do.
So they enforce Title 37 even though it isn't Public Law via de facto commercial contract and coercion under monopoly inducement.
This cuts down the choice of "covered" service providers and also "covered" services, so that even if Doctor A has a cure for cancer, people diagnosed with cancer will be obliged to go to Doctor B, whose services are covered under the Company insurance, aka, Medicare, etc., and their treatment options will be limited in the same way that their choice of doctors or lawyers is limited: by commercial contract and coercion under monopoly inducement.
As a further inducement, hospitals and clinics which receive government corporation grants and aid are forced to work only with "licensed health care professionals" operating as civilian uniformed officers --- unpaid employees of the government monopoly.
You can go to any physician you like, licensed or unlicensed, in a public (licensed) capacity or private (unlicensed) capacity, but you have to pay for it yourself. You can also obtain any service or undergo any treatment you like, so long as you pay for it yourself.
Doctors who wish to conduct their business as "private physicians" may do so, too, so long as they provide all their own services and equipment and operate their own clinics as private enterprises, and of course, they can't accept Medicare or other government program insurance for services.
It is the "Company Store" phenomenon as recorded by Tennessee Ernie Ford singing, "Sixteen tons, and what do you get? Another day older and deeper in debt! St. Peter dontcha call me 'cause I can't go! I owe my soul to the Company Store!"
In this case, the monopolistic corporations serving in place of your lawful government, are forcing you and millions of others to receive their services and only their services at the price and under the conditions they dictate.
They have already taken all the money you might have otherwise had to spend on medical services as taxes over the course of your working life, and now they want to dictate who you can receive service from and how much you can pay for such service and which services you can access.
Lawyers and Indian Chiefs are in the same bind, more or less.
You don't have to be a Bar Member unless you want to work for "the government" or one of its "franchises", but since they have worked it to arbitrarily define almost everyone as a "franchise" belonging to their corporation, the vast bulk of the work is only available to Bar Attorneys.
Similar to the hospitals receiving "government" grants, the courts can only employ Bar Attorneys as officers of the court, because that is what the Company policy dictates.
You can be a private lawyer, called a "Counselor-at-Law" and you can assist your customers (not clients) to navigate whatever jurisdictions or processes are required, but its an uphill go, because most people don't know the difference between a "Bar Attorney" and a "Counselor-at-Law" and so don't have sense enough to seek your services out.
And meanwhile, the Company is ruthlessly passing more policies that make sure that only Bar Attorneys can use all the services and facilities of the courts, while you have to provide all your own clerks and receptionists and paralegal services.
We are dealing with two oppressive old-style monopoly-interest parent corporations acting "as" our government, and while we can --- and some of us do -- continue to operate as private and independent health care professionals and lawyers and tribal chiefs, our customer base is shrinking and the options that people have are shrinking, too, until we all wake up and operate the lawful government we are heir to.
The THINGS in Washington, DC, and all those THINGS operating in your State Capitols are only corporations like J.C. PENNY and Dairy Queen, and they actually have no more authority or lawful control over your lives than any other corporations --- so long as you make it your business to hold them to their limitations and to exercise your own rights and prerogatives.
Begin by reclaiming your own Trade Name and all your Assumed NAMES and removing them to a permanent domicile on the land and soil of your birth State.
And then get busy and boot up your State Jural Assembly.
Anna von Reitz
23 hrs ·
Bingo, Crime and Politics
My article the other day mentioned the fact that political parties are lobbying organizations and need to be regulated the same way that other lobbyists are scrutinized and limited. Color that a timely end to all the shenanigans, the Diebold Machines, and the Clinton Foundation.
For some reason, that idea came as a huge surprise to many people who had never thought of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party as political lobbies.
And the next thought that arose like a lightning bolt was: "OMG! They are supposed to be lobbying Congress, not running it!"
Bingo!
In the lawful American Government structure, there are no political parties per se. There are opinions and there are those who support those opinions in an organized fashion for purposes of debate --- the Federalists vs. the Anti-Federalists, for example, but there are no permanent, organized, fund-raising political parties.
Political parties and the billions of dollars of graft and criminality that go with them are the creatures of the Territorial United States Government and its brand of Territorial "United States" Congress. They are part of the Territorial "democracy" that somehow never achieves a mandate, not part of the actual government owed to the States and People of this country.
So why do we put up with political parties at all? They have come ashore on our land and soil and had a "party" all right --- 150 years worth of "partying" at our expense.
These obnoxious lobbyists pushing their "agendas" back and forth on Capitol Hill have no reason to be there, and should be offshore in some place like the Virgin Islands or at their new IRS Headquarters on the Mariana Islands, plotting how best to convince our Congress to spend our money.
Instead, they have been masquerading as our Congress and passing themselves off as our "representatives" and the only limits to their bad behavior and deceits have been what they thought they could get away with and whatever curbs the demands of their differing agendas have applied.
The Democrats, if you look at their voting history, have a long tradition of stealing our money and assets to provide bribes and pay-offs to their constituents, and then, an equally long history of stabbing those same constituents in the back. This is so marked, so predictable, that I think of Democrats in terms of passive-aggressive psychosis. Donkeys, indeed.
The Republicans, if you look at their voting history, have a long tradition of promoting big business, manipulating commodities, services, stock markets, and currencies, and all aimed at control and profit, profit, profit. But they suffer from their own brand of mental illness and can't tell when enough is a enough; gluttony and compulsive hedonistic tendencies take over and they consistently squander the Greater Good for the sake of petty profits and short term goals.
Elephants are simply big benign animals that are not subject to any appetite compulsions that I know of; pigs should be the logical Republican emblems instead, if logic and voting records have anything to do with it.
But what do you expect from lobbyists? Leadership? Morals?
That's like expecting a hired cheerleader to earn a Nobel Prize in Physics.
No, the "Missing Piece" is you and your Congress, and that has been the missing piece for a long, long time.
These Territorial Yahoos are not supposed to be encamped on Capitol Hill running rampant and spending your money. They are supposed to be lobbying your Congress to spend your money. And you? You are supposed to be sending your own Deputies-- accountable fiduciary officers of your respective States-- to conduct your business in Washington, DC.
Until you wake up and take back your own birthright nationality and non-citizen political status, and until you attend to your own business, boot up your own Jural Assemblies, reconstitute the Federal States of States, and call your own Continental Congress into Session, this is the Mad House scenario we've got, where unaccountable lobbyists pretend to "represent" you and also pretend to have your authority and your permission to do whatever they want, which is only limited by what they can get away with.
Here is an example of what happens when people get fed up enough with lawlessness and idiots "representing" them:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_GGCgFij3s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_GGCgFij3s
We have a good system of Law and Governance provided for us by our ancestors. All we have to do is operate in our natural capacity and take the responsibility for exercising our rights and running the lawful government we are heir to. No insurrections. No arguments. No way for your employees, including "your" hired lobbyists, to say one word about it.
Anna von Reitz
Yesterday at 1:57 PM ·
As Things Now Stand
The assets of the bankrupt States of States (Territorial United States) and the liquidated STATES OF STATES (Municipal United States) have been claimed and rolled into the associated State Trusts doing business as, for example, the Maine State (Trust) and Wisconsin State (Trust) since 2016.
This was done by the Priority Creditors to protect the assets from the Secondary Creditors --- international banks.
Meantime, the guilty government of France has launched "The Republic for the United States of America" as a replacement Territorial Government and the guilty UK Government has launched THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA as a replacement for the Municipal Government.
And they have both proposed, apparently with Mr. Trump's ignorant blessing, to continue paying themselves with our money, based on borrowing against our assets, without our permission and in fact against our actual instructions.
Therefore, as of yesterday, all the State Trusts were rolled over in-to the actual sovereign States and both The Republic for the United States of America and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA were hit with Agricultural Liens and seized upon.
Apparently, neither the UK nor France have learned that "No means no." and they have somehow convinced Mr. Trump that the Operation of Law related to Delegated Authorities doesn't work with the regularity of gravity.
Even though it does.
Their attempt to continue the same old scam on a different day has been thwarted and our assets are now safely off their playing field. From here on in, it becomes a matter of head-to-head debate.
When the Donor and the Heir to an Estate held in trust are one-in-the-same, that person can act as the Donor to collapse or amend the trust, or as the Heir to receive benefit from it. The Trustees in the middle have nothing to say about the actions of the Donor and must obey.
In our case we were coerced and defrauded into unknowingly becoming Donors of our Estates and conveniently not told about all the actions taken by the Trustees acting "for" us. We were, as the saying goes, kept in the dark and fed horseshit for a very long time.
Emerging into the bright light of day, it appears that although our Donor status was engineered within a few days after we were born and were still helpless, and that this was accomplished via deliberate falsification of our public records, the equal presumption that we intended to be the Beneficiaries of our own Estates was not deduced by our brilliant Trustees.
So the Donors have "come back from the dead" and made our Will in the matter explicit and clear: yes, we are the Heirs of our own Estates. We didn't give them away to England nor to France nor to Donald Trump, for that matter. Sorry. There has been a mistake.
And this Ship of State is not headed where we want it to go.
So, Trustees, get your girdles on and prepare to do some honest work.
High above the squabbling of commercial corporations masquerading as the governments of nations when in fact they are merely "service providers", there exist actual sovereign States and Governments.
In this country, each actual State is sovereign and unincorporated.
Our actual Government in the international jurisdiction, The United States of America, is also unincorporated.
We bear the actual responsibility, and therefore, we are the Powerholders.
Since those who formerly held the Delegated Powers have plotted to vacate the constitutional agreements --apparently thinking that that would give them even more liberty to plunder on our shores--- we have called them on it.
The Federal States of States were disabled during the bogus "Civil War" and "held in abeyance" --- so color them gone, along with the original Constitution.
The Territorial Government went bankrupt this past year, as did the Municipal Government in 2015. Count both of them gone, along with whatever ragged claims they had to any constitutional authority at all.
The so-called "International Organizations" which have proposed to replace the Territorial and Municipal Governments owed to this country have been rebuffed and the actual government, The United States of America [Unincorporated] has accepted back the Delegated Powers, and has extended Donald Trump a month-by-month contract and bond, enabling him to get his ducks in order.
The Trustees, both the Queen of England and the Pope, have been given more than adequate Notice and Demand from the Donors that continued interference in our affairs and sequestration of our assets is not acceptable. They are under demand and so is the "Congress" in whatever capacity it pretends to continue to exist and operate -- to deliver our assets back to us and to our control without further obfuscation or delay.
Anything less will be considered a criminal Breach of Trust and will appear so before the entire world.
Delivery and funding of basic government services under Mr. Trump's direction is to continue, including the funding of public and military pensions, which includes Social Security.
Congress does not have access to our assets to borrow against, so we hope that wherever that $716 billion in war-making expenditures was going to come from, they are prepared to ante it up all by themselves. Perhaps they could use some of the over $20 trillion that has been embezzled.
Pope Francis, the Vatican Chancery Court, the Roman Curia, the Queen and Westminster are all under demand to make amends to The United States of America and to our States and People for the great wrongs which have been practiced against us. It is in keeping with the Double Golden Jubilee that all should be returned, free and clear of all debt or encumbrance. It is also in keeping with established Law that those who have been harmed by fraud and breach of trust are owed additional compensation for their innocent suffering and loss: we are thinking now of the many millions of Americans who have paid "federal income taxes" they never owed and "mortgages" they never owed and "utility bills" they never owed, either.
We have suggested full disclosure of the circumstance and facts, allowing individual Americans to choose whether they wish to be considered State Nationals or British Citizens, and following that election for there to be a full and permanent and internationally recognized severance of all other legal presumptions created by the purposeful falsification of our public records and the pernicious offering of adhesion contracts disguised as "government mandates".
We note that although the Queen's Territorial Government has widely described itself as being a "democracy" it has yet to establish a single public mandate for its existence, much less any of the actions which it has taken to cause so much pain, misery, disruption, theft, and war for profit.
Again, if there is any question on this point, we suggest that Americans be offered full disclosure of the history and the facts, and be allowed to participate in free elections to determine whether they wish to live in a "democracy" sans mandate or in their own State Republics.
There is no need for war, only a great need for new understandings and an honest foundation for going forward.
Our assets need to be returned by our Trustees, so that we can operate our own lawful government without any undo interference or financial manipulation. We are not proposing any great disruption of the world banking system nor are we proposing a lot of physical action moving or removing assets on deposit, but we do require the return of title and access to our assets.
While it was laughed at by everyone on Capitol Hill except its lonely sponsor, the original NESARA provisions should be accepted and passed by those few members of the "Congress" who are actually eligible to vote on the matter and the rest of the "Congress" should be ordered to fully fund every iota of it. "Ordered" we say, since every Bar Member currently sitting in the "US Congress" is under the command of the Queen and obligated to do exactly as she wishes.
Passing and fully funding the original un-amended NESARA legislation would at least be a token of repentance and renewed Good Faith between the UK and the American States.
We note that the Law supporting the originally proposed NESARA has already been enabled and that all that is necessary is a swift kick in the keisters of the American Bar Association members and our permission to fund it. Consider that permission granted.
Anna von Reitz
9 hrs ·
Lions, and Tigers, and Bears....and oh, my! World Trusts!
First, there was the "Unum Sanctum" --- "One Sacred" Trust, published in 1302. It gradually gained traction and assets and network connectivity that spanned the Globe.
Like most human endeavors, it had its upsides and its downsides....
Upsides include a global postal and banking system which allows us to communicate and to trade on a global scale. Those strawberries from Ecuador that you are eating in January would not be possible without the work of the Unum Sanctum Trust.
The idea of public hospitals and public charities and public schools for the masses are all the work of the Unum Sanctum Trust. The idea of foundations devoted to things like Public Broadcasting and Art Museums and Public Libraries---- all from the Unum Sanctum Trust.
In fact, much of the modern world as we know it, and much of the good that has been accomplished, has in one way or another been guided or implemented or expedited or planned by the Unum Sanctum Trust and we take this all for granted as if things like the Postal Service just sprang up out of the ground like mushrooms in the fall.
Not so. It took many generations of sacrifice and inspiration and donations by --- largely Catholic supporters --- to make all this possible.
And now for the downside..... over many generations, things got out of control and the power and connectivity and wealth of the Unum Sanctum Trust began to be abused for political and criminal purposes. The so-called "Middle Crown" of the Trust, the Romanus Pontifex was dissolved in 2011 as a result.
And then we had the ill-fated One People's Public Trust --- the OPPT, organized as a result of the work of the Paradigm Project --- an attempt to "take over" the assets and resources of the Unum Sanctum Trust and redefine it and garner political support by giving away little dribs and drabs of assets while retaining the vast bulk of the "foreclosed upon" assets for purposes unknown.
This is in common terms known as "rolling over" a trust. When one trust ends, another begins. Or so that theory and means of dealing with the situation has it.
It is one of the great ironies of the world that Bar Attorneys are generally speaking the only ones who know how to foreclose assets, but they also have no standing as owners with respect to the assets they foreclose. They are the eternal middlemen, foreclosed themselves from entering into the Kingdom.
Well, according to some of the most ancient texts on Earth, somebody had to be the Gatekeepers.
And then, there is "Manna World Holding Trust" that has been making a bid to take over and control all the assets of the world.
Same story as OPPT, different day, more sinister provenance.
Some hackers at MIT in concert with certain loose canons in the so-called "defense community" developed a means to transfer information from the current banking system and lock down accounts all over the world. They have since been thumping themselves on the back for their illegal acts and touting their own horns as if they have done a great thing.
Not.
We expect that when the dust settles they will all be tracked down and scrutinized and while they may make some claims that they did it for "national security", I believe that a very different motive will emerge. They are trying to roll over the World Trust Assets, just like OPPT. Only they serve their own masters and their own peculiar agendas.
Apparently, our simple idea that the assets need to go back to the countries and to the people to whom the assets naturally belong is too hard for all these power-hungry genius-types to grasp.
And in cases where nobody knows any longer who the owners are, simply put the unclaimed assets into an investment fund and use the proceeds to fund infrastructure in underdeveloped countries and to provide aid to those affected by natural catastrophe or war?
Once they deal with the fact that the American assets --- as in our assets --- are not "unclaimed" and that our government isn't in any kind of "abeyance", the larger part of all the land and other assets they were planning to divide among themselves disappears from the table and the whole issue gets cut down to size.
And the World Trust is no longer a single juggernaut poised to destroy all national governments and impose a single world government administered by some kind of global "meritocracy", either. It dissolves like a paper tiger in the rain, melting back into the National Trusts that are owed to the people of every country.
Sometimes going forward means going back, retracing and rethinking. A single World Trust --- or even half a dozen such trusts -- is a bad idea, because it concentrates too much power in the hands of too few people, who then become subject to the corrupting nature of such power.
Instead of universal brotherhood it resulted in universal enslavement.
So scratch that one. Erase the drawing board. Start over.
Anna von Reitz
9 hrs ·
The Department of Injustice
I am re-posting this seminal article from "Four Winds" for all those who need to know the nature and status of the "Department of Justice" --- and the fact that it's an Executive Branch entity not connected with the Judicial Branch of government at all.
This makes the "Department of Justice" an instrumentality of political policy and executive power and divorces it (from inception no less) from any actual role vaguely related to ensuring any kind of justice for anyone, including the President of the United States.
This is why you are continuing to see the DOJ Witchhunt in the national media: it is a political organ, and always has been. Ironically, as you will see, DOJ is also meant to be a creature under the thumb and forefinger of the President, and a means for him to exercise Executive power.
Always remember that your actual land jurisdiction government, The United States of America, [Unincorporated] has never been at war, never been bankrupt, and is not subject to any form of martial law.
And when you reclaim your birthright, neither are you affected by any of this drama.
All this "reconstruction" --- is within and a function of the Federal Government operating under Delegated Powers. And now that the Delegated Powers have
reverted by Operation of Law to the Delegators of those "Powers" it is time for us to settle this hash once and for all.
It is left to us, those who are awake and alive, to determine the fate of the "Federal Government" and finish not only its reconstruction, but determine its role in the modern world. Read on--- and all our many thanks to the original "Four Winds" who dedicated many years of worthy scholarship to the effort:
U.S. Under Martial Law Since The Civil War
Four Winds
Please be aware that what you are about to read will be very difficult to digest. All our life we have been living under a lie to keep us enslaved. The truth is now known.
The problem is, what do we do now? Like you, I became aware of this same truth today and I don’t where to go from here.
I learned judges in California are not “public officials” I wanted to know why, if they are elected by the people.
Now I know why, and so will you after reading this information.
It will take many educated and creative minds to solve our problem. I pray you are up to the challenge.
Further proof that martial law remained in effect after the Civil War can be found in the “Congressional Globe” (now called the “Congressional Record”). The following are excerpts from the April 20th through 29th, 1870 “Congressional Globe” concerning H.R. 1328 which established the Department of Justice to CONTINUE TO CARRY OUT MARTIAL LAW nearly five years after the end of the Civil War:
“The following bureaus shall be established in this department [the Department of Justice]: a Bureau of International Law, a Bureau of Revenue Law, a Bureau of Military and Naval Law, a Bureau of Postal Law, a Bureau of Land Management Law.”
Congressman Lawrence then said in the record:
“This Bill, however, does transfer to the Law Department, or the Department of Justice as it is now called, the cognizance of all subjects of martial law, and the cognizance of all subjects of military and naval law, except that portion of the administration of military justice which relates to military court martial, their proceedings, and the supervision of records.
“If a question of martial law is to be determined by the law officers of government, it will now belong to the Attorney General, or to this Department of Justice. It will not belong to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. He will not be called upon for any opinion relating to martial law or military law except as to that portion of the administration of military law which relates to military justice.
“In other words, the Judge Advocate General, instead of giving legal opinions to the Secretary of War relating to the status of the states of the union, their right to call upon the government for military protection, or military aid, and other grave Constitutional questions, will be limited.
The Judge Advocate General will perform duties administrative in their character and almost exclusively so.
“But I will state to the House why, in my judgment, no transfer of the Judge Advocate General or of his duties to the Department of Justice has been proposed in this Bill. If this had been done, the Bill would have encountered the opposition of some of the officers of the Bureau of Military Justice and their friends, and so great is the power of men in office, so difficult is it to abolish an office, that we were compelled in the consideration of this subject to leave officers in this Bureau untouched in their official tenure in order that this Bill might get through Congress.
“But so far as the Solicitor and Naval Judge Advocate General is concerned, he is transferred with all his supervisory power over naval court partials and the records and proceedings of such courts, so that to that extent, this Bill accomplishes the great purpose which it has in view of bringing into one department the whole legal service of the government. It is misfortunate that there should be different constructions of the laws of the United States by different law officers of the United States.”
WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT:
These traitors knew they would have encountered opposition from the military with the provisions of H.R. 1328, so they decided to leave the military officers untouched during their tenure, and transfer them to supervisory positions over court partials. This appeased the military leaders, who didn’t have the foggiest idea as to what was really going on.
Had the traitors fleeced the military of all their powers during their tenure in office, the military would have realized and possibly taken some military action. But as nothing was happening at the hen house, they slept through this entire situation which resulted in an overthrow of the Constitution — an overthrow under which government pretended to operate in 1933, and under which it continues to pretend to operate today.
The traitors were now faced with a very serious problem, namely, what to do with the powers of the Office of the Judge Advocate General when their tenure in office expired. And they solved this dilemma by adding the following amendments, detailed in that same “Congressional Globe”:
Congressman Jenks: I move to amend Section 3 by inserting the word “naval” before the words “Judge Advocate General”.
The amendment was agreed to and later Congressman Finkelburg stated:
I would suggest the propriety of amending the third section of this Bill by inserting after the words “the Naval Solicitor and Naval Judge Advocate General” the words “who shall hereafter be known as Naval Solicitor”.
Mr. Jenks: I have no objection to that amendment.
This amendment was also agreed to, and the Office of the Judge Advocate General became known as the Naval Solicitor. Thus, when the existing tenure was over, the new office would have a different set of rules and regulations so that the Bill accomplished the great purpose which it had in view of bringing into one department the whole legal service of the government without the power of the Office of the Judge Advocate General getting in their way.
This was a necessary step to bring the President into the position of dictator over America.
But they had one other problem facing them, namely, DIRECT ACCESS to the Treasury for the Department of Justice without interference. They accomplished this by the following three sections of the Bill:
“…The Eighth Section provides that the Attorney General is hereby empowered to make all necessary rules and regulations for the government….
“…The Eleventh Section provides that all monies hereafter drawn out of the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be dispersed by such one of the clerks herein provided for the Attorney General as he may designate, and so much of the First Section of the Act, making appropriations, past March 3rd, 1859, as provides that money drawn out of the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be dispersed by such dispersing officer as the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby repealed….
“…The Fifteenth Section provides that the supervisory powers now exercised by the Secretary of the Interior over the accounts of the district attorneys, marshals, clerks, and other officers of the courts of the United States, shall be exercised by the Attorney General….”
It is important here to remember that under the Trading with the Enemy Act, the District Courts of the United States are:
“…hereby given jurisdiction to make and enter all such rules as to notice and otherwise and all such orders and decrees and to issue such process as may be necessary and proper in the premises to enforce the provisions of this Act.”
It is here that we find out that the district attorneys, marshals, clerks and other officers of the courts are under the Department of Justice. That seems an obvious statement, given the state of the nation today. But the REAL PROBLEM — given the broad scope of powers granted the District Courts under the Trading with the Enemy Act — is that the Department of Justice is *NOT* a part of the Judicial Branch of Government!
According to Section 101 of Title 5 of the United States Code, the Department of State, the Department of Treasury, the Department of Defense, the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Energy, the Department of
Education, and the Department of the Veteran Affairs are
*ALL* under the Executive Branch of Government.
All of the above departments are under the Executive Branch–which raises quite a few questions about the balance of powers between the Executive, Judicial, and Legislative branches of government.
How can this be? There is no balance of power under a declared state of emergency. And we’ve been living under a declared state of emergency ever since the Civil War began, and have been living under a declared state of martial law ever since the Reconstruction Act.
This overthrow of the Constitution occurred long before the War Powers Act, and if we are going back in history to find our roots of legality — and if we stop our search when we reach the War Powers Act — we are NOT going to succeed in this venture.
Where is the separation of powers if the Department of Justice is under the Executive branch? Shouldn’t it be part of the Judiciary? The answer, of course, is yes; but it’s not. Again, just check Section 101 of Title 5 of the United States Code. There is no Judiciary!
If only Congress has the power to regulate Commerce, under Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution, why are the Department of Commerce and the Department of Transportation under the Executive branch and not under the Legislative branch?
And if only the Congress has the power to coin money, according to the Constitution, why is the Department of Treasury under the Executive branch?
The Commerce Department (from Title 5):
“…part of the Executive branch of federal government, headed by a Cabinet member, the Secretary of Commerce, which is concerned with promoting domestic and international business and commerce.”
To further illustrate the take-over by the Executive branch of government via martial law rule, the following offices, bureaus, divisions, and organizations are under the Department of Justice. And remember, the Department of Justice is under the Executive branch — NOT under the judicial branch.
The Office of Solicitor General
The Federal Bureau of Investigation
The Drug Enforcement Agency
The Bureau of Prisons
Immigration and Naturalization
United States Marshal Service
Office of Justice Program
United States Parole Commission
United States National Central Bureau
The Office of the Pardon Attorney
Executive Office of the United States Attorney
Criminal Division
Civil Division
Anti-Trust Division
Civil Rights Division
Tax Division
Environmental and Natural Resource Division
Community Relations Services
Foreign Claim Settlement Division
Executive Office of United States Trustees
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Justice Management Division
Office of Legal Counsel
Office of Policy Development
Office of Legislative Affairs
Office of Public Affairs
Office of Liaison Services
Office of Intelligence and Policy Review
Office of International Affairs
Office of the Inspector General
Office of Professional Responsibility; and
Interpol — (Note: Interpol is a private corporation, yet it comes under (in this country) the Executive branch of government.)
In my opinion: if the matter of the repeal of the Reconstruction Act and the old H.R. 1328 are not addressed, we will remain in a state of declared martial law. But few people do any research anymore, and even fewer read the results of research done by others. Yes, we are already, and have been all our lives, living under declared martial law.
The source of this law is from 1875.
‑CITE‑ 2 USC Sec. 118
‑EXPCITE‑
TITLE 2
CHAPTER 4
‑HEAD‑
Sec. 118. Actions against officers for official acts
‑STATUTE‑
In any action brought against any person for or on account of anything done by him while an officer of either House of Congress in the discharge of his official duty, in executing any order of such House, the United States attorney for the district within which the action is brought, on being thereto requested by the officer sued, shall enter an appearance in behalf of such officer; and all provisions of the eighth section of the Act of July 28, 1866, entitled ‘An Act to protect the revenue, and for other purposes’, and also all provisions of the sections of former Acts therein referred to, so far as the same relate to the removal of suits, the withholding of executions, and the paying of judgments against revenue or other officers of the United States, shall become applicable to such action and to all proceedings and matters whatsoever connected therewith, and the defense of such action shall thenceforth be conducted under the supervision and direction of the Attorney General.
‑SOURCE‑
(Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 130, Sec. 8, 18 Stat. 401; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, Sec. 1, 62 Stat. 909.)
‑REFTEXT‑REFERENCES IN TEXT
The provisions of section 8 of act July 28, 1866, ch. 298, 14 Stat. 329, referred to in text, were contained generally in R.S.Sec. 643, which was incorporated in the former Judicial Code, Sec. 33, and was repealed by act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, Sec. 39, 62 Stat. 992. See sections 1442, 1446, and 1447 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Other provisions referred to were contained in R.S. Sec. 771, 989, which were also repealed by act June 25, 1948. See sections 509, 547, and 2006, respectively, of Title 28.
‑CHANGE‑
CHANGE OF NAME
Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, substituted ‘United States attorney’ for ‘district attorney’. See section 541 of Title
28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
‑CROSS‑
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Judgment against certain public officers, satisfaction of, see Rule 69, Title 28, Appendix, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
‑SECREF‑
SECTION REFERRED TO IN OTHER SECTIONS
This section is referred to in section 118a of this title.
‑END‑
Statutes Relating to Commissions, Appointments, etc.
Sections in this file relate to required commissions, oaths, etc., for officers and employees of United States government and the government of the District of Columbia. All sections have been pasted directly from the 1996 CD-ROM edition of the United States Code produced and distributed by the Government Printing Office. Notes in Italics that follow the sections list regulations for each section listed in the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules.It is significant that the “Seal of the United States” is no longer affixed to commissions of “judicial officers” appointed by the President with advice and consent of the Senate; commissions are filed with the Department of Justice under the D.O.J. seal, which is an executive seal. This is suggestive that there are no longer any Article III[constitutional] judges in the United States.
-CITE-
4 USC Sec. 41 01/16/96
HERE’S THER REAL KICKER
THIS IS WHAT ENSLAVES US AS 14th AMENDMENT CITIZENS
The Insurrection Act (enacted in 1807) delegates authority to the President to federalize and deploy the National Guard domestically during an insurrection or civil disturbance (10 U.S.C. Sections 331-335). Section 331 authorizes the President to use federal military forces to suppress an insurrection at the request of a state government. Section 332 authorizes the President to use armed forces in such manner as he deems necessary to enforce the laws or suppress a rebellion. Section 333 authorizes the President to use federal military forces to protect individuals from unlawful actions that obstruct the execution of federal laws or which impede the course of justice under federal laws. Section 333 was enacted to implement the Fourteenth Amendment and does not require the request or consent of the governor of the affected state.
Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·
To Be Clear About the Paperwork
Destry Payne did not do the paperwork I recommend that every American do.
(See Article 928 on my website: www.annavonreitz.com.)
Bruce Doucette didn't do the paperwork I recommended, either.
Neither did Stephen Nalty.
Neither did Ammon Bundy.
Neither did the Hammonds.
Neither did LaVoy Finicum.
Neither did Steve Curry.
I could go on all day long listing all the people who have listened with only half an ear to what I am saying, and who have paid the price for not doing a few hours of due diligence and maybe a half-day chore of recording some paperwork.
All these men thought they knew better. They all went their own way. They all trespassed into Federal Jurisdiction. They all suffered the consequences.
Rain falls from the sky. Water runs downhill.
We are living in a bogus state of manufactured political "war", which is considerably more phony than any $3 bill,
but until you realize what is being promoted against you and by whom and what, it is not possible to gain control of the situation or take any action to correct it.
Now, some people have done the paperwork and have still been arrested by highway patrolmen and so on.
Best be aware that there is no automatic computer-generated connection between what you have on file at the Recorder's Office and what the police have on their screens. You not only have to record it, you have to bring it forward. (Someday, hopefully quite soon, there will be a database connection, but not yet.)
When people do this and knowledgeably defend their position as landlubbers, miracles are happening.
Mortgages are being set-aside and "paid off". People are leaving jails, set free because they are not subject to statutory law. The Indemnity Bond is being honored.
The police, the judges, and the "Machine" are slowly waking up along with the rest of America, and beginning to come to heel, but these are early days and these atrocities against our States and our People have been going on for a long time.
Imagine that you are at the helm of a Supertanker far out at sea and you are trying to execute a 180 degree turn around and reversal? Even at "Full Speed" that kind of change takes time.
So is the paperwork a Silver Bullet?
Yes, so long as you don't murder, rape, steal or do other things that damage actual people and property. And so long as you get it on the Public Record prior to running afoul of THEIR law. The Truth will set you free, so long as you establish what your truth is and provide proof of it.
Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·
Cancellation of All Powers of Attorney
Many people have been asking me, "Well, how do I cancel Powers of Attorney that I may or may not even know exist?" You record your Cancellation of all such Powers and make it another Extension of your Deed of Re-Conveyance.
Here is a bare-bones example of how it needs to be set up and what it needs to say:
"All prior Powers of Attorney granted by Anna Maria Riezinger are removed, cancelled, and permanently revoked effective June 6, 1956.
Anna Maria Riezinger is Attorney-in-Fact for all purposes related to the administration of her estates and all correspondence should be addressed to: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652."
by:______________________________ this ____day of _______ 2018.
Public Notary Witness
Alaska
Matanuska-Susitna County
I____________________, a Public Notary, was visited today by the woman known to me to be Anna Maria Riezinger, and she did affirm and sign this Cancellation of All Powers of Attorney in my presence for the purposes stated.
by:____________________________Public Notary; my Commission expires on:______________________.
____________________________________
To my readers--- notice that the place this notary function is taking place in is "Alaska" --- the sovereign State, and also that it is taking place in "Matanuska-Susitna County", both of which are unincorporated entities.
Not the State of Alaska, not County of Matanuska-Susitna, Not a Borough. Not a City. Or any other incorporated entity.
And also note, that because this is taking place in the land jurisdiction "State" and in the land jurisdiction "County", this is a Public Notary function and not a "Notary Public" function.
In other words she has agreed to represent herself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigjon
On a historical note the function of attorney was abolished in England around 1873. Their function was in feudal law to make sure the vassal had eternal allegiance to his liege lord.Quote:
attorney (n.)
early 14c. (mid-13c. in Anglo-Latin), "one appointed by another to act in his place," from Old French atorné "(one) appointed," past participle of aturner "to decree, assign, appoint," from atorner "to assign," literally "to turn to" (see attorn). The sense is of "one appointed to represent another's interests."
In English law, a private attorney (attorney in fact) was one appointed to act for another in business or legal affairs (usually for pay); an attorney at law or public attorney was a qualified legal agent in the courts of Common Law who prepared the cases for a barrister, who pleaded them (the equivalent of a solicitor in Chancery). So much a term of contempt in England that it was abolished by the Judicature Act of 1873 and merged with solicitor.
Johnson observed that "he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney." [Boswell]
In U.S., barrister is not used and the general designation became properly attorney and counselor at law; when presenting a case in court, simply counselor. The double -t- is a mistaken 15c. attempt to restore a non-existent Latin original, perhaps by influence of legal Latin form attornare.
Maybe, again I don't know, but there are many forms of law and many definitions and many lieyers.Quote:
Originally Posted by ziero0
Anna von Reitz
August 21 at 3:08 PM ·
Basics of Birth Certificates
I have been asked and asked about Birth Certificates--- what are they? Why do we have one? Much less two?
You are given a "certificate" in exchange for "registering" something.
When you register a piece of property --- say, a car or truck? Or a name? --- you give up your ownership interest in it and pass the ownership interest on to the "entity" that you register it with.
So, when your Mother is subtly misinformed and coerced to register her new possession --- you ---- with the corporation posing as your government, guess what?
You get a "birth certificate" for the same reason you get a car registration.
It's a historical document memorializing the event and identifying the property that changed hands, in the event that anyone needs to know the details later on.
This is how the British-backed Territorial Corporation known as the "State of Florida" or "State of Maine" or "State of Texas"...... picked up an ownership interest in "you" and "your name" ---- converted your identity from that of a living man or woman, and gained the right (by your Mother's mistake and your later silence) to consider you a "franchise" of their corporation and chattel backing their debts.
But did you or your Mother ever knowingly and willingly give them the right to use your name, steal your identity, use you as chattel backing their debts, or any of this other nonsense? Of course not.
It's all fraud. It's all criminal. It's all malarkey.
And the corporations "acting as" governments that have promoted and permitted any such scheme richly deserve to be liquidated for their crimes.
So before I get off-track and into the bushes --- that is what a "Birth Certificate" is and it is basically the same as a car registration. You get to use the car, just as you get to use your own body --- with the owner's permission. The sleazy lawyers then step in as the owner's representatives and beat you silly and tax you to death in private customs houses disguised as public courts.
This has been going on since 1702 and has been outlawed worldwide since the Napoleonic Wars, but what the hey? Mack and the Boys got it all started again and the Popes and the Queens sat back and smoked cigars.... but I digress.....
Why do you have two different documents purporting to be some form of birth certificate?
Typically, you will have something called a "Certificate of Live Birth" and also something called a "Birth Certificate".
The Certificate of Live Birth will usually have your name in Upper and Lower Case, First, Middle, Last --- just as you were taught to write it out in Grade School.
The Birth Certificate will have your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
You have two of them, because two separate commercial corporations have claimed to have an ownership interest in you.
The British-backed Territorial State of State organization doing business as (for example) the State of Oregon has seized upon and laid claim to "First Middle Last" and the Municipal STATE OF STATE (for example, STATE OF WYOMING) has claimed an ownership interest in FIRST MIDDLE LAST.
Two birth certificates, two franchises for them, neither one of them having anything to do with you, except for the fact that they are using and abusing your Given Name without your knowledge, sending their franchise's bills to you for payment, and otherwise working confusion all across the board.
In Law, this is known as "unlawful conversion" --- a form of kidnapping of assets on paper, which converts the nature of an asset (from living man to corporate franchise for example) and the jurisdiction in which it operates (from land law to sea law in this case).
Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Co-chair of the House Banking Committee at the time ---recognized it for what it was back in 1934, and brought charges for it before the House Judiciary Committee which have yet to be heard.
He was the only honest and competent and courageous member of Congress.
One out of 435. And the odds have remained about the same ever since.
Send this article to the local authorities and Congressional "delegates" and object to being treated in this fashion and demand action to correct these practices.
See what you get back. Typically, since 1934, all you hear is silence. This is for the very good reason that they are obligated to keep silence under the whip of 18 USC 472.---knowledge and use of fraudulent conveyances, false securities, etc.
Send it Registered Mail, Return Receipt Requested, so that you have proof you sent it and proof you objected to having your Given Name used and abused in this fashion, and that you want their cooperation in ending this venal practice.
A baby is not a new car. And so far as that goes, they have no right to demand any ownership interest in your car, either.
Kick them to curb as hard as you can, and keep kicking. And never register anything voluntarily.
Congressman McFadden was poisoned, mafia-style, for lodging his complaint with the House Judiciary Committee, but because he did the right thing, those charges still stand, as firmly lodged today as they were in 1934.
The next question is --- other than objecting on the record, what do we do?
Well, look at either one of the "Birth Certificates" that were issued in your name.
You will notice that your actual birth day is always a few days earlier than the "birthdate" of the THING they claim an interest in --- that is, it's "birthdate" is after your "birth day". This gives you a superior claim in commerce, and since all this fraud, theft, and legal chicanery is taking place in the realm of commerce, that is an important point.
Now all you have to do is prove who you are, that you objected to being "enfranchised" and that you have recorded your counter-claim to be the true and lawful owner of your Good Name and Estates and all derivatives thereof and re-conveyed your property (Name, Estate, and the derivative Assumed NAMES) back to their natural and permanent domicile on the land and soil of--- for example--- Georgia.
Georgia, you will note, is not the "State of Georgia" nor the "STATE OF GEORGIA" nor "THE State of Georgia" nor "GEORGIA" nor any other version of this corporate franchise naming scheme they can dream up. It's the actual unincorporated and sovereign State of the Union, so they can all go blow.
Please also note that it's right and proper for you to record --- record, not "register"--- your interest in your own Given Name and Estate and anything else that is named after you via infringement on your Common Law Copyright guaranteed under the Copyright Act of 1795 and still standing.
Most important--- why do you HAVE TO do something to counterclaim your Good Name and Estate back out of Babylon?
For starters, if you don't, you get stuck holding the bag for all their debts, and their debts are insurmountable.
For middles, if you don't, you will not be "identifiable" as a living man or woman, which means they can murder you at will and face no consequences.
For lasts, if you don't, the vermin will never be brought to justice and never forced to change their ways.
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
A Court Order is Like an Order for French Fries, Okay?
The Judge gives his Order and the for-hire private security force goons acting under Color of Law as "Sheriffs" and as, for example, "State of Vermont Troopers" --then swing into clueless action to bring him his booty.
But, what happens if someone intercepts and cancels his order?
"Hey, yah, Jaime, cancel that order for fries---!"
Then nothing happens. The "Order" just disappears. Nobody scurries around. The potatoes don't go in the oil. The house doesn't get sold. The whole thing gets dropped.
And that is what needs to happen with all these foreclosure cases that are taking place under false legal presumptions and color of law.
There are now three really good reasons why the Foreclosure Mills need to shut down.
(1) All the Federal States of States and Federal State Trusts have been seized upon and rolled back into the actual sovereign States. That reverses the legal presumptions all these courts have been operating under and takes all the "franchise" property off the table. They can no longer "presume" that anyone is acting in the capacity of a federal "citizen". Instead, they have to presume that you are acting in your private trade capacity under the Public Law owed to this country.
(2) They are using your bond to fund their case. You have every right to subrogate the case and dismiss it with extreme prejudice ---and can easily put teeth into the claim by claiming the Case (Contract) Number as the collateral and the Court's Name and Address as the Debtor. Use your Trade Name (First, Middle, Last) as the Secured Party and mention that it is a Trade Name of the living-man: first-middle-last to whom all the property, assets, and interest belongs. Check the Non-UCC-Lien box on the UCC-1 Form, and present a certified copy to the Court Clerk. Then instead of them getting to claim your assets, you get to claim theirs, and they promptly start losing money as a result of their criminal racketeering, which gives them motive to stop doing what they are doing.
(3) You are indemnified in the strongest terms possible from suffering any "loss or damage" as a result of the existence of these "federal franchises". In fact, you are exempt from claims and your VESSELS are already tax pre-paid. So how is it that these "courts" are dragging YOU in and railroading you with their "Orders"? Could it be that you aren't cancelling their Orders?
Yes, it could. If you just stand there and let their "orders" be served by the clueless police, they win because you don't do anything effective to cancel their order.
It's just a little bit more complicated than saying, "Hey, Jaimie...."
You take their "Court Order" and you write: "Accepted for Indemnification Value" on it, and you write: Private Registered Indemnity Bond Number: RA 393 427 640 US -- AMRI00001 -1 (California or Ohio or whichever State) and you sign it with your Upper and Lower Case Trade Name using a by-line, that is, pretend you are an author and sign it by: Your Signature, and date it.
Take copies. And either return it to the Clerk of Court via Registered Mail as soon as you get it, Return Receipt Requested, of course.
Or take two copies into the Clerk of Court's Office, get both date-stamped, and give the original to her, keeping your own date-stamped copy for yourself.
Consider the "Order" to sell YOUR house cancelled. Along with the French Fries.
Now, the "lawful conversion" back to the States is somewhat recent and not all courts will be aware of the reversal at the same time. Several Judges will no doubt have to step on the landmine before it is universal knowledge. It could take a few months.
The subrogation of your bond can be used right now.
And you can cancel their Orders to seize upon you or your assets by claiming against the indemnity bond, too. You are insured against loss or damage and your "policy number" is there on file and up to date.
Oh, and let's add a Fourth Reason --- a really BIG Reason -- why all these Foreclosure Mills need to shut down: no living man or woman ever owed any "mortgage" to begin with.
So, time to bat your eyelashes at the Judge and say, "Oh, and by the way....., your Honor, I wish to see the Bill connected to this case....."
And if the Judge doesn't have it ready for you to sign off, then you bat your eyelashes again and say, "I wish for dismissal of this claim with extreme prejudice, and I wish for the Prosecutor to pay me three times damages and court costs in the amount of....."
Calculate this number based on current value of the property that has been put at risk and a realistic idea of what the case has cost you in terms of time and money and angst. Don't go overboard, but make your point. And then walk away.
Some judges are honorable men and some are not. Be forewarned that some will try to trick you by addressing you as "Mister" or "Miss" or by calling you a "resident" or attempting to give you an "order" from the bench, such as, "Uh, Mister Johnson, come back here..... " Or, "Miss St. James, sit down...."
When they do this, they are trying to establish a basis for claiming jurisdiction they don't have. They are grasping at straws for some excuse to claim that you are subservient to them. Object to any attempt to call you "Mister" or "Missus" or "Miss" or anything else like that, and also to calling you a "resident" or giving you any orders.
You are the sovereign and they are the servants.
Period.
Get your attitude adjusted and your facts and processes in hand --- and stop sending me sad and desperate letters and emails about these vermin taking your farms and homes.
We are doing all we can to stop this criminality on a systemic level. Until we do, you have all you need to defend yourselves one by one.
Anna von Reitz
August 21 at 12:22 AM ·
Let's begin with this important piece of information:
"Hell" is not "Hades" as in the underworld of the Ancient Greeks, and it is not "Sheol" the shadow world of Second Soul in the Hebrew scheme of things, nor is it "Gehenna" the realm of separation and misery in the Hebrew system.
In fact, if you really search Catholic Dogma, you won't find any reference to "Hell" there, either, though most people attach the meaning of Satan's fiery prison to it.
No.
"Hell" is literally the name of Debtor's Prison. And that's why apprentice attorneys are still called "Devils" in Scotland.
Don't believe it? I have plenty of books.
You've been living in a Debtor's Prison all your life without knowing it. So, yes, you are in Hell right now. Literally.
What are you going to do about it?
When I say, "Wake to Hell up!" this is what I am talking about: the circumstance in which you live. Wake up!
If I walked up to you and told you that the clerk at your insurance company stole the information off your credit card and that he is pilfering your credit account ----- you might stare at me, you would definitely be alarmed, but once you checked your statement and saw that it was true, you would know what to do.
You would call your bank or credit card company and say, "Hey! I didn't make these charges! My account has been compromised! This is a mistake! I don't know anything about "Felix's Massage Therapy" and I sure didn't order a new hot tub from "Wonder Spa" or buy anything at Neiman Marcus..... "
So why is it that everyone stops and balks and stares at me like I'm the crazy one when I tell you that a foreign, private, for-profit governmental services corporation has stolen your identity and your credit cards? And is charging you for services you never ordered and is charging whatever they want to charge for all the "services" they have foisted off on you and charged to your ACCOUNT?
It's really no different. It's the same crime. It's being committed at the same level -- the level of commerce. And the end result --- to put you in debt up to your ears for expenditures you never authorized --- is the same.
But, hey, until you raise your hand and object --- everyone assumes that you authorized the charges and that you owe them.
The bank isn't going to call up Neiman Marcus if you don't object to paying for someone else's trip to Beijing, the $1200 bath robe, the 3 carat diamond ring, and new leather furniture set they charged to YOU.
The so-called "government" doesn't use credit cards, it uses Treasury Bonds and CUSIP Bonds and other forms of debt instruments to pile its debts on your weary head.
They use the "presumption" that if you vote in their private corporate elections, you must be going along with all this and profiting from it somehow.
Why else would you let a foreign private investment corporation use your assets as collateral for its debts and charge you whatever it wants to charge?
Do you know that there isn't a single mortgage in America that is owed by a living man or woman?
That's what "mortgage" means --- its a debt owed by a dead person.
That "dead person" is a defunct earlier version of another foreign, privately owned, for-profit government services corporation that went bankrupt and left you and your children responsible for paying off its debts.
Right.
Got the picture now?
You and your children and your children's children's children are buried alive under a mountain of Odious Debt--- that is, debt that you didn't authorize and didn't benefit from.
When a "government services corporation" pulls this kind of criminal crap there is no bank or credit card company to call, so you may be standing there with a dumb, horrified look on your face, feeling terribly alone. And helpless.
Been there and done that.
But you are in luck. And you are not alone. There are at least 350 million other Americans in the exact same boat. And there are good solid historical reasons for why we are in this deplorable situation --- reasons that are known and there are things we can do to change "Hell" into Paradise.
We've written three books so far that give you all the basics, all of them available on Amazon.com for a few bucks.
The first one, Disclosure 101 tracks my own experience, how I got my "wake up call" and details the early history of the effort to not only wake up, but make sense of what we call "The Mess" --- plus our early actions to put a stop to the crimes.
The second book is aimed at a broad audience. Anyone can read "You Know Something Is Wrong When.....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause" which is lavishly illustrated with cartoons and helpful graphs and commentary. It may strike some people as to "not serious"---- but it is.
And the third book, America: Some Assembly Required, is very short --- an "executive summary" built on 30-second sound-bites of information that coalesce as you go, so, you can have the whole Big Picture lined out in an hour or two if the "Just the Facts, Ma'am" approach works for you.
We woke up to this reality more than twenty years ago and every year, more and more Americans wake up. Word is spreading every day. And yes, we have found ways to deal with the pesky "devils" among us.
The good news is that the Truth will set you free, and there is a path forward and onward and upward. There is a way to save our country and reform our government. And even if you are in "Hell" right now, you don't have to stay there.
You can come home, come out of Babylon, and once you boil it all down, it isn't even that hard to do (though we can assure you that the road to ferret out the information was anything but easy).
Go to Article 928 posted at www.annavonreitz.com. There you will find a handful of simple forms that establish your claim to own your own Trade Name and which enable you to claim your children and grandchildren's names for them, too.
This is the start --- the foundation to reclaim your freedom, your identity, and your correct political status. It's the beginning of taking back control of your country and your finances and your future.
And if the forms don't immediately make sense to you, take the time to read the books so that the Big Picture of what happened snaps into view. There is a logic to every thing that happened, and therefore, a logic to everything we do in response.
Anna von Reitz
August 21 at 3:11 PM ·
More Basics. Social Security: Impact On?
None. They still owe you.
I regularly get questions from retirees who want to know what impact claiming their birthright will have on Social Security payments and services owed to them?
Notice --- I did not say "benefits".
Let's begin with what "Social Security" is.
It's a government employee pension program started under FDR. Chances are, you were never eligible to enroll in Social Security because you were never a federal government employee, never a federal government dependent, and never knowingly or willingly sought political asylum from the British Territorial United States.
No American in their right mind would ever choose Territorial "citizenship" because it is a distinctly unfavorable status with no constitutional guarantees and no "Natural and Unalienable" rights, and tons of obligations.
But you weren't told any of this. Instead, you were told a Big, Fat, Self-Interested Fib --- that you had to enroll in Social Security and pay into it "in order to have a job" and your employers were lied to, too, and told that they "had to" participate in and collect taxes for the program also.
Another one of Satan's little half-lies.
Of course, if you were working for the federal government, you would have to enroll in their employee pension program and if your employer happened to have a contract with the federal government, they would have to allow you to (voluntarily) participate..... but for most of us who never saw a federal paycheck or even a "federally connected" paycheck in our lives, it is all nothing but fraud and false presumptions.
We were deliberately mis-informed by fraudsters and compelled under the "appearance" of a government mandate to enroll in a pension program that had nothing to do with most of us.
In recent years the rats in charge have plundered the Social Security funds and given them away to illegal immigrants and whoever else's votes they wanted to buy, so now they have taken to calling Social Security payments "benefits" -- as in "welfare benefits" -- because for people who never worked their forty quarters and who never "vested" in the system, that's what such payments are.
But there's another, darker reason, too.
Having busted your nickel and spent all your credit and the credit of your children's children, too, the "governmental services corporations" responsible have all declared bankruptcy and left you and yours holding the bag.
And it's easier and more justifiable to stop "voluntary" welfare payments than it is to avoid the obligations of an old age pension actually owed to someone.
Head's up, seniors. Those of you who worked your rumps off for fifty years -- they spent all the money you gave them on war and depravity, never caring or intending to pay you back. And now they are trying to grease their backdoor, Plan B --- change a few words here and there, call your pension payments and services "benefits" --- and skate.
And that is just One More Reason you have to take control of your affairs and wise up right about now.
So, what's the deal, Grandma?
First, you have do the basic paperwork I've assigned (Article 928, www.annavonreitz.com) and get your counterclaim recorded. And then, as part of that, you will also record your "Cancellation of All Prior Powers of Attorney".
Unknown to you, as part of your "enrollment" in Social Security (most of us were 16 and real sharp about legal stuff) they slipped in a "General Power of Attorney" for themselves.
Once your "Cancellation of All Prior Powers of Attorney" is recorded, you will want to send one copy of the recorded document to the Social Security Administration and give them Notice that you have returned to your birthright political status, that you earned your pension, and that you have cancelled their Power of Attorney. As always, send it Registered Mail, Return Receipt Requested.
Now, until everyone gets the "word" this may leave the Social Security Administration workers scratching their heads and their butts. They may think you are nuts. Hey, they really ARE "federal" workers and really DO get a federal paycheck, and yes, Social Security IS mandatory for THEM, so, they assume that you are obligated to enroll in Social Security, too, because THEY are----right?
Right.
That's what is so ingenious about this scam, just like Eve and the apple. It's half true --- true for some people and not for others. You won't die......right away.
Anyway, serve them Notice right up front, and then contemplate your next moves. The Legal Law Firm is stretched tight as a drum, but working away on all fronts: foreclosures, theft of Social Security, child custody snares, Odious Debt, utility bills, "citizenship", the "UN" --- all of it, and we are going as fast as we can.
You can help a lot by doing your part. Get your paperwork recorded at the local land recording office and get your own fat out of the fire. Next, boot up your local County and State Jural Assemblies. Those are the most important things to do right now --- (1) stake your claims and (2) begin operating your own lawful government again.
I think it is obvious that we cannot depend on hired subcontractors to do the job for us. If that were an option, we wouldn't be in this Mess. So even if the prospect of operating your own local government seems daunting --- do it. Feel your way forward and join together to help chart the way. Americans provided their own government for two hundred years prior to these European Sharpies moving in like Cuckoo birds and substituting their "services" for our lawful government. We can do it again.
The other thing you can do is help support The Living Law Firm. It's the only organization of its kind in the entire country, and its the only one organized to take on the Big Issues and find solutions that apply across the board, for the good of everyone concerned, and the good of our country.
It means a lot to me when one of "our guys" calls up and needs help, to be able to send help, and as this whole effort spools up, more Americans join the effort and become part of the team. As our efforts expand, so do our expenses. It cost me over $1000 this past week in filing fees and over $200 for Registered Mail -- multiply that by all the rest of the work being done by other members of The Living Law Firm and all the light bills, travel costs, paper and ink, certified copy costs, filing fees..... and then allow for a broken arm, flat tires, and a busted water heater for some of us along the way.... and you will know what our team is up against.
In addition to all my other roles, I am still serving as Paymaster for all of this. As Head Cheese (or "Cheese Head" since I am from Wisconsin) I have to parcel out the resources as they come in and do the best I can.
Right now, I have several team members who need help to buy school supplies and shoes and clothes for their children. That isn't -- strictly speaking -- related to the legal and research work they do for me, but it is part of their duty as mothers and fathers and it hurts when they work so very hard on all of this --- and can't meet basic obligations. Your donations make it possible for me to help them and keep the ball rolling. It also allows us to keep offering the information for free.
There are people out there selling "packages" for thousands of dollars that don't do anything more or better than what you find posted at www.annavonreitz.com for free to everyone. Our attitude is --- and has always been --- we are all Americans and we are all in this together, rich and poor alike. We don't want anyone left behind because they couldn't afford it.
So, if you can, if you have some extra this month, think of our "legal troops and history snoops". We've come a long way, but we haven't done it alone, and we couldn't have come this far, this fast, without your donations tiding our volunteers over the rough spots.
We take PayPal at:
avannavon@gmail.com and other donations via Snail Mail: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652
Anna von Reitz
August 26 at 12:11 PM ·
To Our British, Aussie, and Canadian Friends
Be assured that the Birth Certificate Fraud was started in America by the British-backed Territorial United States and implemented by the British Crown with the full knowledge and approval of Queen Victoria and her Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli.
We have all been victims and we have all been victims together. The proof of the matter stands in the British public and private records of the time. We were not the perpetrators. We were the first victims.
The object of dragging the old Babylonian Slave System out of the moth-balls was to finance the Raj in India and to promote the profitability of British agricultural investments in Africa and India.
It goaded the members of Parliament that their textile industry was so largely dependent on American cotton, which despite the cost of shipping it all the way from America, was still less expensive than the Egyptian cotton the British government subsidized and invested in.
So there you have the reason that our country was subjected to a bitter and illegal commercial mercenary war, aka, "American Civil War" promoted by Bar Members acting as Esquires of the British Queen and her cohorts in Westminster. This was also the means and excuse by which the British Queen and the Lords of the Admiralty usurped our lawful government in Gross Breach of Trust.
They simply substituted their British Territorial "States of States" for our Federal States of States using similar names deceits to fool the trusting people of this country, and thus, commandeered our lawful government.
Four fingers are pointing back at Britain for all of this. Not at the British people. At the Queen and the Crown. And the Popes who, as Roman Pontiffs, assisted in all this criminality.
Since at least 1860, when Abraham Lincoln, a British Bar Attorney who was ineligible for public office in our actual government, took over as "President" of the incorporated British Territorial Government, all the bad things that the "Americans" and "the US" have been accused of are actually the fault of the British Government and the British Crown, instead.
They were using us as proxies, puppets, to do their bidding, carry their water, and pay their bills. And now, thank God, they are exposed as the criminals they are and that part of history is finally becoming history.
We have been ruthlessly, shamelessly defrauded and enslaved by our own purported International Trustees --- and those same Trustees have then dishonored every other constitution and treaty in the western world in the same way. After they pulled their sleight of hand with us, they betrayed their own people on their home islands and went on to rape and pillage Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and every other member of the Commonwealth.
From there, they used our wealth and manpower to enslave the Indian Subcontinent, used our resources and manpower to promote the First World War and the Second. They cast the seeds of "perpetual war" in the Middle East in order to guarantee their oilfield investments.
This is not in doubt. They bragged about it. They wrote it down.
They think they are so very special that they will never be caught and brought to task for what they have done to the rest of the world.
You only help your own slave masters by mischaracterizing all this as an American problem or as the fault of "the US" --- when "the US" has been run as a proxy of the British Government for 150 years.
More than any other people on the face of the Earth the members of the former British Colonies need to wake up and join forces with their brethren still on the Home Islands to put an end to this Great Fraud ----- and we will say, Great Evil.
Without us and our manpower and our resources, Britain is nothing but a pile of rocks in the Atlantic sea, populated by an enslaved and down-trodden people who are laboring under six layers of taxation, invaded by foreign work forces, and helplessly trying to pin the blame for all this on someone or something other than their very own beloved Queen and Parliament and Lords of the Admiralty.
We have spent forty years researching these issues and we can tell you with great certainty and more than adequate documentation that the problem began in Britain and it needs to end there, too.
We suggest that everyone begins by realizing that the Disraeli-Gladstone Debates were about more than giving working people a vote and that the attorneys among us have a quite different meaning attached to the word, "enfranchisement".
We are not angry with the British people. We have suffered the same scourge. Our statement of the facts is not to blame the British people for the sins of their government, but to draw the world's attention to the facts, so that the facts may be dealt with.
It's an Old Chestnut that to solve a problem one must first realize that a problem exists, but it is well-worth restating here.
Britain, not America, is accountable for the sins of "the US".
Britain, not America, imposed the Birth Certificate Fraud on all of us, in Breach of Trust and via legal chicanery implemented by the British Crown.
What we do from here on, is what counts. We suggest that the people of Britain realize just how miserable they are and for how long they have suffered, and join with the rest of us to demand reform of their government.
Anna von Reitz
August 26 at 4:16 PM ·
The War Against, Within, and Around the Church
The first thing you must realize about Satanism is that it is a religion --- it involves a complete belief system, involves worship of external deities, and anyone of any race or background can be subscribed to it.
This religion, Satanism, is older by far than Christianity. It was the state religion in the days of Noah, and its return was prophesied by Jesus when he said that in the Latter Days, it would be as in the days of Noah.
Satanism was the state religion of Sumeria and Babylon. It was this religion that Abraham sought to escape when he fled from Ur. It was this religion that ten of his great-grandsons returned to, thus becoming "lost" to the worship of the Hebrew God.
Satanism worships Death and Evil. Please notice that "death" spelled backwards is "htaed" and "evil" spelled backward is "live". In Satanism, everything is backward, including logic.
A lie is a prayer to Satanists. Sex is a sacrament, especially perverted sex.
It is common among Satanists to trade their children as sex slaves to garner favor or money for themselves, and the children are brought up to think that this is all well and good.
As a result, their world is upside down and backwards from ours, a mirror image. A twelve-year old Satanist who has been raped regularly by his "Uncle" since he was nine, thinks nothing of offering his rump to a priest or anyone else. He just does what he is told by his parents or whoever else.
I say this to point out the extremities of the depravity that this whole system holds and the use of even very young children of both sexes as knowing prostitutes and seducers, well-practiced in sex of every sort, willing to do virtually anything anyone wants.
In the Old Days, many of those groomed in this way became official Temple Prostitutes. In order to be forgiven one's sins in this venal belief system, you have to have sex with a Temple Prostitute and pay handsomely for the "service". We still refer to
"worship services" and "religious services" today.
The members of the "Lost" Ten Tribes went back to this religion and practiced it in Jesus' time, and it was to them he referred as literally "the synagogue of Satan". These same Satan-worshiping Israelites much later codified some of their practices and beliefs in the Talmud. Many of these Talmudic Israelites still later became bankers and brokers.
To this day, many bankers and many banking families are Satan worshipers. Satan is just another name for the horned "god" of the sea, Poseidon. There is very good reason to surmise that King Henry the Eighth succumbed to this religion, and that Elizabeth I followed it, too, and that ever since, various members of the British Royal Family have been devotees.
The Talmudic Israelite bankers are such snakes that they don't trust each other for banking services, and rely on Chinese and Muslim bankers instead.
The British are such snakes they depend upon the Scots and the Scots depend upon the French, the French depend upon the Popes and the Popes depend upon the Spanish.
And that's the way it goes.
So to finally get to the topic -- the current attacks and exposes against the Catholic Church began immediately after the Church took steps to rein in and clean up the banks. Immediately.
Does anyone think this is a coincidence?
Within a week of Benedict XVI moving against the banks, the first accusations of sexual abuse and sex crimes surfaced.
The Satanists are exposing their own victims within the Church --- men who were targeted, tempted, and overcome by lusts of one kind or another --- then used to do whatever the Satanists wanted done. Sex and blackmail.
Sex and blackmail.
This is what the Satanists do, and it is largely all they have ever done to get and maintain power. The antidote is to not blink an eye-lash and not be shocked or distracted.
Keep watching their little game, because that's what it is.
Their sex and blackmail ploy is an astonishingly simple gambit and it works an astonishing percentage of the time, especially among Christian leaders who cannot afford to be exposed as leeches and predators. When sex isn't enough, the Satanists add money to the pot. When sex and money don't do the trick, they try drugs and even such esoteric means as hypnosis and spells.
The relatively recent change that demands the Catholic clergy to remain celebate and solitary (1870's? Just about at the same time all this other Babylonian Slave System crappola was introduced) was a perfect Satanic set-up, both to make sure everyone in the Church leadership was physically deprived, and so that everyone else outside the Church would more readily believe that this deprivation led to gross and widespread sexual immorality.
No doubt it made the Satanists job easier, both to compromise many Church leaders, and to sell the idea of sex-starved priests molesting everyone.
It's evident that the bankers are selling out their victims, taking their revenge on men they purposefully compromised. I don't have to think twice about it. Do you? They are also accusing men they never succeeded in compromising, simply using the same dirty brush to paint everyone the same color.
They are trying to keep the attention focused on their victims and their victim's victims, so as to keep attention away from their own misdeeds and practices.
Just as they used the Church as a storefront --- like bookies operating out of a funeral parlor -- they are now seeking to use the Church's evils as a smokescreen to keep public attention focused away from the banks and the bankers and the politicians, too.
Don't fall for it.
If you let them, they will flip things around and have you believing that the Church was responsible for The Bohemian Grove and that your own Mother was a transvestite male.
As for me, I don't blink.
You could show me a picture of Pope Francis raping a pig and I wouldn't blink, because I would know where that photo was coming from and I would be keeping my attention on the snake, not the snake's victims.
Today, I heard the first whisper of what will be the Satanist's attempt to besmirch the entire Christian Church. Don't be deceived. Satanists always want us to blame the victims instead of the perpetrators---- for obvious reasons.
Keep digging, Campers, and look more closely at the accusers than at those accused.
I think Nuncio Vigano is an honest man. I think he is telling the truth with exactitude. I think he did tell Francis about Cardinal McCarrick's bad reputation and the punishment Benedict XVI imposed on McCarrick.
All of that is true, so far as it goes.
But the Nuncio and I both also know the cat-and-mouse game that goes on around the Catholic Confessional --- that Francis would have gone to McCarrick directly and privately and would have heard McCarrick's Confession, and that Francis's action going forward would be informed by what he heard in Confession.
Can the Pope tell us what he was told by McCarrick, so as to defend his own actions going forward?
We will never know what McCarrick told the Pope.
So once again, this is a classic Satanic logic trap. You use an honest man, the Nuncio, to tell the part of the Truth that he knows, in order to condemn a man, the Pope, who cannot reply and tell us the rest of the story.
Just like Satan telling Eve -- you won't die if you eat the fruit....
Well, at least not right away.....
So the real "story" here isn't about the Pope or McCarrick or the Nuncio, either. The real story is to be found in whoever pushed Nuncio Vigano to do this.
Anna von Reitz
56 mins ·
How to Suppress Bad Courts
You can't present "Accepted For Value" offers to bankrupt entities for the simple reason that they have no available credit at their disposal to exchange.
What people so cavalierly call an "A4V" is actually called a "Mutual Offset Credit Exchange", in which two or more parties exchange credits: for example, you owe me $10 bucks and I owe you $20, so we "trade" these credits (you could just as easily look at them as debts) and I wind up owing you $10 at the end of the day.
That is what an "A4V" with a government corporation is. They owe you for leases and rents and payments you made for them above and beyond services you received, and at the same time, you owe them for services you did receive. Both sides have an obligation to trade the credit they are holding against the other --- my tax bill against your lease payments. Or your service fees against my bond.
But what happens when one party to this arrangement goes bankrupt? Suddenly, all bets are off, their affairs get passed off into the hands of Trustees, who must then decide which creditors get paid and which ones take the loss and in what order and for how much.
The time to get in line as a Secured Party Creditor was ten years ago. The time to do A4V transactions ended last October, almost a year ago. As the Territorial United States continues to wrestle with its reorganization and the Municipal United States continues its liquidation, the only claim and hope that millions of Americans have rests on the work and claims that The Living Law Firm put in place for years prior to this.
We are even now wrestling with the Powers That Be to bring forward the Principal Priority Creditor Status and Claim of the American States and People, to own and control their own assets.
Foreseeing the current situation, we took steps to create and lodge an Indemnity Bond with the U.S. Treasury, which is essentially an insurance policy for the States and People against loss and damage. This means that when they drag you into court and attempt to seize upon your home or otherwise bill you for public debts owed by the foreign FRANCHISES, you can continue to charge those bills off against their underwriters----but this is not an "Accepted for Value" nor is it an exchange of any kind.
It's a private insurance claim, which only superficially resembles an "A4V" because it discharges against a pre-existing U.S. Treasury Account and requires your signature.
When the foreign governmental services corporations that you have mistaken to be your government created all these franchise PERSONS to enrich themselves, they did so under the obligation of causing you no harm.
In far, far too many cases that is precisely what the existence of these PERSONS has done. They have been used as a means to defraud Americans and steal their property under force --- paid racketeers operating under color of law as "STATE OF COLORADO TROOPERS" for example --- have evicted millions of Americans from their homes under false pretenses, in order to "take title" to the properties and resell them for their own profit.
These crimes have shocked the world and we have had a hard time gaining traction to prosecute it precisely because what appear to be (but aren't really) law enforcement personnel have been used to carry out the racketeering activities. That is what is meant by "color of law".
There are no easy answers and confusion still abounds, but for millions of Americans, the worst of the nightmare is over.
When these fake courts act against you, the Judge who is actually acting as an Executive Administrator, is required to have the Bill in question sitting on the bench in front of him or her.
You ask to see the Bill in open court.
If the Judge has no Bill it means that the Prosecutor was just "fishing" and didn't provide the Bill and Bid Bond required.
If they don't instantly produce the Bill, you say, "I wish for this case contract to be dismissed with prejudice and the proceedings to be eliminated from the record and for the Prosecutor to pay me three times damages for my harm suffered and inconvenience."
They have to dismiss for failure to Show Cause and the Prosecutor has to take out his checkbook and pay the Piper ---- you ---- on the spot. If he fails to do so, he is in Dishonor and you can ask the Bailiff to arrest him for Gross Negligence and Fraud Upon the Court.
If they do produce the Bill, you simply write:
Accepted for Indemnification Value:
Private Registered Indemnity Bond AMRI00001
Account Number: RA 393 427 640 US
by: ____________________________ (Your Normal Signature)
dated: __________________________
And hand it back to the Judge. Be aware that you are making an insurance claim for the full face value of whatever it is that they have attempted to charge against your bond.
Which brings up another point that offers another way for average Americans to fend off the "offers" of these courts and their officers.
They are using your bond to bring their charges, a fact that you can flip on its head and use to your advantage simply by bringing recorded Witness Testimony identifying you in a color photo as the man or woman born in such and such a place to such and such a family--- and your Birth Certificate.
The BC is your bond and their warehouse receipt showing that one of their franchises is holding your bond.
"Your Honor, my bond is being used to fund these proceedings. I wish to subrogate the case contract, eliminate the record, and dismiss the charges with prejudice."
You are basically telling the Judge -- hey, slime bag, you can't use my own money and authority to prosecute me.
Both of these are commercial remedies owed to you and these are commercial courts you are being forced to deal with. They are here on your shores as foreign vessels in dry-dock. The Bar Attorneys are operating as Shipping and Transfer Clerks. And they are all engaged in racketeering and personage under color of law---- shipping your assets "home" to their bosses in Europe.
This criminality which stems from the courts and the officers of the courts themselves is hard to recognize and once recognized is hard to stop, because these entities and officials are supposed to represent the forces of law and order.
It is anti-intuitive for people to see them as gangs of racketeers operating under color of law and employing mercenaries under color of law like the "STATE OF COLORADO TROOPERS" to do their dirty work, but such are the facts and the circumstances.
Trillions of dollars have been looted from our shores by these Bad Actors and we all continue to endure the ravages of the Bar Associations and their members --- crime syndicates that should be internationally suppressed and outlawed.
Do what you can to protect yourselves. Get your own paperwork corrected and recorded so that you have admissible evidence ready to go and available to stand in your behalf. Become familiar with the rationale under which these "courts" are operating and the jurisdiction they are inhabiting. Don't go in there arguing about Law and Fact or the Constitution --- which are all moot points to them.
These are foreign Bill Collectors seeking to collect money from the franchises of bankrupt commercial corporations: YOU.
Promissory notes discharge. They don't extinguish. The difference is with extinguishment the contract vanishes. Doesn't exist. May be said to have never existed at all. A discharge on the other hand insures that the contract can be brought up any time later.
The world is awash in discharged contracts.